Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Judiciary Committee

SSB 5356

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Title: An act relating to the humane treatment of dogs.

Brief Description: Concerning the humane treatment of dogs.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Fain, Palumbo, Miloscia, Frockt, Bailey, Rolfes, Angel, Keiser, Conway, Pedersen and Wilson).

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

  • Sets forth a number of rules and restrictions regarding dog tethering.

  • Provides civil penalties, ranging from a warning to a class 1 civil infraction.

Hearing Date: 3/15/17

Staff: Audrey Frey (786-7289).

Background:

Washington's animal cruelty laws protect livestock, pets, and working animals from unnecessary pain, suffering, abuse, and neglect. There is no statute specifically concerning dog tethering, but there are a number of statutes within the animal cruelty laws that concern the humane treatment of dogs, such as:

Both law enforcement agencies and locally authorized animal control agencies may enforce the animal cruelty laws. The same principles of liability that apply to the Washington Criminal Code also apply to the animal cruelty laws, including the definitions of criminal negligence, recklessness, knowledge, and intent.

Summary of Bill:

A new section setting forth requirements and restrictions regarding dog tethering is added to the animal cruelty laws.

Rules and Restrictions Regarding Dog Tethering.

A dog that is restrained outside by a tether must only be restrained for a period of time that is not reckless and in compliance with the following provisions (A person is reckless or acts recklessly when he or she knows of and disregards a substantial risk that a wrongful act may occur, and his or her disregard of such substantial risk is a gross deviation from conduct that a reasonable person would exercise in the same situation.):

  1. A dog shall not be tethered in a manner that results, or could reasonably result, in the dog becoming frequently entangled.

  2. If multiple dogs are tethered, each dog must be on a separate tether, and multiple dogs may not be secured to the same fixed point.

  3. A tether must allow a dog a range of movement and must allow the dog to sit, lie down, and stand comfortably without the restraint becoming taut.

  4. A dog shall not be tethered if it is ill, suffering from a debilitating disease, injured, in distress, in the advanced stages of pregnancy, or under 6 months of age.

  5. A tethered dog must have access to clean water and necessary shelter while tethered; the shelter and water vessel must be constructed or attached so that the dog cannot knock them over.

  6. A dog shall not be tethered in a manner that results in the dog being left in unsafe or unsanitary conditions, or that forces the dog to stand, sit, or lie down in its own excrement or urine.

  7. A dog shall not be tethered by means of a choke, pinch, slip, halter, or prong-type collar, or by any means other than with a properly fitted buckle-type collar or harness that provides enough room to allow normal breathing and swallowing.

  8. The weight of the tether shall not unreasonably inhibit the free movement of the dog within the area allowed by the length of the tether.

  9. The dog shall not be tethered in a manner that causes the dog injury or pain.

Exceptions.

The first four provisions listed above do not apply to a dog that is:

Penalties.

Each incident involving a violation of this section is a separate offense:

Definitions.

Several definitions are added to the animal cruelty laws:

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.