HOUSE BILL REPORT

SSB 5581

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Passed House - Amended:

March 8, 2019

Title: An act relating to improving the effectiveness and adequacy of state tax laws by clarifying and simplifying nexus provisions, by decreasing compliance and administrative burdens for taxpayers and the department of revenue, by facilitating the collection of new tax revenue resulting from the United States supreme court's decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., by providing more consistent tax obligations for both domestic and foreign sellers, and by simplifying the expiration of sales tax sourcing mitigation payments to local governments on September 30, 2019.

Brief Description: Improving the effectiveness and adequacy of state tax laws by clarifying and simplifying nexus provisions, by decreasing compliance and administrative burdens for taxpayers and the department of revenue, by facilitating the collection of new tax revenue resulting from the United States supreme court's decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., by providing more consistent tax obligations for both domestic and foreign sellers, and by simplifying the expiration of sales tax sourcing mitigation payments to local governments on September 30, 2019.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Rolfes, Braun, Carlyle, Keiser and Saldaña; by request of Department of Revenue).

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Finance: 2/21/19, 2/25/19 [DPA].

Floor Activity:

Passed House - Amended: 3/8/19, 58-36.

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

(As Amended by House)

  • Modifies the nexus threshold for marketplace facilitators and remote sellers to align state law with a recent United States Supreme Court decision.

  • Eliminates the option for marketplace facilitators and remote sellers to elect to not collect tax and requires them to instead comply with notice and reporting requirements.

  • Limits the import tax exemption to import sales involving a parent company and a wholly owned subsidiary.

  • Clarifies certain provisions under the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement and repeals sections related to local jurisdiction mitigation payments.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE

Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Tarleton, Chair; Walen, Vice Chair; Chapman, Frame, Macri, Morris, Orwall, Springer and Wylie.

Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Orcutt, Ranking Minority Member; Young, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Stokesbary and Vick.

Staff: Tracey O'Brien (786-7152).

Background:

Business and Occupation Tax.

Washington's major business tax is the business and occupation (B&O) tax. The B&O tax is imposed on the gross receipts of business activities conducted within the state, without any deduction for the costs of doing business. Businesses must pay the B&O tax even though they may not have any profits or may be operating at a loss.

A taxpayer may have more than one B&O tax rate, depending on the types of activities conducted. Major B&O tax rates are: 0.471 percent for retailing; 0.484 percent for manufacturing, wholesaling, and extracting; and 1.5 percent for services and for activities not classified elsewhere. Several preferential tax rates also apply to specific business activities.

A business does not have to file an annual B&O tax return if the business does not owe other taxes or fees to the Department of Revenue (DOR), and has annual gross proceeds of sales, gross income, or value of products for all B&O tax classifications of less than $28,000 per year, or less than $46,667 if at least 50 percent of its taxable income is from services or activities not classified elsewhere.

Retail Sales and Use Tax.

Retail sales taxes are imposed on retail sales of most articles of tangible personal property, digital products, and some services. A retail sale is a sale to the final consumer or end user of the property, digital product, or service. If retail sales taxes were not collected when the user acquired the property, digital products, or services, then use tax applies to the value of property, digital product, or service when used in the state. The state, all counties, and all cities levy retail sales and use taxes. The state sales and use tax rate is 6.5 percent; local sales and use tax rates vary from 0.5 percent to 3.9 percent, depending on the location.

Nexus.

Nexus is required before a taxing jurisdiction can impose taxes on an entity. In the case of retail sales taxes, nexus is necessary in determining whether an out-of-state business selling products into a state is liable for the collection of retail sales taxes for that state. Both the Dormant Commerce Clause (Commerce Clause) and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution "pose distinct limits on the taxing powers of the States. Accordingly, while a State may, consistent with the Due Process Clause, have the authority to tax a particular taxpayer, imposition of the tax may nonetheless violate the Commerce Clause" (Quill v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298, 302 (1992)).

In evaluating a state's exercise of taxing powers under the Commerce Clause, the Court applies a four-part test:

  1. Is the tax applied to an activity with substantial nexus with the taxing state?

  2. Is the tax fairly apportioned?

  3. Does the tax discriminate against interstate commerce?

  4. Is the tax fairly related to the services provided by the state?

Quill v. North Dakota.

In 1992 the United States Supreme Court (Court) ruled on the case of Quill v. North Dakota (Quill). The Court invalidated a North Dakota law that required businesses to collect a use tax from a consumer and remit it to the state. An analysis under the Due Process Clause focused on "whether a defendant had minimum contacts with the jurisdiction 'such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice'" (Id.at 305).

According to the Court, the Commerce Clause and its nexus provisions focus on the structural concerns related to the state's regulation and the impact on the national economy.

Applying the four-part Commerce Clause test, the Court invalidated the North Dakota law as an undue burden on interstate commerce. As a result, Quill required a retailer to have a physical presence in a state in order to be obligated to collect and remit retail sales taxes.

Washington Nexus.

The B&O tax is imposed on persons engaging in business in Washington that have a substantial nexus with the state. Substantial nexus occurs when an individual is a resident or domiciliary of the state, a business entity is organized or commercially domiciled in this state, or a nonresident meets certain economic thresholds. A nonresident has substantial nexus for B&O tax purposes if the individual or business has more than $53,000 in property or payroll in the state, has more than $267,000 in receipts in the state, or at least 25 percent of the individual or business's total property, payroll, or receipts are in Washington during the current or immediately preceding calendar year.

In 2015 Washington joined several other states and adopted "click-through" nexus. Under this nexus standard, certain remote sellers are required to collect and remit Washington retail sales tax for sales made into the state and may also have to pay B&O tax on their Washington sales.

A remote seller is covered by "click-through" nexus if the remote seller: (1) enters into agreements with Washington residents who, for a commission or other consideration, refer potential customers to the remote seller such as by a link on a website; and (2) generates more than $10,000 in gross receipts during the prior calendar year under such agreements from sales into this state.

In 2017 Washington enacted "Marketplace Fairness" (Engrossed House Bill 2163, Part II) that gives out-of-state sellers the choice to collect and remit retail sales tax on sales made into Washington or to comply with notice and reporting requirements.

Sellers, other than referrers, choosing not to collect and remit retail sales tax must provide notices to consumers on two occasions: (1) a general notice on the website; and (2) a notice on any invoice or sales receipt. The notice is intended to inform a Washington consumer that retail sales tax may be owed and that the seller is not collecting and remitting such a tax to Washington; therefore, the consumer may need to file a use tax return with the DOR. In addition, a seller, other than a referrer, must send a yearly report to any purchaser that received an item or service in Washington with a list of potentially covered sales and a reminder that the purchaser may owe Washington use tax. It will also send the DOR a list of Washington purchasers and details of the purchases that may be subject to use tax.

A referrer, who transfers potential purchasers to a seller, also has notice and reporting requirements if it chooses not to collect and remit retail sales tax. The referrer must send a general notice to consumers on its platform. The referrer also must notify all of the sellers that the referrer referred potential purchaser from Washington a notice. The notice must state that the seller may have an obligation to send reports to both purchasers and the DOR if it did not collect and remit retail sales tax. In addition, a referrer must send the DOR a list of sellers to which it referred potential purchasers from Washington.

Wayfair v. South Dakota.

In June 2018 the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair (138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018)), overturning the long-standing Quill physical presence nexus precedent and upholding a South Dakota law that imposes a sales tax collection obligation on sellers. The new "substantial nexus" standard allows a state to require a remote seller to collect or remit sales tax. The remote seller must have had gross sales over $100,000, or at least 200 transactions in the state in the current or prior calendar year.

The Court found that several features of the South Dakota tax system prevent discrimination or undue burdens upon interstate commerce: the protection of businesses that have limited transactions in South Dakota; the obligation applying only prospectively; the state's membership in Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement (SSUTA); and the system's standardization of taxes to reduce administrative and compliance costs.

Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement.

In 2007 the Legislature fully adopted the SSUTA. The SSUTA includes provisions for determining where a sale is deemed to occur for local sales and use tax purposes. As part of that legislation, the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Mitigation Account was created to mitigate the effect of the change in sourcing rules on negatively impacted local jurisdictions. The State Treasurer must transfer amounts determined by the DOR to fully mitigate negatively impacted local jurisdictions.

In 2017 the Legislature repealed local mitigation payments, effective October 1, 2019. Until that time, payments must be adjusted to reflect the impact of marketplace fairness on local tax revenues and will be made only to cities, counties, and public facilities districts.

The SSUTA also established certain monetary allowances for sellers who use certified service providers, tax compliance software, or another means of collecting and remitting tax that is authorized under the SSUTA. A "Model 1 seller" means a seller that has selected a certified service provider as its agent to perform all the seller's sales and use tax functions, other than the seller's obligation to remit taxes on its own purchases.

Import and Export Commerce Tax Exemption.

Washington law provides that the sale of tangible personal property that is in import or export commerce is not subject to the B&O or retail sales taxes.

Import commerce includes any tangible personal property in the process of import transportation. Property is in the process of import transportation from the time the property begins its transportation at a point outside of the United States until the time the property is delivered to the buyer in this state. Property is also in the process of import transportation while it is flowing through the state on its way to a destination in some other state or country.

However, property is no longer in the process of import transportation when it is:

Tangible personal property is generally in export commerce when the seller delivers the property to the buyer at a destination in a foreign country. The export exemption applies with respect to property delivered to the buyer in this state if, at the time of delivery, it is certain that the process of export has begun. The export process begins when the property starts its final and certain continuous movement to a destination in a foreign country.

Summary of Amended Bill:

Nexus.

A nonresident individual or a business entity is deemed to have substantial nexus in Washington if the individual or business entity has more than $100,000 of cumulative gross receipts, or at least 200 transactions, in this state in the current or immediately preceding calendar year. The nexus standard applies retroactively beginning October 1, 2018. Only those receipts from retail sales sourced to Washington between October 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, count for purposes of the gross receipts threshold.

The nexus threshold of at least 200 transactions in this state is eliminated effective with the passage of this act.

For marketplace facilitators, receipts and transactions counting towards the receipts and transactions thresholds include:

An individual or business establishing nexus must begin paying tax only on business activity occurring on and after the date nexus is established. A business that establishes nexus in one year is deemed to have nexus for the remainder of that year and the entire subsequent year.

The nexus standards related to property and payroll in the state are eliminated, including the standard established if an individual or business has at least 25 percent of their total property, payroll, or receipts in the state. The click-through nexus standard is eliminated. Inflation adjustments for the receipts threshold are eliminated.

Any person or business entity establishing nexus for business and occupation and retail sales tax purposes is required to pay all other applicable taxes and fees administered by the Department of Revenue (DOR).

The term "seller" includes marketplace facilitators, whether making sales in their own right or facilitating sales on behalf of marketplace sellers.

"Marketplace" means a physical or electronic place, including, but not limited to: a store, a booth, an Internet website, a catalog, or a dedicated sales software application, where tangible personal property, digital codes and digital products, or services are offered for sale.

"Marketplace facilitator" means a person that:

Marketplace facilitator does not include:

Referrers are removed from both the reporting requirements and the duty to collect and remit any applicable taxes.

Marketplace Facilitators.

Beginning October 1, 2018, marketplace facilitators must collect and remit retail sales tax on all taxable retail sales made or facilitated by the marketplace facilitator, whether in its own right or as an agent of a marketplace seller, regardless of whether the marketplace seller is subject to a tax collection obligation.

Beginning January 1, 2020, the collection obligation of a marketplace facilitator also applies to any other taxes and fees imposed on a retail sale made or facilitated by the marketplace facilitator, whether in its own right or as an agent of a marketplace seller, regardless of whether the marketplace seller has a tax collection obligation.

Liability relief provisions for marketplace facilitators and references to referrers are eliminated.

Prepared Food and Food Ingredients.

A definition of food sold with eating utensils provided by the seller is provided and applies when:

A seller has more than 75 percent prepared food sales if the seller's gross retail sales of prepared food equal more than 75 percent of the seller's gross retail sales of all food and food ingredients, including prepared food, soft drinks, and dietary supplements. An exemption applies for prepared foods sold in servings of four or more as a single item.

Certain specified requirements for calculating a seller's annual percentage of prepared food sales are established.

Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement.

The definition of "Model 1 Seller" is amended to include only those situations in which a seller has selected a certified service provider to perform its sales and use tax functions and outlined those functions in a contract between the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board and the certified service provider.

The provisions for monetary allowances are modified to clarify that monetary allowances for certified service providers are available to those certified service providers selected by "Model 1 Sellers." Monetary allowances for certified service providers are limited to a base rate.

The DOR's discretionary authority to provide monetary allowances for sellers other than as required under the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement is eliminated. The DOR may adopt rules re-imposing the use tax notice and reporting election provisions on remote sellers and marketplace facilitators if the agency determines that a subsequent change in federal law eliminates its ability to enforce a retail sales tax collection obligation on any remote sellers or marketplace facilitators.

Provisions requiring the DOR to determine total impact of marketplace fairness on local tax revenues for the purposes of making adjusted mitigation payments is eliminated.

Import Tax Exemption.

The import tax exemption is limited to only wholesale sales of tangible personal property in import commerce between a parent company and its wholly owned subsidiary.

Miscellaneous Provisions.

The act repeals, conforms with, or modifies a number of conflicting or obsolete statutes, and provides various effective dates.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill contains multiple effective dates.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The transition from the voluntary marketplace fairness to the new mandated sales tax collection environment established, by the United States Supreme Court, in South Dakota v. Wayfair (Wayfair) is allowing the DOR to apply lessons learned in hopes of maintaining fairness. This bill will place foreign and domestic retailers and wholesalers on equal footing by removing the import exemption. A sound tax system treats similar taxpayers in a similar manner. Marketplace fairness is the foundation that this bill builds upon. The thresholds will be uniform regarding the applicability of duties to collect and remit sales tax and the imposition of business and occupation tax obligations. The bill also includes a provision that the DOR can re-implement marketplace fairness should Congress take action contrary to the Wayfair decision.

(Opposed) None.

(Other) Platforms exist that enable sales by connecting buyers and sellers without being involved in facilitating payment. The buyers and sellers engage in cash transactions and are generally not required to collect and remit retail sales tax under the casual sales exception. As more payments are processed electronically, these transactions will qualify for the collect and remit obligation. Thus, two similar transactions are treated differently: a cash transaction imposes no burden on the seller to collect and remit retail sales tax, but an electronic payment would impose such a burden. This distinction should not exist and the two transactions should be treated the same. Thus, there needs to be a casual or small seller exception. In addition, we should remove the marketplace's obligation to collect and remit if it is not facilitating payments.

Persons Testifying: (In support) David Duvall, Department of Revenue; and Bob Mitchell, Washington State Commercial Association of REALTORS.

(Other) Mark Johnson, Washington Retail Association; and Nick Huzar and Nathan Garnett, OfferUp, Incorporated.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.