SB 5065

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of February 7, 2019

Title: An act relating to consumer competitive group insurance.

Brief Description: Concerning consumer competitive group insurance.

Sponsors: Senators Hobbs and Wilson, L..

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Financial Institutions, Economic Development & Trade: 1/17/19.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Excludes payments by an insurer to offset documented expenses during a change in coverage from one insurer to another from being considered an inducement by an insurer, insurance producer, or title insurance agent.


Staff: Clint McCarthy (786-7319)

Background: Group term life insurance is a benefit frequently offered by employers for their employees. Many employers provide, at no cost, a base amount of group coverage as well as the ability to purchase supplemental coverage through payroll deductions. The plans may also offer employees the option to purchase coverage for their spouses and children.

Insurers are prohibited from offering inducements to insureds and potential insureds. The types of prohibited inducements include a rebate, discount, abatement, reduction of premium, a commission, earnings, profit, dividends or any other valuable consideration. Exceptions to this statutory requirement include:

Summary of Bill: Payments that offset documented expenses by a group policyholder when changing coverage from one insurer to another are excluded from the definition of an inducement concerning rebates and illegal inducements.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: An insurance company was trying to be responsive to a request for proposal (RFP) for a group insurance carrier. This change will allow for a level playing field. If you do not allow implementation credits, the incumbent will always be at an advantage in a competitive bidding process. Forty-eight other states allow implementation credits. Implementation credits make it so that the owner of a policy can seek to replace their incumbent, and to smooth the transition from the prior to the new coverage. Reprogramming computers and changing forms are examples of costs that need to be covered.

CON: No one from the Health Care Authority or Met Life Insurance spoke with the Office of the Insurance Commissioner (OIC) in advance of designing the RFP. The OIC is working with many state agencies. Met Life was fined $7,000. The OIC wants to include all the costs of service within the premium tax, which goes into the general fund. The bill includes the ability to offer inducements between new plans, rather than the carrier. While 99.999 percent of businesses are trustworthy, there is no mechanism to audit the use of these implementation credits and it is a potential opening for abuse.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator Steve Hobbs, Prime Sponsor; David Rose, MetLife; Steve Buckner, MetLife; Mel Sorensen, American Council of Life Insurers. CON: Lonnie Johns-Brown, Office of the Insurance Commissioner.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.