FINAL BILL REPORT

2SSB 5149

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

C 296 L 20

Synopsis as Enacted

Brief Description: Concerning electronic monitoring with victim notification technology.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Wilson, L., Becker, Kuderer, Short and Takko).

Senate Committee on Law & Justice

Senate Committee on Ways & Means

House Committee on Public Safety

House Committee on Appropriations

Background: Electronic monitoring means tracking the location of an individual through the use of technology that is capable of determining or identifying the monitored individual's presence or absence at a particular location and includes, but is not limited to:

A passive GPS stores and transmits data at appointed times to the monitoring agency. In contrast, an active GPS transmits information in near-real-time on the individual’s location to the monitoring agency. This near-real-time transmission theoretically allows an agency to alert someone immediately when a violation occurs. It also provides information on where an individual has been throughout the course of the day and when the offender was at various locations.

Pursuant to state law, electronic monitoring may be imposed in various circumstances, including:

In most circumstances, the court may order the person being monitored to pay the costs of electronic monitoring.

Summary: Electronic monitoring is defined to include electronic monitoring with victim notification technology (EMVNT) that is capable of notifying a victim or protected party, either directly or through a monitoring agency, when a monitored individual enters within a restricted distance of a protected person or place.

Definitional sections for those protection orders that authorize electronic monitoring are updated to clarify that electronic monitoring has the same meaning provided in the Sentencing Reform Act.

The Administrative Office of the Courts must:

State and local governments are immune from civil liability for damages resulting from the use of EMVNT unless the state or local government acted with gross negligence or in bad faith.

Votes on Final Passage:

Senate

45

0

House

96

0

(House amended)

Senate

48

0

(Senate concurred)

Effective:

June 11, 2020