Tax Increment Financing. Traditional Tax Increment Financing (TIF) taps increased property taxes generated by private development, and applies those taxes to pay bonds issued to finance the public infrastructure supporting the development. A particular TIF district will be located within various overlapping taxing districts, and the TIF mechanism captures the increased property taxes of all overlapping taxing districts.
Traditional TIF financing is unconstitutional under Washington State law. In Leonard v. Spokane, the court held that a 1982 TIF statute violated the Washington State Constitution, which requires the entire revenue derived from the common school fund and the state tax for common schools to be exclusively applied to the support of the common schools. The 1982 TIF statute permitted forming TIF districts in which incremental property taxes, including the state property tax, could be applied to pay for public infrastructure. The court found the diversion of state property tax to be inconsistent.
The Legislature has since authorized TIF-lite districts capturing only increases in local property taxes. TIF-lite districts must also work within the constitutional and statutory constraints of property taxes, including Washington's statutory 101 percent limitation on annual increases in property taxes. One exception to this limitation is for increased property taxes resulting from new construction or improvements. Accordingly, taxing districts generally can capture only the full increase in property taxes from new construction and improvements, and not the full increase in property taxes resulting from appreciation in property values within the TIF-lite district.
TIF-lite programs, such as the Local Infrastructure Financing Tool Program, the hospital benefit zone statute, and the Local Revitalization Financing Program also capture excise taxes in addition to the capped local property taxes. Increased state excise taxes are contributed in the form of a state sales tax credit. The state sales tax credit is applied through imposition of an increase in the local sales tax rate. The increased local sales tax is credited against the sales tax that would otherwise go to the state, resulting in no net increase in the tax rate paid by taxpayers.
Local governments are authorized to finance public improvements using tax increment financing through adopting an ordinance to designate an increment area.
Prerequisites for Establishing a Local Tax Increment Financing Area. To establish an increment area, a local government must complete a project analysis of any public improvement project to determine the viability of the project by evaluating the potential costs and benefits of the project. A local government may be reimbursed by private developers to cover the cost of the analysis. Some of the elements that the analysis should consider include project job creation, impacts on affordable and low-income housing, and estimates on the amount of tax revenue generated from the project within the proposed increment area.
The local government must make a finding that the improvements in the increment area:
The increment area cannot comprise the entire jurisdiction of the local government. A local government may have a maximum of three active increment areas at any given time that do not overlap with each other. Increment areas must be retired after 25 years.
A local government must also ensure that public improvements are expected to increase the fair market value of real property within an increment area.
A local government can coordinate with other taxing districts and programs, and projects may be funded in part from revenue sources other than tax increment financing from the increment area.
Local governments are required to:
Apportioning Local Revenues for Local Governments with Increment Area Ordinances. The apportionment of revenue commences in the calendar year after the increment area ordinance passes. The county treasurer is directed to distribute receipts from taxes imposed on real property within the increment area as follows:
Incurring Debt and Issuing Bonds. Local governments are permitted to incur general indebtedness, and issue general obligation bonds to finance the public improvements and retire debt in whole or in part from its tax revenue allocation from its TIF area. Debt from the TIF area may be payable from other tax revenues, the full faith and credit of local government, and other revenues. Local governments are permitted to require a private entity to provide adequate security to protect any public investment in the increment area.
Local governments may issue revenue bonds within an increment area to fund revenue-generating public improvements. Revenue bonds with a maturity in excess of 30 years cannot be issued to support projects financed by an increment area.
PRO: This bill is the result of discussions during the interim on how to help the economy recover. This tax increment financing vehicle does not touch state revenues. This public infrastructure financing is designed to facilitate private growth. This is a useful to tool for local governments that meet the constitutional requirements for the state. Washington and Arizona are the only two states that do not have tax increment financing. This is new approach to TIF does not require state investment. This is an accountable program that meets the constraints of the state constitution. This is an important tool to have in the toolbox. The barrier to entry needs to be low so they are accessible by local governments.