WSR 01-21-016

RULES OF COURT

STATE SUPREME COURT


[ October 4, 2001 ]

IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENTS TO CRLJ 72 AND 75, NEW CRLJ 75A AND RALJ 1.1 )

)

)

ORDER

NO. 25700-A-715


     The Board for Judicial Administration having recommended the adoption of the proposed amendments to CRLJ 72 and 75, New CRLJ 75A and RALJ 1.1, and the Court having determined that the proposed amendments and new rule will aid in the prompt and orderly administration of justice and further determined that an emergency exists which necessitates an early adoption;

     Now, therefore, it is hereby

     ORDERED:

     (a) That the amendments and new rule as attached hereto are adopted.

     (b) That pursuant to the emergency provisions of GR 9(i), the amendments and new rule will be published expeditiously and become effective upon publication.

     DATED at Olympia, Washington this 4th day of October 2001.
     Alexander, C.J.


     Smith, J.


     Sanders, J.


     Johnson, J.


     Bridge, J.


     Madsen, J.


     Chambers, J.


     Ireland, J.


     Owens, J.



[Suggested Changes]

CRLJ 72. APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT


     (a) Types of Appeals. An appeal from a court of limited jurisdiction is governed by the Rules for Appeal of Decisions of Courts of Limited Jurisdiction. Under RALJ 1.1, the appeal from some courts is an appeal for error on the record, and the appeal from other courts is conducted as a trial de novo or a trial de novo on the record, as set forth in section (b) below. The procedures for an appeal for error on the record are defined by the RALJ. The procedures for a trial de novo and a trial de novo on the record are defined by CRLJ 73 and 75 below.

     (b) Small Claims Court Appeals. An appeal from a decision of a small claims court operating under RCW Chapter 12.40 shall be a trial de novo on the record from the court of limited jurisdiction.


[Suggested Changes.]

CRLJ 75. RECORD ON TRIAL DE NOVO


     (a) Scope of Rule. [Unchanged.]

     (b) Transcript; Procedure in Superior Court; Pleadings in Superior Court. Within 14 days after the notice of appeal has been filed in a civil action or proceeding, including a small claims appeal pursuant to RCW 12.40, the appellant shall file with the clerk of the superior court a transcript of all entries made in the docket of the court of limited jurisdiction relating to the case, together with all the process and other papers relating to the case filed in the court of limited jurisdiction which shall be made and certified by such court to be correct upon the payment of the fees allowed by law therefor, and upon the filing of such transcript the superior court shall become possessed of the cause, and shall proceed in the same manner, as near as may be, as in actions originally commenced in that court, except as provided in these rules. The issue before the court of limited jurisdiction shall be tried in the superior court without other or new pleadings, unless otherwise directed by the superior court.

     (c) Small Claims Appeals; Trial De Novo on the Record. Small claims appeals pursuant to RCW 12.40 shall be tried by the superior court de novo on the record. Within 14 days after the notice of appeal has been filed in a small claims proceeding, appellant shall cause to be filed with the clerk of the superior court a verbatim electronic recording of the trial of the matter in district court and any exhibits from the trial. The electronic recording shall be made and certified by the district court to be correct upon the payment of the fees allowed by law therefor.

     (c)(d) [Unchanged.]


[Suggested New Rule]


     CRLJ 75A


     ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF SMALL CLAIMS PROCEEDINGS


    
     (a) Generally. Small claims proceedings in a court of limited jurisdiction shall be recorded by electronic means.

     (b) Nonelectronic Record in Emergency. In the event of an equipment failure or other situation making an electronic recording impossible, the court may order the proceeding to be recorded by nonelectronic means. The nonelectronic record must be made at the court's expense, and in the event of an appeal, any necessary transcription of the nonelectronic record must be made at the court's expense.

     (c) Statements to Be Made on the Record. At the beginning of the case, the judge of the court of limited jurisdiction shall state on the record the name and number of the case and the names of the parties. During the trial of the case, the judge shall state on the record or have stated on the record the names of any or all witnesses as they appear in the course of the proceeding.

     (d) Log. The judge of the court of limited jurisdiction shall cause a written log to be maintained separate from the recording indicating the location on the electronic record of relevant events in the proceedings, including but not limited to the beginning of the proceeding, the beginning and ending of the testimony of each witness, the decision of the court, and the end of the proceeding.

     (e) Loss or Damage of Electronic Record. In the event of loss or damage of the electronic record, or any significant or material portion thereof, the appellant, upon motion to the superior court, shall be entitled to a new trial, but only if the loss or damage of the record is not attributable to the appellant's malfeasance. The court of limited jurisdiction shall have the authority to determine whether or not significant or material portions of the electronic record have been lost or damaged, subject to review by the superior court upon motion.


[Suggested Changes.]


     RALJ 1.1 SCOPE OF RULES


     (a) Proceedings Subject to Rules. These rules establish the procedure, called appeal, for review by the superior court of a final decision of a court of limited jurisdiction, subject to the restrictions defined in this rule. These rules apply only to review of (1) district courts operating under RCW 3.30; (2) municipal departments operating under RCW 3.46; (3) alternative municipal courts operating under RCW 3.50 in municipalities exceeding 5,000 in population; (4) municipal courts operating under RCW 35.20; (5) all other courts operating under RCW Title 35 or 35A in municipalities exceeding 5,000 in population; and (6) any other court required by law to have a lawyer-judge. These rules do not apply to review of other courts of limited jurisdiction, do not apply to review of a small claims court operating under RCW 12.40, and do not apply to review of a decision of a judge who is not admitted to the practice of law in Washington. These rules do not supersede the procedure for seeking de novo review when these rules do not apply. These rules do not apply to and do not supercede the procedure for seeking de novo review or de novo review on the record of other decisions of a court of limited jurisdiction.

     (b) - (e) [Unchanged.]

     Reviser's note: The brackets and enclosed material in the text above occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.

     Reviser's note: The typographical errors in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the State Supreme Court and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.

© Washington State Code Reviser's Office