PERMANENT RULES
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Date of Adoption: March 17, 2004.
Purpose: The Department of General Administration is establishing, by rule, procedures regarding competitive contracting pursuant to RCW 41.06.142.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 41.06.142.
Adopted under notice filed as WSR 03-24-090 on December 3, 2003.
Changes Other than Editing from Proposed to Adopted Version:
Reason for Rule Adoption:
Background: Under RCW 41.06.142, agencies may competitively contract for services that state employees have customarily and historically provided. The law directs the Department of General Administration (GA) to adopt rules to ensure that the submittal and evaluation of bids are fair and objective, and that there exists a competitive market for the service. GA's objective in writing these rules is to provide clear, simple, fair, and consistent guidance in complying with the law.
Consideration and Response Summary: Consistent with the requirements of RCW 34.05.325 (1) through (5), GA received public comments from January 8 through February 10, 2004. Comments were received via: Oral and written testimony at five public hearings, the state's competitive contracting website, and written submissions sent via e-mail, fax, and mail. We are responding to all comments received as provided in RCW 34.05.325 (6)(a)(iii) and (b).
Based on the comments received, GA has made a number of nonsubstantive changes to the proposed rules filed with the Office of the Code Reviser on December 3, 2003. These changes are reviewed below in accordance with RCW 34.05.325 (6)(a)(ii).
The adopted rules comply with the legislative intent and authority granted GA in RCW 41.06.142. A thorough review of the final adopted rule, consistent with requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act, RCW 34.05.340 (2)(a) through (c), did not reveal any substantial differences from the proposed rules filed in the Washington State Register (WSR) under WSR 03-24-090. In addition, GA's effort and thoughtful incorporation of input from a diverse group of stakeholders are reflected in the adopted rules. We would like to thank our many stakeholders who contributed to this process and without whose help this undertaking would not have been possible.
Differences Between Proposed and Adopted Rule Text: Change #1; Displaced employees:
Basis for Change: Comments regarding proposed WAC 236-51-010(10) "Displaced employee" indicate a mixed understanding of our intended meaning of the word "eliminated." The definition in the proposed rules generated the following comments:
• | What percentage of an employee's work must be competitively contracted before they are considered "displaced"? |
• | In the case of a reassignment or redeployment, what constitutes displacement? |
WAC 236-51-010 Definitions (11) "Displaced employee" means a classified employee whose position or work would be eliminated, resulting in the employee being laid off or assigned to a different job classification, as a result of an award via the competitive contracting process.
Note: Numbering change results from the inclusion of a new definition for "day" (see Change #9).
Change #2; Response to a potentially displaced employee alternative:
Basis for Change: The proposed rules provided for agency control of the timeframes between the alternatives phase and bid solicitation. As structured, it did not prevent an agency from rejecting employee alternatives and soliciting bids the next day. The proposed rules provided for agency control of preparation time, state resources for EBU formation, and the overall time between alternatives rejection and solicitation issuance.
RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a) does not allow an agency to solicit bids until after it has considered all alternatives to competitive contracting submitted by potentially displaced employees in a timely fashion. GA's intent was to provide the agencies with flexibility in implementing this provision. GA also intended that, if an EBU did not have enough time to form and notify the agency of its inclusion as a bidder, that this would be grounds for a complaint or appeal under WAC 236-51-510 and 236-51-710. Comments indicated that neither was clearly communicated.
WAC 236-51-120 Agency response to a potentially displaced employee alternative. (1) An agency shall respond in writing to all potentially displaced employee alternatives.
(2) If no potentially displaced employee alternatives are
accepted, the agency shall notify in writing all potentially
displaced employees of its intent to proceed with soliciting
bids per the agency's original notification referred to in WAC 236-51-110.:
(a) Its intent to proceed with soliciting bids on the date indicated in the agency's original notification referred to in WAC 236-51-110(3) or in 20 calendar days, whichever is greater; and
(b) The amount and type of state resources allocated by the agency to assist potentially displaced employees in developing the notice referred to in WAC 236-51-200.
(3) Failure to comply with (2)(a) of this section is an allowable ground for complaint under WAC 236-51-510(1).
Change #3; Resource plans:
Basis for Change: GA's proposed rules required EBU's to provide a resource plan to the agency if they plan to use state resources to prepare their bid. However, the proposed rules were silent as to what resources would be available for preparing the resource plan and the notification referred to in WAC 236-51-200 of the proposed rules. Comments recommended providing direction to agencies in guidance, or that there be a clarification to the rules on this matter. Other comments indicated a misunderstanding that the rules implied that potentially displaced employees must seek the agency's approval for the use of private resources to prepare an alternative to competitive contracting.
The changes below clarify the language by removing the terms "independent" and "outside," and replacing them with language referring to use of "state resources" other than those offered in the notice. It should also be noted that WAC 236-51-110(5), 236-51-115, 236-51-200(c), 236-51-205, and 236-51-225 work together to define a state agency controlled process to allow potentially displaced employees and EBU's to have access to state agency resources for work that currently supports, or will support, the contracting agency's official duties. This is consistent with chapter 42.52 RCW, Ethics in Public Service.
WAC 236-51-115 Employees wanting to work outside or
independent of agency provided resources. If potentially
displaced employees decide to work independently or outside of
an agency resourced effort to develop and submit alternatives
within the sixty-day window, as described in WAC 236-51-110(5), the potentially displaced employees shall
submit, in writing, a resource plan to the agency for approval
prior to using state resources other than what was offered by
the agency in the notice referred to in WAC 236-51-110.
Employees wanting to use state resources other than those
offered by an agency. If potentially displaced employees want
to use state resources other than those offered by the agency
to develop alternatives pursuant to WAC 236-51-110(5), they
shall submit a written resource plan to the agency for
consideration. No state resources other than those offered by
the agency pursuant to WAC 236-51-110(5) shall be used in
developing alternatives without prior written agency approval.
WAC 236-51-120 Agency response to a potentially displaced employee alternative. (1) An agency shall respond in writing to all potentially displaced employee alternatives.
(2) If no potentially displaced employee alternatives are
accepted, the agency shall notify in writing all potentially
displaced employees of its intent to proceed with soliciting
bids per the agency's original notification referred to in WAC 236-51-110.:
(a) Its intent to proceed with soliciting bids on the date indicated in the agency's original notification referred to in WAC 236-51-110(3) or in 20 calendar days, whichever is greater; and
(b) The amount and type of state resources allocated by the agency to assist potentially displaced employees in developing the notice referred to in WAC 236-51-200.
(3) Failure to comply with (2)(a) of this section constitutes allowable grounds for complaint under WAC 236-51-510(1).
Note: WAC 236-51-120 is the same as Change #2 above.
WAC 236-51-010 Definitions. (23) "Resource plan" means a
detailed written plan created by potentially displaced
employees or the employee business unit and submitted to the
agency for approval for of the use of state resources,
including but not limited to: state funds, facilities, tools,
property, employees and their time requested needed for:
(a) Employees to work independently or outside an agency
resourced effort to prepare an alternative within the
sixty-day window, as described in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a)
Potentially displaced employees to prepare an alternative
within the sixty calendar day window, as described in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a), using state resources other than those
offered by an agency; or
(b) The employee business unit to prepare its bid.
Note: Numbering change results from the inclusion of a new definition for "Day" (see Change #9).
Change #4; Performance of services not in contract:
Basis for Change: In considering comments on proposed WAC 236-51-225, GA found that the existing language could be interpreted as allowing an awarded EBU to perform services for an entity other than the contracting agency without prior agency approval. The proposed rule language only referred to an EBU's participation in solicitations for services without agency approval. GA's intent was for an EBU to secure approval from the contracting agency in all cases.
WAC 236-51-225 Limits on performance of services not contained in a contract. An employee business unit awarded a contract by an agency shall not perform or bid on solicitations for performance of services not contained in its contract unless their agency approves in writing.
Change #5; GA formats, guidelines, procedures, and
instructions:
Basis for Change: The proposed rules stated that agencies, EBU's and other bidders may be required to utilize GA specified formats, guidelines, procedures, or instructions concerning solicitations, determination of fully allocated costs or submittal and evaluation of bids. Comments expressed concern that this is too vague. Analysis of these comments revealed that the use of the word "required" implied a requirement in the competitive contracting process that was not intended.
GA will be the focal point of the competitive contracting process, establishing "best practices" through standardization and examination of lessons learned as it does today for current state procurement and material management practices. By establishing formats, guidelines, and procedures, GA will encourage the overall quality and consistency of the competitive contracting process across all of state government consistent with the intent of the statute.
WAC 236-51-300 General administration may establish
required formats. The department of general administration
may establish required formats, guidelines, procedures, or
instructions concerning solicitation, determining fully
allocated costs, or submittal and evaluation of bids for use
by agencies, employee business units, and other bidders.
Change #6; Cancellation of solicitation:
Basis for Change: The proposed language of WAC 236-51-615(4), regarding cancellation of a solicitation inadvertently restricted an agency's ability to cancel a solicitation and reject all bids. Under the proposed language, an agency may only apply WAC 236-51-615(4) for cancellation of a solicitation if it has determined the solicitation and evaluation process is not fair, equitable, and objective. GA's intent was to allow agencies to cancel a solicitation if any of the three conditions were met. Using "and" inadvertently restricted the ability of the agency to cancel a solicitation under appropriate circumstances. The word "and" is changed to "or" to clarify the original intent.
WAC 236-51-615 Cancellation of solicitation.
(4) The solicitation and evaluation process was not fair,
equitable, and or objective; or
Change #7; Cost evaluation criteria:
Basis for Change: Comments regarding proposed rule section WAC 236-51-306 (4)(c), presented situations where revenue could be affected under a number of scenarios. The proposed language in WAC 236-51-306 (4)(c) envisioned only one possibility; an increase in the tax base or in collections resulting from a nonemployee business unit performing a service. Conceivably, revenue may be impacted in many ways. GA's original intent was to enable agencies to normalize bids to account for any cost or revenue impacts when evaluating proposals and determining if an award results in savings or efficiency improvements. By removing this limitation, all revenue impacts will be considered.
WAC 236-51-306 Cost evaluation criteria.
(4) An agency shall adjust the bids of the most responsive employee and nonemployee business unit in accordance with the following factors:
(c) Revenue impact to the state resulting from increased
tax base or collections that result from a nonemployee
business unit performing the service from changes to the tax
base or collections that would result from an award of a
contract to perform the service. Examples include, but are
not limited to, state sales and use, business and occupation,
inventory, fuel, and real estate tax; provided that a revenue
impact does not mean, nor imply, that any added fees or
charges for state services may be part of a bid.
Change #8; Bid evaluation:
Basis for Change: As part of its comments on the proposed rules, the Executive Ethics Board (EEB) has recommended a clarification to the proposed rule sections on solicitation development and bid evaluation which will ensure consistent interpretation and compliance.
WAC 236-51-302 Solicitation development. Employees whose
work or positions may be displaced and potential bidders may
participate provide technical assistance in the preparation of
the solicitation document and performance work statement of
work provided that their participation assistance does not
create an unfair advantage over other bidders. Potentially
displaced employees and potential bidders shall not determine
the award methodology and scoring to be used in the evaluation
of bids.
WAC 236-51-410 Bid evaluation. (1) RCW 41.06.142 (4)(d)(i) prohibits employees who prepared the employee business unit's bid or who perform any of the services to be contracted from participating in the bid evaluation process.
(2) Members of an EBU or others who provided technical assistance to the EBU in the development of their bid shall be excluded from being evaluators.
(3) Evaluators cannot have a personal or financial interest in the outcome of the award.
(4) Evaluators shall sign declaratory statements certifying that they have no conflicts of interest and assuring confidentiality.
(5) Evaluators shall use only the evaluation criteria stated in the solicitation in evaluating bids.
Change #9; Calendar and business days:
Basis for Change: The terms days, business days, and calendar days are used throughout the rules.
The changes are consistent with our intended meaning and remove doubt regarding how dates are to be calculated. Change in first sentence in section 110 now refers to the subject matter of the notice.
WAC 236-51-010 Definitions. (10) "Day," whether calendar or business day, means 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Standard Time or Pacific Daylight Time, whichever is in effect. Business day excludes weekends and state holidays. Calendar day is every day including weekends and state holidays. If the end of a period calculated using calendar days falls on a weekend or state holiday, it will be extended to 5 p.m. of the next business day.
WAC 236-51-010 Definitions. (15) "Employee notice" means the notice the agency is required to provide in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a), at least ninety calendar days prior to the date the contracting agency requests bids from private entities...
Note: Numbering change results from the inclusion of a new definition for "day."
WAC 236-51-110 Agencies shall notify employee(s) of
intent to solicit bids. The agency shall provide notice in
writing to all potentially displaced employees as required by
RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a) As required by RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a), the
agency shall provide written notice to all potentially
displaced employees of the agency's intent to solicit bids.
(4) A statement that employees whose position or work will be displaced have sixty calendar days from the date of notification...
Change #10; Notice of intent to award:
Basis for Change: Comments indicate that, as written, the proposed rules may inadvertently allow negotiations to occur after the issuance of a notice of intent to award. To clarify potential disparity between WAC 236-51-010 and 236-51-605, a change is made to clarify that the notice of intent to award is issued after completion of negotiations but prior to the date of award. Additionally, the definition of "notice of intent to award" uses the word "preannouncement," which is unclear. It is replaced with "announcement."
WAC 236-51-600 Notice of intent to award. (1) An agency shall issue a notice of intent to award after concluding negotiations authorized under WAC 236-51-605, if any, and prior to the date of award. This notice shall also include a statement that any complaints must be filed prior to the expected date of award.
(2) Agencies shall notify all bidders of the intent to award consistent with WAC 236-51-320.
WAC 236-51-010 Definitions. (19) "Notice of intent to
award" means a written preannouncement of the apparent
awardee(s) and the expected date of award.
Note: Numbering change results from the inclusion of a new definition for "day" (see Change #9).
Change #11; State standards:
Basis for Change: Comments indicated confusion regarding whether required state standards must be included in the solicitation. GA's intent was that agencies must identify state standards in the solicitation if the use of those standards was mandatory. The language has been changed to clarify this intent and alleviate confusion.
WAC 236-51-210 Agencies may shall identify state
standards. The agency may require in the solicitation the use
of state standards, infrastructure, or practices including,
but not limited to: Financial, accounting, audit, payroll,
human resources, procurement, or record retention methods. If
an agency intends to require the use of state standards, it
shall identify them in the solicitation document. State
standards may include, but are not limited to: Financial,
information, accounting, audit, payroll, human resources,
procurement, record retention, or other systems, methods,
infrastructure, or practices. Agencies shall use technology
standards established by the Washington State Department of
Information Services, Information Services Board.
Change #12; RCW and WAC citations:
Basis for Change: A number of comments were received about the proposed rules containing references and citations of RCWs and WACs that were difficult to follow or understand.
Using RCW 34.05.365 Incorporation by reference as a guide, we analyzed RCW and WAC citations in the proposed rule and identified three instances where it would benefit the reader to have the information contained in the rule text. The remaining RCW and WAC references fall into the following two categories:
• | Citation of chapter 41.06 RCW, State civil service law, the enabling legislation. We conclude citation to the enabling statute is appropriate as the rule is interpreting the law; |
• | Citation of chapter 34.05 RCW, Administrative Procedure Act and chapter 10-08 WAC, Model rules of procedure. The citations in these instances relate to the appeal process as references pertaining to the Office of Administrative Hearings. Additionally, citation of these provisions as rule is consistent with other rule-making authorities (e.g. the Human Rights Commission as contained in WAC 162-06-030(7) Nature of proceeding). |
WAC 236-51-010 Definitions. (24) "Responsible bidder"
means a bidder who has the capability in all respects to
perform in full the contract requirements and meet the
elements of responsibility defined in RCW 43.19.1911(9). In
determining the "lowest responsible bidder," in addition to
cost, the following elements shall be given consideration:
(a) The ability, capacity, and skill of the bidder to perform the contract or provide the service required;
(b) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience, and efficiency of the bidder;
(c) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified;
(d) The quality of performance of previous contracts or services;
(e) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws relating to the contract or services; and
(f) Such other information as may be secured having a bearing on the decision to award the contract.
Note: Numbering change results from the inclusion of a new definition for "day" (see Change #9).
WAC 236-51-005 Scope of chapter. This chapter applies to all services customarily and historically provided by state employees, except:
(1) As described in RCW 41.06.142(3) and 41.06.070;
(2) In the case of emergency purchases as provided for in
RCW 43.19.200 which may be made in response to unforeseen
circumstances beyond the control of the agency which present a
real, immediate, and extreme threat to the proper performance
of essential functions or which may reasonably be expected to
result in excessive loss or damage to property, bodily injury,
or loss of life. When an emergency purchase is made, the
agency head shall submit written notification of the purchase,
within three days of the purchase, to the director of general
administration. This notification shall contain a description
of the purchase, description of the emergency and the
circumstances leading up to the emergency, and an explanation
of why the circumstances required an emergency purchase; or
(3) If state employees will not be displaced.
Change #13; Information services board oversight:
Basis for Change: The proposed rules were not clear as to whether Information Services Board (ISB) oversight would apply in cases where employees would be displaced and the provisions on chapter 236-51 WAC would apply.
ISB had recommended that GA's proposed rules be amended to include a statement alerting agencies that GA's competitive contracting rules are in addition to, and do not replace ISB procedures and standards for acquisitions involving information technology services.
GA's proposed rules did intend to provide for the inclusion of state standards (i.e. ISB technology standards) in competitive contracting solicitations. However, chapters 41.06 RCW and 236-51 WAC do not share jurisdiction with any other law or rule when it comes to the purchase of services customarily and historically provided by state employees.
WAC 236-51-305 Solicitation content. Solicitations shall include:
(1) Complete bidder instructions;
(2) Submittal requirements;
(3) Performance work statement;
(4) Cost and noncost evaluation criteria;
(5) Name and address of the person designated to receive complaints and appeals;
(6) Agency's plan for publication and notice of award/intent to award; and
(7) Contract requirements, which shall include, but are not limited to:
(a) State standards as provided in WAC 236-51-210;
(b) Compliance and adherence to a quality assurance plan;
(c) Measurable standards for the performance of the contract;
(d) Methods used to measure contract performance, costs, service delivery quality, and other contract standards;
(e) Terms and conditions;
(f) Provisions requiring an entity other than an employee business unit to consider employment of state employees who may be displaced by the contract;
(g) Cancellation provisions for improper or failed performance;
(h) Complaint process; and
(i) Appeal process.
WAC 236-51-210 Agencies may shall identify state
standards. The agency may require in the solicitation the use
of state standards, infrastructure, or practices including,
but not limited to: Financial, accounting, audit, payroll,
human resources, procurement, or record retention methods. If
an agency intends to require the use state standards, it shall
identify them in the solicitation document. State standards
may include, but are not limited to: Financial, information,
accounting, audit, payroll, human resources, procurement,
record retention, or other systems, methods, infrastructure,
or practices. Agencies shall use technology standards
established by the Washington State Department of Information
Services, Information Services Board.
Note: WAC 236-51-210 is the same as Change #11 above.
Change #14; Clarification of language in WAC 236-51-200 and
236-51-120:
Basis for Change: Modifications were made to both sections to improve readability and be more specific. During GA's review, it was determined that the use of the words "requirement" in WAC 236-51-200 (1)(c) and "needed" in WAC 236-51-010(22) (definition of "Resource Plan") could lead to misinterpretation of GA's original intent. GA's intent was that resource plans submitted to an agency by an EBU represent requests for use of state resources. The words "request" and "requested" clarify this intent.
WAC 236-51-200 An employee business unit shall notify the agency of its formation. (1) Potentially displaced employees that decide to compete by forming an employee business unit shall notify the agency in writing before the agency's intended day to solicit bids pursuant to WAC 236-51-110 and provide the following information:
(1) (a) A list of those potentially displaced employees
forming the employee business unit;
(2) (b) The employee business unit leader(s); and
(3) (c) A resource plan outlining the employee business
unit's requirement request for use of state resources needed
to prepare the employee business unit's bid.
(2) The agency shall not consider a bid from an employee
business unit if:
(a) The employee business unit notifies the agency of its formation after the agency has issued the solicitation; or
(b) The employee business unit did not provide the agency with the information required under subsection (1) of this section. the employee business unit fails to notify the agency of its formation as provided in subsection (1) of this section.
WAC 236-51-010 Definitions. (23) "Resource plan" means a
detailed written plan created by potentially displaced
employees or the employee business unit and submitted to the
agency for approval for of the use of state resources,
including but not limited to: State funds, facilities, tools,
property, employees and their time requested needed for:
(a) Employees to work independently or outside an agency
resourced effort to prepare an alternative within the
sixty-day window, as described in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a)
Potentially displaced employees to prepare an alternative
within the sixty calendar day window, as described in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a), using state resources other than those
offered by an agency; or
(b) The employee business unit to prepare its bid.
Note: WAC 236-51-120 is the same as Change #3 above.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Comply with Federal Statute: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Federal Rules or Standards: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Recently Enacted State Statutes: New 42, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted at Request of a Nongovernmental Entity: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted on the Agency's Own Initiative: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Clarify, Streamline, or Reform Agency Procedures: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted Using Negotiated Rule Making:
New 0,
Amended 0,
Repealed 0;
Pilot Rule Making:
New 0,
Amended 0,
Repealed 0;
or Other Alternative Rule Making:
New 42,
Amended 0,
Repealed 0.
Effective Date of Rule:
July 1, 2005.
March 17, 2003
R. D. Fukai
Director
OTS-6802.7
COMPETITIVE CONTRACTING
[]
(1) As described in RCW 41.06.142(3) and 41.06.070;
(2) In the case of emergency purchases, which may be made in response to unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the agency which present a real, immediate, and extreme threat to the proper performance of essential functions or which may reasonably be expected to result in excessive loss or damage to property, bodily injury, or loss of life. When an emergency purchase is made, the agency head shall submit written notification of the purchase, within three days of the purchase, to the director of general administration. This notification shall contain a description of the purchase, description of the emergency and the circumstances leading up to the emergency, and an explanation of why the circumstances required an emergency purchase; or
(3) If state employees will not be displaced.
[]
[]
(1) "Agency" means an office, department, board, commission, institution of higher education, or other separate unit or division, however designated, of the state government and all personnel thereof; it includes any unit of state government established by law, the executive officer or members of which are either elected or appointed, upon which the statutes confer powers and impose duties in connection with operations of either a governmental or proprietary nature.
(2) "Appeal" means both a request for an adjudicative proceeding or the actual adjudicative proceeding presided over by an administrative law judge from the office of administrative hearings in accordance with chapter 34.05 RCW.
(3) "Award" means to grant a contract to a successful bidder or bidders, which occurs on the date as specified in the award notice.
(4) "Bid" means a written offer to perform services by contract in response to a solicitation.
(5) "Bidder" means a party who submits a bid or proposal for consideration by an agency issuing a solicitation.
(6) "Competitive contracting" means the process by which classified employees compete with businesses, individuals, nonprofit organizations, or other entities for the performance of services those employees have customarily and historically performed.
(7) "Complainant" means bidder or potential bidder who files a complaint about the bidding process to the agency head or designee on allowable grounds.
(8) "Conflict of interest" means having a personal or financial interest that is in conflict with the proper discharge of state duties, including the transaction of state business with an entity or individual in which a state employee has an interest.
(9) "Date of award" means the date on which the agency and the successful bidder sign the contract.
(10) "Day," whether calendar or business day, means 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time or Pacific Daylight Time, whichever is in effect. Business day excludes weekends and state holidays. Calendar day is every day including weekends and state holidays. If the end of a period calculated using calendar days falls on a weekend or state holiday, it will be extended to 5:00 p.m. of the next business day.
(11) "Displaced employee" means a classified employee whose position or work would be eliminated, resulting in the employee being laid off or assigned to a different job classification, as a result of an award via the competitive contracting process.
(12) "Efficiency improvement" means the enhanced value and/or quality that an agency achieves as a result of a change to a service or the ways a service is provided. This enhancement may come at a higher cost but its relative value offsets it. Such improvements may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Reduced preparation or process time;
(b) Greater accessibility or availability of service; or
(c) Improved data quality and timeliness.
(13) "Employee business unit" means a group of employees who perform services for which an agency proposes to competitively contract and who:
(a) Notify the agency of their intent to submit a bid for the performance of those services through competitive contracting; or
(b) Receive award of a contract from the agency as a result of being the successful bidder.
(14) "Employee business unit leader" means a member of the employee business unit chosen and granted authority by the other employee business unit members to represent the interests of the employee business unit in the bid process.
(15) "Employee notice" means the notice the agency is required to provide in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a), "At least ninety calendar days prior to the date the contracting agency requests bids from private entities for a contract for services provided by classified employees, the contracting agency shall notify the classified employees whose positions or work would be displaced by the contract."
(16) "Fully allocated costs" means those costs associated with a service, including the cost of employees' salaries and benefits, space, equipment, materials, and other costs necessary to perform the service but does not include the state or agency's indirect overhead costs unless those costs can be attributed directly to the function in question and would not exist if that function were not performed by the state.
(17) "In writing" means written communication from one party to another including, but not limited to, electronic means.
(18) "Indirect costs" means state or agency costs linked to services which may not be assigned directly. Indirect costs include various administrative and support activities provided to a service by other units from within the agency or by other state government entities. These indirect costs are generally assigned to a service through cost allocation methods.
(19) "Notice of intent to award" means a written announcement of the apparent awardee(s) and the expected date of award.
(20) "Performance work statement" means a statement of the technical, functional and performance characteristics or requirements of the work to be performed. The statement identifies essential functions to be performed, determines performance factors, including the location of the work, the units of work, the quantity of work units, and the quality and timeliness of the work units.
(21) "Potential bidder" means a business, individual, nonprofit organization, employee business unit, or other entity capable of providing the services being considered for competitive contracting.
(22) "Quality assurance plan" means a plan by which an agency will monitor a contract awardee's performance to ensure that the standards of the performance work statement are met within the costs, quality of service, delivery, and other standards of the contract.
(23) "Resource plan" means a detailed written plan created by potentially displaced employees or the employee business unit and submitted to the agency for approval of the use of state resources including, but not limited to: State funds, facilities, tools, property, employees and their time requested for:
(a) Potentially displaced employees to prepare an alternative within the sixty calendar day window, as described in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a), using state resources other than those offered by an agency; or
(b) The employee business unit to prepare its bid.
(24) "Responsible bidder" means a bidder who has the capability in all respects to perform in full the contract requirements and meet the elements of responsibility. In determining the "lowest responsible bidder," in addition to cost, the following elements shall be given consideration:
(a) The ability, capacity, and skill of the bidder to perform the contract or provide the service required;
(b) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience, and efficiency of the bidder;
(c) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified;
(d) The quality of performance of previous contracts or services;
(e) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws relating to the contract or services; and
(f) Such other information as may be secured having a bearing on the decision to award the contract.
(25) "Sealed bid" means a bid that is submitted in a manner to prevent its contents from being revealed or known before the deadline for submission of all bids.
(26) "Solicitation" means the process of notifying potential bidders that the agency desires to receive competitive bids or proposals for furnishing services. This includes references to the actual document used in that process, such as the bid or request for proposal and any amendments to such documents.
(27) "State employee" or "employee" mean an employee in the classified service subject to the provisions of chapter 41.06 RCW.
[]
PRELIMINARY STEPS TO COMPETITIVE CONTRACTING(2) For the purposes of this chapter, a competitive market exists when there are two or more separate businesses, individuals, nonprofit organizations, or other entities capable of providing the services being considered for competitive contracting.
(3) Agencies shall not consider an employee business unit as an entity capable of providing the service when determining the existence of a competitive market for that service.
[]
(1) A statement that the agency will pursue competitive contracting of specified services;
(2) The agency's determination that a competitive market exists;
(3) The date that the agency intends to solicit bids;
(4) A statement that employees whose position or work will be displaced have sixty calendar days from the date of notification to offer alternatives to competitive contracting as described in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a) and an agency contact for submitting alternatives;
(5) The amount and type of state resources allocated by the agency to assist employees in developing alternatives within the time frame described in subsection (4) of this section; and
(6) A statement that employees whose positions or work will be displaced may compete in competitive contracting as one or more employee business units.
[]
[]
(2) If no potentially displaced employee alternatives are accepted, the agency shall notify in writing all potentially displaced employees of:
(a) Its intent to proceed with soliciting bids on the date indicated in the agency's original notification referred to in WAC 236-51-110(3) or in twenty calendar days, whichever is greater; and
(b) The amount and type of state resources allocated by the agency to assist potentially displaced employees in developing the notice referred to in WAC 236-51-200.
(3) Failure to comply with subsection (2)(a) of this section is an allowable ground for complaint under WAC 236-51-510(1).
[]
EMPLOYEE BUSINESS UNITS IN THE BID PROCESS(a) A list of those potentially displaced employees forming the employee business unit;
(b) The employee business unit leader(s); and
(c) A resource plan outlining the employee business unit's request for use of state resources needed to prepare the employee business unit's bid.
(2) The agency shall not consider a bid from an employee business unit if the employee business unit fails to notify the agency of its formation as provided in subsection (1) of this section.
[]
(2) An employee business unit shall not use state resources to prepare its bid prior to receiving the agency's response as provided in subsection (1) of this section.
[]
[]
(1) Direct costs; which are costs that the service consumes or expends and thus are chargeable to the service. These direct costs include, but are not limited to:
(a) Salaries, wages, overtime, and benefits of employees directly performing the service;
(b) Purchased services, supplies and materials;
(c) Space, rents, and leases;
(d) Equipment and depreciation;
(e) One-time, transition, or start-up costs; and
(f) Travel.
(2) Indirect costs that would be reduced or eliminated if the service currently being provided by employees were instead provided by an outside contractor.
(3) Inflation assumptions.
[]
(1) Authority to contractually obligate the employee business unit;
(2) Receiving and submitting notices (including the notice to the agency of employee business unit formation);
(3) Participating in any presolicitation conference;
(4) Signing solicitation documents and submittals;
(5) Seeking clarifications and amendments of solicitations;
(6) Acknowledging award and conducting negotiations;
(7) Filing complaints;
(8) Filing appeals; and
(9) Committing to a performance agreement or quality assurance plan.
[]
[]
SOLICITING BIDS
[]
[]
(1) Complete bidder instructions;
(2) Submittal requirements;
(3) Performance work statement;
(4) Cost and noncost evaluation criteria;
(5) Name and address of the person designated to receive complaints and appeals;
(6) Agency's plan for publication and notice of award/intent to award; and
(7) Contract requirements, which shall include, but are not limited to:
(a) State standards as provided in WAC 236-51-210;
(b) Compliance and adherence to a quality assurance plan;
(c) Measurable standards for the performance of the contract;
(d) Methods used to measure contract performance, costs, service delivery quality, and other contract standards;
(e) Terms and conditions;
(f) Provisions requiring an entity other than an employee business unit to consider employment of state employees who may be displaced by the contract;
(g) Cancellation provisions for improper or failed performance;
(h) Complaint process; and
(i) Appeal process.
[]
(2) The total cost of contracting shall not include solicitation related costs such as, but not limited to:
(a) An evaluator's time;
(b) Bid-related expenses; or
(c) The cost of complaints or appeal.
(3) The most responsive employee and nonemployee business unit's bid shall include, but is not limited to:
(a) Bid price. The nonemployee business unit's bid price will include any applicable state tax paid by the agency on the purchase of services;
(b) Required one-time, transition, or start-up costs for implementing the proposal and recognized during the contract in the year those costs would be incurred; and
(c) Inflation assumptions.
(4) An agency shall adjust the bids of the most responsive employee and nonemployee business unit in accordance with the following factors:
(a) The agency's conversion or transition costs relative to each bid;
(b) Contract administration costs incurred by the agency to administer either contract. Contract administration costs may differ depending on the performance monitoring requirements of the agency;
(c) Revenue impact to the state from changes to the tax base or collections that would result from an award of a contract to perform the service. Examples include, but are not limited to, state sales and use, business and occupation, inventory, fuel, and real estate tax; provided that a revenue impact does not mean, nor imply, that any added fees or charges for state services may be part of a bid.
(5) Agencies shall consider costs associated with the state's assumed risks in the evaluation of bid costs. If the agency cannot reasonably estimate the state's assumed risk costs, the agency shall structure the solicitation to eliminate these costs from the evaluation process. These costs include, but are not limited to:
(a) Insurance. Agencies shall calculate casualty, liability and property insurance premiums in cost estimates and enter these costs as appropriate for assets and risk coverage.
(b) Performance bonds. When a solicitation requires nonemployee business unit bidders to provide a performance bond, the agency shall exclude the cost from the nonemployee business unit's bid price. The solicitation bid structure should facilitate the elimination of this cost from the nonemployee business unit's bid.
[]
[]
(2) In addition to using methods and systems provided above, agencies may post or otherwise publicize competitive contracting solicitations, amendments, notice of intent to award, notice of award, or notice of cancellation via other methods and/or systems of their choosing.
[]
THE BIDDING PROCESS(2) The agency shall ensure that bids remain sealed until the opening date and time specified in the solicitation.
(3) The agency shall open all sealed bids at the same time.
(4) Bidders shall submit bids to the agency no later than the opening date and time, and at the place specified, in the solicitation. An agency shall reject any bid received at a place different than, or on a date and time later than, what was specified in the solicitation.
(5) The agency may modify bid submission dates. When modifying the time allowed for submitting a bid, the agency shall issue an amendment as required by WAC 236-51-310 and provide notice consistent with WAC 236-51-320.
[]
[]
(2) Members of an EBU or others who provided technical assistance to the EBU in the development of their bid shall be excluded from being evaluators.
(3) Evaluators cannot have a personal or financial interest in the outcome of the award.
(4) Evaluators shall sign declaratory statements certifying that they have no conflicts of interest and assuring confidentiality.
(5) Evaluators shall use only the evaluation criteria stated in the solicitation in evaluating bids.
[]
THE COMPLAINT PROCESS
[]
[]
(1) Complainant's name, address, and telephone number;
(2) Identification of the specific grounds for filing the complaint; and
(3) The relevant facts, arguments, exhibits, and supporting evidence known to the complainant and related to each identified ground.
[]
(1) The manner in which the solicitation was conducted;
(2) Undue constraint of competition by requirements of the solicitation;
(3) Inadequate and/or improper criteria in the solicitation document;
(4) Bias or discrimination; or
(5) Conflict of interest.
[]
[]
THE AWARD PROCESS(2) Agencies shall notify all bidders of the intent to award consistent with WAC 236-51-320.
[]
(1) Determining if the bid may be improved;
(2) Clarifying elements of the bid that are not sufficiently precise or direct; or
(3) Securing better terms and conditions for the agency.
[]
(2) The award notice shall include the right to appeal, the appeal deadline, and the address for submitting an appeal. See WAC 236-51-700.
[]
(1) The award will not achieve anticipated cost savings or efficiency improvements as required by RCW 41.06.142 (1)(e);
(2) The solicitation did not include all factors for the agency to determine cost savings or efficiency improvements;
(3) No responsive bid has been received from a responsible bidder;
(4) The solicitation and evaluation process was not fair, equitable, or objective; or
(5) There have been changes in business or market conditions that significantly impact the agency's original intent to competitively contract the service.
[]
[]
APPEALING AN AWARD
[]
(1) Unsuccessful bidders with regard to elements of the bid submittal and evaluation process;
(2) Complainants with regard to an agency response to their complaint; or
(3) Displaced or potentially displaced employees with regard to an agency's:
(a) Adherence to the statutory notice requirements of RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a); or
(b) Determination of the existence of a competitive market as provided in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(d).
[]
(1) Appellant's name, contact person, and/or representative with respective address, and telephone numbers;
(2) Identification and brief description of the grounds relied on for filing an appeal and a brief description of the issues to be resolved.
[]
[]
(2) The agency shall provide the office of administrative hearings with the following information:
(a) The name of the agency contact in the matter and any contact information;
(b) The name of the appellant and any contact information, including address and telephone number;
(c) The name and any contact information for other bidders;
(d) The name and address of the agency contact for billing purposes; and
(e) The name and address of the agency contact where the file should be sent after the office of administrative hearings closes the appeal.
(3) The agency shall transmit all appeals to the headquarters of the office of administrative hearings in Olympia, Washington.
[]
(2) Bidders may intervene as a party to the appeal if they file a petition for intervention with the office of administrative hearings and all parties within ten business days after the issuance of the notice of hearing. The administrative law judge may limit intervention under RCW 34.05.443.
(3) The administrative law judge may schedule a prehearing conference.
(4) Hearings shall be scheduled for the earliest possible date available for the administrative law judge that does not result in prejudice to the parties.
(5) The hearing shall be recorded electronically at the discretion of the administrative law judge unless specified otherwise in law or rule.
(6) No transcript is required unless specified otherwise in law or rule.
(7) In any appeal under this chapter, the administrative law judge shall apply the model rules of procedure set forth in chapter 10-08 WAC, irrespective of the provisions of WAC 10-08-001(4) or other agency procedural rules.
[]
[]
[]
(2) If the administrative law judge finds for the appellant, the administrative law judge shall:
(a) Remand back to the agency for reconsideration or action if the appeal was from an unsuccessful bidder with regard to the bid submittal and evaluation process;
(b) Remand back to the agency for reconsideration or action if the appeal was from a complainant with regard to their complaint; or
(c) Remand back to the agency to start the bidding process over if the appeal was from a displaced or potentially displaced employee with regard to:
(i) The statutory notice requirements of RCW 41.06.142 (4)(a); or
(ii) The determination of the existence of a competitive market as provided in RCW 41.06.142 (4)(d).
(3) The decision of the administrative law judge in any appeal under this chapter shall be considered a final order.
[]