PROPOSED RULES
RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
Original Notice.
Preproposal statement of inquiry was filed as WSR 03-16-050.
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: WAC 415-02-140 What is excess compensation and how is the employer's excess compensation billing calculated?
Hearing Location(s): Department of Retirement Systems, 6835 Capitol Boulevard, Conference Room 115, Tumwater, WA, on May 24, 2005, at 9:00 a.m.
Date of Intended Adoption: May 25, 2005.
Submit Written Comments to: Leslie L. Saeger, Rules Coordinator, Department of Retirement Systems, P.O. Box 48380, Olympia, WA 98504-8380, e-mail leslies@drs.wa.gov, fax (360) 753-3166, by 5:00 p.m. on May 24, 2005.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: Contact Leslie L. Saeger, Rules Coordinator, by May 12, 2005, TDD (360) 664-7291, TTY (360) 586-5450, phone (360) 664-7291.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: The proposed amendments clarify department policy, correct errors in the examples, and expand the rule to address billing for excess compensation when two or more employers are involved.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 41.50.050(5).
Statute Being Implemented: RCW 41.50.150.
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Name of Proponent: Department of Retirement Systems, governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting: Leslie Saeger, P.O. Box 48380, Olympia, WA 98504-8380, (360) 664-7291; Implementation and Enforcement: Dorothy Bailey, P.O. Box 48380, Olympia, WA 98504-8380, (360) 664-7291.
No small business economic impact statement has been prepared under chapter 19.85 RCW. These rules have no effect on businesses.
A cost-benefit analysis is not required under RCW 34.05.328. The Department of Retirement Systems is not one of the named departments in RCW 34.05.328.
March 30, 2005
Leslie Saeger
Rules and Contracts Coordinator
OTS-7967.3
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 03-06-043, filed 2/27/03,
effective 4/1/03)
WAC 415-02-140
What is excess compensation and how is
((it)) the employer's excess compensation billing calculated?
(1) What is excess compensation? Excess compensation refers
to certain payments from an employer to an employee((, if))
when the payment is used in the calculation of the employee's
retirement allowance. ((If used in the calculation of an
employee's retirement allowance,)) The following payments are
excess compensation when they are reportable compensation and
used in the calculation of the employee's retirement
allowance:
(a) A cash out of unused annual leave in excess of two hundred forty hours;
(b) A cash out of other forms of leave, including sick leave and holiday leave;
(c) A payment for a personal expense, if the payment qualifies as reportable compensation in the employee's own retirement system;
(d) That portion of any payment, such as an overtime or incentive payment, that exceeds twice the employee's regular rate of pay for the period of time that the overtime or incentive payment applies; and
(e) ((Any)) A termination or severance payment.
(2) ((How is the amount of excess compensation
calculated? The department:
(a) Determines the increased amount of retirement benefits related to the excess compensation;
(b) Obtains the actuarial factor based on age for the monthly benefit per one dollar of accumulation to defined benefit plan (see WAC 415-02-340);
(c) Divides the benefit increase due to excess compensation by the actuarial factor; and
(d) Uses the result for the excess compensation billing.
(3) How does the payment of excess compensation affect employers? The department will bill an employer for any increase in an employee's retirement benefit resulting from the excess compensation. The employer must pay the present value of the amount by which the employee's pension is increased.)) How does the payment of excess compensation affect employers? The department determines how much an employee's retirement benefit will increase as a result of the excess compensation, and bills the employer or employers for the present value of that increase.
(a) If an employee cashes out annual leave while working concurrently for two or more employers and the total cash-outs result in excess compensation, each employer's billing will be based on:
(i) The number of hours cashed out by that employer in relation to the total number of hours cashed out by all employers; and
(ii) The hourly rate paid by that employer.
Example: Brian, a PERS 1 member, separated from employment at Agency A and Agency B at the same time. He cashed out 75 hours of annual leave from Agency A and 225 hours from Agency B, resulting in a total of 300 hours that will be used in the calculation of his average final compensation (AFC). A cash-out of unused annual leave in excess of two hundred forty hours is excess compensation (see subsection (1)(a) of this section). Therefore, sixty hours of the cash-out is excess compensation. (300 hours - 240 hours =60 hours of excess compensation.)
Employer | Total hours cashed out | Percentage of total hours cashed out | Excess compensation billing will be based on: |
Agency A | 75 hours | 25% (75/300) | 15 hours (60 hours of excess compensation hours x 25% = 15 hours) at the hourly rate paid by Agency A. |
Agency B | 225 hours | 75% (225/300) | 45 hours (60 hours of excess compensation hours x 75% = 45 hours) at the hourly rate paid by Agency B. |
(i) Determine the hours cashed out sequentially (employer by employer);
(ii) Identify the employer at the time the cumulative total cashed out exceeded two hundred forty hours, resulting in excess compensation; and
(iii) Bill the employer, identified in (b)(ii) of this subsection, and any subsequent employers during the AFC period, for the number of excess compensation hours each cashed out.
Example: Deborah is a TRS 1 member who changed employment three times during her AFC period.
1. When Deborah separated employment from School District A, she cashed out 156 hours of annual leave;
2. When she separated employment from School District B, she cashed out 96 hours of annual leave; and
3. When she separated from School District C, she cashed out an additional 48 hours of annual leave.
School District | Annual Leave Cash-out | Rationale and Determination |
A 7/1/03 - 6/30/04 |
156 | The department will not bill School District A because excess compensation did not result from the 156 hours of annual leave Deborah cashed out at School District A. |
B 7/1/04 - 2/28/05 |
96 | The cumulative total of the annual leave cashed out by School District A and School District B exceeds 240 hours, and results in 12 hours of excess compensation1. School District B's excess compensation billing will be based on 12 hours at the hourly rate paid by School District B. |
C 3/1/05 - 6/30/05 |
48 | Since the cumulative total exceeded 240 hours prior to Deborah's employment with School District C, all of the leave cashed out by Agency C is excess compensation. School District C's excess compensation billing will be based on 48 hours at the hourly rate paid by School District C. |
1 | 156 hours (cashed out by School District A) plus 96 hours (cashed out by Agency B) = 252 hours. A cash-out of unused annual leave in excess of two hundred forty hours is excess compensation (subsection (1)(a) of this section). 252 hours - 240 hours = 12 hours of excess compensation. |
(a) Determines the increased amount of the employee's monthly retirement allowance that will result from the increase in the AFC, based on a standard benefit allowance (benefit option one);
(b) Determines the actuarial factor, based on the employee's age and retirement plan, from WAC 415-02-340; and
(c) Divides the amount of the monthly benefit increase in (a) of this subsection by the actuarial factor in (b) of this subsection.
If two or more employers are responsible for an employee's excess compensation, the department will calculate the bill for each employer individually, based solely on the excess compensation attributed to that employer. See subsection (2)(a) and (b) of this section.
(4) Examples:
(a) Example 1: Excess compensation arising from cash out of sick leave (PERS Plan 1):
Denise is a 59 year-old (( |
Year 1 | - | $59,000 Salary |
Year 2 | - | $61,000 Salary + $8,000 sick leave cash out |
Q: Did Denise receive excess compensation? | |
A: Yes. Under subsection (1)(b) of this section, the
$8,000 sick leave cash out is excess compensation. |
|
Q: (( |
|
A: Yes. Denise's retirement allowance will
increase(( |
Without the excess compensation (cash out): | ||
AFC | = | (( $120,000/24 = $5,000/month |
Retirement allowance | = | (( |
With the excess compensation (cash out): | ||
AFC | = | (( $128,000/24 = $5,333.33/month |
Retirement allowance | = | (( |
Difference in retirement allowances: | ||
$3,200/month - $3,000/month = $200/month |
Q: (( |
|
A: The employer must pay $24,565.50, as shown: |
Using an annuity factor of 0.00814151: | ||
$200/month | = | $24,565.50 |
0.0081415 | ||
1Based on Denise's age of 59. The factor can be found in the table in WAC 415-02-340. |
George is a (( |
Year 1 | - | $52,500 Salary |
Year 2 | - | $54,000 Salary + $900 for four days of personal leave cash out |
Q: Did George receive excess compensation? | |
A: Yes. Under subsection (1)(b) of this section, the
$900 leave cash out is excess compensation. |
|
Q: (( |
|
A: Yes. George's retirement allowance will
increase(( |
Without the excess compensation (cash out): | ||
AFC | = | (( $106,500/24 = $4,437.50/month |
Retirement allowance | = | (( |
With the excess compensation (cash out): | ||
AFC | = | (( $107,400/24 = $4,475/month |
Retirement allowance | = | (( |
Difference in retirement allowances: | ||
$2,506/month - $2,485/month = $21/month |
Q: (( |
|
A: The employer must pay $2,802.28, as shown: |
Using an annuity factor of 0.00749392: | ||
$21/month | = | $2,802.28 |
0.0074939 | ||
2Based on George's age of 55. The factor can be found in the table in WAC 415-02-340. |
Susan is retiring at age 65 in PERS Plan 2. (( |
Year 1 | - | $59,000 Salary |
(( |
||
Year 2 | - | $59,000 Salary |
Year 3 | - | $59,000 Salary |
Year 4 | - | $59,000 Salary |
Year 5 | - | $76,083.33 (includes a $15,083.33 bonus for services provided in the month of February). |
Q: (( |
|
A: Yes. (( |
Regular monthly rate: | $61,000/12 = $5,083.33/month |
Twice February's monthly rate: | 2 x $5,083.33 = $10,166.66 |
Excess compensation: | $15,083.33 - $10,166.66 = $4,916.67 |
Q: (( |
|
A: Yes. It increases by (( |
Without excess compensation (portion of bonus): | ||
AFC | = | (( $307,166.66/60 = $5,119.44/month |
Retirement allowance | = | (( |
With the excess compensation (portion of bonus): | ||
AFC | = | (( $312,083.33/60 = $5,201.39/month |
Retirement allowance | = | (( |
Difference in retirement allowances: | ||
(( |
Q: (( |
|
A: The employer must pay (( |
Using an annuity factor of 0.0072458: | ||
(( |
= | (( |
0.0072458 |
[Statutory Authority: RCW 41.50.050(5) and 41.50.150. 03-06-043, § 415-02-140, filed 2/27/03, effective 4/1/03.]