PROPOSED RULES
Continuance of WSR 05-18-060.
Preproposal statement of inquiry was filed as WSR 05-11-034.
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: The department is proposing the following amendments to chapter 16-228 WAC, General pesticide rules, that affect the application of pesticides near schools, hospitals, nursing homes, adult and child day care centers:
• | Adding the definition of "responsible person" to WAC 16-228-1010; |
• | Modifying the definition of "fumigant" in WAC 16-228-1010; and |
• | Adding a new section WAC 16-228-1221 Must an applicator notify schools, hospitals, nursing homes and day care centers prior to an application of certain pesticides? Requires an applicator to provide notification of application for certain applications of specified pesticides near schools, hospitals, nursing homes and adult and child day care centers. |
DATE | TIME | LOCATION |
Wednesday, November 2, 2005 | 3:00 p.m. | Wenatchee Valley
Community College Room: Anderson 2047 1300 5th Street Wenatchee, WA 98801 |
Wednesday, November 2, 2005 | 7:00 p.m. | Wenatchee Valley
Community College Room: Anderson 2047 1300 5th Street Wenatchee, WA 98801 |
Monday, November 7, 2005 | 7:00 p.m. | Washington State
Department of Agriculture 21 North 1st Avenue Suite 236 Yakima, WA 98902 |
Monday, November 14, 2005 | 3:00 p.m. | Washington State
Department of Agriculture Second Floor, Room 259 1111 Washington Street S.W. Olympia, WA 98504-2560 |
The department intends to continue its consideration of all these submissions and has continued the intended date of adoption to December 30, 2005.
Date of Intended Adoption: December 30, 2005.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: The proposed amendments result from pesticide stakeholders expressing concerns to the department that those parts of chapter 16-228 WAC regulating airblast applications need to be more restrictive. The proposed amendments:
Add notification requirements for specified applications of "Danger/Poison" pesticides near schools, hospitals, nursing homes and adult and child day care centers;
Add a definition of "responsible person" to WAC 16-228-1010;
Modify the definition of "fumigant" to be consistent with RCW 17.21.020(20); and
Establish a mechanism to reduce the possibility that sensitive human populations will accidentally be exposed to pesticides as a result of pesticide drift.
Reasons Supporting Proposal: The department obtained stakeholder comments regarding the need to modify WAC 16-228-1220(4) so it would be more restrictive. A committee of interested parties worked with the department to develop proposed rule amendments. Although it does not represent a consensus opinion of the committee, the new section 16-228-1221 is the final result of the committee's effort.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 17.21.030 (1)(a) and chapter 34.05 RCW.
Statute Being Implemented: RCW 17.21.030 (1)(a).
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Agency Comments or Recommendations, if any, as to Statutory Language, Implementation, Enforcement, and Fiscal Matters: The proposed rule language was a compromise based upon the work of a representative stakeholder committee. The department is prevented from proposing some additional airblast restrictions requested by some committee members because those restrictions exceed the department's statutory authority. Only the legislature has the authority to amend chapter 17.21 RCW.
Name of Proponent: Washington State Department of Agriculture, governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting: Ann Wick, 1111 Washington Street, Olympia, WA, (360) 902-2051; Implementation and Enforcement: Cliff Weed, 1111 Washington Street, Olympia, WA, (360) 902-2036.
No small business economic impact statement has been prepared under chapter 19.85 RCW. RCW 19.85.030 (1)(a) requires the department to prepare a small business economic impact statement (SBEIS) for proposed rules that impose a more than minor cost on businesses in an industry. The department has analyzed the economic impact of the proposed amendments and concluded that the cost imposed by the notification requirements in WAC 16-228-1221 are "not more than minor" and do not have a disproportionate impact on small businesses, therefore, a formal SBEIS is not required. Affected sites (schools, hospitals, nursing homes and adult and child day care centers) are not required to take any action if they choose not to. However, by following the notification requirements in WAC 16-228-1221, affected sites could benefit from substantial cost savings by avoiding possible pesticide exposure incidents.
A cost-benefit analysis is not required under RCW 34.05.328. The Washington State Department of Agriculture is not a listed agency under RCW 34.05.328 (5)(a)(i).
November 30, 2005
Bob Arrington
Assistant Director