Effective Date of Rule: June 1, 2007.

     Purpose: The rule changes:

•	Repeal WAC 388-502-0240 and move under a new chapter 388-502A WAC;
•	Reorganize the original section into multiple sections under the new chapter;
•	Eliminate old, outdated sections of the WAC related to audit appeal hearings that are no longer applicable;
•	Add and delete definitions;
•	Reduce notification for on-site audits from twenty working days to ten working days - with the exception of hospitals;
•	Clarify that hospitals receive thirty days for on-site audit notification;
•	Allow the department to bypass the dispute process when certain conditions are met;
•	Clarify what appropriate documentation is to support services;
•	Clarify that the department reviews objective records;
•	Clarify that billing adjustments to paid claims do not impact the original audit universe;
•	Clarify that interest on overpayments are extrapolated;
•	Clarify the department's authority to initiate a reaudit;
•	Delete the revised draft report;
•	Clarify that the department may issue a subpoena for records;
•	Remove language about the department's process that does not need to be codified but which the department continues to adhere to such as "the department destroys records at the end of the audit" and "the department does not remove original records from the provider's office;"
•	Clarify that the department does not reimburse providers' administrative fees associated with an audit;
•	Expand audit focus to include "medically necessary" and "provided at the appropriate level of care;"
•	Reduce the time period for the provider to dispute draft audit findings from forty-five days to thirty;
•	Clarify that the department will acknowledge dispute requests in writing;
•	Require the provider attend the dispute conference;
•	Require the provider to schedule the dispute conference within sixty days from when the provider receives the department's written acceptance of the dispute; and
•	Eliminate the option to ask for an extension for requesting a dispute conference.

     Citation of Existing Rules Affected by this Order: Repealing WAC 388-502-0240.

     Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 74.09.200.

     Other Authority: RCW 74.08.090.

      Adopted under notice filed as WSR 07-05-052 on February 16, 2007.

     A final cost-benefit analysis is available by contacting Evonne Peryea/Scott Kibler, P.O. Box 45503, Olympia, WA 98504-5503, phone (360) 725-1859/(360) 725-1861, e-mail peryeel@dshs.wa.gov.

     Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Comply with Federal Statute: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Federal Rules or Standards: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Recently Enacted State Statutes: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.

     Number of Sections Adopted at Request of a Nongovernmental Entity: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.

     Number of Sections Adopted on the Agency's Own Initiative: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.

     Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Clarify, Streamline, or Reform Agency Procedures: New 13, Amended 0, Repealed 1.

     Number of Sections Adopted Using Negotiated Rule Making: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0;      Pilot Rule Making: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Other Alternative Rule Making: New 13, Amended 0, Repealed 1.

     Date Adopted: April 20, 2007.

Robin Arnold-Williams

Secretary

     (a) Defines the department's audit and appeal process for providers; and

     (b) Includes, but is not limited to, actions the department may take to ensure provider payments for covered services, supplies, or equipment:

     (i) Are made in accordance with federal and state statutes and regulations; and

     (ii) Comply with provider billing instructions, published memoranda, and fee schedules. For provider reimbursement rate appeals, see WAC 388-502-0220 and for hospital reports and audits, see WAC 388-550-5700.

     (2) This chapter applies to all providers except:

     (a) Nursing homes as described in chapter 388-96, 388-97, and 388-98 WAC; and

     (b) Managed care organizations as described in chapter 388-538 WAC.

[]

     "Audit period" - The time period the department selects to review a provider's records. This time period is indicated in the audit report.

     "Chargemaster" - A list of all goods and services and the prices the provider charges for each of those goods and services.

     "Extrapolation" - The methodology of estimating an unknown value by projecting, with a calculated precision (i.e., margin of error), the results of an audited sample to the universe from which the sample was drawn.

     "Medical assistance" - For purposes of this chapter, the common phrase used to describe all medical programs available through the department.

     "Overpayment" - Any payment or benefit to a client or to a vendor in excess of what is entitled by law, rule or contract, including amounts in dispute, as defined in RCW 43.20B.010.

     "Record" - Documentation maintained by a health services provider to show the details of the providing of services or products to a medical assistance client. See also WAC 388-502-0020, general provider requirements.

     "Sample" - A selection of claims reviewed under a defined audit process.

     "Universe" - A defined population of claims submitted by a provider for payment during a specific time period.

     "Usual and customary charge" - The rate providers must bill the department for a certain service or equipment. This rate may not exceed:

     (1) The established charge billed to the general public for the same services; or

     (2) If the general public is not served, the established rate normally offered to other payers for the same services.

[]

     (2) The department conducts audits on a routine basis and as necessary. Audits can be conducted prior to, or following, payment of services, supplies, or equipment.

     (3) The department may also conduct an audit as a result of:

     (a) Complaints/allegations;

     (b) Actions taken by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or the department regarding Medicare or medical assistance; or

     (c) Actions taken by the department of health.

[]

     (1) To determine if services billed and paid under the state's medical assistance and medical care service programs were:

     (a) Provided to an eligible client;

     (b) Medically necessary;

     (c) Provided at the appropriate level of care;

     (d) Appropriately documented; and

     (e) In accordance with WAC 388-502A-0100(1).

     (2) To provide a systematic and uniform method of determining compliance with state and federal program rules and regulations;

     (3) To provide a mechanism for data gathering which can be used to modify the state's medical assistance and medical care service programs policies and procedures;

     (4) To determine if the services provided meet the community standard of care; and

     (5) To determine if the provider is maintaining clinical and fiscal records which substantiate claims submitted for payment during the audit period.

[]

     (1) On-site audits, conducted on the provider's premises;

     (2) Desk audits, conducted at the department's offices; or

     (3) A combination of an on-site and a desk audit.

[]

     (a) Thirty calendar days in advance for hospitals according to RCW 70.41.045; and

     (b) Ten business days in advance for all other providers.

     (2) Exceptions to the written notice in subsection (1) of this section include, but are not limited to:

     (a) Providers who are suspected of fraudulent or abusive practices;

     (b) When the department has reason to believe that a provider's action endangers the health and safety of one or more clients; or

     (c) A third-party liability compliance audit.

[]

     (a) An examination of provider medical and financial records;

     (b) A draft audit report, which contains findings and directives;

     (c) A dispute process as described in WAC 388-502A-1100, unless a condition in subsection (4) of this section or a condition in WAC 388-502A-1100(8) applies; and

     (d) A final audit report.

     (2) Providers must maintain appropriate documentation in the client's medical or health care service records to verify the level, type, and extent of services provided. Pursuant to WAC 388-502-0020, providers must:

     (a) Keep legible, accurate, and complete charts and records to justify the services provided to each client;

     (b) Assure charts are authenticated by the person who gave the order, provided the care, or performed the observation, examination, assessment, treatment or other service to which the entry pertains; and

     (c) Make charts and records available to DSHS, its contractors, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services upon request, for six years from the date of service or longer if required specifically by federal or state law or regulation. Refer to WAC 388-502-0020 for additional provider requirements.

     (3) A health care provider's bill for services, appointment books, accounting records, or other similar documents alone do not qualify as appropriate documentation for services rendered.

     (4) If a provider fails to participate or comply with the department's audit process or unduly delays the department's audit process, the department considers the provider's actions or lack thereof, as abandonment of the audit.

     (5) If the department suspects a provider of fraud, abusive practices, audit abandonment, or presents a risk of imminent danger to clients, the department may take one or more of the actions listed below:

     (a) Immediately issue a final report;

     (b) Terminate the core provider agreement;

     (c) Issue a subpoena for the provider's records pursuant to RCW 43.20A.605; or

     (d) Refer the provider to the appropriate prosecuting authority.

[]

     (2) The department may assess an overpayment for medical services and terminate the core provider agreement if a provider fails to retain adequate documentation for services billed to the department.

     (3) As part of the audit:

     (a) The department may examine provider financial records, client medical records, employee records, provider appointment books, and any other applicable records that are related to the services billed to the department. The examination may:

     (i) Verify usual and customary charges and payables including receivable accounts;

     (ii) Verify third-party liability;

     (iii) Compare clinical and fiscal records to each claim; and

     (iv) Compare Medicaid charges to other insured or private pay patient charges to determine that the amount billed to the department is not more than the usual and customary charge documented in the provider's chargemaster.

     (b) The department's procedures for auditing providers may include:

     (i) Use of random sampling;

     (ii) Extrapolation of principal and interest;

     (iii) Conducting a claim audit;

     (iv) Interviews with clients, providers, and/or their employees;

     (v) Investigating complaints or allegations;

     (vi) Investigating actions taken regarding Medicare or medical assistance; and

     (vii) Investigating actions taken by the health profession's quality assurance commissions with the department of health.

     (4) Per RCW 43.20A.605, the department may issue a subpoena for records from the provider or a third party including taking depositions or testimony under oath.

     (5) When possible, the department works with the provider to minimize inconvenience and disruption of health care delivery during the audit.

     (6) The department does not reimburse a provider's administrative fees, such as copying fees, for records requested during an audit.

[]

     (a) The use of random sampling and extrapolation; and/or

     (b) A claim-by-claim based review.

     (2) The department's sample sizes are sufficient to ensure a minimum of ninety-five percent confidence level.

     (a) When calculating the amount to be recovered, the department totals all overpayments and underpayments reflected in the sample and may extrapolate to the universe from which the sample was drawn.

     (b) When the department uses the results of an audit sample to extrapolate the amount to be recovered, the provider may request a description of all of the following:

     (i) The universe from which the department drew the sample;

     (ii) The sample size and method that the department used to select the sample; and

     (iii) The formulas and calculation procedures the department used to determine the amount of the overpayment.

     (c) If a provider rebills a claim(s) for an adjustment and that claim(s) is part of the audit universe, the department does not remove the original paid claim(s) amount from the audit universe.

     (3) When a claim-by-claim audit is conducted, specific claims are selected from the universe and audit overpayments are not extrapolated.

     (4) The department recovers overpayments identified in the final audit report.

     (5) The department does not consider non-billed or zero paid services or supplies when calculating underpayments or overpayments.

     (6) The department considers undocumented services to be program overpayments.

[]

     (2) After the department completes its review of the provider's records, the department issues a draft report.

[]

     (a) Specify which finding(s) the provider is contesting;

     (b) Supply documentation to support the provider's position; and

     (c) Indicate whether a dispute conference is requested.

     (2) The department acknowledges and responds in writing to providers' requests for a dispute conference and to each disputed finding.

     (3) In accordance with WAC 388-502A-0700 (4) and (5), the department may decline a provider's dispute request.

     (4) The provider must schedule the dispute conference with the department within sixty calendar days from the day the provider receives the department's written acceptance of the request for a dispute conference.

     (5) The provider requesting the dispute conference and the appropriate department representatives must attend the dispute conference.

     (6) If the department and the provider reach an agreement during the dispute conference process, the department issues the final audit report.

     (7) If the department and the provider cannot reach an agreement during the dispute process, and the provider has had the opportunity to raise all concerns related to the audit findings, the department closes the dispute process and issues a final audit report.

     (8) In addition to the circumstances in WAC 388-502A-0600(2), the department may also issue a final audit report without the dispute process described in this section when the provider:

     (a) Transfers ownership of the business;

     (b) Ceases doing business in Washington;

     (c) Files for bankruptcy;

     (d) Transfers business or personal assets available to the audited entity at the time of the initial audit; or

     (e) Abandons the dispute process by failing to participate in the process.

[]

     (2) The request for an audit appeal hearing must:

     (a) Be in writing;

     (b) State the basis for contesting the final audit report;

     (c) Include a copy of the department's final audit report;

     (d) Be received by the department within twenty-eight calendar days of the provider's receipt of the notice of overpayment;

     (e) Be served on the department in a manner which provides proof of receipt as described in WAC 388-02-0050; and

     (f) Be sent to:

     DSHS Office of Financial Recovery

     P.O. Box 9501

     Olympia, WA 98507-9501

     (3) The burden of proving compliance with applicable federal and state statutes and regulations, provider billing instructions, published memoranda, and fee schedules rests with the provider at the audit appeal hearing.

[]

     (a) Request repayment, including interest on the amount of excess benefits or payments, per RCW 43.20B.695; and

     (b) Assess civil penalties per chapter 74.09 RCW. The amount of civil penalties may not exceed three times the amount of excess benefits or payments the provider received.

     (2) When the department imposes a civil penalty or terminates a provider's core provider agreement the department gives written notice of the action taken to the appropriate licensing agency, disciplinary commission, or other entity requiring a report.

     (3) When an audit shows that a provider has not complied with the regulations and policies of the medical assistance or the medical care service program(s), the department may refer that provider to the appropriate disciplinary commission.

     (4) When the department finds evidence of or has reason to suspect fraud, the provider is referred to the appropriate prosecuting authority for possible criminal action.

[]

     The following section of the Washington Administrative Code is repealed:

WAC 388-502-0240

Audits and the audit appeal process for contractors/providers.

© Washington State Code Reviser's Office