Preproposal statement of inquiry was filed as WSR 07-03-063.
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: Amendment of chapter 504-26 WAC, Standards of conduct for students.
Hearing Location(s): Washington State University, Lighty Room 405, Pullman, Washington, on October 12, 2007, at 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Date of Intended Adoption: November 16, 2007.
Submit Written Comments to: Ralph T. Jenks, Director, Procedures, Records, and Forms and University Rules Coordinator, P.O. Box 641225, Pullman, WA 99164-1225, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org, fax (509) 335-3969, by October 12, 2007.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: Contact Linda Nelson by October 5, 2007, (509) 335-3928.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: Revisions clarify how the university intends to address conduct violations.
Reasons Supporting Proposal: Revisions necessary to clarify how the university intends to address conduct violations.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 28B.30.150.
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Name of Proponent: Washington State University, public.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting, Implementation and Enforcement: Elaine Voss, Director, Student Affairs, (509) 335-4532.
No small business economic impact statement has been prepared under chapter 19.85 RCW. The rule has no impact on small business.
A cost-benefit analysis is not required under RCW 34.05.328. The university does not consider this rule to be a significant legislative rule.
August 30, 2007
Ralph T. Jenks, Director
Procedures, Records, and Forms
and University Rules Coordinator
WAC 504-26-005 Good standing. The award of a degree is conditioned upon the student's good standing in the university and satisfaction of all university graduation requirements. "Good standing" means the student has resolved any unpaid fees or acts of academic or behavioral misconduct and complied with all sanctions imposed as a result of any misconduct. The university shall deny award of a degree if the student is dismissed from the university based on his or her misconduct. (See also rule 45 in the university general catalog.)
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-200, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 07-11-030, § 504-26-201, filed 5/8/07, effective 6/8/07; 06-23-159, § 504-26-201, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(1) Academic integrity violations including, but not limited to, cheating as defined in WAC 504-26-010.
(2) Knowingly furnishing false information to any university official, faculty member, or office.
(3) Forgery, alteration, or misuse of any university document or record, or instrument of identification whether issued by the university or other state or federal agency.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 07-11-030, § 504-26-202, filed 5/8/07, effective 6/8/07; 06-23-159, § 504-26-202, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-207, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-208, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-213, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(1) Unauthorized entry into a file, to use, read, or change the contents, or for any other purpose.
(2) Unauthorized transfer of a file.
(3) Unauthorized use of computer hardware.
(4) Use of another individual's identification and/or password.
(4))) (5) Use of computing facilities and resources to
interfere with the work of another student, faculty member, or
(5))) (6) Use of computing facilities and resources to
send obscene, harassing, or threatening messages.
(6))) (7) Use of computing facilities and resources to
interfere with normal operation of the university computing
(7))) (8) Use of computing facilities and resources in
violation of any law, including copyright laws.
(8))) (9) Any violation of the university computer use
policy found at
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-218, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(1) Failure to obey ((
the)) any notice from a university
conduct board or other university official to appear for a
meeting or hearing as part of the student conduct system.
(2) Willful falsification, distortion, or
misrepresentation of information before a ((
university conduct (( board)) proceeding.
(3) Disruption or interference with the orderly conduct
of a ((
student)) university conduct board proceeding.
(4) Filing fraudulent charges or initiating a ((
university conduct (( code)) proceeding in bad faith.
(5) Attempting to discourage an individual's proper participation in, or use of, the student conduct system.
(6) Attempting to influence the impartiality of a member
a)) the university conduct (( board)) system prior to,
and/or during the course of, (( the student)) any university
conduct board proceeding.
(7) Harassment (verbal or physical) and/or intimidation
of a member of a university conduct board prior to, during,
and/or after ((
a student)) any university conduct (( code))
(8) Failure to comply with the sanction(s) imposed under the standards of conduct for students.
(9) Influencing or attempting to influence another person
to commit an abuse of the ((
student)) university conduct
(( code)) system.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-219, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-225, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-304, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(2) A student conduct officer, or designee, may review and investigate any complaint to determine whether it appears to state a violation of the code of conduct. If a conduct officer determines that a complaint appears to state a violation of the student code of conduct, she or he considers whether the matter might be resolved through agreement with the accused or through alternative dispute resolution proceedings involving the complainant and the accused. The complainant and the accused are informed of university options for alternative dispute resolution and may request that the matter be addressed using alternative dispute resolution techniques. Generally, the accused and complainant must agree to the use of alternative dispute resolution techniques. If the accused and the student conduct officer reach an agreed resolution of the complaint, the disposition is final; there is no right to appeal from an agreed disposition.
(3) If the conduct officer has determined that a complaint has merit and if the matter is not resolved through agreement or alternative dispute resolution, the matter is handled through either a conduct officer hearing or as a university conduct board hearing.
(a) When the allegation involves ((
community complainant)) harm or threat of harm to any person
or person's property and the accused disputes the facts and/or
denies responsibility, the matter (( is)) may be referred to
the university conduct board for resolution.
(b) If the possible or recommended sanction is expulsion
or suspension, ((
except for suspensions resulting from
violations of the alcohol or drug provisions of this code,))
the matter is referred to the university conduct board.
(c) Matters other than those listed in (a) and (b) of
this subsection are heard by a conduct officer, unless the
conduct officer exercises his or her discretion to refer the
matter to a conduct board at any time before a decision is
issued. A student may request that a conduct board hear the
case, but the final decision ((
on the matter)) to refer the
matter to the university conduct board for hearing is made by
the university conduct officer and such decision is not
subject to appeal.
(4) The student conduct officer provides complainants who have been targets of alleged misconduct or who feel victimized thereby with names of university and community advocates or resources who may be able to help the complainant address his or her concerns about the behaviors and provide support to the complainant throughout the conduct process. Due to federal privacy law, the university may not disclose to the complainant any sanctions taken against the accused student, unless the complainant was the victim of a violent crime for which the accused was found responsible as defined under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 U.S.C. Sec. 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99), or the accused student consents to such disclosure.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-401, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(a) The conduct officer provides notice by personal delivery or by regular United States mail addressed to the student or student organization at his, her, or its last known address. Duplicate notice may be provided by electronic mail.
(b) If the student is no longer enrolled at the time notice is sent, the notice is sent to the student's permanent address recorded in the registrar's files. The student or student organization is responsible for maintaining an updated mailing address on file with the registrar.
(c) Any request to ((
continue)) extend the time and/or
date of the conduct officer conference/hearing should be
addressed to the conduct officer.
(2) In order that any informality in disciplinary proceedings not mislead a student as to the seriousness of the matter under consideration, the student is informed of the potential sanctions involved at the initial conference or hearing.
(3) After a review of the evidence and interviewing the student(s) involved in the case, the conduct officer may take any of the following actions:
(a) Terminate the proceeding exonerating the student or students;
(b) Dismiss the case;
(c) Impose ((
verbal warning to the student directly,
not)) appropriate sanctions as provided in WAC 504-26-405.
Such sanctions are subject to the student's right of appeal as
provided in this code; or
Impose additional sanctions of reprimand,
probation, or, for violations of alcohol or drug policies,
suspension. Such sanctions are subject to the student's right
of appeal as provided in this code; or
(e))) Refer the matter to the ((
conduct board pursuant to WAC 504-26-401(3).
(4) The conduct officer may consider the student's past contacts with the office of student conduct in determining an appropriate sanction and/or deciding whether to refer the case for a university conduct board hearing.
(5) The student is notified in writing of the
determination made by the conduct officer within ten business
days of the proceeding. The ((
student is also notified of his
or her)) notice includes information regarding the student's
right to appeal pursuant to WAC 504-26-407.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-402, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(a) If the student is no longer enrolled at the time notice is sent, the notice is sent to the student's permanent address recorded in the registrar's files.
(b) The student or student organization is responsible for keeping an updated mailing address on file with the registrar.
(2) The written notice shall be completed by the conduct officer and shall include:
(a) The specific complaint, including the university policy or regulation allegedly violated;
(b) The approximate time and place of the alleged act that forms the factual basis for the charge of violation;
(c) The time, date, and place of the hearing;
(d) A list of the witnesses who may be called to testify, to the extent known;
(e) A description of all documentary and real evidence to be used at the hearing, to the extent known, including a statement that the student shall have the right to inspect his or her student conduct file.
(3) Time for hearings.
(a) The conduct board hearing is scheduled not less than seven days after the student has been sent notice of the hearing, except in the case of interim suspensions as set forth in WAC 504-26-406. Ordinarily, the hearing occurs within fifteen days of notice.
(b) Requests to ((
continue)) extend the time and/or date
for hearing (( date)) must be addressed to the chair of the
university conduct board. Requests made by an accused student
must be copied to the office of student conduct; requests made
by the office of student conduct must be copied to the accused
student. A (( continuance)) request for extension of time is
granted only upon a showing of good cause.
(4) University conduct board hearings are conducted by a university conduct board according to the following guidelines, except as provided by subsection (6) of this section:
(i) University conduct board hearings are conducted in private.
(ii) The complainant, accused student, and his or her advisor, if any, are allowed to attend the entire portion of the university conduct board hearing at which information is received (excluding deliberations). Admission of any other person to the university conduct board hearing is at the discretion of the university conduct board chair and/or the student conduct officer.
(iii) In university conduct board hearings involving more than one accused student, the student conduct officer, at his or her discretion, may permit joint or separate hearings.
(iv) In university conduct board hearings involving graduate students, board memberships are comprised to include graduate students and graduate teaching faculty to the extent possible.
(v) The complainant and the accused student have the
right to be assisted by an advisor they choose, at their own
expense. The complainant and/or the accused student is
responsible for presenting his or her own information, and
therefore, during the hearing, advisors are not permitted to
speak or)) address the board, witnesses, conduct officers or
any party or representatives invited by the parties to the
hearing, or to participate directly in any university conduct
hearing. An advisor may communicate with the accused and
recesses may be allowed for (( privacy)) this purpose. A
student should select as an advisor a person whose schedule
allows attendance at the scheduled date and time for the
university conduct board hearing because delays are not
normally allowed due to the scheduling conflicts of an
(vi) The complainant, the accused student, and the student conduct officer may arrange for witnesses to present pertinent information to the university conduct board. The conduct officer tries to arrange the attendance of possible witnesses who are identified by the complainant. Complainant witnesses must provide written statements to the conduct officer at least two weekdays prior to the hearing. Witnesses identified by the accused student must provide written statements to the conduct officer at least two weekdays prior to the conduct hearing. The accused student is responsible for informing his or her witnesses of the time and place of the hearing. Witnesses provide information to and answer questions from the university conduct board. Questions may be suggested by the accused student and/or complainant to be answered by each other or by other witnesses. Written questions are directed to the conduct board chair, rather than to the witness directly. This method is used to preserve the educational tone of the hearing and to avoid creation of an unduly adversarial environment, and to allow the board chair to determine the relevancy of questions. Questions concerning whether potential information may be received are resolved at the discretion of the chair of the university conduct board.
(vii) Pertinent records, exhibits, and written statements (including student impact statements) may be accepted as information for consideration by a university conduct board at the discretion of the chair.
(viii) Questions related to the order of the proceedings are subject to the final decision of the chair of the university conduct board.
(ix) After the portion of the university conduct board hearing concludes in which all pertinent information is received, the student conduct board shall determine (by majority vote) whether the accused student has violated each section of the standards of conduct for students as charged.
(x) The university conduct board's determination is made on the basis of a "preponderance of the evidence," that is, whether it is more likely than not that the accused student violated the standards of conduct for students.
(xi) Formal rules of process, procedure, and/or technical
rules of evidence, such as are applied in criminal or civil
court, are not used in conduct proceedings. Relevant
evidence, including hearsay, is admissible if it is the type
of evidence that reasonable members of the university
community would rely upon in the conduct of their affairs. ((
Additionally, rules of privilege and relevancy apply.)) The
chair of the student conduct board shall have the discretion
to determine admissibility of evidence.
(b) If the accused student is found responsible for any of the charges brought against the accused, the board may, at that time, consider the student's past contacts with the office of student conduct in determining an appropriate sanction.
(c) The accused student or student organization is notified of the conduct board's decision within ten calendar days from the date the matter is heard. The accused student or organization shall receive written notice of the decision, the reasons for the decision (both the factual basis therefore and the conclusions as to how those facts apply to the conduct code), the sanction, notice that the order will become final unless internal appeal is filed within twenty-one days of the date the letter was personally delivered or deposited in the U.S. mail, and a statement of how to file an appeal.
(i) The conduct board's written decision is sent by regular mail or personal delivery, and may also be sent by electronic mail to the accused student's or the president of the student organization's last known address, as set forth in the registrar's files.
(ii) The written decision is the university's initial order.
(iii) If the student or organization does not appeal the conduct board's decision within twenty-one calendar days from the date of the decision letter, it becomes the university's final order.
(5) There is a single verbatim record, such as a tape recording, of all university conduct board hearings (not including deliberations). Deliberations are not recorded. The record is the property of the university.
(6) If an accused student ((
who has been provided)) to
whom notice of the hearing has been sent (in the manner
provided above) does not appear before a university conduct
board hearing, the information in support of the complaint is
presented and considered in his or her absence, and the board
may issue a decision based upon that information.
(7) The university conduct board may for convenience or to accommodate concerns for the personal safety, well-being, and/or fears of confrontation of the complainant, accused student, and/or other witnesses during the hearing by providing separate facilities, and/or by permitting participation by telephone, audio tape, written statement, or other means, as determined in the sole judgment of the vice-president for student affairs or designee to be appropriate.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 06-23-159, § 504-26-403, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(a) When a responsible instructor finds that a violation
of academic integrity has occurred, the instructor shall
assemble the evidence and, upon reasonable notice to the
student of the date, time, and nature of the allegations, meet
with the student suspected of violating academic integrity
policies. If the student admits violating academic integrity
policies, the instructor assigns an outcome in keeping with
published course policies and notifies the office of student
conduct in writing ((
of the)), including the allegations, the
student's admission, and the sanctions imposed.
(b) If the instructor is unable to meet with the student or if the accused student disputes the allegation(s) and/or the outcome proposed by the instructor, the instructor shall make a determination as to whether the student did or did not violate the academic integrity policy. If the instructor finds that the student was in violation, the instructor shall provide the student and the office of student conduct with a written determination, the evidence relied upon, and the sanctions imposed.
(c) The student has twenty-one days from the date of the decision letter to request review of the instructor's determination and/or sanction(s) imposed to the academic integrity hearing board.
(a) Upon timely request for review by a student who has
been found by his or her instructor to have violated the
academic integrity policy, the academic integrity hearing
board shall make a separate and independent determination of
whether or not the student is responsible for violating the
academic integrity policy and/or whether ((
or not)) the
outcome proposed by the instructor is in keeping with the
instructor's published course policies.
(b) The academic integrity hearing board is empowered to provide an appropriate remedy for a student including arranging a withdrawal from the course, having the student's work evaluated, or changing a grade where it finds that:
(i) The student is not responsible for violating academic integrity policies; or
(ii) The outcome imposed by the instructor violates the instructor's published policies.
(c) Students who appear before the academic integrity board shall have the same rights to notice and to conduct a defense as enumerated in WAC 504-26-403 except:
(i) Notice of hearing and written orders shall be sent to the address provided by the student in the student's request for review (unless an address is not provided therein); and
(ii) The written decision of the academic integrity hearing board is the university's final order. There is no appeal from findings of responsibility or outcomes assigned by university or college academic integrity hearing boards.
(3) If the reported violation is the student's first offense, the office of student conduct ordinarily requires the student to attend a workshop separate from, and in addition to, any academic outcomes imposed by the instructor. A hold is placed on the student's record preventing registration or graduation until completion of the workshop.
(4) If the reported violation is the student's second offense, the student is ordinarily required to appear before a university conduct board with a recommendation that the student be dismissed from the university.
(5) If the instructor or academic integrity hearing board determines that the act of academic dishonesty for which the student is found responsible is particularly egregious in light of all attendant circumstances, the instructor or academic integrity hearing board may direct that the student's case be heard by the university conduct board with a recommendation for dismissal from the university even if it is the student's first offense.
(6) Because instructors and departments have a legitimate educational interest in the outcomes, reports of academic integrity hearing board and/or conduct board hearings shall be reported to the responsible instructor and the chair or dean.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 07-11-030, § 504-26-404, filed 5/8/07, effective 6/8/07; 06-23-159, § 504-26-404, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(a) Warning. A notice in writing to the student that the student is violating or has violated institutional regulations.
(b) Probation. Formal action placing conditions upon the student's continued attendance at the university. Probation is for a designated period of time and warns the student that suspension or expulsion may be imposed if the student is found to violate any institutional regulation(s) or fails to complete his or her conditions of probation during the probationary period. A student on probation is not eligible to run for or hold an office in any student group or organization; she or he is not eligible for certain jobs on campus, including but not limited to resident advisor or orientation counselor, and she or he is not eligible to serve on the university conduct board.
(c) Loss of privileges. Denial of specified privileges for a designated period of time.
(d) Restitution. Compensation for loss, damage, or injury. This may take the form of appropriate service and/or monetary or material replacement.
(e) Education. The university may require the student to successfully complete an educational project designed to create an awareness of the student's misconduct.
(f) Community service. Imposition of service hours (not to exceed eighty hours per student or per member of an organization).
(g) Residence hall suspension. Separation of the student
from the residence halls for a definite period of time, after
which the student ((
is)) may be eligible to return. Conditions for readmission may be specified.
(h) Residence hall expulsion. Permanent separation of the student from the residence halls.
(i) University suspension. Separation of the student
from the university for a definite period of time, after which
the student is eligible to ((
return)) request readmission. Conditions for readmission may be specified. (( More than two
violations of the standards of conduct for students involving
alcohol or drugs may result in a suspension of one or more
(j) University expulsion. Permanent separation of the student from the university.
(k) Revocation of admission and/or degree. Admission to or a degree awarded from the university may be revoked for fraud, misrepresentation, or other violation of law or university standards in obtaining the degree, or for other serious violations committed by a student prior to graduation.
(l) Withholding degree. The university may withhold awarding a degree otherwise earned until the completion of the process set forth in this student conduct code, including the completion of all sanctions imposed, if any.
(m) Trespass. A student may be restricted from any or
all university ((
property)) premises based on his or her
(n) Loss of recognition. A student organization's recognition may be withheld permanently or for a specific period of time. A fraternity or sorority may be prohibited from housing freshmen. Loss of recognition is defined as withholding university services, privileges or administrative approval from a student organization. Services, privileges and approval to be withdrawn include, but are not limited to, intramural sports (although individual members may participate), information technology services, university facility use and rental, campus involvement office organizational activities, and office of Greek life advising.
(o) Hold on transcript and/or registration. ((
This is a
temporary measure restricting)) A hold restricts release of a
student's transcript or access to registration until
satisfactory completion of conditions or sanctions imposed by
a student conduct officer or university conduct board. Upon
proof of satisfactory completion of the conditions (( of the))
or sanctions, the hold is released.
(p) No contact order. A prohibition of direct or indirect physical, verbal, and/or written contact with another individual or group.
(2) More than one of the sanctions listed above may be imposed for any single violation.
(3) In determining an appropriate sanction for a violation of the student conduct code, a student's or student organization's past contacts with the office of student conduct may be considered.
(4) Other than university expulsion or revocation or withholding of a degree, disciplinary sanctions are not made part of the student's permanent academic record, but shall become part of the student's disciplinary record.
(4))) (5) In cases heard by university conduct boards,
sanctions are determined by that board. The student conduct
officer has the authority to assign sanctions in any conduct
officer hearing(( s or cases in which the accused student takes
responsibility for violations of the standards of conduct for
(5))) (6) Academic integrity violations.
(a))) No credit need be given for work that is not a
student's own. Thus, in academic integrity violations, the
responsible instructor has the authority to assign a grade
and/or educational sanction in accordance with the
expectations set forth in the relevant course syllabus. The
instructor's choices may include, but are not limited to,
assigning a grade of "F" for the assignment and/or assigning
an educational sanction such as extra or replacement
assignments, quizzes, or tests, or assigning a grade of "F"
for the course.
(b) Instructors do not have authority to suspend or
dismiss a student from the university.))
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 07-11-030, § 504-26-405, filed 5/8/07, effective 6/8/07; 06-23-159, § 504-26-405, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]
(a) The university president or designee, of his or her own initiative, may direct that an appeals board be convened to review a conduct board decision without notice to the parties. However, the appeals board may not take any action less favorable to the accused student(s), unless notice and an opportunity to explain the matter is first given to the accused student(s).
(b) If the accused and/or the office of student conduct
may)) wish to explain their views of the matter to the
appeals board they shall do so in writing.
(c) The appeals board shall make any inquiries necessary to ascertain whether the proceeding must be converted to a formal adjudicative hearing under the Administrative Procedure Act (chapter 34.05 RCW).
(2) Except as required to explain the basis of new information, an appeal is limited to a review of the verbatim record of the university conduct board hearing and supporting documents for one or more of the following purposes:
(a) To determine whether the university conduct board hearing was conducted fairly in light of the charges and information presented, and in conformity with prescribed procedures giving the complaining party a reasonable opportunity to prepare and to present information that the standards of conduct for students were violated, and giving the accused student a reasonable opportunity to prepare and to present a response to those allegations. Deviations from designated procedures are not a basis for sustaining an appeal unless significant prejudice results.
(b) To determine whether the decision reached regarding the accused student was based on substantial information, that is, whether there were facts in the case that, if believed by the fact finder, were sufficient to establish that a violation of the standards of conduct for students occurred.
(c) To determine whether the sanction(s) imposed were appropriate for the violation of the standards of conduct for students which the student was found to have committed.
(d) To consider new information, sufficient to alter a decision, or other relevant facts not brought out in the original hearing, because such information and/or facts were not known to the person appealing at the time of the original student conduct board hearing.
(3) The university appeals board shall review the record
any briefing filed)) all information provided by the
parties and make (( one of the)) determinations based on the
following (( determinations)):
(a) Affirm, reverse or modify the conduct board's decision;
(b) Affirm, reverse, or modify the sanctions imposed by the conduct board.
(4) The appeal board's decision ((
is entered within
twenty calendar days from the date of the appeal letter. By
the close of the next business day following entry of the
order, the decision is provided to the accused student(s) by
personal delivery or deposited into the United States mail
addressed to)) shall be personally delivered or mailed via
U.S. mail to the student. Such decision shall be delivered or
mailed to the last known address of the accused student(s). It is the student's responsibility to maintain a correct and
updated address with the registrar. The university appeal
board's decision letter is the final order and shall advise
the student or student organization that judicial review may
be available. If the appeal board does not provide the
student with a response within twenty days after the request
for appeal is received, the request for appeal is deemed
(5) The appeals board decision is effective as soon as the order is signed. A petition to delay the date that the order becomes effective (a "petition for stay") may be directed to the chair of the appeals board within ten days of the date the order was personally delivered to the student or placed in the U.S. mail. The chair shall have authority to decide whether to grant or deny the request.
(6) There is no further review beyond that of the findings of responsibility or outcomes assigned by university or college academic integrity hearing boards.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.30.150. 07-11-030, § 504-26-407, filed 5/8/07, effective 6/8/07; 06-23-159, § 504-26-407, filed 11/22/06, effective 12/23/06.]