PERMANENT RULES
PILOTAGE COMMISSIONERS
Effective Date of Rule: Thirty-one days after filing.
Purpose: Amend/create/clarify rules resulting from the implementation of statutory modifications to chapter 88.16 RCW; rules concerning the protest, review and appeal of pilot licensing examinations; rules concerning pilot licensing examination qualifications and procedures; rules concerning training program and license upgrade provisions; and make housekeeping modifications as necessary.
Citation of Existing Rules Affected by this Order: Repealing WAC 363-116-075 and 363-116-150; and amending WAC 363-116-010, 363-116-070, 363-116-0751, 363-116-076, 363-116-077, 363-116-078, 363-116-082, 363-116-083, 363-116-110, 363-116-120, 363-116-200, 363-116-205, 363-116-315, 363-116-35001, 363-116-370, 363-116-405 and 363-116-420; and new section WAC 363-116-084.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: Chapter 88.16 RCW.
Other Authority: SSB 6602 enacted during the 2008 regular session of the Washington state legislature.
Adopted under notice filed as WSR 08-10-106 on May 7, 2008.
Changes Other than Editing from Proposed to Adopted Version: The proposed amendment to WAC 363-116-315 was not adopted. The proposed definition of "junior master" was not adopted. The proposed definition of "master" was modified. Two subject areas pertaining to local knowledge exams were moved onto the list of subject areas for the written examination. License upgrade trips for a new Grays Harbor pilot are now allowed in the Puget Sound pilotage district in years 3-5 rather than 1-5 as proposed. Procedures for written exam protests and simulator evaluation reviews were further modified.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Comply with Federal Statute: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Federal Rules or Standards: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Recently Enacted State Statutes: New 0, Amended 1, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted at Request of a Nongovernmental Entity: New 0, Amended 2, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted on the Agency's Own Initiative: New 1, Amended 17, Repealed 2.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Clarify, Streamline, or Reform Agency Procedures: New 1, Amended 17, Repealed 2.
Number of Sections Adopted Using Negotiated Rule Making: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Pilot Rule Making: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Other Alternative Rule Making: New 1, Amended 17, Repealed 2.
Date Adopted: June 12, 2008.
Peggy Larson
Administrator
OTS-1522.3
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97,
effective 3/28/97)
WAC 363-116-010
Time and place of meeting.
The regular
monthly meeting of the board of pilotage commissioners shall
be on the second Thursday of each month at ((9:00)) 9:30 a.m.
((at Pier 52, Seattle, Washington)) in the offices of the
Washington state ferries, Seattle, Washington, unless another
time and place has been designated by the chairperson at the
last previous meeting. If the aforementioned day falls on a
holiday, the meeting shall take place on the following
Thursday at the same hour.
[Recodified as § 363-116-010. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035 and 88.16.155. 78-09-057 (Order 78-2, Resolution No. 78-2), § 296-116-010, filed 8/23/78; Order 2-68, § 296-116-010, filed 11/1/68; § 1, effective 11/25/58.]
[Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.090 and 88.16.035. 07-17-128, § 363-116-070, filed 8/20/07, effective 9/20/07. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.090. 04-14-017, § 363-116-070, filed 6/28/04, effective 7/29/04. Recodified as § 363-116-070. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.090 and 1995 c 175. 97-06-105, § 296-116-070, filed 3/5/97, effective 4/5/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 88-14-063 (Order 88-13, Resolution No. 88-13), § 296-116-070, filed 7/1/88. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.090. 85-15-032 (Order 85-1, Resolution No. 85-1), § 296-116-070, filed 7/12/85; 84-11-056 (Order 84-4, Resolution No. 84-4), § 296-116-070, filed 5/18/84. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 82-24-010 (Order 82-8, Resolution No. 82-8), § 296-116-070, filed 11/18/82; 79-11-063 (Order 79-5, Resolution No. 79-5), § 296-116-070, filed 10/18/79. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035 and 88.16.155. 78-09-057 (Order 78-2, Resolution No. 78-2), § 296-116-070, filed 8/23/78; Order 2-68, § 296-116-070, filed 11/1/68; § 7, effective 11/25/58.]
(a) In addition to meeting the preexamination requirements of RCW 88.16.090, pilot applicants must, before taking the examination provided in WAC 363-116-076, meet one of the following indicated service requirements as master, while holding a minimum license as master of steam or motor vessels of not more than 1600 GRT or 3000 GT (ITC):
Vessel Type | Minimum Size | Waters | Minimum Time |
Cargo or tank | 5000 GRT or 10,000 GT (ITC) | Ocean or near coastal | 1 year |
Cargo or tank | 700 GRT or 1400 GT (ITC) | Ocean or near coastal | 2 years |
Cargo or tank | 1600 GRT or 3000 GT (ITC) | Inland | 2 years |
Passenger or ferry | 1600 GRT or 3000 GT (ITC) | Ocean, near coastal or inland | 2 years |
Towing | 150 GRT or 300 GT (ITC) | Ocean, near coastal or inland | 2 years |
(2) In lieu of the requirements of subsection (1) of this
section, ((an)) a pilot applicant may substitute either:
(a) Three years of service as an active member of an organized professional pilot association or as a government employed pilot during which periods the pilot applicant was actively engaged in piloting while holding a minimum license as a master of steam or motor vessels of not more than 1600 GRT or 3000 GT (ITC) upon oceans, near coastal waters or inland waters. For purposes of this section, piloting shall refer to piloting vessels in the capacity of the pilot in charge of navigation; or
(b) Two years of service as a commanding officer or master of U.S. flag government vessels of not less than 3000 displacement tons. The pilot applicant must hold at the time of application a minimum license as master of steam or motor vessels of not more than 1600 GRT or 3000 GT (ITC) upon oceans, near coastal waters or inland waters.
(3) ((An applicant who does not meet the sea service
requirements set forth in subsection (1) or (2) of this
section but is otherwise qualified to take the examination,
shall be eligible to take examinations given on or after July
1, 2008, if the applicant qualified for, took and passed the
most recent examination given prior to July 1, 2008, pursuant
to WAC 363-116-075 and any subsequent examinations given after
July 1, 2008, pursuant to WAC 363-116-0751.
(4))) As used in this section these terms shall have the following meanings:
(a) Cargo or tank vessels shall refer to vessels primarily engaged in the transportation of cargo between points.
(b) Passenger vessels shall refer to vessels primarily engaged in the transportation of passengers between points. This shall include yachts only to the extent and for such times that such vessels are actively engaged in moving passengers between points.
(c) Ferry vessels shall refer to vessels primarily engaged in the transportation of vehicles and passengers between points.
(d) Towing vessels shall refer to vessels primarily engaged in commercial towing of vessels or in ship assist work.
(e) GRT shall refer to gross register tonnage (domestic).
(f) GT (ITC) shall refer to gross tonnage measured in accordance with the requirements of the 1969 International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships.
(g) Master shall refer to the person of master's rank on the vessel's station bill or muster list or other such document who, in the event of an emergency or the sounding of a general alarm, is required to be on the bridge and in charge. If there is no such designation, the term master shall refer to the person of master's rank and pay who is ultimately in charge of the navigation of the vessel as reflected in the vessel's official log book, or there being no official log book, the bridge log of the vessel.
(4) It will be the responsibility of the pilot applicant to provide adequate documentation to enable the board to set forth and verify sea service in the manner specified in the board's application form.
(5) The provisions of this section shall apply to examinations provided in WAC 363-116-076 given on or after July 1, 2008.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 88.16 RCW and 2005 c 26. 05-18-021, § 363-116-0751, filed 8/29/05, effective 10/1/05.]
(2) The examination may be taken by all pilot applicants
who the board has determined have met the qualifications of
WAC ((363-116-075 or)) 363-116-0751 and who:
(a) Have had an application on file with the board for at least one month prior to the examination. This requirement may be waived by the chairperson of the board upon the showing of good cause.
(b) Have tendered with the application a nonrefundable
examination administration fee in such amount as may be set by
the board from time to time. The board may, at its
discretion, refund all or part of the examination
administration fee for ((an)) a pilot applicant who is unable
to sit for the written examination ((or refund all or part of
the portion of the examination administration fee that
encompasses the simulator fee for an applicant who is unable
to sit for the simulator evaluation)).
(3) The written examination shall be in compliance with RCW 88.16.090 and may consist of questions covering, but not limited to, the following subjects:
(a) Rules of the Road then applicable to the pilotage district for which the pilot applicant is applying and accompanying information set forth in United States government publications on the subject;
(b) Meaning and understanding of the aids to navigation;
(c) Seamanship, including piloting and ship handling, docking and undocking problems, use of ship assist tugs and anchors;
(d) Vessel traffic system regulations;
(e) Engine and rudder order commands for United States and foreign merchant vessels and United States naval vessels;
(f) Operation and use of marine radar and automatic radar plotting aids (ARPA);
(g) Ability to calculate currents and tides;
(h) Federal laws affecting mariners and pilots including environmental laws;
(i) Use of vessel navigational equipment;
(j) Duties of a pilot;
(k) Relationship between pilot and master;
(l) Bridge resource management;
(m) United States government public health quarantine regulations;
(n) Marine VHF radio usage and phraseology, including bridge-to-bridge communications regulations;
(o) Federal navigation safety and security regulations;
(p) International distress signals;
(q) Nonlocal chart knowledge, including chart symbols and
abbreviations as set forth in the latest U.S. Department of
Commerce, NOS (National Ocean Survey) Chart No. 1; ((and))
(r) ((Chapters 88.16 RCW and 363-116 WAC.)) Maneuvering
behavior for different vessel types; and
(s) Impact of propulsion and maneuvering machinery on vessel navigation.
(4) ((In addition to the subjects listed in subsection
(3) of this section, the following subjects as they pertain to
the pilotage district for which the examination is being given
may be included in examinations given before July 1, 2008:
(a) Knowledge of local tidal currents;
(b) Overhead cable areas and clearances;
(c) Submerged cable and pipeline areas;
(d) Channel, waterway and passage widths, depths and shoal areas and other information from the Army Corps of Engineers survey charts;
(e) Bridge transit knowledge - signals, channel width, regulations, and closed periods;
(f) Lock characteristics, rules and regulations;
(g) Ranges for determining compass error and measured miles;
(h) Channel ranges;
(i) Pier, wharf, or terminal locations and berth numbers; dock or pier headings, lengths, and minimum depths of water alongside;
(j) Prohibited areas, restricted areas, regulated navigation areas and explosive anchorages;
(k) Commonly used anchorage locations;
(l) Use of anchors and knowledge of ground tackle;
(m) State and federal tanker escort rules;
(n) State environmental law and regulations affecting mariners;
(o) Marine and port security regulations;
(p) Harbor safety plan and harbor regulations; and
(q) Local chart knowledge, including chart symbols and abbreviations as set forth in the latest U.S. Department of Commerce, NOS (National Ocean Survey) Chart No. 1.)) The board may require that the cost of the written examination will be at the expense of the pilot applicant.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 88.16 RCW and 2005 c 26. 05-18-021, § 363-116-076, filed 8/29/05, effective 10/1/05.]
(2) The simulator evaluation shall take place at a marine
simulator facility designated by the board and shall be
recorded. In this evaluation pilot applicants shall be
observed by available board members but shall be evaluated
only by those board members who hold, or have held a minimum
U.S. Coast Guard license as master of steam or motor vessels
of not more than 1600 gross tons((, provided that no currently
licensed Washington state pilots shall be evaluators or be
present during the evaluation)). The board shall also appoint
a minimum of two additional evaluators who hold, or have held
within ten years of the examination date, a state pilot
license issued by another state or who have held a Washington
state pilot license within the last ten years.
(3) All pilot applicants will be evaluated in writing based on some or all of the following factors:
(a) Fundamental piloting and ship handling ability;
(b) Ability to assimilate and prioritize all data necessary to safely maneuver the ship;
(c) Ability to respond appropriately in routine situations;
(d) Ability to respond appropriately in emergency or nonroutine situations;
(e) Ability to communicate well and project the proper bridge presence;
(f) Understanding of bridge resource management; and
(g) Understanding and command of the Rules of the Road then applicable to the pilotage district for which the pilot applicant is applying.
(4) The board will determine the scoring method on the
simulator evaluation and the relative weight of this score to
the whole examination ((will be determined by a board
designated examination committee and provided to the
applicants prior to the examination provided in WAC 363-116-076)).
(5) The board will set a minimum passing score.
(6) The board may require that the cost of the simulator
evaluation ((fee)) will be at the expense of the pilot
applicant.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 88.16 RCW and 2005 c 26. 05-18-021, § 363-116-077, filed 8/29/05, effective 10/1/05.]
(1) Notification. Pilot applicants on the list waiting
to enter the training program shall provide the board with a
current address to be used for notification for entry into the
training program. Such address shall be a place at which mail
is delivered. In addition, ((an)) a pilot applicant may
provide the board with other means of contact such as a phone
number, fax number, and/or an e-mail address. The mailing
address will, however, be considered the primary means of
notification by the board. It will be the responsibility of
the pilot applicant to ensure that the board has a current
mailing address at all times. If ((an)) a pilot applicant
cannot personally receive mail at the address provided to the
board for any period of time, another person may be designated
in writing with a notarized copy to the board as having power
of attorney specifically to act in the pilot applicant's
behalf regarding such notice. If notice sent to the address
provided by the pilot applicant is returned after three
attempts to deliver, that pilot applicant will be skipped and
the next pilot applicant on the list will be contacted for
entry into the training program. A person so skipped will
remain next on the list. ((An)) A pilot applicant or his/her
designated attorney in fact shall respond within fifteen
calendar days of receipt of notification to accept, refuse, or
request a delayed entry into the training program.
(2) Entry. At such time that the board chooses to start
((an)) a pilot applicant in the training program, notification
shall be given to the first person on the list. Pilot
applicants shall be eligible in the order of their total
combined scores on the written examination and simulator
evaluation or as otherwise may be determined by the board. ((Any)) A pilot applicant who refuses entry into the program
will be removed from the waiting list with no further
obligation by the board to offer a position in the training
program to such pilot applicant. ((An)) A pilot applicant who
is not able to start the training program ((within two months
of the board's notice)) on the date the board sets for that
pilot applicant's entry into the training program may, with
written consent of the board, delay entry into the training
program for up to two months. The board will then give notice
to the next pilot applicant on the list to enter the training
program. The pilot applicant who delays entry, shall remain
eligible for the next position in the training program,
provided that the next position becomes available within the
earlier of:
(a) Four years from the pilot applicant's taking the written examination; or
(b) The date scheduled for the next pilotage examination.
Pilot applicants not able to start in the training program
within two months of the ((board's notice of eligibility))
date the board sets for that pilot applicant's entry into the
training program and who do not obtain the board's written
consent to delay entry into the training program shall no
longer be eligible for the training program without retaking
the examination provided in WAC 363-116-076 and the simulator
evaluation provided in WAC 363-116-077.
(3) Training license. Prior to receiving a training
license pilot applicants must pass a physical examination by a
board-designated physician ((designated by the board)) and in
accordance with the requirements of WAC 363-116-120 for
initial pilot applicants. A form provided by the board must
be completed by the physician and submitted to the board along
with a cover letter indicating the physician's findings and
recommendations as to the pilot applicant's fitness to pilot. The physical examination must be taken not more than
((forty-five)) ninety days before issuance of the training
license. Holders of a training license will be required to
pass a general physical examination annually within
((forty-five)) ninety days prior to the anniversary date of
that license. Training license physical((s)) examinations
will be at the expense of the pilot applicant. All training
licenses shall be signed by the chairperson or his/her
designee and shall have an expiration date ((and fee
established by the board)). Training licenses shall be
surrendered to the board upon completion or termination of the
training program.
(4) Development. As soon as practical after receiving notification of eligibility for entry into the training program as set forth in this section, the pilot applicant shall meet with the trainee evaluation committee for the purpose of devising a training program for that pilot applicant. The training program shall be tailored to the ability and experience of the individual pilot applicant and shall consist of observation trips, training trips in which the pilot applicant pilots the vessel under the supervision of licensed pilots, ship assist tug trips, and such other forms of learning and instruction that may be designated. The trainee evaluation committee shall recommend a training program for adoption by the board. After adoption by the board, it will be presented to the pilot applicant. If the pilot applicant agrees in writing to the training program, the board shall issue a training license to the pilot applicant, which license shall authorize the pilot applicant to take such actions as are contained in the training program. If the pilot applicant does not agree to the terms of the training program in writing within fifteen business days of it being received by the pilot applicant, that pilot applicant shall no longer be eligible for entry into the training program and the board may give notice to the next available pilot applicant that he/she is eligible for the training program.
(5) Initial evaluation.
(a) The trainee evaluation committee shall create an initial evaluation at the beginning of each pilot applicant's training program subject to approval by the board. The goal of the initial evaluation is to, as soon as practical after adequate observation trips, have the pilot trainee involved in hands-on piloting and ship handling under the supervision of licensed pilots and subject to the evaluation of training pilots. To this end the trainee evaluation committee shall devise an initial evaluation of a specified length not to exceed six months if the pilot trainee is on stipend and nine months if not on stipend. The initial evaluation shall:
(i) Afford the pilot trainee early and concentrated exposure to a commonly navigated waterway, channel or tributary within the pilotage district and the main ship channel routes between such area and the seaward boundary of the pilotage district;
(ii) Except for pilot trainees taking an examination prior to July 1, 2008, provide the pilot trainee the opportunity to study for and pass any local knowledge examinations provided by the board as to the conditions found in such waterway, channel or tributary;
(iii) Specify a number of training trips in which the pilot trainee pilots vessels under the supervision of licensed pilots; and
(iv) Specify a number of training trips in which the pilot trainee pilots vessels under the supervision of training pilots and the pilot members of the trainee evaluation committee.
(b) As a condition of completing the initial evaluation, the pilot trainee shall:
(i) Pass any required local knowledge examinations given by the board covering the routes described in (a)(i) of this subsection. This examination can be repeated as necessary, provided that it may not be taken more than once in any thirty day period and further provided that it must be successfully passed before the expiration date of the initial evaluation; and
(ii) Possess a first class pilotage endorsement without tonnage or other restrictions on his/her United States government license to pilot in at least one route in the pilotage district in which the pilot applicant seeks a license.
(c) After completion of the initial evaluation, the trainee evaluation committee shall make a recommendation to the board and the board shall determine, whether the pilot trainee has demonstrated the potential for superior piloting and ship handling and has demonstrated the ability to assimilate and retain the local knowledge necessary to pilot. Unless the board finds that such superior potential exists, it shall terminate the pilot trainee's participation in the training program.
(6) Specification of trips. To the extent possible, the
training program shall provide a wide variety of assignments,
observation and training trips. The training program may
contain deadlines for achieving full or partial completion of
certain necessary actions. Where relevant, it may specify
such factors as route, sequence of trips, weather conditions,
day or night, stern or bow first, draft, size of ship and any
other relevant factors. The board may designate specific
trips or specific numbers of trips that shall be made with
training pilots or with the pilot members of the trainee
evaluation committee or with pilots of specified experience.
In the Puget Sound pilotage district, pilot applicants taking
an examination before July 1, 2008, shall ((have)) complete a
minimum of one hundred thirty trips. After July 1, 2008, all
Puget Sound pilotage district pilot applicants shall ((have))
complete a minimum of one hundred fifty trips. The board
shall set from time to time the minimum number of trips for
pilot applicants in the Grays Harbor pilotage district. The
board will ensure that during the training program the pilot
trainee will get significant review by training pilots and the
pilot members of the trainee evaluation committee.
(7) Local knowledge. The training program shall provide
opportunities for the education of pilot trainees and shall
provide for testing of pilot trainees on the local knowledge
necessary to become a pilot. This education program shall be
developed by the trainee evaluation committee and recommended
to the board for adoption and shall be tailored to the needs
of the individual pilot trainee. It shall be the
responsibility of the pilot trainee to obtain the local
knowledge necessary to be licensed as a pilot in the district
for which he/she is applying. Prior to the completion of the
training program, the board, or its designee, ((shall)) may
give ((a)) such local knowledge examination(s) as it deems
appropriate to the pilot trainees who shall be required to
pass such examination(s) before completing the training
program. ((Pilot trainees taking an examination before July
1, 2008, shall not be required to take local examinations.))
The trainee evaluation committee may require a pilot trainee
to sit for a local knowledge examination provided the trainee
evaluation committee informs the pilot trainee in writing
sixty days in advance of the scheduled date of the
examination. Failure to sit for the examination on the date
scheduled may constitute cause for removal from the training
program. The trainee evaluation committee may also establish
in writing such interim performance requirements as it deems
necessary. These local examinations can be repeated as
necessary, except that an examination for the same local area
may not be taken more than once in any thirty day period and
all required local know examinations must be successfully
passed before the expiration date of the training program. The local knowledge required of a pilot trainee and the local
knowledge examination(s) may include the following subjects as
they pertain to the pilotage district for which the pilot
trainee seeks a license:
(a) Area geography;
(b) Waterway configurations including channel depths, widths and other characteristics;
(c) Hydrology and hydraulics of large ships in shallow water and narrow channels;
(d) Tides and currents;
(e) Winds and weather;
(f) Local aids to navigation;
(g) Bottom composition;
(h) Local docks, berths and other marine facilities including length, least depths and other characteristics;
(i) Mooring line procedures;
(j) Local traffic operations e.g., fishing, recreational, dredging, military and regattas;
(k) Vessel traffic system;
(l) Marine VHF usage and phraseology, including bridge-to-bridge communications regulations;
(m) Air draft and keel clearances;
(n) Submerged cable and pipeline areas;
(o) Overhead cable areas and clearances;
(p) Bridge transit knowledge - signals, channel width, regulations, and closed periods;
(q) Lock characteristics, rules and regulations;
(r) Commonly used anchorage areas;
(s) Danger zone and restricted area regulations;
(t) Regulated navigation areas;
(u) Naval operation area regulations;
(v) ((Maneuvering behavior for different vessel types;
(w) Impact of propulsion and maneuvering machinery on vessel navigation;
(x))) Local ship assist and escort tug characteristics;
(((y))) (w) Tanker escort rules - state and federal;
(((z))) (x) Use of anchors and knowledge of ground
tackle;
(((aa))) (y) Applicable federal and state marine and
environmental safety law requirements;
(((bb))) (z) Marine security and safety zone concerns;
(((cc) Marine port security regulations;
(dd))) (aa) Harbor safety plan and harbor regulations;
((and
(ee))) (bb) Chapters 88.16 RCW and 363-116 WAC, and other relevant state and federal regulations in effect on the date the examination notice is published pursuant to WAC 363-116-076; and
(cc) Courses in degrees true and distances in nautical miles and tenths of miles between points of land, navigational buoys and fixed geographical reference points, and the distance off points of land for such courses as determined by parallel indexing along pilotage routes.
(8) Length.
(a) In the Puget Sound pilotage district, for pilot applicants taking an examination before July 1, 2008, the minimum length of the training program shall be seven months. For pilot applicants who take an examination on or after July 1, 2008, the minimum length of the training program shall be eight months. The maximum length of the training program shall be thirty-six months if the pilot applicant elects to receive a stipend. The length of the training program shall be established by the board based on the recommendation of the trainee evaluation committee.
(b) In the Grays Harbor pilotage district, the length of the training program shall be set by the board based on the recommendation of the trainee evaluation committee.
(9) Rest. It is the pilot trainee's responsibility to
provide adequate rest time so that he/she is fully able to
pilot on training trips. Pilot trainees shall not take pilot
training trips in which they will be piloting the vessel
without observing the rest rules for pilots in place by
federal or state law or regulation. For purposes of
calculating rest required before a training trip in which the
pilot trainee will be piloting after an observation trip in
which the pilot trainee did not pilot the vessel, such
observation trip shall be treated as though it had been a
normal ((pilotage)) pilot training assignment. Nothing herein
shall be construed as requiring any particular amount of rest
before any observation trip in which the pilot trainee will
not be piloting.
(10) Stipend.
(a) At the initial meeting with the trainee evaluation
committee the pilot applicant shall indicate whether he/she
wishes to receive a stipend during the training program. In
the Puget Sound pilotage district, as a condition of receiving
such stipend, pilot applicants will agree to forego during the
training program other full- or part-time employment which
prevents them from devoting themselves on a full-time basis to
the completion of the training program. With the consent of
the board and the restructuring of the training program, pilot
trainees may elect to change from a stipend to nonstipend
status, and vice versa, during the training program. The
stipend paid to pilot trainees shall be six thousand dollars
per month (or such other amount as may be set by the board
from time to time), shall be contingent upon the board's
setting of a training surcharge ((fee)) in the tariffs levied
pursuant to WAC 363-116-185 and 363-116-300 sufficient to
cover the expense of the stipend and shall be paid from a
pilot training account as directed by the board and pursuant
thereto shall be paid to pilot trainees as set forth below:
(i) ((The stipend will be paid on a full calendar month
basis except that prorations may be used for the first and
last months in which the trainee is found unfit for duty and
in which the trainee changes to a nonstipend status.
(ii))) Determinations as to stipend entitlement will be made on a full calendar month basis and documentation of trips will be submitted to the board by the fifth day of the following month. The stipend will be paid on an all or nothing basis for each month except that prorations shall be allowed at the rate of two hundred dollars per day (or such other amount as may be set by the board from time to time), under the following circumstances:
(A) For the first and last months of the training program (unless the training program starts on the first or ends on the last day of a month); or
(B) ((The)) For a pilot trainee who is deemed unfit for
duty by ((the)) a board-designated physician during a training
month; or
(C) ((A)) For a pilot trainee who requests a change from
a nonstipend status to a stipend status, or from a stipend
status to a nonstipend status as set forth in (a)(((vii)))
(vi) of this subsection.
(((iii))) (ii) A certain minimum number of trips are
required each month for eligibility to receive the stipend. This minimum number shall be specified in the training program
and shall be the total number of trips required in the
training program divided by the number of months in the
training program. Only trips required by the training program
can be used to satisfy this minimum. Trips will be documented
at the end of each month.
(((iv))) (iii) It is the pilot trainee's responsibility
to make all hard-to-get trips before the end of the training
program. If a training program is extended due to a failure
to get all of these trips, the board may elect not to pay the
stipend if the missing trips were available to the pilot
trainee but not taken.
(((v))) (iv) The trainee evaluation committee with
approval by the board may allocate, assign or specify training
trips among multiple pilot trainees. Generally, the pilot
trainee who finished the qualifying examination and simulator
evaluation with the highest score has the right of first
refusal of training trips provided that the trainee evaluation
committee may, with approval by the board, allocate or assign
training trips differently as follows:
(A) When it is necessary to accommodate any pilot trainee's initial evaluation program;
(B) When it is necessary to spread hard-to-get trips
among pilot trainees so that as many as possible complete
required trips on time. If a pilot trainee is deprived of a
hard-to-get trip by the trainee evaluation committee, that
trip will not be considered "available" under (a)(((iii)))
(ii) of this subsection. However, the pilot trainee will
still be required to complete the minimum number of trips for
the month in order to receive a stipend, and the minimum
number of trips as required to complete his/her training
program;
(((vi))) (v) If a pilot trainee elects to engage in any
full- or part-time employment, the terms and conditions of
such employment must be submitted to the trainee evaluation
committee for prior determination by the board of whether such
employment complies with the intent of this section
prohibiting employment that "prevents (pilot trainees) from
devoting themselves on a full-time basis to the completion of
the training program."
(((vii))) (vi) If a pilot trainee requests to change to a
nonstipend status as provided in this section such change
shall be effective for a minimum nonstipend period of thirty
days, provided that before any change takes effect the board
and the pilot trainee must agree in writing on the terms of a
revised training program.
(b) Any approved pilot association or other organization
collecting the pilotage tariff levied by WAC 363-116-185 or
363-116-300 shall transfer the pilot training surcharge
receipts to the board at least once a month or otherwise
dispose of such funds as directed by the board. The board may
set different training stipends for different pilotage
districts. Receipts from the training surcharge shall not
belong to the pilot providing the service to the ship that
generated the ((fee)) surcharge or to the pilot association or
other organization collecting the surcharge receipts, but
shall be disposed of as directed by the board. Pilot
associations or other organizations collecting surcharge
receipts shall provide an accounting of such funds to the
board on a quarterly basis or at such other intervals as may
be requested by the board. Any audited financial statements
filed by pilot associations or other organizations collecting
pilotage tariffs shall include an accounting of the collection
and disposition of these surcharges ((fees)). The board shall
direct the disposition of all funds in the account.
(11) Trainee evaluation committee. There is hereby
created a trainee evaluation committee to which members shall
be appointed by the board. The committee shall include at a
minimum: Three active licensed Washington state pilots, who,
to the extent possible, shall be from the district in which
the pilot trainee seeks a license and at least one of whom
shall be a member of the board; one representative of the
marine industry from the relevant pilotage district (who may
be a board member) who holds, or has held, the minimum U.S.
Coast Guard license required by RCW 88.16.090; and one
((public representative)) other member of the board who is not
a pilot. The committee may include such other persons as may
be appointed by the board. The committee shall be chaired by
a pilot member of the board and shall meet as necessary to
complete the tasks accorded it. In the event that the trainee
evaluation committee cannot reach consensus with regard to any
issue it shall report both majority and minority opinions to
the board.
(12) Training pilots. The board shall designate as training pilots those pilots with a minimum of seven years of piloting in the relevant district who are willing to undergo such training as the board may require and provide. The board may establish a lower experience level for the Grays Harbor pilotage district. Training pilots shall receive such training from the board to better enable them to give guidance and training to pilot trainees and to properly evaluate the performance of pilot trainees. The board shall keep a list of training pilots available for public inspection at all times. All pilot members of the trainee evaluation committee shall also be training pilots.
(13) Evaluation. When a pilot trainee pilots a vessel
under the supervision of another pilot, the supervising pilot
shall, to the extent possible, communicate with and give
guidance to the pilot trainee in an effort to make the trip a
valuable learning experience. After each such trip, the
supervising pilot shall complete a form provided by the board
evaluating the pilot trainee's performance. ((The board shall
prepare different forms to be used by supervising pilots who
are training pilots and those who are not.)) Evaluation forms
prepared by licensed pilots who are not training pilots shall
be used by the trainee evaluation committee and the board for
assessing a pilot trainee's progress, providing guidance to
the pilot trainee and for making alterations to the training
program. All evaluation forms shall be delivered or mailed by
the supervising pilot to the board. They shall not be given
to the pilot trainee. The supervising pilot may show the
contents of the form to the pilot trainee, but the pilot
trainee has no right to see the form until it is filed with
the board. The trainee evaluation committee shall review
these evaluation forms from time to time and the chairperson
of the trainee evaluation committee shall report the progress
of all pilot trainees at each meeting of the board. If it
deems it necessary, the trainee evaluation committee may
recommend, and the board may make, changes from time to time
in the training program requirements applicable to a pilot
trainee, including the length of the training program.
(14) Removal. A pilot trainee may be removed from the training program by the board if it finds any of the following:
(a) Failure to maintain the minimum federal license required by RCW 88.16.090;
(b) Conviction of an offense involving drugs or involving the personal consumption of alcohol;
(c) Failure to devote full time to training in the Puget Sound pilotage district if receiving a stipend;
(d) The pilot trainee is not physically fit to pilot;
(e) Failure to make satisfactory progress toward timely completion of the program or timely meeting of interim performance requirements in the training program;
(f) Inadequate performance on examinations or other actions required by the training program;
(g) Failure to demonstrate the superior skills required in the initial evaluation;
(h) Inadequate performance on training trips; or
(i) Violation of a training program requirement, law, regulation or directive of the board.
(15) Completion of the training program shall include the requirement that the pilot trainee:
(a) Successfully complete the requirements set forth in the training program;
(b) Possess a valid first class pilotage endorsement without tonnage or other restrictions on his/her United States government license to pilot in all of the waters of the pilotage district in which the pilot applicant seeks a license; and
(c) Successfully complete any local knowledge examination(s) required by the board and specified in the training program.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.105. 06-20-107, § 363-116-078, filed 10/4/06, effective 11/4/06. Statutory Authority: Chapter 88.16 RCW and 2005 c 26. 05-18-021, § 363-116-078, filed 8/29/05, effective 10/1/05.]
(2) Puget Sound pilotage district - license limitation periods. Except for trips being made for pilot license upgrades, licenses issued in the Puget Sound pilotage district shall have the following limitations:
License Year | Maximum Size of Tank Vessels Carrying Petroleum Products as Bulk Cargo | Maximum Size of Other Vessels |
1 | Piloting on vessels of any size prohibited | 30,000 GT (ITC) or 660 feet except for passenger vessels which may only have a maximum size of 5000 GT (ITC) |
2 | 30,000 GT (ITC) | 38,000 GT (ITC) |
3 | 38,000 GT (ITC) | 48,000 GT (ITC) |
4 | 45,000 GT (ITC) | 60,000 GT (ITC) |
5 | 55,000 GT (ITC) | 75,000 GT (ITC) |
(4) Grays Harbor pilotage district - license limitation periods. Pilots licensed in the Grays Harbor pilotage district shall not pilot vessels in violation of the restrictions set forth in the table below during the indicated license year.
License Year | Maximum Size of Tank Vessels Carrying Petroleum Products | Maximum Size of Other Vessels |
1 | Piloting on vessels of any size prohibited | 25,000 GT (ITC) except that piloting on vessels of any size is prohibited through the Chehalis River Bridge unless vessel is in ballast and does not exceed 25,000 GT (ITC) |
2 | 10,000 GT (ITC) | 30,000 GT (ITC) |
3 | 45,000 GT (ITC) | 45,000 GT (ITC) |
4 | 60,000 GT (ITC) | 60,000 GT (ITC) |
5 | 75,000 GT (ITC) | 75,000 GT (ITC) |
(5) Grays Harbor pilotage district - pilot license upgrade requirements.
(a) Prior to the expiration of the first license year, a new pilot must make five license upgrade trips. Three of these trips shall be through the Chehalis River bridge on loaded or partially loaded vessels. The other trips shall be on vessels in excess of 25,000 GT (ITC) and involve docking and passage to or from the sea buoy; and one of these trips shall involve turning the vessel in the waterway.
(b) Prior to the expiration of the second license year, a new pilot must make two license upgrade trips on tank vessels in excess of 10,000 GT (ITC) and one trip on a vessel in excess of 30,000 GT (ITC). Two of these trips shall involve docking and passage to or from the sea buoy; and one of these trips shall involve turning the vessel in the waterway. Upon satisfactory completion of the two upgrade trips upon tank vessels and completion of the second license year, the pilot will be authorized to pilot tank vessels in accordance with the limitations specified in subsection (4) of this section. Upon satisfactory completion of the one upgrade trip upon a vessel in excess of 30,000 GT (ITC) and completion of the second license year, the pilot will be authorized to pilot vessels in accordance with the limitations specified in subsection (4) of this section.
(c) Prior to the expiration of the third license year, a
new pilot must make three license upgrade trips on vessels in
excess of 45,000 GT (ITC) ((or on the nearest larger size
vessels available)). Two of these trips shall involve docking
and passage to or from the sea buoy; and one of these trips
shall involve turning the vessel in the waterway.
(d) Prior to the expiration of the fourth license year, a
new pilot must make two license upgrade trips on vessels in
excess of 60,000 GT (ITC) ((or on the nearest larger size
vessels available)).
(e) Prior to the expiration of the fifth license year, a
new pilot must make two license upgrade trips on vessels in
excess of 75,000 GT (ITC) ((or on the nearest larger size
vessels available)).
(f) ((Notwithstanding (c), (d), and/or (e) of this
subsection not being accomplished due to unavailability of
vessels, in the sixth license year a pilot will be issued a
license without limitations.)) If vessels are not available in
the Grays Harbor pilotage district to allow a pilot to comply
with (c) through (e) of this subsection in a timely manner,
the board may designate substitute trips in the Puget Sound
pilotage district as allowed by law and in so doing may
specify the size of the vessel and any other characteristics
of the trips that the board deems appropriate. Such
designation shall be considered a modification of the pilot's
state license to authorize the specified trips in the Puget
Sound pilotage district.
(6) The initial license shall contain the limitations contained above and list the date of commencement and expiration of such periods. If a newly licensed pilot is unable to pilot for forty-five days or more in any one of the five years, he/she shall notify the board and request a revised schedule of limitations.
(7) Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, no pilot shall be dispatched to, or accept an assignment on, any vessel which exceeds the limitations of his/her license. On vessels in which there is more than one pilot assigned, the license limitations shall apply only to the pilot in charge.
(8) All limitations on a pilot's license shall be lifted at the beginning of the sixth year of piloting provided he/she has submitted to the board a statement attesting to the fact that he/she has completed all the required license upgrade trips and the vessel simulator courses.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.105 and 88.16.035. 07-17-148, § 363-116-082, filed 8/21/07, effective 9/21/07. Statutory Authority: Chapter 88.16 RCW and 2005 c 26. 05-18-021, § 363-116-082, filed 8/29/05, effective 10/1/05. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.105 and 88.16.035. 05-04-028, § 363-116-082, filed 1/26/05, effective 2/26/05. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.105. 99-08-003, § 363-116-082, filed 3/25/99, effective 4/25/99; 97-14-032, § 363-116-082, filed 6/25/97, effective 7/26/97. Recodified as § 363-116-082. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035 and 88.16.105. 93-09-016, § 296-116-082, filed 4/14/93, effective 5/15/93. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.105. 92-24-056, § 296-116-082, filed 11/30/92, effective 12/31/92; 92-08-051, § 296-116-082, filed 3/26/92, effective 4/26/92; 89-18-063 (Order 89-6, Resolution No. 89-6), § 296-116-082, filed 9/1/89, effective 10/2/89; 89-11-060 (Order 89-5, Resolution No. 89-5), § 296-116-082, filed 5/18/89. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 80-03-081 (Order 79-6, Resolution No. 79-6), § 296-116-082, filed 3/4/80.]
(2) ((Any)) A pilot applicant who takes ((an)) either a
written examination as provided in ((this chapter)) WAC 363-116-076 or a written local knowledge examination as
provided in WAC 363-116-078 that cannot be retaken may
((request)) submit a written protest regarding any such
examination for review by the board and/or a committee
designated by the board ((of his/her examination results. This request must be in writing and must be received by the
board within five business days of receipt of notification of
the examination results)) and/or by a firm under contract with
the board for development and grading of the written
examination. The ((board)) standard of review for reviewing
the written examination protests submitted by a pilot
applicant is that the written examination score will not be
set aside ((its prior determination)) unless the pilot
applicant proves the challenged score was the result of fraud,
coercion, arbitrariness or manifest unfairness ((by the
board)). If it finds that reasonable cause exists to question
((an)) a written examination grade, the board may allow
((any)) a pilot applicant ((appealing)) protesting his/her
written examination results to enter the simulator evaluation.
If the pilot applicant chooses to enter the simulator
evaluation before the pilot applicant receives notification of
the result of the review of his/her Protest Form the pilot
applicant shall be at all times responsible for the charge to
enter the simulator evaluation. No pilot applicant approved
by the board for entry into the simulator evaluation shall be
disqualified by the successful examination appeal of another
pilot applicant. Pilot applicants are not entitled to a
review of the results of a written local knowledge examination
given pursuant to WAC 363-116-078 if the pilot applicant is
eligible to retake the written examination.
(3) The procedure for ((filing a review)) submitting a
protest regarding the written examination or a written local
knowledge examination that cannot be retaken is as follows:
(a) The pilot applicant must ((contact the board office
for an appointment to appear personally to review his/her
examination.)) submit a protest in writing to the person
administering such examination on the day that the pilot
applicant takes such examination and before the pilot
applicant leaves the examination room;
(b) On the day of such examination the pilot applicant
will be provided a Protest Form ((to complete in the board
office in defense of his/her examination answers.)) by the
person(s) administering such examination at the time that
documents for taking such written examination are given to the
pilot applicant;
(c) ((The applicant must state the specific reason or
reasons why he/she feels the results of his/her examination
should be changed.)) In defense of his/her written examination
answers and in support of the pilot applicant's reasons for
protesting a question or questions, the pilot applicant must
write on the Protest Form the reason(s) why he/she protests a
question or questions, what the pilot applicant claims is the
correct answer to the protested question(s), and if a
protested question(s) involves mathematical calculations
provide the calculations that the pilot applicant claims are
correct;
(d) If there are protests regarding improprieties including but not limited to the administration and proctoring of the examination, these assertions must be documented in writing with sufficient detail naming times, people, places, protested activities and witnesses to permit the board to conduct an investigation;
(e) The pilot applicant will be identified only by
((applicant)) number or letter for the purpose of ((this))
review((. Letters of reference or requests for special
consideration will not be read or considered by the board.
(e) The applicant may not bring in notes or texts for use while completing the informal review form.)) of the Protest Form;
(f) ((The applicant will not be allowed to take any notes
or materials from the office upon leaving.
(g))) The pilot applicant shall submit his/her Protest Form at the same time that he/she submits the answer sheet for such written examination to the examination administrator.
(4) The procedure for review of the Protest Form submitted by the pilot applicant is as follows:
(a) The board, and/or a committee designated by it,
and/or a firm under contract with the board for development
and grading of the written examination will ((schedule a
closed session meeting to)) review the written
examination((s)) and Protest Form((s)) completed by the pilot
applicant ((for the purpose of informal review.
(h) The applicant will be notified in writing of the results.
(4) Any)); and
(b) After completion of such review the pilot applicant will be provided with written notification of the decision regarding review of the Protest Form submitted by the pilot applicant. The written notification will show any adjusted credits and scores for any answers that have been changed following such review.
(5) A pilot applicant who is not satisfied with the
result of ((the examination)) such review of his/her Protest
Form may request ((a formal)) an adjudicative hearing pursuant
to RCW ((88.16.100)) 88.16.090 and governed by the provisions
of chapter 34.05 RCW to appeal his/her written examination
results. Such hearing must be requested within thirty days of
receipt of the result of the ((board's)) review of the
((examination results)) Protest Form by sending a written
request for an adjudicative hearing to the board of pilotage
commissioners' office.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 88.16 RCW and 2005 c 26. 05-18-021, § 363-116-083, filed 8/29/05, effective 10/1/05. Recodified as § 363-116-083. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 88-10-038 (Order 88-10, Resolution No. 88-10), § 296-116-083, filed 5/3/88.]
(2) A pilot applicant who takes a simulator evaluation as provided in this chapter may request a review of his/her simulator evaluation results. This request must be in writing and must be received by the board within five business days of receipt of notification of the simulator evaluation results. The standard of review for reviewing the simulator evaluation results challenged by a pilot applicant is that the challenged evaluation score will not be set aside unless the pilot applicant proves the challenged score was the result of fraud, coercion, arbitrariness or manifest unfairness.
(3) The procedure for filing a request for review of the simulator evaluation is as follows:
(a) The pilot applicant must contact the board office for an appointment to appear personally to review his/her simulator evaluation;
(b) The pilot applicant will be provided a Review Form to complete in the board designated review location in defense of his/her simulator evaluation performance;
(c) In review of his/her simulator evaluation performance, the pilot applicant must demonstrate that his/her proposed evaluation of the simulator evaluation is correct;
(d) In review of his/her simulator evaluation performance, the pilot applicant must cite on the Review Form provided by the board, the specific situation(s) presented in the simulator evaluation (i.e., crossing, passing, meeting situations, environmental changes like fog descending, navigational decisions and/or rules-of-the-road interpretations) and detail why the actions he/she took in that situation should receive more credit than that which was given, to demonstrate that his/her score on the simulator evaluation provided by the board is incorrect;
(e) Only the recorded performance of the pilot applicant will be considered in any review of the simulator evaluation performance. If there are assertions regarding improprieties in the administration, proctoring, grading or scoring of the simulator evaluations, these assertions must be documented in writing with sufficient detail naming times, people, places, protested activities and witnesses to permit the board to conduct an investigation;
(f) The pilot applicant will be identified only by number or letter for the purpose of this review;
(g) The board will make available to the pilot applicant reviewing his/her simulator evaluation a copy of his/her simulator evaluation performance; and
(h) At the completion of the review session, the pilot applicant will submit all the Review Forms to the board and return all materials used to review his/her simulator evaluation. The pilot applicant will not be allowed to take any notes or materials from the board designated review location upon leaving.
(4) The procedure for the board's review of the request for review of the simulator evaluation filed by the pilot applicant is as follows:
(a) The board, and/or a committee designated by it, and/or a firm under contract with the board for development and grading of the simulator evaluation will review the simulator evaluation and Review Form completed by the pilot applicant; and
(b) After completion of such review the pilot applicant will be provided with written notification of the decision regarding review of the Review Form submitted by the pilot applicant. The written notification will show any adjusted credits and scores for any answers that have been changed following such review.
(5) A pilot applicant who is not satisfied with the result of such review of his/her Review Form may request an adjudicative hearing pursuant to RCW 88.16.090 and governed by the provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW to appeal his/her simulator evaluation results. Such hearing must be requested within thirty days of receipt of the result of the review of the Review Form by sending a written request for an adjudicative hearing to the board of pilotage commissioners' office.
[]
(2) A pilot, who retires under his/her medical disability
retirement plan, may apply for reinstatement of his/her
pilot's license within five years from the date of ((their))
his/her last pilotage assignment, provided ((they are)) the
pilot is capable of passing a physical examination without any
restrictions as to full pilotage duties. The board may, at
its discretion, waive all or part of the pilotage examination.
The board shall require the pilot to complete a
familiarization/training program prescribed by the board after
a full review of all relevant factors. The board may also
prescribe license limitations such as those contained in WAC
((296-116-082)) 363-116-082.
[Recodified as § 363-116-110. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.090. 93-07-076, § 296-116-110, filed 3/18/93, effective 4/18/93. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 92-08-050, § 296-116-110, filed 3/26/92, effective 4/26/92; 80-03-081 (Order 79-6, Resolution No. 79-6), § 296-116-110, filed 3/4/80; Order 2-68, § 296-116-110, filed 11/1/68; § 11, effective 11/25/58.]
(a) Be physically qualified to possess a U.S. Coast Guard master's license, as required by the state of Washington.
(b) Be capable of boarding a vessel from and leaving a vessel into a pilot boat via a Jacob's ladder and a gangway. A Jacob's ladder involves a vertical climb or descent of up to nine meters and requires both physical energy and mental judgment.
(c) Be capable of moving to a more desirable vantage point in a timely manner, so as to avoid a close quarters situation when the physical characteristics of the ship or cargo obstruct the pilot's field of vision.
(d) Be able to meet the necessary eyesight and hearing requirements to carry out marine pilotage duties.
(e) Have mental reflexes capable of allowing decisions to be made without delay. This is imperative in all aspects of ship handling.
(f) Be capable of withstanding mental stresses which may occur with a vessel in lowered visibility, in a close quarters situation or when docking or undocking.
(g) Be capable of working efficiently and effectively at any time of the day or night, including irregular and unscheduled hours, after sufficient rest.
(h) Possess mental maturity and show mental responsibility.
(2) In order to determine the physical fitness of persons
to serve as licensed pilots under the provisions of the
pilotage act, all licensed pilots and pilot applicants shall
be required to pass a general physical examination annually
within ((forty-five)) ninety days prior to the date their
annual state pilot license fee is due. As used in this
section pilot refers to licensed pilots, including pilots
seeking to renew their state licenses, and pilot applicant
refers to both pilot license applicants who have completed the
board training program but do not yet have a pilot license and
to training license applicants. The physical examination
required of all pilots and initial pilot applicants shall
demonstrate that he/she is fully able to carry out the duties
of a pilot. The examination shall assure that one's abilities
as a pilot will not be impaired by eyesight, hearing or other
bodily function. As part of this examination pilots and pilot
applicants shall have completed on a form provided by the
board a detailed report of physical examination. Each pilot
is required to report on the form any convictions of offenses
involving drugs or the personal consumption of alcohol which
occurred while on duty within the prior twelve months. Pilot
applicants for a license must report on the form any and all
convictions of offenses involving drugs or the personal
consumption of alcohol which occurred within the twelve months
prior to the date of their application. This form shall be
prepared by the examining physician and shall be submitted to
the board along with a letter stating his/her
findings/recommendations as to the ability of the pilot or
pilot applicant to safely perform the pilotage duties based on
the job description for a Washington state licensed marine
pilot and the standards set forth below. The examining
physician should review these standards and review the job
description in subsection (1) of this section before making
findings/recommendations as to the medical fitness of the
pilot applicant. A medical/occupational history form will be
completed and signed by the initial pilot applicant for review
((of)) by the physician prior to the initial examination. The
board may in its discretion check with the appropriate
authorities for any convictions of offenses involving drugs or
the personal consumption of alcohol in the prior twelve
months. The detailed report of physical examination is a
confidential record and will not be available for public
inspection. Such examination shall be obtained at the expense
of the licensed pilot or pilot applicant from a physician or
physicians designated in advance by the board. The secretary
of the board shall give each pilot or pilot applicant
reasonable written notice of the date when any such physical
examination becomes due and shall specify the name of the
physicians then approved by the board to conduct such physical
examination.
(3) Based upon the findings/recommendations of the examining physician and review by the board, the board will make the determination as to the pilot applicant's or pilot's fitness to perform the duties of a pilot. This determination will be made within ninety days after each annual physical examination.
(4) The purpose of the history and physical examination is to detect the presence of physical, mental, or organic defects of such character and extent as to affect an individual's ability to pilot a vessel safely. The examination will be made carefully and at least as complete as indicated by the form provided by the board. History of certain defects may be cause for rejection of the initial pilot applicant or indicate the need for making certain laboratory tests or a further and more stringent examination. Defects may be recorded which do not, because of their character or degree, indicate that certification of physical fitness should be denied. However, these defects should be discussed with the pilot applicant or pilot who should be advised to take the necessary steps to ensure correction, particularly of those which, if neglected, might lead to a condition likely to affect the ability to perform the duties of a pilot.
(5) The board has determined which physical conditions
may be permanently disqualifying for initial pilot applicants
as well as which conditions may be permanently disqualifying
for renewal of a pilot license. Certain conditions are not
necessarily disqualifying, for renewal of ((licensure)) a
pilot license only, when, based on the knowledge and
experience of the examining physician these conditions can be
managed medically and without threat to the pilot's ability to
perform the duties of a pilot. An individual may be
disqualified when, in the opinion of the examining physician,
there is reasonable probability that a condition can occur
suddenly and without warning which would render the pilot
applicant incapable of promptly responding, both mentally and
physically to emergency situations. When certain conditions
exist the medical examiner may recommend either:
(a) A permanent disqualification; or
(b) A temporary disqualification until which time the condition is either corrected or medically managed.
(6) Initial pilot applicants will be required to take a test indicating they are free of illegal substance abuse. Testing will be for the presence of cocaine, opiates, marijuana (THC), amphetamines and PCP (phencyclidine). Testing will be in accordance with the Department of Transportation (Coast Guard) guidelines outlined in the Federal Register 46 CFR 4, 5, and 16. Urine specimens are to be analyzed by a laboratory that meets DHHS regulations set forth by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA).
Chain of custody forms and instructions for collection and transport to a NIDA approved laboratory can be obtained from:
Laboratory of Pathology
Nordstrom Medical Tower
P.O. Box 14950
Seattle, WA 98114-0950
((())206(()))-386-2872
(7) The conditions in these standards are listed
according to the International Classification of Diseases
(ICD). Some categories may not apply to the standards set
forth and therefore may be absent in some listings. However,
all categories should be taken into consideration by the
examining physician.
(a) Infectious and parasitic diseases.
(b) Neoplasms.
(c) Endocrine, nutritional, metabolic, and immunity disorders.
(d) Diseases of the blood and blood forming organs.
(e) Mental disorders.
(f) Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs.
(g) Diseases of the respiratory system.
(h) Diseases of the digestive system.
(i) Diseases of the genitourinary system.
(j) Complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium.
(k) Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissues.
(l) Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissues.
(m) Congenital anomalies.
(n) Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period.
(o) Symptoms, signs, and other ill defined conditions.
(p) Injury and poisonings.
(8) The guidelines for recommended visual standards are
based on the necessity of a pilot to be able to safely perform
the duties of a pilot, including functioning under all
emergency conditions aboard the vessel. Consideration must be
given to the pilot's previously demonstrated ability to
perform his ((or))/her pilotage duties.
(a) The visual acuity of ((an)) a pilot applicant shall
be at least 20/200 in each eye uncorrected and correctable to
at least 20/40 in each eye as determined by Snellen test or
its equivalent unless the pilot applicant qualifies for a
waiver from the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, or the
Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard.
(b) The initial pilot applicant should have normal color vision per pseudo isochromatic plates, Ishihara or Keystone test. If the initial pilot applicant fails this test, the Farnsworth or Williams Lantern tests or their equivalent may be used to determine the initial pilot applicant's ability to distinguish primary colors.
(c) Loss of vision in one eye may not be disqualifying if one eye passes the test required for the better eye of the pilot applicant with binocular vision and the pilot applicant has had sufficient time to develop and demonstrate adequate judgment of distances.
(d) Pilot applicants who wear corrective lenses and meet the qualifications in (a) of this subsection are medically fit to carry out pilotage duties only while wearing their corrective lenses and if they have with them, while on duty, a spare pair of correcting lenses that provide at least the same visual acuity.
(9) Baseline audiograms shall be performed on all entry level pilot applicants. All licensed pilots will be tested annually, with the first audiogram considered baseline. Each ear will be tested separately using properly calibrated equipment which meets ANSI (American National Standards Institute) standards criteria for background noise in audiometric rooms. Testing should not be performed unless the pilot applicant has been free of work noise or intense noise for a period of at least fourteen hours prior to testing. Should the pilot applicant have a current condition which can cause a temporary hearing loss, such as a cold, the pilot applicant should be rescheduled for testing in two weeks, or until such condition is resolved. Testing will be performed by a licensed audiologist, otolaryngologist, physician with sufficient training in conducting and interpreting audiograms, or a technician who is currently certified by the Council for Accreditation in Occupational Hearing Conservation (CAOHC).
(a) A baseline audiogram is required on all initial pilot applicants. The first audiogram performed on a currently licensed pilot shall be considered the baseline audiogram.
(b) Pilot applicants having hearing threshold levels that do not exceed 40 dB at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 Hz in either ear are considered to have normal hearing for communication purposes.
(c) Annual audiograms will be performed thereafter for the purposes of comparison to baseline. A significant threshold shift is defined as a change averaging more than 10 dB from baseline in the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 Hz and requires further evaluation by a physician, otolaryngologist, or audiologist and preventive action taken on the part of the pilot.
(d) Mechanical acoustical devices (hearing aids) are not disqualifying but should not be worn in areas of high background noise levels in order to prevent further deterioration of his/her hearing.
(e) ((An)) A pilot applicant must minimally be able to
hear an average conversational voice in a quiet room while
standing with his/her back turned at a distance of eight feet.
(10) Below is a list of conditions which can be absolutely disqualifying for initial licensure as a maritime pilot. The list of causes for disqualification is not all inclusive or intended to be complete, but represents the types of conditions that would interfere with the safe performance of pilotage duties. This guide is not intended to replace the physician's professional judgment. Rather, it calls for the physician and the board to closely examine whether the pilot applicant can safely perform the tasks outlined in the job description of a Washington state licensed marine pilot. The examining physician should also be aware that a second opinion concerning the diagnosis may be sought in cases of unfavorable determinations. A condition should only be considered disqualifying while such condition persists. Following corrective medical action the pilot applicant should be encouraged to apply for reentry.
1. Infectious and parasitic diseases - Any communicable disease in its communicable or carrier stage.
2. Neoplasms - Malignant diseases of all kinds in any location.
3. Endocrine, nutritional, metabolic, and immunity disorders - Diabetes requiring insulin or hypoglycemic drugs; cirrhosis of the liver; alcohol abuse (unless abstinence for two years).
4. Diseases of the blood and blood forming organs - Hemophilia; acute or chronic significant anemias.
5. Mental disorders - Severe personality disorders; use of illegal drugs; dementia of Alzheimer's type, senility, psychosis.
6. Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs - Epilepsy or any convulsive disorder resulting in an altered state of consciousness, regardless of control; disturbance of balance; multiple sclerosis; Meniere's syndrome.
7. Diseases of the circulatory system - Multiple myocardial infarctions or cardiac class II or IV (NYHA); hypotension with syncopal episodes; varicose veins if associated with edema, skin ulceration or residual scars. Recurrent thromboembolic conditions.
8. Diseases of the respiratory system - Active pulmonary tuberculosis Class IV respiratory impairment; permanent tracheostomy.
9. Diseases of the genitourinary system - Chronic renal failure; permanent ureterostomy.
10. Complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium - Pregnancy is not in itself disqualifying, if, in the opinion of the examining physician and the pilot applicant's obstetrician determine that the pilotage duties can be safely carried out without risk to the mother or fetus and without risk to the safety of the vessel, crew, and property.
11. Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissues - There are no absolute exclusions listed for diseases of the skin unless, in the opinion of the examining physician, a condition exists that would interfere with the performance of pilotage duties.
12. Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissues - Lupus erythematosus, disseminated; amputation of any portion of a limb, resection of a joint, artificial joint or absence of the toes which would preclude the ability to run, walk, balance oneself, grasp and climb ladder rungs; chronic low back pain that is disabling to the degree of interfering with job requirements.
13. Congenital anomalies - Any existing condition that, in the opinion of the examining physician, would interfere with the safe performance of pilotage duties.
14. Symptoms, signs, and other ill defined conditions - Serious degree of stuttering or speech impediment sufficient to interfere with communication; alcoholism; drug addiction, other than tobacco or caffeine.
15. Injury or poisonings - May be temporarily disqualifying until condition resolved without disabling sequelae.
(11) Below is a list of conditions which can be
absolutely disqualifying for relicensure as a maritime pilot. The list of causes for disqualification is not all inclusive
or intended to be complete, but represent the types of
conditions that would interfere with the safe performance of
pilotage duties. This guide is not intended to replace the
physician's professional judgment. Rather, it calls for the
physician and the board to closely examine whether the pilot
applicant can continue to safely perform the tasks outlined in
the job description of a Washington state licensed marine
pilot. The examining physician should also be aware that a
second opinion concerning diagnosis may be sought in cases of
unfavorable determinations.
1. Neoplasms - Malignancies with metastases.
2. Endocrine, nutritional, metabolic, and immunity disorders - Cirrhosis of the liver with hepatic failure.
3. Diseases of the blood and blood forming organs - Hemophilia; acute leukemia.
4. Mental disorders - Severe personality disorders; senility; dementia of Alzheimer's type psychosis.
5. Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs - Disturbance of balance, permanent and untreatable Meniere's syndrome.
6. Diseases of the circulatory system - Multiple myocardial infarctions or cardiac Class III or IV (NYHA); hypotension with syncopal episodes; varicose veins if associated with edema, skin ulceration or residual scars. Recurrent thromboembolic conditions.
7. Diseases of the respiratory system - Active pulmonary tuberculosis; Class IV respiratory impairment.
8. Diseases of the genitourinary system - Chronic renal failure; permanent ureterostomy.
9. Complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium - Pregnancy is not in itself disqualifying, if, in the opinion of the examining physician and the pilot applicant's obstetrician determine that the pilotage duties can be safely carried out without risk to the mother or fetus and without risk to the safety of the vessel, crew and property.
10. Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissues - There are no absolute exclusions for diseases of the skin unless, in the opinion of the examining physician, a condition exists that would interfere with the performance of pilotage duties.
11. Diseases of the musculoskeletal and connective system - Lupus erythematosus, disseminated; amputation of any portion of a limb, resection of a joint, artificial joint or absence of the toes which would preclude the ability to run, walk, balance oneself, grasp, and climb ladder rungs. Chronic low back pain that is disabling to the degree of interfering with job requirements.
12. Symptoms, signs, and other ill defined conditions - Serious degree of stuttering or speech impediment sufficient to interfere with communication; alcoholism; drug addiction, other than tobacco or caffeine. Current need to use methadone, antabuse, antidepressants, antianxiety drugs.
13. Injury or poisonings - May be temporarily disqualifying until condition resolved without disabling sequelae.
(12) Some conditions may develop during the course of
employment that would be absolutely disqualifying for initial
licensure. In evaluating the impact of such a condition on an
existing pilot, the examining physician and the board should
take into consideration the pilot's past experience,
effectiveness of performance and predictability of his/her
performance. The board may waive certain duties of a pilot as
outlined in the job description contained in subsection (1) of
this section. The list of conditions requiring in-depth
evaluation is not all inclusive or intended to be complete,
but represent the types of conditions that might interfere
with the safe performance of pilotage duties. The examining
physician should also be aware that a second opinion
concerning the diagnosis may be sought in cases of unfavorable
determinations.
1. Neoplasms - Malignancies of any kind.
2. Endocrine, nutritional, metabolic, and immunity disorders - Diabetes requiring hypoglycemic drugs; cirrhosis of the liver.
3. Diseases of the blood and blood forming organs - Chronic leukemia.
4. Mental disorders - Anxiety reactions; depression.
5. Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs - Disturbance of balance; multiple sclerosis; epilepsy or any convulsive disorder resulting in an altered state of consciousness.
6. Diseases of the circulatory system - Uncontrolled hypertension; varicose veins; pacemaker, demand.
7. Diseases of the respiratory system - Respiratory impairment; permanent tracheostomy.
8. Diseases of the digestive system - Permanent colostomy; permanent ileostomy.
9. Complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium - Pregnancy.
10. Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissues - Any skin disorders that, in the opinion of the examining physician, may interfere with the performance of pilotage duties.
11. Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissues - Lupus erythematosus, disseminated; artificial joints; chronic low back pain.
12. Injury or poisonings - May be temporarily disqualifying until condition resolved without disabling sequelae.
((13.)) (13) A pilot may be temporarily relieved of
pilotage duties until such time as a disqualifying condition
is resolved or medically managed and with frequent evaluation
by the examining physician or specialist. In this case, the
board, after consulting with the physician, will determine the
frequency of medical examinations. A condition should only be
considered disqualifying while such a condition persists. Following corrective medical action, the individual may be
removed from temporary disqualification. Provided that, if a
temporary disqualifying condition continues for longer than
two years from the time the pilot is initially relieved of
pilotage duties, the board, in its discretion and after a full
review of all relevant factors, may make a determination that
the condition is permanently disqualifying.
[Recodified as § 363-116-120. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.090(6) and 88.16.100(4). 90-24-019, § 296-116-120, filed 11/28/90, effective 12/29/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.090(6). 90-13-065, § 296-116-120, filed 6/18/90, effective 7/19/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.090. 88-09-027 (Order 88-5, Resolution No. 88-5), § 296-116-120, filed 4/14/88; 85-15-033 (Order 85-2, Resolution No. 85-2), § 296-116-120, filed 7/12/85. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035 and 88.16.090(6). 80-16-005 (Resolution No. 79-5), § 296-116-120, filed 10/23/80. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 79-11-063 (Order 79-5, Resolution No. 79-5), § 296-116-120, filed 10/18/79; Order 73-6, § 296-116-120, filed 5/11/73; Order 2-68, § 296-116-120, filed 11/1/68; § 12, effective 11/25/58.]
(a) Pilot's Report of Incident. A state licensed pilot involved in an incident shall notify the board by telephoning or radioing the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound as soon as the situation is stabilized or within one hour of reaching shore. The pilot shall also complete the board required Pilot's Report of Incident form and file it with the board as soon as possible after the incident, but in no event more than ten days afterwards. An incident includes an actual or apparent collision, allision or grounding, as well as a navigational occurrence which results in actual or apparent personal injury or property damage or environmental damage.
(b) Pilot's Report of Marine Safety Occurrence. A state licensed pilot involved in a near-miss occurrence shall complete the board required Pilot's Report of Marine Safety Occurrence form and file it with the board as soon as possible after the near-miss occurrence, but in no event more than ten days afterwards. A near-miss occurrence is where a pilot successfully takes action of a nonroutine nature to avoid a collision with another vessel, structure or aid to navigation, to avoid a grounding of the vessel or to avoid causing damages to the environment. Information relating to near-miss occurrences provided by a pilot on this form shall not be used for imposing any sanctions or penalties against said pilot. A state licensed pilot may also use this form on a voluntary basis for reporting out of the ordinary occurrences or concerns for navigational safety encountered or observed during the course of piloting a vessel.
(c) Completion of these forms does not replace or relieve a pilot from any other reporting requirements under federal, state or local law. If circumstances permit, a pilot will notify the vessel master of his/her intent to file a report of incident or marine safety occurrence with the board. The board shall forward a copy of any form received to the respective shipper or its board representative. The board of pilotage commissioners may, with or without a complaint being made against a pilot, investigate the matter reported upon.
(2) Pilots will report to the ((pilot office and to the))
aids to navigation officer of the ((U.S.)) United States Coast
Guard, all changes in lights, range lights, buoys, and any
dangers to navigation that my come to their knowledge.
(3) Any pilot who shall fail, neglect or refuse to make a
report to the board of pilotage commissioners as required by
the pilotage laws of the state, or by these rules and
regulations, for a period of ten days after the date when
((the)) said report is required to be made, shall be subject
to having his/her license suspended at the discretion of the
board, and if he/she fails to report for a period of thirty
days the board may, at its discretion, revoke his/her license.
(4) Pilots when so notified in writing shall report in person to the board, at any meeting specified in such notice.
(5) Any pilot summoned to testify before the pilotage
board shall appear in accordance with such summons and shall
make answer, under oath, to any question put to him/her which
deals with any matter connected with the pilot service, or of
the pilotage waters over which he/she is licensed to act. ((He)) The pilot shall be entitled to have his/her attorney or
advisor present during any such appearance and testimony.
(6) Any pilot who shall absent himself/herself from his/her pilotage duties or district for a period of sixty days without permission of the board of pilotage commissioners shall be liable to suspension or to the forfeiture of his/her license.
(7) A pilot on boarding a ship, if required by the master thereof, shall exhibit his/her license, or photo static copy thereof.
(8) When a pilot licensed under this act is employed on an enrolled ship, the same rules and regulations shall apply as pertain to registered ships.
(9) Any state licensed pilot assigned to pilot a vessel entering, leaving, or shifting berths under its own power in any of the waters subject to the provisions of chapter 88.16 RCW shall before assuming pilotage obligations for such vessel obtain assurance from the master that the vessel meets all requirements for safe navigation and maneuvering. In addition, the pilot shall obtain assurance that the ship's officers will maintain navigation procedures by all navigational aids available to insure that the vessel's position is known at all times. If the pilot in his/her professional judgment considers the vessel to be incapable of safe navigation and maneuvering due to performance limitations, he/she shall refuse to assume the obligations of pilotage for such vessel until such limitations have been corrected and shall promptly notify the pilot's control station and the chairman of the board of pilotage commissioners of such action.
(10) In providing pilotage services under chapter 88.16 RCW every pilot shall perform those duties in a professional manner and without negligence so as to not endanger life, limb or property, not violate or not fail to comply with state laws or regulations intended to promote marine safety or to protect navigable waters.
[Recodified as § 363-116-200. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: Chapter 88.16 RCW. 97-06-106, § 296-116-200, filed 3/5/97, effective 4/5/97; Order 73-6, § 296-116-200, filed 5/11/73; Order 2-68, § 296-116-200, filed 11/1/68; § 20, effective 11/25/58.]
If the master is unable to certify that all of the above conditions are met, he/she shall be asked to certify that the United States Coast Guard captain of the port has been notified of said deficiencies and has authorized the vessel to proceed.
If the master is unable or unwilling to certify that either of the above are the case, the pilot shall not offer pilotage services to said vessel. Instead, the pilot shall disembark from the vessel as soon as practicable, immediately inform the captain of the port of the conditions and circumstances by the best possible means and forward a written report to the board of pilotage commissioners no later than twenty-four hours after disembarking from the vessel. Any Washington licensed pilot who offers pilotage services to a vessel on which the master has failed to make a certification required by this section shall be subject to the penalties provided in RCW 88.16.100 and 88.16.150.
(2) Upon boarding vessels in either the Puget Sound pilotage district or the Grays Harbor pilotage district, the pilot shall also request to see the vessel's SOLAS certificate, and the Federal Maritime Commission certificate of financial responsibility.
The pilot shall also inspect the following of the ship's equipment and conditions and indicate their suitability:
VHF radio, channels 13, 14; radar; gyrocompass; rudder angle indicator; whistle; wheelhouse staffed by an officer and helmsman, one of whom speaks English; local, up-to-date charts; and wheelhouse to engine room communications.
(3) The form appearing in WAC 296-116-2051 shall be used by pilots and masters in complying with the above requirements.
(4) Forms completed by masters and pilots which indicate that the vessel is in compliance and nondeficient shall be forwarded to the offices of the board of pilotage commissioners where they will be retained for a period of at least six months. Forms indicating a vessel not in compliance or deficient and forms upon which either the master or the pilot have failed to make the required certification shall be forwarded to the board of pilotage commissioners and retained for a period of at least twelve months.
[Recodified as § 363-116-205. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 82-13-087 (Order 82-10-049, Resolution No. 82-10-049), § 296-116-205, filed 6/23/82; 79-11-063 (Order 79-5, Resolution No. 79-5), § 296-116-205, filed 10/18/79. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035 and 88.16.155. 78-09-057 (Order 78-2, Resolution No. 78-2), § 296-116-205, filed 8/23/78.]
[Recodified as § 363-116-315. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 91-06-033, § 296-116-315, filed 2/26/91, effective 3/29/91.]
There is presently no intent to exercise this authority. Additionally, said act is currently under constitutional
challenge. Thus, the ((commission)) board indicates its
intent that if, and when, any authority should be exercised
pursuant to this provision, it would do so consistent with the
guidelines contained within chapter 197-10 WAC insofar as
practicable. (The referenced chapter being the regulations
developed by the council on environmental policy.)
[Recodified as § 363-116-35001. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Order 76-14, § 296-116-350 (codified as WAC 296-116-35001), filed 5/6/76.]
(1) An approved course-of-study which may include navigation training and testing; or
(2) Any remedial activity or treatment designated by the board to assure fitness and competence for full pilotage duties.
In ordering such disciplinary action, the board shall take into account both the causes of the previous disciplinary actions and the pilot's previous record.
Failure to enter into such corrective action within thirty days of the board's action may be cause for revocation of the pilot's license.
In the event of a temporary license suspension, license reinstatement and resumption of pilotage duties shall not be authorized until the board has reviewed completed activity and formally extended approval. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld by the board and shall be reviewed and acted upon within five days of the completion of the activity.
[Recodified as § 363-116-370. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.100. 88-14-062 (Order 88-14, Resolution No. 88-14), § 296-116-370, filed 7/1/88.]
[Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 03-09-096, § 363-116-405, filed 4/21/03, effective 5/22/03.]
(1) A pilot has been involved in any vessel accident where there has been major property damage, loss of life, or loss of a vessel; or
(2) Where there is a reasonable cause to believe that a pilot has diminished capacity or is under the influence of drugs, alcohol, or other substances; and
(3) Such an accident or physical or mental impairment would significantly diminish that pilot's ability to carry out pilotage duties and that the public health, safety, and welfare requires such emergency action. Notification of this suspension shall be made directly to the pilot and the appropriate pilot's association.
Within seventy-two hours an emergency board meeting will be held to determine whether to continue such suspension. In the event the suspension is continued pending proceedings for revocation or other action, an order shall be immediately prepared and notice shall be personally served upon the pilot advising of the board's action.
These further proceedings shall be promptly instituted in the office of administrative hearings.
All final decisions of the administrative law judge shall be subject to review by the superior court of the state of Washington for Thurston County or by the superior court of the county in which the pilot maintains his/her residence or principal place of business, to which court any case with all the papers and proceedings therein shall be immediately certified by the administrative law judge if requested to do so by any party to the proceedings at any time within thirty days after the date of such final decision. No appeal may be taken after the expiration of thirty days after the date of final decision.
[Recodified as § 363-116-420. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.100. 88-10-040 (Order 88-12, Resolution No. 88-12), § 296-116-420, filed 5/3/88.]
The following sections of the Washington Administrative Code are repealed:
WAC 363-116-075 | Qualifications for pilot applicants taking examinations before July 1, 2008. |
WAC 363-116-150 | Registration of operators. |