EXPEDITED RULES
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: WAC 458-20-196 Bad debts, provides information about the tax
treatment of bad debts under the business and occupation
(B&O), public utility, retail sales, and use taxes.
THIS RULE IS BEING PROPOSED UNDER AN EXPEDITED RULE-MAKING PROCESS THAT WILL ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR THE AGENCY TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS, PREPARE A SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT, OR PROVIDE RESPONSES TO THE CRITERIA FOR A SIGNIFICANT LEGISLATIVE RULE. IF YOU OBJECT TO THIS USE OF THE EXPEDITED RULE-MAKING PROCESS, YOU MUST EXPRESS YOUR OBJECTIONS IN WRITING AND THEY MUST BE SENT TO Gayle Carlson, Department of Revenue, P.O. Box 47453, Olympia, WA 98504-7453, e-mail GayleC@dor.wa.gov , AND RECEIVED BY October 4, 2010.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: The department is proposing revision to WAC 458-20-196 (Rule 196) to:
• Recognize provisions of Chapter 23, Laws of 2010 1st
sp. sess. (E2SSB 6143). This legislation amended
the law to provide that only the original seller in
the transaction that generated the bad debt, or a
certified service provider used by the seller, may
claim a retail sales or use tax credit or refund on
or after July 1, 2010.
• Recognize the decision of the Washington State Court of Appeals Division 2 in Home Depot USA, Inc. vs. State of Washington, 151 Wash. App. 909, 215 P.3d 222. This decision held that a seller cannot claim a bad debt sales tax refund for bad debts incurred by the private label credit card issuer that financed its customers' purchases.
Copies of draft rules are available for viewing and
printing on our web site at
http://dor.wa.gov/content/FindALawOrRule/RuleMaking/agenda.aspx.
Reasons Supporting Proposal: To recognize the legislation and court decision noted above.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 82.32.300 and 82.01.060(2).
Statute Being Implemented: RCW 82.08.037 and 82.12.037.
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Name of Proponent: Department of revenue, governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting: Gayle Carlson, 1025 Union Avenue S.E., Suite #544, Olympia, WA, (360) 570-6126; Implementation: Alan R. Lynn, 1025 Union Avenue S.E., Suite #544, Olympia, WA, (360) 570-6125; and Enforcement: Gilbert Brewer, 1025 Union Avenue S.E., Suite #544, Olympia, WA, (360) 570-6147.
July 28, 2010
Alan R. Lynn
Rules Coordinator
OTS-3250.3
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 06-01-005, filed 12/8/05,
effective 1/8/06)
WAC 458-20-196
Bad debts.
(1) Introduction.
(((a) New laws effective July 1, 2004.)) This ((rule))
section provides information about the tax treatment of bad
debts under the business and occupation (B&O), public utility,
retail sales, and use taxes((, and reflects legislation
enacted in 2003 and 2004 conforming Washington law to
provisions of the national Streamlined Sales and Use Tax
Agreement. See chapter 168, Laws of 2003 and chapter 153,
Laws of 2004. The new laws related to bad debts are effective
July 1, 2004)).
(((b))) (a) Bad debt deduction for accrual basis
taxpayers. Bad debt credits, refunds, and deductions occur
when income reported by a taxpayer is not received. Taxpayers
who report using the cash method do not report income until it
is received. For this reason, bad debts are most relevant to
taxpayers reporting income on an accrual basis. However, some
transactions must be reported on an accrual basis by all
taxpayers, including installment sales and leases. These
transactions are eligible for a bad debt credit, refund, or
deduction as described in this ((rule)) section. For
information on cash and accrual accounting methods, refer to
WAC 458-20-197 (When tax liability arises) and WAC 458-20-199
(Accounting methods). Refer to WAC 458-20-198 (Installment
sales, method of reporting) and WAC 458-20-199(3) for
information about reporting installment sales.
(((c))) (b) Relationship between retailing B&O tax
deduction and retail sales tax credit. Generally, a retail
sales tax credit for bad debts is reported as a deduction from
the measure of sales tax on the excise tax return. The amount
of this deduction, or the measure of a recovery of sales tax
that must be reported, ((is the same as the amount reported as
a deduction or recovery under the retailing B&O tax
classification.
(d))) may differ from the amount reported as a deduction or recovery from the retailing B&O tax classification due to exempt sales (for example: Sales of motor vehicles and trailers for use in interstate or foreign commerce (RCW 82.08.0263); sales of manufacturing machinery and equipment (RCW 82.08.02565).)
(c) Relationship to federal income tax return. Washington credits, refunds, and deductions for bad debts are based on federal standards for worthlessness under section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code. If a federal income tax return is not required to be filed (for example, where the taxpayer is an exempt entity for federal purposes), the taxpayer is eligible for a bad debt credit, refund, or deduction on the Washington tax return if the taxpayer would otherwise be eligible for the federal bad debt deduction.
(2) Retail sales and use tax.
(a) General rule. Under RCW 82.08.037 and 82.12.037,
sellers are entitled to a credit or refund for sales and use
taxes previously paid on "bad debts" under section 166 of the
Internal Revenue Code, as amended or renumbered as of January
1, 2003. Taxpayers may claim the credit or refund for the tax
reporting period in which the bad debt is written off as
uncollectible in the taxpayer's books and records and would be
eligible for a bad debt deduction for federal income tax
purposes. However, ((the amount of any credit or refund must
be adjusted to exclude amounts attributable to)) "bad debts"
do not include:
(i) Amounts due on property that remains in the possession of the seller until the full purchase price is paid;
(ii) Expenses incurred in attempting to collect debt;
((and))
(iii) Debts sold or assigned by the seller to third parties, where the third party is without recourse against the seller (see (c) of this subsection for additional information about this restriction); and
(iv) The value of repossessed property taken in payment of debt.
(b) Recoveries. If a taxpayer takes a credit or refund for sales or use taxes paid on a bad debt and later collects some or all of the debt, the amount of sales or use tax recovered must be repaid in the tax-reporting period during which collection was made. The amount of tax that must be repaid is determined by applying the recovered amount first proportionally to the taxable price of the property or service and the sales or use tax thereon and secondly to any interest, service charges, and any other charges.
(c) Assigned debt and installment sales. Effective July 1, 2010, RCW 82.08.037 and 82.12.037 limit who can claim a credit or refund for retail sales or use tax. Only the original seller in the transaction that generated the bad debt, or a certified service provider (CSP) used by the seller, is entitled to claim a credit or refund on or after July 1, 2010. If the original seller in the transaction that generated the bad debt has sold or assigned the debt instrument to a third party with recourse, the original seller may claim a credit or refund only after the debt instrument is reassigned by the third party to the original seller. In the case where the seller uses a CSP to administer its sales tax responsibilities the CSP may claim, on behalf of the seller, the credit or refund allowed. See chapter 23, Laws of 2010, 1st sp. sess., (2ESSB 6143).
(3) Business and occupation tax.
(a) General rule. Under RCW 82.04.4284, taxpayers may deduct from the measure of B&O tax "bad debts" under section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended or renumbered as of January 1, 2003, on which tax was previously paid. Taxpayers may claim the deduction for the tax reporting period in which the bad debt is written off as uncollectible in the taxpayer's books and records and would be eligible for a bad debt deduction for federal income tax purposes. However, the amount of the deduction must be adjusted to exclude amounts attributable to:
(i) Amounts due on property that remains in the possession of the seller until the full purchase price is paid;
(ii) Sales or use taxes payable to a seller;
(iii) Expenses incurred in attempting to collect debt; and
(iv) The value of repossessed property taken in payment of debt.
(b) Recoveries. Recoveries received by a taxpayer after a bad debt is claimed are applied under the rules described in subsection (2)(b) of this section if the transaction involved is a retail sale. The amount attributable to "taxable price" is reported under the retailing B&O tax classification. If the recovery of debt is not related to a retail sale, recovered amount is applied proportionally against the components of the debt (e.g., interest and principal remaining on a wholesale sale).
(c) Extracting and manufacturing classifications. Bad debt deductions are only allowed under the extracting or manufacturing classifications when the value of products is computed on the basis of gross proceeds of sales.
(4) Public utility tax. Under RCW 82.16.050(5), taxpayers may deduct from the measure of public utility tax "bad debts" under section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended or renumbered as of January 1, 2003, on which tax was previously paid. Taxpayers may claim the deduction for the tax reporting period in which the bad debt is written off as uncollectible in the taxpayer's books and records and would be eligible for a bad debt deduction for federal income tax purposes. No deduction is allowed for collection or other expenses.
(5) Application of payments - general rule. The special rules for application of payments received in recovery of previously claimed bad debts described in subsections (2)(b) and (3)(b) of this section are not used for other payments. Payments received before a bad debt credit, refund, or deduction is claimed should be applied first against interest and then ratably against other charges. Another commercially reasonable method may be used if approved by the department.
(6) ((Assigned debt and installment sales.
(a) General rule. If a person makes a retail sale under an installment sales contract and then legally assigns his or her rights under the contract to another party, the assignee "steps into the shoes" of the person making the sale and may claim a bad debt credit or refund for unpaid retail sales tax to the extent a credit or refund would have been available to the original seller and to the extent that the assignee actually incurs a loss. The seller's B&O tax deduction for bad debt may not be claimed by an assignee. A retail sales tax bad debt credit or refund for unpaid sales tax is available only to the person who makes the retail sale or an assignee under the contract. For example, a bank that loans money to the purchaser of a vehicle may not claim a retail sales tax bad debt credit or refund. The bank did not sell the vehicle and is not an assignee of the dealer who made the retail sale.
(b) Discounts. A person who makes a retail sale on credit and then assigns the sales contract in exchange for less than the face value of the contract may not claim a bad debt credit, refund, or deduction for the difference between the face value and the amount received. The discount is a nondeductible cost of doing business, not a bad debt. An assignee of a retail sales contract that pays less than face value for the contract is not required to reduce the amount of a retail sales tax bad debt credit or refund in proportion to the amount of the discount. The assignee may take a credit or refund for the amount that would have been available to the original seller if the original seller had retained the contract and received the payments made by the buyer.
(c) Recourse financing. An assignee who receives payment on a bad debt from the assignor must reduce the sales tax credit in proportion to the payment. The assignor may claim a sales tax credit and retailing B&O tax deduction in proportion to the payment if obligated to make the payment and otherwise qualified under this rule.
(d) Documentation. All persons claiming a bad debt credit for installment contracts must retain appropriate documentation, including documentation establishing:
(i) The amount of the original sale by the seller, and component amounts necessary to determine that amount, such as credits for trade-ins, down payments, and individual amounts charged for different products;
(ii) The buyer's equity in any trade-in property;
(iii) The contract principal owed at the time of repossession, if any; and
(iv) The deductibility of the debt as worthless for federal income tax purposes.)) Private label credit cards. If a business contracts with a financial company to provide a private label credit card program, and the financial company becomes the exclusive owner of the credit card accounts and solely bears the risk of all credit losses, the business that contracted with the financial company is not entitled to any bad debt deduction if a customer fails to pay his or her credit card invoice.
Example. Hot Shot Ski Equipment (Hot Shot) is a sporting equipment retailer. Hot Shot contracts with ABC Financial Institution (ABC) to issue a Hot Shot private label credit card. ABC has the authority to accept or reject an applicant's credit card application. After Hot Shot transmits the credit card sales records to ABC, ABC pays Hot Shot the proceeds of the sales including the retail sales tax minus any applicable service fees. Hot Shot remits the retail sales tax to the Department of Revenue. If a customer using the Hot Shot credit card fails to pay ABC the outstanding amount on the credit card invoice, ABC suffers the loss. Hot Shot is not entitled to a bad debt deduction or credit as it has no bad debt loss when a customer defaults on a debt to ABC.
(7) Reserve method. Ordinarily, taxpayers must report bad debt refunds, credits or deductions for specifically identified transactions. However, taxpayers who are allowed by the Internal Revenue Service to use a reserve method of reporting bad debts for federal income tax purposes, or who secure permission from the department to do so, may deduct a reasonable addition to a reserve for bad debts. What constitutes a reasonable addition to a reserve for bad debts must be determined in light of the facts and will vary between classes of business and with conditions of business prosperity. An addition to a reserve allowed as a deduction by the Internal Revenue Service for federal income tax purposes, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, will be presumed reasonable. When the reserve method is employed, an adjustment to the amount of loss deducted must be made annually to make the total loss claimed for the tax year coincide with the amount actually sustained.
(8) Statute of limitations for claiming bad debts. No credit, refund, or deduction, as applicable, may be claimed for debt that became eligible for a bad debt deduction for federal income tax purposes more than four years before the beginning of the calendar year in which the credit, refund, or deduction is claimed.
(9) Examples. The following examples identify a number of facts and then state a conclusion. These examples should be used only as a general guide. The tax results of other situations must be determined after a review of all of the facts and circumstances.
In all cases, an eight percent combined state and local sales tax rate is assumed. Figures are rounded to the nearest dollar. Payments are applied first against interest and then ratably against the taxable price, sales tax, and other charges except when the special rules for subsequent recoveries on a bad debt apply (see subsections (2) and (3) of this section). It is assumed that the income from all retail sales described has been properly reported under the retailing B&O tax classification and that all interest or service fees described have been accrued and reported under the service and other activities B&O tax classification.
(a) ((Seller)) Scenario 1. Joe's Hardware makes a retail
sale of goods with a selling price of $500 and pays $40 in
sales tax to the department. No payment is received by
((Seller)) Joe at the time of sale.
(i) Bad debt. One and a half years later, no payment has
been received by ((Seller)) Joe, and the balance with interest
is $627. ((Seller)) Joe is entitled to claim a bad debt
deduction on ((the)) his federal income tax return.
((Seller)) He is also entitled to claim a bad debt sales tax
credit or refund in the amount of $40, a B&O tax deduction of
$500 under the retailing B&O tax classification, and a B&O tax
deduction of $87 under the service and other activities B&O
tax classification.
(((b) The facts are the same as in (a) of this
subsection, except that)) (ii) Recoveries. Six months after
the credit and deduction are claimed, a $50 payment is
received on the debt. Recoveries received on a retail sale
after a credit and deduction have already been claimed must be
applied first proportionally to the taxable price and sales
tax thereon in order to determine the amount of tax that must
be repaid. Therefore, ((Seller)) Joe must report $4, or $50 x
($40/$540), of sales tax on the current excise tax return and
$46, or $50 x ($500/$540) under the retailing B&O tax
classification. Additional recoveries should be applied in
the same manner until the original $40 credit for sales tax is
reduced to zero.
(((c) Seller)) (b) Scenario 2. Joe makes a retail sale
of goods on credit for $500 and pays $40 in sales tax to the
department. No payment is received at the time of sale. Over
the following year, regular payments are received and the debt
is reduced to $345, exclusive of any interest or service
charges. The $345 represents sales tax due to ((Seller)) Joe
in the amount of $26, or $345 x ($40/$540), and $319 remaining
of the original purchase price, or $345 x ($500/$540). Payments cease.
(i) Bad debt. Six months later the balance with interest
and service fees is $413. ((Seller)) Joe is entitled to claim
a bad debt deduction on the federal income tax return. ((Seller)) He is also entitled to claim a sales tax refund or
credit on the current excise tax return of $26, a deduction
under the retailing B&O tax classification of $319, and a
deduction under the service and other activities B&O tax
classification of $68.
(((d) The facts are the same as in (c) of this
subsection, except that before Seller)) (ii) Recoveries.
Before Joe charges off the debt, ((Seller)) he repossesses the
goods. At that time, the goods have a fair market value of
$250. No credit is allowed for repossessed property, so the
value of the collateral must be applied against the
outstanding balance. After the value of the collateral is
applied, ((Seller)) Joe has a remaining balance of $163, or
$413 - $250. The allocation rules for recoveries do not apply
because a bad debt credit or refund has not yet been taken. The value is applied first against the $68, or $413 - $345, of
interest, so the $163 remaining is attributable entirely to
taxable price and sales tax. Any costs ((Seller)) Joe may
incur related to locating, repossessing, storing, or selling
the goods do not offset the value of the collateral because no
credit is allowed for collection costs. ((Seller)) Joe is
entitled to a sales tax refund or credit in the amount of $12,
or $163 x ($40/$540) and deduction of $151, or $163 x
($500/$540) under the retailing B&O tax classification.
(iii) Sales of repossessed goods. If ((Seller)) Joe
later sells the repossessed goods, ((Seller)) he must pay B&O
tax and collect retail sales tax as applicable. If the sales
price of the repossessed goods is different from the fair
market value previously reported and the statute of
limitations applicable to the original transaction has not
expired, ((Seller)) Joe must report the difference between the
selling price and the claimed fair market value as an
additional bad debt credit or deduction or report it as an
additional recovery, as appropriate.
(((e) Seller)) (c) Scenario 3. Phil, of Phil's Fine
Cars, sells a car at retail for $1000 and charges Alice, the
buyer, an additional $50 for license and registration fees. ((Seller))
(i) Trade-in accepted. Phil accepts trade-in property
with a value of $500 in which ((the buyer)) Alice has $300 of
equity. (The value of trade-in property of like kind is
excluded from the selling price for purposes of the retail
sales tax. Refer to WAC 458-20-247 for further information.) ((Seller)) Phil properly bills ((the buyer)) Alice for $40 of
sales tax, for a total of $1090 owed to ((Seller)) Phil by
((the buyer)) Alice. ((Seller)) Phil pays the department the
$40 in sales tax. No payment other than the trade-in is
received by ((Seller)) Phil at the time of sale.
(ii) Bad debt. Eight months later, ((Seller)) Phil has
not received any payment. ((Seller)) Phil is entitled to
claim a bad debt deduction on ((the)) his federal income tax
return. The equity in the trade-in is equivalent to a payment
received at the time of purchase, reducing the balance
remaining on the initial sale to $790, or $1090 - $300. ((Seller)) Phil is entitled to claim a sales tax credit or
refund of $29, or $790 x ($40/$1090) of sales tax, and a
deduction of $725, or $790 x ($1000/$1090) under the retailing
B&O tax classification, exclusive of any deduction for accrued
interest.
(((f) Seller)) (d) Scenario 4. Phil sells a car at
retail for $1000, and charges ((the buyer)) Jake an additional
$50 for license and registration fees. ((Seller)) Phil
properly bills ((the buyer)) Jake for $80 of sales tax and
remits it to the department. No money is received from ((the
buyer)) Jake at the time of sale.
(i) Bad debt. Eight months later ((Seller)) Phil is
entitled to claim a bad debt deduction on the federal income
tax return. ((Seller)) Phil claims an $80 sales tax credit, a
$1000 retailing B&O tax deduction, and an additional amount
under the service and other activities classification for
accrued interest.
(ii) Recoveries. Six months after ((that)) claiming a
bad debt, ((Seller)) Phil receives a $200 payment from ((the
buyer)) Jake. Recoveries must be allocated first
proportionally to the taxable price (the measure of the sales
tax) and the sales tax thereon, and secondly to other charges.
B&O tax consequences follow the same rules. Accordingly,
((Seller)) Phil must report $15, or $200 x ($80/$1080) of
sales tax and $185, or $200 x ($1000/$1080) of income under
the retailing B&O tax classification. Additional recoveries
should be applied in the same manner until the original $80
sales tax credit is reduced to zero.
(((g) Seller)) (e) Scenario 5. Phil sells a car at
retail for $1000, and charges ((the buyer)) Robin an
additional $50 for license and registration fees. ((Seller))
(i) Trade-in accepted. Phil accepts trade-in property
with a value of $500 in which ((the buyer)) Robin has $300 of
equity. ((Seller)) Phil properly bills ((the buyer)) Robin
for $40 of sales tax for a total of $1090 owed to ((Seller))
Phil by ((the buyer)) Robin. No payment other than the
trade-in is received by ((Seller)) Phil at the time of sale.
(ii) Bad debt. Eight months later, no payment has been
received by ((Seller)) Phil. ((Seller)) Phil is entitled to
claim a bad debt deduction on the federal income tax return. The equity in the trade-in is equivalent to a payment received
at the time of purchase, reducing the balance remaining on the
initial sale to $790, or $1090 - $300. ((Seller)) Phil is
entitled to claim a sales tax credit or refund of $29, or $790
x ($40/$1090) of sales tax, and a deduction of $725, or $790 x
($1000/$1090) under the retailing B&O tax classification,
exclusive of any deduction for accrued interest.
(iii) Recoveries. Six months after that, ((Seller)) Phil
receives a $200 payment from ((the buyer)) Robin. Recoveries
must be allocated first proportionally to the taxable price
(the measure of the sales tax) and sales tax thereon, and
secondly to other charges. B&O tax consequences follow the
same rules. Accordingly, ((Seller)) Phil must report $15, or
$200 x ($40/$540) in sales tax, and $185, or $200 x
($500/$540) under the retailing B&O tax classification. Additional recoveries should be applied in the same manner
until the original $29 sales tax credit is reduced to zero.
(((h))) (f) Scenario 6. The facts are the same as in
(((e))) Scenario 3 (c) of this subsection, except that
immediately after the sale, ((Seller)) Phil assigns the
contract to a finance company without recourse, receiving face
value for the contract. The finance company may not claim the
retail sales tax credit or refund ((of $29)). The finance
company may not claim any deductions for ((Seller's)) Phil's
B&O tax liability. No bad debt deduction or credit is
available to ((Seller.
(i) The facts are the same as in (h) of this subsection, except that the Seller receives less than face value for the contract. The result is the same as in (h) of this subsection for both parties. The finance company may claim a $29 retail sales tax bad debt credit or refund, but may not claim a B&O bad debt deduction for Seller's B&O tax liability. No bad debt deduction or credit is available to Seller)) Phil, as the contract was sold without recourse.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 82.32.300 and 82.01.060(2). 06-01-005, § 458-20-196, filed 12/8/05, effective 1/8/06. Statutory Authority: RCW 82.32.300, 82.01.060(1), and 34.05.230. 05-04-048, § 458-20-196, filed 1/27/05, effective 2/27/05. Statutory Authority: RCW 82.32.300. 83-07-032 (Order ET 83-15), § 458-20-196, filed 3/15/83; Order ET 70-3, § 458-20-196 (Rule 196), filed 5/29/70, effective 7/1/70.]