WSR 13-23-027
RULES OF COURT
STATE SUPREME COURT
[November 6, 2013]
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENT TO ER 1101 (c)(4)—APPLICABILITY OF RULES—WHEN RULES NEED NOT BE APPLIED—APPLICATIONS FOR PROTECTION ORDERS
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
NO. 25700-A-1044
The District Municipal Court Judges' Association having recommended the adoption of the proposed amendment to ER 1101 (c)(4)—Applicability of Rules—When Rules Need Not Be Applied—Applications for Protection Orders, and the Court having determined that the proposed amendment will aid in the prompt and orderly administration of justice and further determined the need for expedited adoption;;
Now, therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED:
(a) That the amendments as shown below are adopted under emergency provisions of GR 9.
(b) That the amendments will be published expeditiously and will become effective upon publication.
DATED at Olympia, Washington this 6th day of November, 2013.
 
 
Madsen, C.J.
C. Johnson, J.
 
Stephens, J.
Owens, J.
 
Wiggins, J.
Fairhurst, J.
 
Gonzalez, J.
J. M. Johnson, J.
 
Gordon McCloud, J.
Proposed Amendment:
EVIDENCE RULE 1101
APPLICABILITY OF RULES
(a) Courts Generally. Except as otherwise provided in section (c), these rules apply to all actions and proceedings in the courts of the state of Washington. The terms "judge" and "court" in these rules refer to any judge of any court to which these rules apply or any other officer who is authorized by law to hold any hearing to which these rules apply.
(b) Law With Respect to Privilege. The law with respect to privileges applies at all stages of all actions, cases, and proceedings.
(c) When Rules Need Not Be Applied. The rules (other than with respect to privileges, the rape shield statute and ER 412)) need not be applied in the following situations:
(1) Preliminary Questions of Fact. The determination of questions of fact preliminary to admissibility of evidence when the issue is to be determined by the court under rule 104(a).
(2) Grand Jury. Proceedings before grand juries and special inquiry judges.
(3) Miscellaneous Proceedings. Proceedings for extradition or rendition; detainer proceedings under RCW 9.100; preliminary determinations in criminal cases; sentencing, or granting or revoking probation; issuance of warrants for arrest, criminal summonses, and search warrants; proceedings with respect to release on bail or otherwise; contempt proceedings in which the court may act summarily; habeas corpus proceedings; small claims court; supplemental proceedings under RCW 6.32; coroners' inquests; preliminary determinations in juvenile court; juvenile court hearings on declining jurisdiction; disposition, review, and permanency planning hearings in juvenile court; dispositional determinations related to treatment for alcoholism, intoxication, or drug addiction under RCW 70.96A; and dispositional determinations under the Civil Commitment Act, RCW 71.05.
(4) Applications for Protection Orders. Protection order proceedings under RCW 7.90, 7.94, 10.14, 26.50 and 74.34. Provided when a judge proposes to consider information from a criminal or civil database, the judge shall disclose the information to each party present at the hearing; on timely request, provide each party with an opportunity to be heard; and, take appropriate measures to alleviate litigants' safety concerns. The judge has discretion not to disclose information that he or she does not propose to consider.
(d) Arbitration Hearings. In a mandatory arbitration hearing under RCW 7.06, the admissibility of evidence is governed by MAR 5.3.
Reviser's note: The typographical errors in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the State Supreme Court and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.