WSR 20-05-033
PROPOSED RULES
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
[Filed February 11, 2020, 11:36 a.m.]
Original Notice.
Preproposal statement of inquiry was filed as WSR 18-16-005.
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: The Washington utilities and transportation commission (UTC) is engaged in a rule making in dockets UE-170002 and UG-170003 to consider rules governing cost of service studies for electric and natural gas investor-owned utilities, including, but not limited to, revising WAC 480-07-510(6) and creating a new chapter. This rule making is intended to standardize how investor-owned utilities and other parties to commission general rate case proceedings conduct and present cost of service studies in the state of Washington.
Hearing Location(s): On April 16, 2020, at 1:30 p.m., at 621 Woodland Square Loop S.E., Room 110, Lacey, WA 98503. Public hearing to consider adoption of the proposed rules.
Date of Intended Adoption: April 16, 2020.
Submit Written Comments to: Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, 621 Woodland Square Loop S.E., Lacey, WA 98503, email records@utc.wa.gov, fax 360-586-1150, by March 27, 2020.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: Contact Susan Holman, phone 360-664-1243, TTY 360-586-8203, email susan.holman@utc.wa.gov.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: The purpose of this rule is to establish minimum filing requirements for any cost of service study filed with the commission. These rules are designed to improve and promote efficiency in analyzing rate cases, clarity of presentation, and ease of understanding cost of service studies with the commission. The minimum filing requirements will allow for more effective comparisons of cost of service studies.
Reasons Supporting Proposal: The proposed cost of service rules standardize how investor-owned utilities and other parties to general rate case proceedings conduct and present cost of service studies in Washington. Cost of service studies are one element of the ratemaking process, but can be a burdensome component of general rate cases. During the CR-101 phase, the commission requested investor-owned utilities to run a variety of scenarios with different cost of service methodologies, and found only minor variances. Further, the commission held technical workshops to receive input from various stakeholders. Standardizing the way cost of service studies are conducted and presented will ensure more efficient analysis and review of such studies, allowing parties to dedicate more resources to other aspects of a general rate case.
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Name of Proponent: UTC, governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting: Elaine Jordan, 621 Woodland Square Loop S.E., Lacey, WA 98503, 360-664-1307; Implementation and Enforcement: Mark L. Johnson, 621 Woodland Square Loop S.E., Lacey, WA 98503, 360-664-1115.
A school district fiscal impact statement is not required under RCW
28A.305.135.
A cost-benefit analysis is not required under RCW
34.05.328. UTC is not an agency to which RCW
34.05.328 applies. The proposed rules are not significant legislative rules of the sort referenced in RCW
34.05.328(5).
This rule proposal, or portions of the proposal, is exempt from requirements of the Regulatory Fairness Act because the proposal:
Is exempt under RCW
19.85.025(3) as the rules adopt, amend, or repeal a procedure, practice, or requirement relating to agency hearings; or a filing or related process requirement for applying to an agency for a license or permit.
Explanation of exemptions: The proposed rule changes the filing requirements for cost of service studies prepared in general rate case proceedings before the commission by investor-owned electric and natural gas companies regulated by the commission. None of the electric or natural gas companies regulated by the commission are small businesses as defined in RCW
19.85.020. However, the proposed rule would apply to any party seeking to file a cost of service study with the commission.
Out of an abundance of caution, the commission conducted a small business economic impact statement (SBEIS) survey to determine whether the proposed rule would impose more than minor costs as defined in RCW
19.85.020(2). The survey responses indicate that two of the five regulated companies anticipate no cost impact, and three were not able to quantify the additional cost of compliance with the proposed rule. The commission concluded based on the survey results that it was unnecessary to conduct a SBEIS, even if none of the exemptions listed above were applicable.
February 11, 2020
Mark L. Johnson
Executive Director
and Secretary
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 18-18-041, filed 8/29/18, effective 9/29/18)
WAC 480-07-510General rate proceeding filings—Electric, natural gas, pipeline, and Class A telecommunications companies.
General rate proceeding filings by electric, natural gas, pipeline, and Class A telecommunications companies as defined in WAC 480-120-034 must include the information described in this section. The company and all parties to an adjudication in a general rate proceeding must file all required documents in electronic form consistent with the requirements in WAC 480-07-140 and by the next business day must file five paper copies of all testimony and exhibits unless the commission establishes a different number. If an exhibit is a database, spreadsheet, or model, the paper copy of that exhibit may simply reference or describe its contents if printing the entirety of the database, spreadsheet, or model would result in a document exceeding five pages and would render the data, spreadsheet cells, or model unusable. The party, however, must submit a complete electronic version of the database, spreadsheet, or model, with all information, formulae, and functionality intact, as part of the party's electronic filing.
(1) Testimony and exhibits. The company's initial filing and any supplemental filings the commission authorizes must include all testimony and exhibits the company intends to present as its direct case. The company must serve a copy of the initial filing on the public counsel unit of the Washington state attorney general's office at the time the company makes the filing with the commission if the proceeding is the type in which public counsel generally appears or has appeared in the past. The filing must include a results-of-operations statement showing test year actual results and any restating and pro forma adjustments in columnar format that support the company's general rate request. The company must identify each restating and pro forma adjustment and the effect of that adjustment on the company's operations and revenue requirement. The testimony must include a written description of each proposed restating and pro forma adjustment describing the reason, theory, and calculation of the adjustment.
(2) Tariff sheets. The company's initial filing must include the company's proposed new or revised tariff sheets in legislative format (i.e., with strike-through to indicate the material to be deleted or replaced and underlining to indicate the material to be inserted) consistent with the requirements in WAC 480-80-105, as well as copies of any tariff sheets that are referenced in the new or amended tariff sheets.
(3) Detailed support for proposals.
(a) General. The company must include in its initial testimony and exhibits, including those addressing accounting adjustments, sufficient detail, calculations, information, and descriptions necessary to meet its burden of proof. Any party responding to the company's proposal also must include in that party's testimony and exhibits sufficient detail, calculations, information, and descriptions necessary to support its filed case.
(b) Capital structure and rate of return. The company must include in testimony and exhibits a detailed description of the development of any capital structure and rate of return proposals. Any other party that files testimony or exhibits that propose revisions to the company's current capital structure or authorized rate of return also must provide similar detailed information in testimony and exhibits supporting its proposal.
(c) Restating and pro forma adjustments. Each party that proposes restating or pro forma adjustments must include in its testimony and exhibits a detailed portrayal of the restating and pro forma adjustments the party uses to support its proposal or position. That portrayal must specify all relevant assumptions and include specific references to charts of accounts, financial reports, studies, and all similar records on which the party relies. Testimony and exhibits must include support for, and calculations showing, the derivation of each input number used in the detailed portrayal, as well as the derivation of all interstate and multiservice allocation factors.
(i) Restating adjustments adjust the booked operating results for any defects or infirmities in actual recorded results of operations that can distort test period earnings. Restating adjustments are also used to adjust from an as-recorded basis to a basis that the commission accepts for determining rates. Restating adjustments must be calculated based on the unadjusted test year operating results, not on another party's adjustments. The commission may refuse to consider any adjustment that is not calculated consistent with this requirement. Nonexclusive examples of restating adjustments are adjustments that:
(A) Remove prior period amounts;
(B) Eliminate below-the-line items that were recorded as operating expenses in error;
(C) Adjust from book estimates to actual amounts;
(D) Annualize ongoing costs that the company began to incur part way through the test year;
(E) Normalize weather or hydro conditions; or
(F) Eliminate or normalize extraordinary items recorded during the test period.
(ii) Pro forma adjustments give effect for the test period to all known and measurable changes that are not offset by other factors. The company and any other party filing testimony and exhibits proposing pro forma adjustments must identify dollar values and underlying reasons for each proposed pro forma adjustment. Pro forma adjustments must be calculated based on the restated operating results. Pro forma fixed and variable power costs, net of power sales, may be calculated directly based either on test year normalized demand and energy load, or on the future rate year demand and energy load factored back to test year loads.
(iii) If a party proposes to calculate an adjustment in a manner different than the method the commission most recently accepted or authorized for the company, the party must also include in testimony and exhibits the rationale for, and documents that demonstrate, how that adjustment would be calculated under the methodology previously accepted by the commission and must explain the reason for the proposed change. Commission approval of a settlement does not constitute commission acceptance of any underlying methodology unless the commission so states in the order approving the settlement.
(d) Revenue sources. The company must include in testimony and exhibits a detailed portrayal of revenue from regulated sources, by source, during the test year and the changes that would result in those revenues if the commission approves the company's request, including an explanation of how the resulting changes were derived.
(e) Achievement of rate of return. The company must demonstrate in testimony and exhibits why the company has not achieved its authorized rate of return and what actions the company has taken prior to and during the test year to improve its earnings in addition to its request for increased rates. If the company has not taken any such actions, the company must explain why it has not.
(f) Rate base and results of operations. The company's testimony and exhibits must include a representation of the company's actual rate base and results of operations during the test period, calculated in the same manner the commission used to calculate the revenue requirement in the final order in the company's most recent general rate proceeding.
(g) Affiliate and subsidiary transactions. The company's testimony and exhibits must supplement, as necessary, the annual affiliate and subsidiary transaction reports required in rules governing reporting for the applicable industry to include all such transactions during the test period. The company must identify all affiliate and subsidiary transactions that materially affect the proposed rates. The company must support the allocation method the company used to distribute common costs between regulated and nonregulated affiliated entities and the dollar amount of those costs.
(h)
Electronic documents and confidentiality. Electronic files must be fully functional and include all formulas and linked spreadsheet files. Electronic files that support exhibits must use logical file paths, as necessary, by witness and must use identifying file names consistent with the naming requirements in WAC 480-07-140. A party may file a document with locked, hidden, or password protected cells only if such restricted access is necessary to protect the information within the cells that is not subject to public disclosure. The party must identify each locked, hidden, or password protected cell and must designate such cells, as well as any other information the party contends is confidential under RCW
80.04.095 or otherwise protected from public disclosure, in compliance with the requirements in WAC 480-07-160 and any applicable protective order. The party must make such information accessible to all persons who have signed the protective order or are otherwise entitled to access the information including, but not necessarily limited to, commission staff and public counsel. Redacted versions of models or spreadsheets that contain information that is designated as confidential or highly confidential or otherwise protected from public disclosure must be in .pdf format (using Adobe Acrobat or comparable software) and must mask the information protected from public disclosure as required in WAC 480-07-160.
(i) Referenced documents. If a party's testimony or exhibits refer to a document including, but not limited to, a report, study, analysis, survey, article, or court or agency decision, the party's testimony and exhibits must include that document except as provided below:
(i) A party may include an official citation or internet Uniform Resource Locator (URL) to a commission order or to a court opinion or other state or federal agency decision, rather than the document itself, if that decision is reported in a generally accepted publication (e.g., Washington Reports Second (Wn.2d), Public Utility Reports (P.U.R.), etc.) or if the document is readily available on the web site of the agency that entered that decision;
(ii) A party may include only the relevant excerpts of a voluminous document if the party also provides a publicly accessible internet URL to the entire document or describes the omitted portions of the document and their content and makes those portions available to the other parties and the commission upon request; and
(iii) A party is not required to file or distribute materials subject to third-party copyright protection but must describe those materials and their content and make them available for inspection upon request by the parties and the commission.
(4) Work papers.
(a) General. Work papers are documents that support the technical aspects of a party's testimony and exhibits. Work papers may include, but are not limited to, calculations, data analysis and raw data. Work papers are not a part of a party's direct case. Within five business days after each party files and serves its testimony and exhibits, the party also must provide to all other parties the work papers on which each of its witnesses relied when preparing testimony and exhibits. All work papers must comply with the requirements of this subsection.
(b) Organization. Work papers must be plainly identified and well organized, with different documents or sections separated by or into tabs, and must include an index. All work papers must be cross-referenced and include a description of the cross-referencing methodology.
(c) Any work papers provided to other parties must comply with requirements governing electronic documents and confidentiality in subsection (3)(h) and referenced documents in subsection (3)(i) of this section.
(d) Filing designated work papers with the commission. If the commission determines that it needs information in addition to a party's testimony and exhibits, the commission may issue a bench request for designated portions of that party's work papers. The commission will receive into evidence the work papers a party provides in response to a bench request unless the commission rejects that response, either in response to an objection or on the commission's own motion, as provided in WAC 480-07-405 (7)(b). The commission will not rely on any other work papers as the basis for any finding of fact or conclusion of law in the proceeding unless the commission formally admits such work papers into the evidentiary record.
(5) Summary document.
(a) Contents. The company must include in its initial filing a document that summarizes the information in this subsection (5)(a) on an annualized basis, if applicable, and must itemize revenues from any temporary, interim, periodic, or other noncontinuing tariffs. The company must include in its rate change percentage and revenue change calculations any revenues from proposed general rate change tariffs that would supersede revenue from noncontinuing tariffs. The summary document must include:
(i) The date and amount of the last general rate change the commission authorized for the company and the revenue the company realized from that change during the test period based on the company's test period units of sale (e.g., kilowatt hours, therms, etc.);
(ii) Total revenues the company is realizing at its present rates and the total revenues the company would realize at the requested rates;
(iii) Requested revenue change in percentage, in total and by major customer class;
(iv) Requested revenue change in dollars, in total and by major customer class;
(v) The representative effect of the request in dollars for the average monthly use per customer, by customer class or other similar meaningful representation, including, but not limited to, the effect of the proposed rate change in dollars per month on residential customers by usage categories;
(vi) Most current customer count, by major customer class;
(vii) Current authorized overall rate of return and authorized rate of return on common equity;
(viii) Actual rate of return and actual rate of return on common equity for the test period;
(ix) Requested overall rate of return and requested rate of return on common equity, and the method or methods used to calculate the requested rates of return;
(x) Requested capital structure;
(xi) Requested net operating income;
(xii) Requested rate base and method of calculation, or equivalent; and
(xiii) Revenue effect of any requested attrition allowance.
(b) Required service.
(i) Persons to receive service. The company must serve the summary document on the persons designated below on the same date it files the summary document with the commission:
(A) The public counsel unit of the Washington state attorney general's office;
(B) All intervenors on the commission's master service list for the company's most recent general rate proceeding;
(C) All intervenors on the master service list for any other rate proceeding involving the company during the five years prior to the company's filing, if the company's rate change request may affect the rates established or considered in that prior proceeding; and
(D) All persons who have informed the company in writing that they wish to be provided with the summary document required under this section.
(ii) Cover letter. The company must enclose a cover letter with the summary document stating that the company's prefiled testimony and exhibits, and the accompanying work papers, are available from the company on request, subject to any restrictions on information that is protected from public disclosure, if the company is not serving them along with the summary document.
(iii) Limitation. This service requirement does not create a right to service or notice of future filings in the proceeding to the persons named to receive the summary. Any person other than commission staff and public counsel who wishes to be served documents subsequently filed in the general rate proceeding must petition to intervene in that proceeding.
(6) Cost of service studies. The ((company's)) initial filing must((: (a) Include any cost studies the company performed or relied on to prepare its proposals; (b) identify all cost studies conducted in the last five years for any of the company's services; and (c) describe the methodology the company used in all such cost studies. If the cost studies are in the form of a model, the company must provide a copy of, or reasonable access to, the model that will enable the commission to verify and modify the model's inputs and assumptions))include a cost of service study that complies with chapter 480-85 WAC.
(7) Additional documents. The company's initial filing must include the following documents or an internet URL for each of these documents:
(a) The company's most recent annual report to shareholders, if any, and any subsequent quarterly reports to shareholders;
(b) The company's most recent FERC Form 1 and FERC Form 2 for electric and natural gas companies; and
(c) The company's Form 10K's, Form 10Q's, any prospectuses for any issuances of securities, and quarterly reports to stockholders, if any, for the most recent two years prior to the rate change request.
Chapter 480-85 WAC
ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS COST OF SERVICE
NEW SECTION
WAC 480-85-010Purpose.
(1) The purpose of these rules is to establish minimum filing requirements for any cost of service study filed with the commission. These rules are designed to streamline, improve, and promote efficiency in analyzing rate cases, clarity of presentation, and ease of understanding. The minimum filing requirements will allow for comparisons of cost of service studies.
(2) The cost of service study is one factor among many the commission considers when determining rate spread and rate design. The commission may also consider, as appropriate, such factors as fairness, perceptions of equity, economic conditions in the service territory, gradualism, and rate stability.
NEW SECTION
WAC 480-85-020Applicability.
The rules in this chapter apply to any person or party who files a cost of service study in any proceeding before the commission.
NEW SECTION
WAC 480-85-030Definitions.
(1) "Allocation factor" means a mathematical expression of the specific cost relationship among revenue requirement and customer classes.
(2) "Common function" means costs that can be functionalized to both electric and natural gas operations.
(3) "Cost of service study" means a study that identifies and calculates, using regulatory accounting rules and principles, the extent to which customers in various customer classes cause costs to a utility. This study correlates a utility's costs and revenues with the service provided to customers in each customer class.
(4) "Electric distribution system peak" means the maximum load of the Washington portion of a utility's distribution system within an identified time frame.
(5) "Load study" means a statistical analysis of load data collected from sampled customers to estimate the load profiles of customer classes over a minimum twelve-month period. Load profile estimates of customer classes shall be hourly (or subhourly) for electric, and daily for natural gas. A load forecast or load projection model is not a substitute for a load study. Load studies should be conducted at a minimum every five years.
(6) "Parity ratio" means a customer class's revenue-to-cost ratio divided by the system's revenue-to-cost ratio. This ratio shall only be presented to the commission as either a percentage or a decimal.
(7) "Revenue-to-cost ratio" means revenue at current rates divided by the revenue requirement. This ratio shall only be presented to the commission as either a percentage or a decimal.
(8) "Special contract" means a negotiated service agreement between a utility and a customer approved pursuant to WAC 480-80-143.
NEW SECTION
WAC 480-85-040Minimum filing requirements.
(1) All cost of service study results must be filed in the following forms, available from the commission: Electric cost of service template; and, gas cost of service template. In addition, the following must be provided contemporaneously with all cost of service studies:
(a) Supporting testimony. All cost of service studies must be filed with supporting testimony and exhibits. If supporting testimony or exhibits reference, discuss, or specifically rely on data, models, calculations, or associated information found only in the supporting work papers, the supporting testimony or exhibit must cite to the work papers.
(b) Supporting work papers. In addition to complying with WAC 480-07-140 (6)(a)(ii), all supporting models, calculations, data, and associated information must be provided to the parties in a manner that allows for the verification and modification of all of the model's inputs and assumptions. This includes:
(i) All models must be fully functional, which requires, at a minimum, that cells are linked where possible and all formulas are calculable. Wherever practical, all associated calculations necessary to support the results of the study must be consolidated in the same electronic workbook file.
(ii) Any macros in a model must be explained in a narrative. The narrative must also identify where each macro is found in the model.
(iii) Each electronic cost of service workbook must have an index identifying links to any external spreadsheet.
(2) Companies that provide electric and natural gas service must file a cost of service study for their electric and natural gas operations simultaneously. If a company providing electric and natural gas service files a general rate case for only one of its services, the company must apportion the common costs shared by both services in lieu of filing a cost of service study for the service not included in the general rate case.
NEW SECTION
WAC 480-85-050Cost of service study inputs.
The rate schedule usage data for any cost of service study must come from the best available source: Advanced metering technology, including advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) and advanced meter reading (AMR); or, a load study.
(1) For utilities with AMI, the use of data from a load study must be explicitly justified.
(2) For utilities with AMR, data from AMR may be used if granularity of the data meets or exceeds hourly for electric and daily for natural gas. For utilities with AMR with the data granularity required by this subsection, the use of data from a load study must be explicitly justified.
(3) For utilities with other advanced metering technology, data from that metering technology may be used if granularity of the data meets or exceeds hourly for electric and daily for natural gas. For utilities with other advanced metering technology with the data granularity required by this subsection, the use of data from a load study must be explicitly justified.
(4) For utilities that do not have advanced metering technology described in subsection (1), (2), or (3) of this section, a load study must be used. Data from special contracts may be used in a load study.
(5) Street lighting schedules may be estimated and, if so, the estimation method must be explicitly presented in testimony and exhibits.
NEW SECTION
WAC 480-85-060Cost of service methodology.
(1) A cost of service study filed with the commission must be calculated using an embedded cost method.
(a) Electric studies shall use the FERC accounts outlined in Table 1 in subsection (3) of this section to functionalize the cost of service. Costs shall be directly functionalized where information is available. Functionalized costs will be classified and allocated by the methods outlined in Table 2 in subsection (3) of this section.
(b) Natural gas studies shall use the FERC accounts outlined in Table 3 in subsection (3) of this section to functionalize the cost of service. Costs shall be directly functionalized where information is available. Functionalized costs will be classified and allocated by the methods outlined in Table 4 in subsection (3) of this section.
(c) FERC accounts not included in Table 1 or Table 3 in subsection (3) of this section but identified in a cost of service study must be accompanied by a rationale for the functional method chosen in the supporting testimony.
(d) If an allocation method in Table 2 or Table 4 in subsection (3) of this section requires direct assignment, any similar remaining costs in the account may not be allocated to the classes included in the direct assignment; except in circumstances where that class derives a direct benefit from the nondirect assigned costs. If a particular account contains several cost items, of which only certain items in the FERC account are directly assigned, the cost items that are not directly assigned will be allocated as appropriate.
(e) The abbreviations for the functionalized costs are:
"Comm" is an abbreviation meaning the common function;
"Cust" is an abbreviation meaning the customer function;
"Dist" is an abbreviation meaning the distribution function;
"Gen" is an abbreviation meaning the generation function, for electric;
"Prod" is an abbreviation meaning the production function, for natural gas;
"Stor" is an abbreviation meaning the storage function, for natural gas; and
"Tran" is an abbreviation meaning the transmission function.
(2) In addition to filing a cost of service study as required in subsection (1) of this section, a party may file a cost of service study based on a system-wide econometric study or a system-wide marginal cost study.
(3) Tables 1 through 4 of this subsection outline the functionalization, classification, and allocation methods required by subsection (1) of this section.
Table 1
Electric Cost of Service Approved Functionalization Methodologies
Functionalization | FERC Account Numbers |
Generation | 151, 152, 310-317, 330-337, 340-348, 500-515, 535-545.1, 546-557 |
Transmission | 350-359.1, 560-573 |
Distribution | 252, 360-374, 580-598 |
Customer | 235, 901-905, 907, 908* 909-910 |
Common | 920-935, working capital allowance |
Gen/Tran/Dist/Cust/Comm | 301-303, 403, 403.1, 404-407 |
Gen/Tran/Dist/Comm | 105, 107, 108, 111, 154, 165, 281, 282, 389-398 |
Allocate based on subaccount | 182.3, 253, 254 |
*Expenses included in account 908 that are related to conservation must be functionalized as generation related. |
Table 2
Electric Cost of Service Approved Classification and Allocation Methodologies
Functionalized Cost | Classification Method | Allocation Method |
Generation | Renewable future peak credit with net power costs allocated on energy | Load net of renewable generation, using 12 coincident peaks. Net power costs are allocated using annual energy usage at the point of generation. |
Transmission | Demand | 12 coincident peaks. |
Distribution Substation | Demand | Direct assignment to large customer classes based on load ratio share of substations they are fed from; for this allocator only, the utility may determine "large customer." |
| | All other classes use an average of the relative share of the summer distribution system coincident peak and the relative share of the winter distribution system coincident peak. |
Distribution Line Transformers | Demand | Secondary customers directly assigned where practical. All remaining costs are allocated using a relative ratio of transformers at current installation costs. |
| | Allocation to the lighting class(es) may be based upon its proportion of noncoincident peak to the sum of noncoincident peaks for all secondary voltage customers. |
Distribution Poles and Wires | Demand | Primary system customers are allocated using the same method as distribution substation, where practical. When not practical, allocate using 12 distribution system noncoincident peaks. |
| | Secondary system customers are allocated using 12 distribution system noncoincident peaks. |
Service Lines | Customer | Average installed cost for new service lines multiplied by customer count relative to average installed cost. |
Meters | Customer | Average installed cost for new metering multiplied by customer or meter count. |
Customer Service/Billing | Customer | All costs assigned by weighted customer counts. |
Administrative & General and General Plant | Depends on functionalization of account | Property insurance and property taxes based on allocated plant; pensions and employee insurance based on salary and wages; FERC fees based on energy; revenue-based fees allocated by class relative share of total revenue. |
| | The remainder of administrative & general and general plant costs shall be allocated as deemed appropriate. An explanation of the allocation method used must be included in testimony. |
Intangible Plant | Depends on functionalization of account | Each type of intangible and amortization in a separate account, allocated using appropriate factors. A materiality threshold of 0.5% of intangible plant will be applied. |
Table 3
Natural Gas Cost of Service Approved Functionalization Methodologies
Functionalization | FERC Account Numbers |
Production | 800-813 |
Storage | 350-356, 352.1, 352.2, 352.3, 814-826, 830-837, 840-843, 842.1-842.3, 843.1-843.9 |
Transmission | 365.1, 365.2, 366-371, 850-867, 870 |
Distribution | 374-387, 871-881, 885-894 |
Customer | 901-905, 907, 908*, 909-910 |
Common | 920-935, working capital |
Prod/Tran/Dist/Stor/Comm | 101.1, 104-108, 111, 114, 115, 117.1-117.4, 165, 182.3, 186, 190, 228.1-228.4, 229, 235, 252, 253, 255, 281-283, 301-303, 389-398, 403 |
Allocate based on subaccount | 182.3, 254 |
*Expenses included in account 908 that are related to conservation must be functionalized as production related. |
Table 4
Natural Gas Cost of Service Approved Classification and Allocation Methodologies
Functionalized Cost | Classification Method | Allocation Method |
Distribution Mains | System load factor | Design day (peak) and annual throughput (average) based on system load factor. |
Transmission Main | Follows distribution mains | Follows distribution mains. |
Distribution Assets | Demand | Follows distribution mains. |
Storage | Determined on a case-by-case basis | Costs classified as balancing are allocated to all customers based on winter sales. |
| | All remaining costs are allocated with a ratio based on average winter sales that exceed average summer sales. |
Services | Customer | Allocated to customer class based on the class average service installation cost. |
| | Large customers are directly assigned based on a special study; for only this allocator, it is up to the utility to determine "large customer." |
Meters | Customer | Average installed cost for new metering multiplied by customer or meter count. |
Customer Service/Billing | Customer | All costs assigned by weighted customer counts. |
Administrative & General and General Plant | Depends on functionalization of account | Property insurance and property taxes based on allocated plant; pensions and employee insurance based on salary and wages; FERC fees based on energy; revenue-based fees allocated by class relative share of total revenue. |
| | The remainder of administrative & general and general plant costs shall be allocated as deemed appropriate. An explanation of the allocation method used must be included in testimony. |
Intangible Plant | Depends on functionalization of account | Each type of intangible and amortization in a separate account, allocated using appropriate factors. A materiality threshold of 0.5% of intangible plant will be applied. |
NEW SECTION
WAC 480-85-070Exemptions.
(1) A petition for exemption from any part of this chapter pursuant to WAC 480-07-110 must include:
(a) A cost of service study that complies with this chapter;
(b) The proposed cost of service study for which the petitioner seeks an exemption; and
(c) A description of the circumstances under which the exemption should be granted.
(2) Under WAC 480-07-500(4), the commission will reject or require revision of any filing presenting a cost of service study that does not fully comply with this chapter unless a commission order has granted an exemption from this chapter.