WSR 22-17-151
PROPOSED RULES
BUILDING CODE COUNCIL
[Filed August 23, 2022, 4:06 p.m.]
Original Notice.
Preproposal statement of inquiry was filed as WSR 22-03-032 and 22-03-033.
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information: Chapter 51-50 WAC, Adoption and amendment of the 2021 International Building Code (Structural Provisions) and 2021 International Existing Building Code.
Hearing Location(s): On September 30, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., at 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901; or on October 14, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., at 1500 Jefferson Street S.E., Olympia, WA 98504. Please access the meetings in-person, or via Zoom or Conference call. The Zoom link and phone are provided in the agenda at sbcc.wa.gov.
Date of Intended Adoption: November 4, 2022.
Submit Written Comments to: State Building Code Council (SBCC), P.O. Box 41449, Olympia, WA 98504-1449, email sbcc@des.wa.gov, by October 14, 2022.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: Contact Annette Haworth, phone 360-407-9255, email sbcc@des.wa.gov, by September 16, 2022.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects, Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: The proposed rule adopts the 2021 edition of the International Building Code (IBC) (Structural Provisions) and the 2021 edition of the International Existing Building Code (IEBC), published by the International Code Council (ICC), with state amendments to incorporate proposed changes as adopted by SBCC. The rules will provide increased clarity and life safety measures for building construction in Washington state.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
2021 IBC/2021 IEBC Amendments to Chapter 51-50 WAC
WAC | Section | Changes in 2021 | Rationale/Discussion |
WAC 51-50-107 | 107.2 | New section; replaces Section 107.2.8 with 107.2.9. | Provides the necessary reference to the newly proposed Section 107.2.9. |
107.2.9 | New section in WAC; adds language to the model code related to nonstructural components. | Clarifies nonstructural components that require an importance factor of 1.5 and require designated seismic restraint systems per ASCE 7 need to be identified on permit drawing sets. These may be mechanical and electrical components as such as smoke control systems, stairways, emergency generators, etc. |
WAC 51-50-1604 | Table 1604.5 | Removes the state amendment and reserves WAC 51-50-1604. | The existing amendment is no longer needed; it is addressed in the model code. |
WAC 51-50-1613 | 1613.4 | Replaces the reference to Section 1613.4.2 with a reference to Section 1613.4.6. | Provides the necessary references to the newly proposed Sections 1613.4.3 through 1613.4.6. |
1613.4.1 | Deletes Item 5 of Section 12.2.5.4. | The 2021 IBC includes changes in a reference standard that duplicate changes made by an amendment to the Washington state building code. These changes relate to the construction of concrete special structural walls which are seismic force resisting elements of a building structural system and are common in commercial and multi-family residential construction. The amendment to the Washington state building code Section 1613.4.1 part 5 was previously needed in the building code as similar requirements weren't included in the reference standards. The 2018 IBC reference standard ACI 318-19 has added similar requirements to those of the amendment. The amendment to the Washington state building code should be removed for clarity. By removing Amendment Section 1613.4.1 part 5, an engineer will be clear that the provisions and ACI 318-19 should be used directly. Without the removal of Item 5, it is unclear if the factors referenced by the amendment and the factor of the reference standards should be used together, which could result in an overestimation of design forces by a factor of 2.5. This would result in an increase in the size of special concrete walls used in new construction. See detailed rationale here: 21-GP2-028. |
1613.4.3 through 1613.4.6 | New sections in WAC; intended to provide a simplified method to develop seismic design parameters for seismic design of buildings. | The current method in ASCE 7-16 for developing seismic design response spectra is very complex, and it requires additional ground motion hazard analyses for many more building sites than required in previous versions of the code. The same amendment was adopted as an emergency rule (WSR 22-11-010) and it is effective until July 1, 2023. If adopted, this proposal will adopt the rule permanently. (See WSR 22-11-010 and detailed rational for adopting it) |
WAC 51-50-1615 | 1615.1 1615.2.4 1615.2.5 1615.2.6 1615.2.7 1615.2.8 1615.2.9 1615.2.10 1615.2.12 1615.2.13 1615.2.14 1615.2.15 | | The proposed amendment in Section 1615 adopts the latest Washington Department of Natural Resources tsunami design zone maps into the 2021 IBC. In addition, it brings forward the latest published tsunami design zone requirements contained in American Society of Civil Engineers Standard 7-22, which would otherwise be adopted as part of the 2024 IBC. Some editorial modifications are also proposed. |
WAC 51-50-1702 | 1702 | Remove the state amendment and save WAC 51-50-1702 as reserved. | The defined terms are deleted to match the model code format. |
WAC 51-50-1705 | 1705.5.3 1705.11.1 1705.12. 1705.19 | Remove the state amendment and save WAC 51-50-1705 as reserved. | The existing amendments are no longer needed; all are addressed in the model code. |
1705.12.6 | Renumber to 1705.13.6; modify item 6.2. | Incorporates renumbering in the model code. |
WAC 51-50-17090 | 1709.5 | Incorporates model code language. | This existing amendment was adopted in 2006. The amendment provides an exception to the load testing requirement for small business manufacturers (Exception 2). The exception was readopted in 2009, 2012, 2015, and 2018 IBC, but the model code language was not updated. The proposed amendment contains Exception 2 and incorporates the model code language. |
WAC 51-50-2103 | 2103.2.4 | New section added to WAC. | A common mode of failure of adhered veneer is the debonding of the units from the wall. Requiring a modified dry-set bond coat mortar capable of developing higher bond strength is warranted. ANSI A118.15, for example, requires a 28-day shear bond strength near 400 psi for an improved-modified dry-set mortar, which is significantly higher than the current TMS 402 requirement of 50 psi. The latest draft for the next TMS reference code edition contains a similar amendment. This new amendment is an early adoption of this beneficial code provision in Washington state. Additionally, the method of installation prescribed in the TMS specification was developed in the 1950s but is not used today for the installation of adhered veneer. (See detailed rationale here: 21-GP1-65 (MOD)) |
WAC 51-50-21070 | 2107.1 | Delete existing amendment. | The existing amendment is no longer needed; it is addressed in the model code. |
WAC 51-50-2111 | 2111.8 | Reference sections renumbering. | Section 2111.8 is an existing amendment, modified to incorporate section renumbering in the model code. |
WAC 51-50-2303 | 2303.1.1.3 | New section in WAC addressing used solid-sawn lumber. | Similar proposal was approved by the SBCC and published as a 2018 amendment in the IRC (Section R602.1.1). This amendment will put the IBC and the IRC in alignment with respect to the reuse of salvaged dimensional sawn lumber. When constructing to the requirements of the IBC, quality, salvaged solid-sawn lumber that is ungraded or does not have a certificate of inspection cannot currently be reused in a structural capacity unless allowed by the building official. The intent of this proposal is to assume conservative material base values that reflect past construction methods which will expand the use of salvaged lumber without compromising safety. This proposal provides clear directive to the engineer/designer, removes potential liability from the building official while maintaining safety, and will result in the increased and economical use of salvaged lumber for those wishing to reuse quality material. (See detailed rationale here: 21-GP1-62 (MOD) |
2303.1.4 | Delete Section 2303.1.4. | The existing amendment is no longer needed; it is addressed in the model code. |
WAC 51-50-2304 | 2304.10 | Delete existing amendment. | The existing amendment is no longer needed; it is addressed in the model code. |
2304.10.8 | Delete existing amendment. | The existing amendment is no longer needed; it is addressed in the model code Section 2304.10.1. |
2304.11.2.1 2304.11.2.2 2304.11.3.1 2304.11.4.1 | New sections in WAC. | The proposed amendments address prescriptive thickness requirements of cross-laminated timber in Chapter 23, originally added in the 2018 IBC model code. With the addition of Type IV-A/B/C construction types in Section 6 of the 2021 IBC model code, Section 602.4 combines the new performance-based requirements of Type IV-A/B/C with the existing prescriptive requirements of Type IV-HT in Chapter 2304.11. The proposed amendments to 2304.11.2.1, 2304.11.2.2, and 2304.11.4.1, simply add consistency and specificity in language (actual thicknesses rather than mix of actual, nominal, or not defined) without modification of prescribed CLT thickness. Nominal dimensions are not used by CLT manufacturers, architects, engineers, or contractors. The proposed amendment to 2304.11.3.1 proposes a change from 4" actual thickness to 3.5" actual thickness with proposed justification of equivalency to or exceedance of allowable prescriptive nominal thicknesses in 2304.11.3.2. The benefit of the proposed prescriptive thickness change to CLT floors adds consistency and flexibility in specification between CLT, GLT, NLT, DLT and is inclusive of standardized metric CLT sizes of 90mm and 100mm. The additional performance requirements in Section 602.4 Type IV remain unchanged. 21-GP1-63 (MOD) |
WAC 51-50-2400 | 2405.3 | Remove existing amendment | The existing amendment is relocated to WAC 51-50-2405. |
WAC 51-50-2405 | 2405.3 | Relocation. | The existing amendment, currently in WAC 51-50-2400, is renumbered to WAC 51-50-2405 to align with the WAC format. The existing amendment is in exception 5, deleting R-2, R-3, and R-4 occupancies from the text. The text in 2405.3 is modified to incorporated changes to the model code. The proposed modifications have no intended change in regulatory effect. |
WAC 51-50-3500 | Chapter 35 | Add new referenced standards. | Adds new standards referenced in the body of the code. The purpose of amending ASCE 7 is to adopt the Supplements to 2016 edition of ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-16), developed by the ASCE 7 Standard Committee to address important issues in between cycles of development. Some of the noted deficiencies in the ASCE 7-16 standard affect high seismic hazard locations such as Washington state and could potentially result in unconservative structural design. Hence, we request that this be adopted under the 2021 IBC reference standards. The ASCE 7-16 standard now has three published supplements - Supplement No. 1 was published on December 11, 2018, Supplement No. 2 was published on October 19, 2021, and Supplement No. 3 was published on November 3, 2021. Supplement No. 1 was adopted into the 2021 International Building Code, but Supplement No. 2 and Supplement No. 3 were not included as they have just been recently published. |
International Existing Building Code |
WAC 51-50-480200 | Chapter 2 | Add new definitions: SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT | When a flood occurs that damages a building, there are oftentimes many structures that are damaged. Securing a real estate professional to determine market value can take up valuable time that would be better served getting the building repaired quickly. ICC publishes building valuation data that should represent the cost to rebuild the building as if it was new. While this may potentially over-value an existing building, it offers a way for building officials to quickly determine a building value that does not include the land value. As the ICC valuation data is maintained and updated regularly by ICC, there is no need for building officials to maintain another way of determining market value. In addition, it is a table available to both public and building departments, so the ability to quickly calculate a value and know if you exceed the substantial threshold is easily determined without the input from a real estate professional. |
WAC 51-50-480302 | 302.2 | Renumbering | Incorporates model code renumbering. |
WAC 51-50-480306 | 306.6 | Add new sections pertaining to LULA elevators. | The code change proposals in Sections 306.6 and 306.7.8 will allow use of a LULA as part of the accessible route in additions. This is a new provision and provides greater flexibility to designers to provide a level of accessibility to a mezzanine, story or occupied roof. A separate code change proposal will allow a LULA in both a change of occupancy and in alterations. This code change would allow a LULA, and would not allow a platform lift permitted in additions to existing buildings. See the detailed rationale here: 21-GP2-054R |
306.7.8 |
306.7.1 | New section | The current language in Section 306.7.1 related to the need to provide an accessible route of travel, accessible toilet facilities and drinking fountains for primary function areas being altered has been the source of confusion for many. The current language, which attempts to combine a mandate to improve the accessible route to primary function areas, which is already addressed in the first sentence of this section, with improvements to existing restrooms and drinking fountains, is the source of this confusion. This proposal replaces the last sentence and slightly modifies Exception 1. This helps the code users to understand the intent of this provision: (1) Provide an accessible route to the primary function area. (2) Make accessibility improvements to existing restrooms and drinking fountains serving the area of primary function. Replacing the current with a separate and distinct sentence addressing the need to update restrooms and drinking fountains is eliminating the ambiguity of the current code. Exception 1 has also been modified to make it clear that the cumulative cost of these improvements are not required to exceed 20 percent of the construction budget. |
306.7.1 | New section | This is another proposal addressing the same issue. It adds a new sentence clarifying that priority shall be given to the improvements affecting the accessible route to the primary function area. |
| 306.7.8 | New section addressing lifts. | The ASME A18.1 Standard, referenced in IEBC Section 305.8.3, recognizes two types of platform lifts: vertical and inclined. The proposed language adds clarity for the reader as to what types of conveyances are allowed by ASME A18.1. It also reduces potential confusion resulting from a conflict that the current provision has with IBC Section 1003.3.3 related to horizontal projections into the circulation path. Stating that this provision applies to both vertical and inclined conveyances will eliminate any confusion that it may only apply to vertical conveyances. |
WAC 51-50-480401 | 401.2 401.4 | New sections | The proposal does three things: • Clarifies that the work needed to facilitate repairs should not be considered an alteration (401.2) The sentence being added to the end of 401.2 was dropped during the 2018 code cycle when the repair provisions were consolidated in Chapter 4 in the IEBC. This allowance was originally in the 2015 IEBC prescriptive and work area methods sections. It provides clarity to the code official about how to deal with existing undamaged components when repairs on a structure are needed. It is a common situation that should be addressed by the code. • Ensures that when a building has been effectively demolished it must be replaced with a new building subject to new code requirements (401.4). The IEBC allows the use of "like materials" for repairs, but these provisions should not apply where the building has been destroyed and the repair needed is a total replacement of the building. The same rules should apply whether the damage is caused directly by the destructive event or if the demolition and subsequent replacement of the building is the owner's choice for correcting the damage. In both cases, owners would have to rebuild using currently adopted codes. • Allows for reuse of the existing foundation with approval by the code official. This proposal is being heard at the ICC hearings for the 2024 code cycle in March/April 2022. Further correlation may be needed in the future if the ICC proposal is approved "as is" or with changes. |
WAC 51-50-480405 | 405.1 405.1.1 | New sections | The proposed amendment adds ACI 562 (Code Requirements for Assessment, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Existing Concrete Structures) to establish minimum requirements for the evaluation, design, construction, repair, and rehabilitation of concrete structural elements in buildings for various levels of desired performance as deemed appropriate for the project. This proposal is intended as a modification where the code is based on the 2021 edition of the ICC IEBC. (See the detailed rationale here: 21-GP2-002R.) |
WAC 51-50-480503 | 503.19 503.19.1 503.19.2 503.19.3 503.19.4 | New sections | The proposals in Sections 503.19 and 805.4 (adding an exception to Item 2) will make it clear that new lateral systems are permitted to be of any type, even of a type that normally would not be allowed in new construction, based on the seismic design category and height, as long as all the other conditions of sections 503.13 and 805.4 are met. The original intent of this code section remains the same, the proposed design shall not weaken the existing lateral resistance of the building or affect the behavior of the building in a severe way. In addition, this proposal will help with cost reduction and most importantly performance since less ductile "Ordinary" or "Intermediate" systems may be closer to matching an existing building's deformation limits. See the detailed rationale here: 21-GP2-056. |
WAC 51-50-480603 | 603.1 | New section | It is oftentimes difficult to determine if 50 percent of the building area is exceeded for a substantial remodel and using ICC valuation could be an easier way to determine if the amount of work in a building is substantial. ICC building valuations can be easily calculated and compared to the proposed value of the remodel; whereas, it can be very difficult to determine if an alteration is exceeding the 50 percent threshold when only portions of rooms are altered. This offers an alternative method to determine if an alteration is Level 3 using ICC building valuation and comparing the valuation to the contract value of the proposed work. |
WAC 51-50-480604 | 604.1 | | See WAC 51-50-480603 |
WAC 51-50-480702 | 702.7 | Renumbering | The existing amendment is modified to align with the model code section renumbering. |
WAC 51-50-480805 | 805.4 | | See WAC 51-50-480503 |
805.5 through 805.5.4 | | Buildings with unreinforced masonry and hollow clay in Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F represent an increased risk to life safety, and jurisdictions need to be able to require seismic upgrades where occupant loads are increased during alterations. Currently the seismic retrofits for URM or hollow clay tile buildings are triggered for the following alteration scenarios: 1. Level 3 remodel triggers parapet bracing, installation of floor/wall anchors, and wall/partition bracing within alteration area. 2. Roof replacement more than 25 percent triggers parapet bracing. 3. Substantial structural alteration triggering upgrading the lateral load resisting system with reduced seismic forces. 4. Change in risk category per IBC Table 1604.5. This proposal captures the situations where the alteration is using either the prescriptive requirements of the code or is falling under the Level 2 remodel that is not triggering any roof replacement requirements. Level 3 alterations require compliance with all Level 2 requirements, and thus must meet the large building provisions as required in that section. See detailed rationale here: 21-GP2-018R |
WAC 51-50-480809 | 809.1 | Delete existing amendment; add a new section with the same number. | The existing amendment is no longer needed because Section 809.1 Minimum fixtures is no longer in the model code. The existing amendment in Section 810.1 is relocated to WAC 51-50-480809 to align with the model code renumbering. |
WAC 51-50-480810 | 810.1 | Relocation | The existing amendment in Section 810.1 is relocated to WAC 51-50-480809 to align with the model code renumbering. |
WAC 51-50-481002 | 1002.1 1002.3 | Delete 1002.1; modify the model code section 1002.3 by incorporating language from the existing amendment in Section 1002.1. | Merging the existing amendment into the new model code language. |
WAC 51-50-481201 | 1201.1 | Incorporates model code changes. | The existing amendment adds the second sentence to the model code language. The proposed modification incorporate changes to the model code, not related to the existing amendment. |
WAC 51-50-481301 | 1301.1 1301.2 | Delete existing amendments. | The existing amendment in Section 1301.1 is no longer needed; it repeats the model code language in Section 1401.1. The existing amendment in Section 1301.2 is renumbered and relocated to WAC 51-50-481401 to match the model code numbering. |
WAC 51-50-481302 | | | The existing amendment is relocated to WAC 51-50-481402 to match the model code numbering. |
WAC 51-50-481401 | 1401.2 | New section. | The existing amendment currently in Section 1301.2 is renumbered and relocated to match the model code numbering. |
WAC 51-50-481402 | | | This is an existing amendment, currently in Section 1302. It is relocated to match the model code numbering. |
WAC 51-50-481500 | 1501.7 | | The existing amendment replaces the International Plumbing Code with the Uniform Plumbing Code. The proposed renumbering aligns the existing amendment with the model code renumbering. |
WAC 51-50-490000 | Appendix N | Delete existing amendment. | The existing amendment is proposed to be deleted due to a conflict with Section C411 of the Washington state energy code—Commercial. |
Note: Those not listed on the table above remain as adopted in 2018 IBC.
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state court decision.
Name of Proponent: SBCC, governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting and Implementation: Stoyan Bumbalov, 1500 Jefferson Street S.E., Olympia, WA 98504, 360-407-9277; Enforcement: Local jurisdictions.
A school district fiscal impact statement is not required under RCW
28A.305.135.
A cost-benefit analysis is required under RCW
34.05.328. A preliminary cost-benefit analysis may be obtained by contacting Stoyan Bumbalov, 1500 Jefferson Street S.E., Olympia, WA 98504, 360-407-9277, email
sbcc@des.wa.gov.
This rule proposal, or portions of the proposal, is exempt from requirements of the Regulatory Fairness Act because the proposal:
Is exempt under RCW
19.85.025(3) as the rules are adopting or incorporating by reference without material change federal statutes or regulations, Washington state statutes, rules of other Washington state agencies, shoreline master programs other than those programs governing shorelines of statewide significance, or, as referenced by Washington state law, national consensus codes that generally establish industry standards, if the material adopted or incorporated regulates the same subject matter and conduct as the adopting or incorporating rule; rules only correct typographical errors, make address or name changes, or clarify language of a rule without changing its effect; and rule content is explicitly and specifically dictated by statute.
Explanation of exemptions: The proposed rule adopts by reference the 2021 IBC and 2021 IEBC with new and existing amendments. Many of the existing amendments are modified to incorporate changes to the model codes or to clarify language. There are 23 significant changes to the model code with economic impact. However, the model code changes are exempt under RCW
19.85.025(3) and
34.05.310 (4)(c), and are not part of this report.
Scope of exemption for rule proposal:
Is partially exempt:
Explanation of partial exemptions: The proposed rule adopts by reference the 2021 IBC and 2021 IEBC with new and existing amendments. Many of the existing amendments are modified to incorporate changes to the model codes or to clarify language. There are 23 significant changes to the model code with economic impact. However, the model code changes are exempt under RCW
19.85.025(3) and
34.05.310 (4)(c), and are not part of this report.
The proposed rule does impose more-than-minor costs on businesses.
Small Business Economic Impact Statement
There are costs imposed by the proposed rule, but the costs do not fall disproportionately on small businesses. The rule will not affect the distribution of impacted work, whether by small businesses or not, doing the work. The rule does not affect employment, reporting or record keeping.
Description: SBCC is filing a proposed rule to adopt the 2021 edition of the IBC, structural provisions and the 2021 edition of the IEBC (chapter 51-50 WAC). Since 1985, SBCC has been responsible to update to new editions of the building code per RCW
19.27.074. The IBC is updated every three years by ICC. The code development process conducted by the model code organization is open to all interest groups within the design and construction industry and from governmental organizations. See
www.iccsafe.org for more information about the model code development process.
The administrative compliance requirements are under the authority of the local governments (RCW
19.27.050). Enforcement activities, including permit issuance, plan review/approval, and inspections occur at the local level. Requirements for construction documents submittal and other reporting mandates are determined by the local jurisdiction and are consistent with previously established policies. The proposed amendments to chapter 51-50 WAC include specific technical requirements for building construction to be consistent with national standards.
Professional Services: Washington has had a statewide building code in effect since 1974. The local enforcement authority having jurisdiction administers the codes through the building and/or fire departments. Administrative procedures for state building code compliance are established and will not be changed by the adoption of the 2021 building codes. Small businesses will employ the same types of professional services for the design and construction of buildings and systems to comply with the state building code. The proposed rule updates the state building code and does not require additional equipment, supplies, labor, or other services. Services needed to comply with the building code are existing within the construction industry as required by the local authority having jurisdiction.
Costs of Compliance for Businesses: The council is required to adopt and maintain the state building code, as provided in chapters
19.27, 19.27A, and
70.92 RCW, and the state legislature. The primary objective of the council is to encourage consistency in the building code throughout the state of Washington and to maintain the building code consistent with the state's interest as provided in RCW
19.27.020. An objective of statewide adoption is to minimize state amendments to the model codes. The council accepts statewide code amendment proposal from stakeholders to amend the IBC to meet the legislative goals. The statewide code adoption process is defined in chapter 51-04 WAC and the council bylaws. All proposals must be submitted in writing on the appropriate form with the indicated supporting documentation. Each proponent must identify where a proposed amendment has an economic impact, and estimate the costs and savings of the proposal on construction practices, users and/or the public, the enforcement community, and operation and maintenance.
The cost of compliance incurred by Washington businesses includes training and educational materials. The new 2021 IBC, 2021 IEBC, 2021 IBC significant changes and 2021 IBC study pack cost $215 + tax shipping and handling. The 2021 IBC and 2021 IEBC are also available online at https://shop.iccsafe.org.
For the 2021 code adoption cycle, the council received 18 proposals. The IBC technical advisory group (TAG) recommended approval of 15 proposals as submitted or as modified, one proposal was withdrawn by the proponent. Three proposals were approved with Group 1 codes. Two proposals were identified by TAG as having a cost (increase) for compliance on businesses. The council recommended filing the proposed rule to allow input through the public hearing process.
1. Section 503.19; 805.5 (21-GP2-018R): The proposals in Sections 503.19 and 805.4 will make it clear that new lateral systems are permitted to be of any type, even of a type that normally would not be allowed in new construction, based on the seismic design category and height, as long as all the other conditions of Sections 503.13 and 805.4 are met. The original intent of this code section remains the same, the proposed design shall not weaken the existing lateral resistance of the building or affect the behavior of the building in a severe way. In addition, this proposal will help with cost reduction and most importantly performance since less ductile "Ordinary" or "Intermediate" systems may be closer to matching an existing building's deformation limits. See the detailed rationale here: 21-GP2-056.
This proposal will increase construction cost. For URM or HCT buildings that trigger the occupant load threshold, there will be a cost of installing seismic supports to include parapet bracing, wall/roof ties, and wall/partition bracing for nonstructural walls. These costs are estimated at $40-$90 per square foot. For large buildings triggering the analysis of the lateral force resisting system, there may be much larger costs such as putting in a moment frame or secondary load transfer for seismic loads. There is no reliable information pertaining to cost as it is very dependent on the design of the specific structure.
2. Chapter 35, Referenced Standards (21-GP2-017). The purpose of amending ASCE 7 is to adopt the supplements to 2016 edition of ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-16), developed by the ASCE 7 Standard Committee to address important issues in between cycles of development. Some of the noted deficiencies in the ASCE 7-16 standard affect high seismic hazard locations such as Washington state and could potentially result in unconservative structural design. Hence, we request that this be adopted under the 2021 IBC reference standards. The ASCE 7-16 standard now has three published supplements: Supplement No. 1 was published on December 11, 2018, Supplement No. 2 was published on October 19, 2021, and Supplement No. 3 was published on November 3, 2021. Supplement No. 1 was adopted into the 2021 IBC, but Supplement No. 2 and Supplement No. 3 were not included as they have just been recently published.
The adoption of ASCE 7-16 Supplements shouldn't impact the cost of construction for most building structures. However, since some of the changes address the deficiencies for specific structures, such as in buildings with extreme torsional irregularities (Supplement No. 2) and seismic design of liquid storage tanks (Supplement No. 3), the design for these buildings and structures could result in increase in structural design loads than designs proportioned by applying just the originally published standard. It is difficult to quantify the construction cost increase for the noted specific structures because the potential increase in seismic loads depends on several factors and seismic demands is only a fraction of the overall loading. This potential amplification of structural loading for the noted building types is a necessary correction in order to meet the life safety criteria of the structure.
Loss of Sales or Revenue: The proposed rules make the state code for building construction consistent with national standards. Businesses with new products or updated test or design standards are recognized in the updated building code. The update will result in some cost outlay for some small businesses for specific building projects, for a transition period. Other small businesses would see an increase in revenue. The amendments to the building codes affect over 25,000 small businesses in the state, where construction activity occurs. The primary intent of the amendments is to improve the safety features in buildings and provide consistency and fairness across the state, for a predictable business environment. The amendments should result in enhanced safety and value in buildings.
Cost of Compliance for Small Businesses: (Determine whether the proposed rule will have a disproportionate cost impact on small businesses, compare the cost of compliance for small business with the cost of compliance for the 10 percent of businesses that are the largest businesses.)
Most businesses affected by the updates to the building codes are small businesses; over 95 percent of those listed in the construction and related industries have under 50 employees. The costs per employee are comparable between the largest businesses and the majority of small businesses. The cost to comply with the updated codes is not a disproportionate impact on small businesses. Where the council found the cost of compliance for small businesses to be disproportionate, the proposed rule mitigates the cost. The proposed rules include a definition of small business and provide exceptions for compliance with the updated rule.
Reducing the Costs of the Rule on Small Businesses: SBCC conducted a detailed review process, including participation at the national code development hearings, to document significant economic impacts of the proposed code amendments.
List of Industries: Below is a list of industries required to comply with the building code:
2017 Industry NAICS Code | NAICS Code Title | Minor Cost Estimate | 1% of Avg Annual Payroll | 0.3% of Avg Annual Gross Business Income |
236115 | New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) | $2,508.04 | $1,919.03 2020 Dataset pulled from USBLS | $2,508.04 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
236116 | New Multifamily Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders) | $32,067.43 | $17,160.94 2020 Dataset pulled from USBLS | $32,067.43 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
236118 | Residential Remodelers | $1,457.74 | $1,457.74 2020 Dataset pulled from USBLS | $901.20 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
236210 | Industrial Building Construction | $59,169.45 | $59,169.45 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $53,925.71 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
236220 | Commercial and Institutional Building Construction | $41,552.81 | $18,126.81 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $41,552.81 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238110 | Poured Concrete Foundation and Structure Contractors | $3,442.28 | $5,027.07 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $3,442.28 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238120 | Structural Steel and Precast Concrete Contractors | $15,401.97 | $20,212.19 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $15,401.97 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238130 | Framing Contractors | $2,234.30 | $3,139.71 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $2,234.30 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238140 | Masonry Contractors | $1,900.60 | $3,582.13 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $1,900.60 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238150 | Glass and Glazing Contractors | 5,255.36 | $9,574.95 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $5,255.36 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238160 | Roofing Contractors | $3,589.99 | $5,007.86 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $3,589.99 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238170 | Siding Contractors | $1,905.61 | $2,485.86 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $1,905.61 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238190 | Other Foundation; Structure; and Building Exterior Contractors | $4,622.07 | $4,141.38 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $4,622.07 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238210 | Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors | $5,941.60 | $9,599.33 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $5,941.60 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238220 | Plumbing; Heating; and Air-Conditioning Contractors | $5,353.76 | $11,047.00 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $5,353.76 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238290 | Other Building Equipment Contractors | $4,335.21 | $16,142.07 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $4,335.21 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238310 | Drywall and Insulation Contractors | $3,725.66 | $9,461.67 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $3,725.66 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
238990 | All Other Specialty Trade Contractors | $3,585.74 | $3,677.28 2019 Dataset pulled from CBP | $3,585.74 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
321213 | Engineered Wood Member (except Truss) Manufacturing | $44,480.76 | $44,480.76 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $41,772.84 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
321214 | Truss Manufacturing | $28,620.35 | $23,341.04 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $28,620.35 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
321219 | Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing | $30,305.17 | $10,139.90 2020 Dataset pulled from USBLS | $30,305.17 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
321911 | Wood Window and Door Manufacturing | $45,151.12 | $18,811.08 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $45,151.12 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
321992 | Prefabricated Wood Building Manufacturing | $5,391.09 | $5,391.09 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $4,888.53 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
327310 | Cement Manufacturing | $50,878.29 | $44,741.20 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $50,878.29 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
327320 | Ready-Mix Concrete Manufacturing | $64,317.30 | $46,126.21 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $64,317.30 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
327331 | Concrete Block and Brick Manufacturing | $15,030.60 | $15,030.60 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $10,431.02 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
332312 | Fabricated Structural Metal Manufacturing | $22,220.31 | $16,337.10 2020 Dataset pulled from USBLS | $22,220.31 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
332321 | Metal Window and Door Manufacturing | $26,369.28 | $14,505.40 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $26,369.28 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
332322 | Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing | $23,337.23 | $23,337.23 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $16,556.52 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
335121 | Residential Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing | $2,011.37 | $2,011.37 2020 Dataset pulled from USBLS | $1,502.01 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
335122 | Commercial; Industrial; and Institutional Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing | $6,357.34 | Redacted 2020 Dataset pulled from USBLS | $6,357.34 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
335129 | Other Lighting Equipment Manufacturing | $6,281.32 | $6,281.32 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $2,494.40 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
423720 | Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies (Hydronics) Merchant Wholesalers | $24,486.53 | $16,589.10 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $24,486.53 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
541310 | Architectural Services | $9,221.65 | $9,221.65 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $3,738.99 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
541330 | Engineering Services | $14,801.92 | $14,801.92 2020 Dataset pulled from USBLS | $7,177.43 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
541350 | Building Inspection Services | $1,868.52 | $1,868.52 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $475.93 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
561621 | Security Systems Services (except Locksmiths) | $9,759.28 | $9,759.28 2020 Dataset pulled from ESD | $6,117.04 2020 Dataset pulled from DOR |
Estimate of the Number of Jobs That Will Be Created or Lost: The adoption of the latest code edition is not expected to significantly impact the number of jobs in the construction industry. These rules are likely to be job neutral overall, i.e., they will not result in any job gains or losses. The scheduled effective date of the new edition is July 1, 2021. Building permits issued prior to that date will be vested under the 2018 building code. Permits issued for projects under the 2021 code edition will generally start with the 2024 construction season.
A copy of the statement may be obtained by contacting Stoyan Bumbalov, 1500 Jefferson Street S.E., Olympia, WA 98504, phone 360-407-9277, email sbcc@des.wa.gov.
August 23, 2022
Tony Doan
Council Chair
OTS-4036.2
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-0107Section 107—Construction documents.
107.2 Construction documents. Construction documents shall be in accordance with Sections 107.2.1 through 107.2.9.
107.2.9 Nonstructural components. Construction documents shall indicate if structural support and anchoring documentation for nonstructural components is part of the design submittal or a deferred submittal. The construction documents for nonstructural components shall at a minimum identify the following:
1. All nonstructural components required by ASCE 7 Section 13.1.3 to have an importance factor of, Ip, of 1.5.
2. All mechanical equipment, fire sprinkler equipment, electrical equipment, and other nonstructural components required by ASCE 7 Section 13.1.3 Item 1 to be operational following a seismic event that require designated seismic systems per ASCE 7 Section 13.2.2 and special inspections per Section 1705.13.4.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-01-090, filed 12/12/19, effective 7/1/20)
WAC 51-50-1604((Section 1604—General design requirements.))Reserved.
((Table 1604.5
Risk Category of Buildings and Other Structures
RISK CATEGORY | NATURE OF OCCUPANCY |
I | Buildings and other structures that represent a low hazard to human life in the event of failure including, but not limited to: |
| | • Agricultural facilities. |
| | • Certain temporary facilities. |
| | • Minor storage facilities. |
II | Buildings and other structures except those listed in Risk Categories I, III, and IV. |
III | Buildings and other structures that represent a substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure including, but not limited to: |
| | • Buildings and other structures whose primary occupancy is public assembly with an occupant load greater than 300. |
| | • Buildings and other structures containing Group E or Group I-4 occupancies with an occupant load greater than 250. |
| | • Buildings and other structures containing educational occupancies for students above the 12th grade with an occupant load greater than 500. |
| | • Group I-2 occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more resident care recipients but not having surgery or emergency treatment facilities. |
| | • Group I-3 occupancies. |
| | • Any other occupancy with an occupant load greater than 5,000.a |
| | • Power-generating stations, water treatment facilities for potable water, wastewater treatment facilities and other public utility facilities not included in Risk Category IV. |
| | • Buildings and other structures not included in Risk Category IV containing quantities of toxic or explosive materials that: |
| | | Exceed maximum allowable quantities per control area as given in Table 307.1(1) or 307.1(2) or per outdoor control area in accordance with the International Fire Code; and |
| | | Are sufficient to pose a threat to the public if released.b |
IV | Buildings and other structures designated as essential facilities including, but not limited to: |
| | • Group I-2 occupancies having surgery or emergency treatment facilities. |
| | • Structures that house private emergency power generation, medical gas systems, HVAC systems or related infrastructure systems that support emergency surgery or emergency treatment. |
| | • Fire, rescue, ambulance and police stations, and emergency vehicle garages. |
| | • Designated earthquake, hurricane, or other emergency shelters. |
| | • Designated emergency preparedness, communications and operations centers, and other facilities required for emergency response. |
| | • Power-generating stations and other public utility facilities required as emergency backup facilities for Risk Category IV structures. |
| | • Buildings and other structures containing quantities of highly toxic materials that: |
| | | Exceed maximum allowable quantities per control area as given in Table 307.1(2) or per outdoor control area in accordance with the International Fire Code; and |
| | | Are sufficient to pose a threat to the public if released.b |
| | • Aviation control towers, air traffic control centers, and emergency aircraft hangars. |
| | • Buildings and other structures having critical national defense functions. |
| | • Water storage facilities and pump structures required to maintain water pressure for fire suppression. |
a | For purposes of occupant load calculation, occupancies required by Table 1004.1.2 to use gross floor area calculations shall be permitted to use net floor areas to determine the total occupant load. |
b | Where approved by the building official, the classification of buildings and other structures as Risk Category III or IV based on their quantities of toxic, highly toxic or explosive materials is permitted to be reduced to Risk Category II, provided it can be demonstrated by a hazard assessment in accordance with Section 1.5.3 of ASCE 7 that a release of the toxic, highly toxic or explosive materials is not sufficient to pose a threat to the public.)) |
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-21-021, filed 10/9/20, effective 11/9/20)
WAC 51-50-1613Section 1613—Earthquake loads.
1613.4 Amendments to ASCE 7. The provisions of Section 1613.4 shall be permitted as an amendment to the relevant provisions of ASCE 7. The text of ASCE 7 shall be amended as indicated in Sections 1613.4.1 through ((1613.4.2))1613.4.6.
1613.4.1 ASCE 7 Section 12.2.5.4. Amend ASCE 7 Section 12.2.5.4 as follows:
12.2.5.4 Increased structural height limit for steel eccentrically braced frames, steel special concentrically braced frames, steel buckling-restrained braced frames, steel special plate shear walls, and special reinforced concrete shear walls. The limits on height, hn, in Table 12.2-1 are permitted to be increased from 160 ft (50 m) to 240 ft (75 m) for structures assigned to Seismic Design Categories D or E and from 100 ft (30 m) to 160 ft (50 m) for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category F, provided that the seismic force-resisting systems are limited to steel eccentrically braced frames, steel special concentrically braced frames, steel buckling-restrained braced frames, steel special plate shear walls, or special reinforced concrete cast-in-place shear walls and all of the following requirements are met:
1. The structure shall not have an extreme torsional irregularity as defined in Table 12.3-1 (horizontal structural irregularity Type 1b).
2. The steel eccentrically braced frames, steel special concentrically braced frames, steel buckling-restrained braced frames, steel special plate shear walls or special reinforced concrete shear walls in any one plane shall resist no more than 60 percent of the total seismic forces in each direction, neglecting accidental torsional effects.
3. Where floor and roof diaphragms transfer forces from the vertical seismic force-resisting elements above the diaphragm to other vertical force-resisting elements below the diaphragm, these in-plane transfer forces shall be amplified by the overstrength factor, Ωo for the design of the diaphragm flexure, shear, and collectors.
4. The earthquake force demands in foundation mat slabs, grade beams, and pile caps supporting braced frames and/or walls arranged to form a shear-resisting core shall be amplified by 2 for shear and 1.5 for flexure. The redundancy factor, ρ, applies and shall be the same as that used for the structure in accordance with Section 12.3.4.
((5. The earthquake shear force demands in special reinforced concrete shear walls shall be amplified by the over-strength factor, Ωo.))
1613.4.2 ASCE 7 Section 12.6. Amend ASCE 7 Section 12.6 and Table 12.6-1 to read as follows:
12.6 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE SELECTION
12.6.1 Analysis procedure. The structural analysis required by Chapter 12 shall consist of one of the types permitted in Table 12.6-1, based on the structure's seismic design category, structural system, dynamic properties, and regularity, or with the approval of the authority having jurisdiction, an alternative generally accepted procedure is permitted to be used. The analysis procedure selected shall be completed in accordance with the requirements of the corresponding section referenced in Table 12.6-1.
Table 12.6-1
Permitted Analytical Procedures
Seismic Design Category | Structural Characteristics | Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure, Section 12.8a | Modal Response Spectrum Analysis, Section 12.9.1, or Linear Response History Analysis, Section 12.9.2 | Nonlinear Response History Procedures, Chapter 16a |
B, C | All structures | P | P | P |
D, E, F | Risk Category I or II buildings not exceeding two stories above the base | P | P | P |
| Structures of light frame construction | P | P | P |
| Structures with no structural irregularities and not exceeding 160 ft in structural height | P | P | P |
| Structures exceeding 160 ft in structural height with no structural irregularities and with T <3.5Ts | P | P | P |
| Structures not exceeding 160 ft in structural height and having only horizontal irregularities of Type 2, 3, 4, or 5 in Table 12.3-1 or vertical irregularities of Type 4, 5a, or 5b in Table 12.3-2 | P | P | P |
| All other structures ≤ 240 ft in height | NP | P | P |
| All structures ˃ 240 ft in height | NP | NP | Pc |
a | P: Permitted; NP: Not Permitted; Ts= SD1/SDS. |
1613.4.3 ASCE 7 Section 11.2. Amend ASCE 7 Section 11.2 to include the following definition:
USGS SEISMIC DESIGN GEODATABASE: A U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) database of geocoded values of seismic design parameters and geocoded sets of multiperiod 5%-damped risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake (MCER) response spectra. The parameters obtained from this database may only be used where referenced by Section 11.4.8.1.
User Note: The USGS Seismic Design Geodatabase is intended to be accessed through a USGS Seismic Design web service that allows the user to specify the site location, by latitude and longitude, and the site class to obtain the seismic design data. The USGS web service spatially interpolates between the gridded data of the USGS geodatabase. Both the USGS geodatabase and the USGS web service can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7NK3C76. The USGS Seismic Design Geodatabase is available at the ASCE 7 Hazard Tool https://asce7hazardtool.online/ or an approved equivalent.
1613.4.4 ASCE 7 Section 11.4.8. Amend ASCE 7 Section 11.4.8 to include the following section:
11.4.8.1 Multiperiod design response spectrum. As an alternative to the ground motion hazard analysis requirements of Section 11.4.8, and suitable for all structures other than those designated Site Class F (unless exempted in accordance with Section 20.3.1), a multiperiod design response spectrum may be developed as follows:
1. For exclusive use with the USGS Seismic Design Geodatabase in accordance with this section, the site class shall be determined per Section 20.6.
2. Where a multiperiod design response spectrum is developed in accordance with this section, the parameters SM, SM1, SD, SD1, and TL as obtained by the USGS Seismic Design Geodatabase shall be used for all applications of these parameters in this standard.
3. The SS and S1 parameters obtained by the USGS Seismic Design Geodatabase are only permitted to be used in development of the multiperiod design response spectrum and are not permitted to be used in other applications in this standard. The mapped parameters SS and S1 as determined by Section 11.4.2 and peak ground acceleration parameter PGAM as determined by Section 11.8.3 shall be used for all other applications in this standard.
4. At discrete values of period, T, equal to 0.0s, 0.01s, 0.02s, 0.03s, 0.05s, 0.075s, 0.1s, 0.15s, 0.2s, 0.25s, 0.3s, 0.4s, 0.5s, 0.75s, 1.0s, 1.5s, 2.0s, 3.0s, 4.0s, 5.0s, 7.5s, and 10.0s, the 5%-damped design spectral response acceleration parameter, Sa, shall be taken as 2/3 of the multiperiod 5%-damped MCER response spectrum from the USGS Seismic Design Geodatabase for the applicable site class.
5. At each response period, T, less than 10.0s and not equal to one of the discrete values of period, T, listed in Item 4 above, Sa, shall be determined by linear interpolation between values of Sa, of Item 4 above.
6. At each response period, T, greater than 10.0s, Sa shall be taken as the value of Sa at the period of 10.0s, factored by 10/T, where the value of T is less than or equal to that of the long-period transition period, TL, and shall be taken as the value of Sa at the period of 10.0s factored by 10TL/T2, where the value of T is greater than that of the long-period transition period, TL.
7. Where an MCER response spectrum is required, it shall be determined by multiplying the multiperiod design response spectrum by 1.5.
8. For use with the equivalent lateral force procedure, the spectral acceleration Sa at T shall be permitted to replace SD1/T in Equation (12.8-3) and SD1TL/T2 in Equation (12.8-4).
1613.4.5 ASCE 7 Section 20.6. Amend ASCE 7 Chapter 20 to include the following section:
Section 20.6 Site classification procedure for use with Section 11.4.8.1. For exclusive use in determining the multiperiod design response spectrum and associated spectral parameters in accordance with Section 11.4.8.1, the site class shall be determined in accordance with this section. For all other applications in this standard the site class shall be determined per Section 20.1.
20.6.1 Site classification. The site soil shall be classified in accordance with Table 20.6-1 and Section 20.6.2 based on the average shear wave velocity parameter, , which is derived from the measured shear wave velocity profile from the ground surface to a depth of 100 ft (30 m). Where shear wave velocity is not measured, appropriate generalized correlations between shear wave velocity and standard penetration test (SPT) blow counts, cone penetration test (CPT) tip resistance, shear strength, or other geotechnical parameters shall be used to obtain an estimated shear wave velocity profile, as described in Section 20.6.3. Where site-specific data (measured shear wave velocities or other geotechnical data that can be used to estimate shear wave velocity) are available only to a maximum depth less than 100 ft (30 m), shall be estimated as described in Section 20.6.3. Where the soil properties are not known in sufficient detail to determine the site class, the most critical site conditions of Site Class C, Site Class CD and Site Class D, as defined in Section 20.6.2, shall be used unless the authority having jurisdiction or geotechnical data determine that Site Class DE, E or F soils are present at the site. Site Classes A and B shall not be assigned to a site if there is more than 10 ft (3.1 m) of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of the spread footing or mat foundation.
20.6.2 Site class definitions. Site class types shall be assigned in accordance with the definitions provided in Table 20.6.2-1 and this section.
20.6.2.1 Soft clay Site Class E. Where a site does not qualify under the criteria for Site Class F per Section 20.3.1 and there is a total thickness of soft clay greater than 10 ft (3 m), where a soft clay layer is defined by su<500psf (su<25 kPa), w ≥ 40%, and PI ˃ 20, it shall be classified as Site Class E. This classification is made regardless of , as computed in Section 20.4. 20.6.2.2 Site Classes C, CD, D, DE and E. The assignment of Site Class C, CD, D, DE and E soils shall be made based on the average shear wave velocity, which is derived from the site shear wave velocity profile from the ground surface to a depth of 100 ft (30 m), as described in Section 20.4.
20.6.2.3 Site Classes B and BC (medium hard and soft rock). Site Class B can only be assigned to a site on the basis of shear wave velocity measured on site. If shear wave velocity data are not available and the site condition is estimated by a geotechnical engineer, engineering geologist, or seismologist as Site Class B or BC on the basis of site geology, consisting of competent rock with moderate fracturing and weathering, the site shall be classified as Site Class BC. Softer and more highly fractured and weathered rock shall either be measured on site for shear wave velocity or classified as Site Class C.
20.6.2.4 Site Class A (hard rock). The hard rock, Site Class A, category shall be supported by shear wave velocity measurement, either on site or on profiles of the same rock type in the same formation with an equal or greater degree of weathering and fracturing. Where hard rock conditions are known to be continuous to a depth of 100 ft (30 m), surficial shear wave velocity measurements to maximum depths less than 100 ft are permitted to be extrapolated to assess . Table 20.6.2-1 Site Classification
| Site Class | Calculated Using Measured or Estimated Shear Wave Velocity Profile (ft/s) | |
| A. Hard Rock | ˃ 5,000 | |
| B. Medium Hard Rock | ˃ 3,000 to 5,000 | |
| BC. Soft Rock | ˃ 2,100 to 3,000 | |
| C. Very Dense Sand or Hard Clay | ˃ 1,450 to 2,100 | |
| CD. Dense Sand or Very Stiff Clay | ˃ 1,000 to 1,450 | |
| D. Medium Dense Sand or Stiff Clay | ˃ 700 to 1,000 | |
| DE. Loose Sand or Medium Stiff Clay | ˃ 500 to 700 | |
| E. Very Loose Sand or Soft Clay | ≤ 500 | |
20.6.3 Estimation of shear wave velocity profiles. Where measured shear wave velocity data are not available, shear wave velocity shall be estimated as a function of depth using correlations with suitable geotechnical parameters, including standard penetration test (SPT) blow counts, shear strength, overburden pressure, void ratio, or cone penetration test (CPT) tip resistance, measured at the site.
Site class based on estimated values of shall be derived using , /1.3, and 1.3 when correlation models are used to derive shear wave velocities. Where correlations derived for specific local regions can be demonstrated to have greater accuracy, factors less than 1.3 can be used if approved by the authority having jurisdiction. If the different average velocities result in different site classes per Table 20.6.2-1, the most critical of the site classes for ground motion analysis at each period shall be used. Where the available data used to establish the shear wave velocity profile extends to depths less than 100 ft (30 m) but more than 50 ft (15 m), and the site geology is such that soft layers are unlikely to be encountered between 50 and 100 ft, the shear wave velocity of the last layer in the profile shall be extended to 100 ft for the calculation of in Equation (20.4-1). Where the data does not extend to depths of 50 ft (15 m), default site classes, as described in Section 20.6.1, shall be used unless another site class can be justified on the basis of the site geology. 1613.4.6 ASCE 7 Section 21.3.1. Amend ASCE 7 Section 21.3 to include the following section:
Section 21.3.1 Alternate minimum design spectral response accelerations. As an alternate approach to Section 21.3, the lower limit of Sa is permitted to be determined according to this section. The design spectral response acceleration at any period shall not be taken less than 80% of the multiperiod design response spectrum as determined by Section 11.4.8.1.
For sites classified as Site Class F requiring site-specific analysis in accordance with Section 11.4.8, the design spectral response acceleration at any period shall not be less than 80% of Sa determined for Site Class E.
EXCEPTION: | Where a different site class can be justified using the site-specific classification procedures in accordance with Section 20.6.2.2, a lower limit of 80% of Sa for the justified site class shall be permitted to be used. |
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 21-12-075, filed 5/28/21, effective 6/28/21)
WAC 51-50-1615Tsunami loads.
1615.1 General. The design and construction of Risk Category III and IV buildings and structures located in the Tsunami Design Zones shall be in accordance with Chapter 6 of ASCE ((7))7-22, except as modified by this code.
USER NOTE: | The intent of the Washington state amendments to ASCE 7 Chapter 6 (Tsunami Loads and Effects) is to require use of the Washington Tsunami Design maps to determine inundation limits, i.e., when a site is within a tsunami design zone, where those maps are available. If they are not available for a given site, ASCE 7 maps are to be used. For sites where the Washington state department of natural resources has parameters for tsunami inundation depth and flow velocity available, those parameters are required to be used in ((the energy grade line analysis methodology))lieu of ASCE 7 methodology, and as a basis for comparison in the probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis in this chapter. |
1615.2 Modifications to ASCE 7. The text of Chapter 6 of ASCE 7 shall be modified as indicated in this section.
1615.2.1 ASCE 7 Section 6.1.1. Modify the third paragraph and its exception in ASCE 7 Section 6.1.1 to read as follows:
The Tsunami Design Zone shall be determined using the Washington Tsunami Design Zone maps (WA-TDZ). The WA-TDZ maps are available at https://www.dnr.wa.gov/wa-tdz. For areas not covered by the extent of the WA-TDZ maps, the Tsunami Design Zone shall be determined using the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase of geocoded reference points shown in Fig. 6.1-1. The ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase of geocoded reference points of runup and associated inundation Limits of the Tsunami Design Zone is available at http://asce7tsunami.online.
EXCEPTION: | For coastal regions subject to tsunami inundation and not covered by WA-TDZ maps or Fig. 6.1-1, Tsunami Design Zone, inundation limits, and runup elevations shall be determined using the site-specific procedures of Section 6.7, or for Tsunami Risk Category II or III structures, determined in accordance with the procedures of Section 6.5.1.1 using Fig. 6.7-1. |
1615.2.2 ASCE 7 Section 6.1.1. Add new fifth paragraph and user note to ASCE 7 Section 6.1.1 to read as follows:
Whenever a Tsunami Design Zone or Fig. 6.1-1 is referenced in ASCE 7 Chapter 6, it shall include the WA-TDZ maps, within the extent of those maps.
USER NOTE: | Tsunami inundation depths and flow velocities may be obtained from the Washington state department of natural resources. See https://www.dnr.wa.gov/wa-tdz. |
1615.2.3 ASCE 7 Section 6.2. Modify ASCE 7 Section 6.2 definitions to read as follows:
MAXIMUM CONSIDERED TSUNAMI: A probabilistic tsunami having a 2% probability of being exceeded in a 50-year period or a 2,475-year mean recurrence, or a deterministic assessment considering the maximum tsunami that can reasonably be expected to affect a site.
TSUNAMI DESIGN ZONE MAP: The Washington Tsunami Design Zone maps (WA-TDZ) designating the potential horizontal inundation limit of the Maximum Considered Tsunami, or outside of the extent of WA-TDZ maps, the map given in Fig. 6.1-1.
1615.2.4 ASCE 7 Section 6.2. Add new definitions to ASCE 7 Section 6.2 to read as follows:
SHORELINE AMPLITUDE: The Maximum Considered Tsunami amplitude at the shoreline, where the shoreline is determined by vertical datum in North American Vertical Datum (NAVD 88).
WASHINGTON TSUNAMI DESIGN ZONE MAP (WA-TDZ): The Washington department of natural resources maps of potential tsunami inundation limits for the Maximum Considered Tsunami, designated as follows:
Anacortes Bellingham area | MS 2018-02 Anacortes Bellingham |
Columbia River | DOGAMI SP-51 (L1 scenario) adopted by WA DNR |
Elliott Bay Seattle | OFR 2003-14 |
Everett area | OFR 2014-03 |
Port Angeles | MS 2022-01 |
((Port Angeles and)) Port Townsend area | MS 2018-03 ((Port Angeles and Port Townsend)) |
Port Townsend | MS 2018-03 (Partially superseded by MS 2022-01) |
Puget Sound | MS 2021-01 |
San Juan Islands | MS 2016-01 (Partially superseded on its eastern edge by MS 2021-01) |
Southern Washington Coast | MS 2018-01 |
Tacoma area | OFR 2009-9 |
The Washington state department of natural resources geodatabase of design parameters for tsunami inundation depth and flow velocity for a maximum considered tsunami from select published sources is available at the Washington TDZ website https://www.dnr.wa.gov/wa-tdz.
1615.2.5 ASCE 7 Section 6.5.1. Add new second paragraph to ASCE 7 Section 6.5.1 to read as follows:
6.5.1 Tsunami Risk Category II and III buildings and other structures. The Maximum Considered Tsunami inundation depth and tsunami flow velocity characteristics at a Tsunami Risk Category II or III building or other structure shall be determined by ((using the Energy Grade Line Analysis of Section 6.6 using the inundation limit and runup elevation of the Maximum Considered Tsunami given in Fig. 6.1-1.
Where tsunami inundation depth and flow velocity characteristics are available from the Washington state department of natural resources, those parameters shall be used to determine design forces in the Energy Grade Line Analysis in Section 6.6.))the WA-TDZ maps. Those parameters shall be used as the Maximum Considered Tsunami inundation depth and tsunami flow velocity characteristics in lieu of the Energy Grade Line Analysis in Section 6.6. Where WA-TDZ maps are not available the tsunami inundation depth and tsunami flow velocity characteristics shall be determined using the Energy Grade Line Analysis of Section 6.6 using the inundation limit and runup elevation of the Maximum Considered Tsunami given in Fig. 6.1-1.
1615.2.6 ASCE 7 Section 6.5.1.1. Modify the first paragraph of ASCE 7 Section 6.5.1.1 to read as follows:
6.5.1.1 Runup evaluation for areas where no map values are given. For Tsunami Risk Category II and III buildings and other structures where no mapped inundation limit is shown in the Tsunami Design Zone map, the ratio of tsunami runup elevation above Mean High Water Level to Offshore Tsunami Amplitude, R/HT, shall be permitted to be determined using the surf similarity parameter ξ100, according to Eqs. (6.5-2a, b, c, d, or e) and Fig. 6.5-1.
1615.2.7 ASCE 7 Section 6.5.2. Add new second exception to the first paragraph ((to))of ASCE 7 Section 6.5.2 to read as follows:
6.5.2 Tsunami Risk Category IV buildings and other structures. The Energy Grade Line Analysis of Section 6.6 shall be performed for Tsunami Risk Category IV buildings and other structures, and the site-specific Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis (PTHA) of Section 6.7 shall also be performed. Site-specific velocities determined by site-specific PTHA determined to be less than the Energy Grade Line Analysis shall be subject to the limitation in Section 6.7.6.8. Site-specific velocities determined to be greater than the Energy Grade Line Analysis shall be used.
EXCEPTIONS: | For structures other than Tsunami Vertical Evacuation Refuge Structures, a site-specific Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis need not be performed where the inundation depth resulting from the Energy Grade Line Analysis is determined to be less than 12 ft (3.66 m) at any point within the location of the Tsunami Risk Category IV structure. |
| Where ((tsunami inundation depths and))design flow velocities are available ((for a site from the Washington state department of natural resources, those parameters shall be used as the basis of comparison for the PTHA above and to determine whether the exception applies, in lieu of the Energy Grade Line Analysis))from WA-TDZ maps, those parameters shall be used, in lieu of the Energy Grade Line Analysis, as the basis of comparison with the site-specific velocities determined by site-specific PTHA. |
1615.2.8 ASCE 7 Section 6.6.1. Add new ((third paragraph))user note to ASCE 7 Section 6.6.1 to read as follows:
6.6.1 Maximum inundation depth and flow velocities based on runup. The maximum inundation depths and flow velocities associated with the stages of tsunami flooding shall be determined in accordance with Section 6.6.2. Calculated flow velocity shall not be taken as less than 10 ft/s (3.0 m/s) and need not be taken as greater than the lesser of 1.5(ghmax)1/2 and 50 ft/s (15.2 m/s).
Where the maximum topographic elevation along the topographic transect between the shoreline and the inundation limit is greater than the runup elevation, one of the following methods shall be used:
1. The site-specific procedure of Section 6.7.6 shall be used to determine inundation depth and flow velocities at the site, subject to the ((above)) range of calculated velocities defined in the first paragraph of this section.
2. For determination of the inundation depth and flow velocity at the site, the procedure of Section 6.6.2, Energy Grade Line Analysis, shall be used, assuming a runup elevation and horizontal inundation limit that has at least 100% of the maximum topographic elevation along the topographic transect.
((Where tsunami inundation depths and flow velocities are available from Washington state department of natural resources, those parameters shall be used to determine design forces in the Energy Grade Line Analysis in Section 6.6.2.))
3. Where the site lies within a completely overwashed area for which inundation depth points are provided in the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase, the inundation elevation profiles shall be determined using the Energy Grade Line Analysis with the following modifications.
a. The Energy Grade Line Analysis shall be initiated from the inland edge of the overwashed land with an inundation elevation equal to the maximum topographic elevation of the overwashed portion of the transect.
b. The Froude number shall be 1 at the inland edge of the overwashed land and shall vary linearly with distance to match the value of the Froude number determined at the shoreline per the coefficient α.
c. The Energy Grade Line Analysis flow elevation profile shall be uniformly adjusted with a vertical offset such that the computed inundation depth at the inundation depth point is at least the depth specified by the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase, but the flow elevation profile shall not be adjusted lower than the topographic elevations of the overwashed land transect.
USER NOTE: | Where tsunami inundation depths and flow velocities are available from the WA-TDZ maps, those parameters shall be used as the Maximum Considered Tsunami inundation depth and tsunami flow velocity in lieu of the Energy Grade Line Analysis in Section 6.6.2. |
1615.2.9 ASCE 7 Section 6.7. Modify ASCE 7 Section 6.7 and add a user note to read as follows:
When required by Section 6.5, the inundation depths and flow velocities shall be determined by site-specific inundation studies complying with the requirements of this section. Site-specific analyses shall use an integrated generation, propagation, and inundation model that replicates the given offshore tsunami waveform amplitude and period from the seismic sources given in Section 6.7.2.
USER NOTE: | ((Washington Tsunami Design Zone maps and inundation depths and flow velocities from Washington state department of natural resources))WA-TDZ maps are based on an integrated generation, propagation, and inundation model replicating waveforms from the seismic sources specific to Washington state. ((Model data can be obtained by contacting Washington state department of natural resources.)) See https://www.dnr.wa.gov/wa-tdz. |
1615.2.10 ASCE 7 Section 6.7.5.1((, Item 4)).((Modify))Add new exceptions to ASCE 7 Section 6.7.5.1, Item 4, Item 5, and Item 6, to read as follows:
6.7.5.1 Offshore tsunami amplitude for distant seismic sources. Offshore tsunami amplitude shall be probabilistically determined in accordance with the following:
4. ((The value of tsunami wave amplitude shall be not less than 80% of the shoreline amplitude value associated with the Washington state inundation models as measured in the direction of the incoming wave propagation.))The extent of offshore tsunami amplitude points considered for the site shall include the following:
a. For sites within Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii, the extent shall include points within at least 40 mi (64.4 km) but not exceeding 50 mi (80.5 km) of projected length along the coastline, centered on the site within a tolerance of plus or minus 6 mi (9.7 km);
b. For sites within Alaska, the extent shall include points within at least 100 mi (161 km) but not exceeding 125 mi (201 km), centered on the site within a tolerance of plus or minus 15 mi (24.1 km);
c. For sites within bays, the designated center of the computed offshore tsunami amplitude points shall be taken either offshore of the mouth of the bay or centered in accordance with criteria a. or b. above, whichever produces the more severe flow conditions at the site.
d. For island locations where the projected width of the island is less than 40 mi (64.4 km), it shall be permitted to consider the extent of offshore tsunami amplitude points corresponding to the projected width of the island. Shorter extents of offshore tsunami amplitude points shall be permitted for island locations, but shall not be less than 10 mi (16.1 km). In addition, the tsunami source development and inundation modeling are subject to an independent peer review by a tsunami modeler approved by the authority having jurisdiction, who shall present a written report to the authority having jurisdiction as to the hazard consistency of the modeling with the requirements of Section 6.7.
EXCEPTION: | Where tsunami inundation depths are available from the WA-TDZ maps, the shoreline tsunami amplitudes shall be used as the basis of comparison, in lieu of the offshore tsunami amplitudes. The extents of shoreline tsunami amplitude points considered for the site shall be determined along the coastline, in the same manner as those of offshore tsunami amplitude points, but without projecting from the coastline toward the offshore. |
5. The mean value of the computed offshore tsunami wave amplitudes shall be not less than 100% of the mean value for the coinciding offshore tsunami amplitude data given by the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase.
EXCEPTION: | Where tsunami inundation depths are available from the WA-TDZ maps, the computed shoreline tsunami amplitudes shall be used as the basis of comparison, in lieu of the computed offshore tsunami amplitudes, with the coinciding shoreline tsunami inundation data associated with the WA-TDZ maps as measured in the direction of the incoming wave propagation. |
6. The individual values of the computed offshore tsunami wave amplitude shall be not less than 80% of the coinciding offshore tsunami amplitude values given by the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase.
EXCEPTION: | Where tsunami inundation depths are available from the WA-TDZ maps, the computed shoreline tsunami amplitudes shall be used as the basis of comparison, in lieu of the computed offshore tsunami amplitudes, with the coinciding shoreline tsunami inundation data associated with the WA-TDZ maps as measured in the direction of the incoming wave propagation. |
1615.2.11 ASCE 7 Table 6.7-2. Modify ASCE 7 Table 6.7-2 to read as follows:
Table 6.7-2
Maximum Moment Magnitude
Subduction Zone | Moment Magnitude MWmax |
Alaskan-Aleutian | 9.2 |
Cascadia | 9.0 |
Chile-Peru | 9.5 |
Izu-Bonin-Mariana | 9.0 |
Kamchatka-Kurile and Japan Trench | 9.4 |
1615.2.12 ASCE 7 Section 6.7.5.2.((Modify))Add new exception to the first paragraph of ASCE 7 Section 6.7.5.2 to read as follows:
6.7.5.2 Direct computation of probabilistic inundation and runup. It shall be permitted to compute probabilistic inundation and runup directly from a probabilistic set of sources, source characterizations, and uncertainties consistent with Section 6.7.2, Section 6.7.4, and the computing conditions set out in Section 6.7.6. ((The shoreline amplitude values computed shall not be lower than 80% of the shoreline amplitude value associated with the Washington state inundation models as measured in the direction of the incoming wave propagation.
1615.2.13))The offshore wave amplitudes computed shall comply with the requirements of Sections 6.7.5.1.4, 6.7.5.1.5, and 6.7.5.1.6.
EXCEPTION: | Where tsunami inundation depths are available from the WA-TDZ maps, the computed shoreline tsunami amplitudes shall be used as the basis of comparison, in lieu of the computed offshore tsunami amplitudes for complying with the requirements of Sections 6.7.5.1.4, 6.7.5.1.5, and 6.7.5.1.6. |
1615.2.13 ASCE 7 Section 6.7.5.3. Add new exceptions to ASCE 7 Section 6.7.5. 3.1(b) and (c) to read as follows:
b. The mean value of the computed offshore tsunami amplitudes is at least 85% of the mean value for the coinciding offshore tsunami amplitude data of the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase.
EXCEPTION: | Where tsunami inundation depths are available from the WA-TDZ maps, the computed shoreline tsunami amplitudes shall be used as the basis of comparison, in lieu of the computed offshore tsunami amplitudes, with the coinciding shoreline tsunami inundation data associated with the WA-TDZ maps as measured in the direction of the incoming wave propagation. |
c. The values of the computed offshore tsunami wave amplitude are not less than 75% of the coinciding offshore tsunami amplitude values of the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase.
EXCEPTION: | Where tsunami inundation depths are available from the WA-TDZ maps, the computed shoreline tsunami amplitudes shall be used as the basis of comparison, in lieu of the computed offshore tsunami amplitudes, with the coinciding shoreline tsunami inundation data associated with the WA-TDZ maps as measured in the direction of the incoming wave propagation. |
1615.2.14 ASCE 7 Section 6.7.6.2. Modify ASCE 7 Section 6.7.6.2 and add a user note to read as follows:
6.7.6.2 Seismic subsidence before tsunami arrival. Where the seismic source is a local earthquake event, the Maximum Considered Tsunami inundation shall be determined for an overall elevation subsidence value shown in Fig. 6.7-3(a) and 6.7-3(b) or shall be directly computed for the seismic source mechanism. The GIS digital map layers of subsidence are available in the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase at http://asce7tsunami.online.
USER NOTE: | The WA-TDZ maps include computed subsidence and uplift (where applicable) in the inundation results. Subsidence data may be obtained from the Washington state department of natural resources. See https://www.dnr.wa.gov/wa-tdz. |
((1615.2.14))1615.2.15 ASCE 7 Section 6.8.9. Modify the first sentence of ASCE 7 Section 6.8.9 to read as follows:
6.8.9 Seismic effects on the foundations preceding maximum considered tsunami. Where designated in the Tsunami Design Zone map as a site subject to a tsunami from a local earthquake, the structure shall be designed for the preceding coseismic effects.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-1702((Section 1702—Definitions.))Reserved.
((1702.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:
Approved agency
Approved fabricator
Certificate of compliance
Designated seismic system
Fabricated item
Intumescent fire-resistant coatings
Main wind-force resisting system
Mastic fire-resistant coatings
SMALL BUSINESS.
Special inspection
Continuous special inspection
Periodic special inspection
Special inspector
Sprayed fire-resistant materials
Structural observation))
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-01-090, filed 12/12/19, effective 7/1/20)
WAC 51-50-1705Section 1705—Required special inspections and tests.
((1705.5.3 Mass timber construction.Special inspections of mass timber elements in Types IV-A, IV-B and IV-C construction shall be in accordance with Table 1705.5.3.
Table 1705.5.3
Required Special Inspections of Mass Timber Construction
Type | Continuous Special Inspection | Periodic Special Inspection |
1. Inspection of anchorage and connections of mass timber construction to timber deep foundation systems. | | X |
2. Inspect erection and sequence of mass timber construction. | | X |
3. Inspection of connections where installation methods are required to meet design loads. | | |
| 3.1. Threaded fasteners. | | |
| | 3.1.1. Verify use of proper installation equipment. | | X |
| | 3.1.2. Verify use of predrilled holes where required. | | X |
| | 3.1.3. Inspect screws, including diameter, length, head type, spacing, installation angle, and depth. | | X |
| 3.2. Adhesive anchors installed in horizontal or upwardly inclined orientation to resist sustained tension loads. | X | |
| 3.3. Adhesive anchors not defined in 3.2 | | X |
| 3.4. Bolted connections. | | X |
| 3.5. Concealed connections. | | X |
1705.11.1 Structural wood.Continuous special inspection is required during field gluing operations of elements of the main windforce-resisting system. Periodic special inspection is required for nailing, bolting, anchoring and other fastening of elements of the main windforce-resisting system, including wood shear walls, wood diaphragms, drag struts, braces and hold-downs.
EXCEPTION: | Special inspections are not required for wood shear walls, shear panels and diaphragms, including nailing, bolting, anchoring and other fastening to other elements of the main windforce-resisting system, where the lateral resistance is provided by sheathing of wood structural panels, and the fastener spacing of the sheathing is more than 4 inches (102 mm) on center. |
1705.12.2 Structural wood. For the seismic force-resisting systems of structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E, or F:
1. Continuous special inspection shall be required during field gluing operations of elements of the seismic force-resisting system.
2. Periodic special inspection shall be required for nailing, bolting, anchoring and other fastening of elements of the seismic force-resisting system, including wood shear walls, wood diaphragms, drag struts, braces, shear panels and hold-downs.
EXCEPTION: | Special inspections are not required for wood shear walls, shear panels and diaphragms, including nailing, bolting, anchoring and other fastening to other elements of the seismic force-resisting system, where the lateral resistance is provided by sheathing of wood structural panels, and the fastener spacing of the sheathing is more than 4 inches (102 mm) on center. |
1705.12.6))1705.13.6 Plumbing, mechanical and electrical components. Periodic special inspection of plumbing, mechanical and electrical components shall be required for the following:
1. Anchorage of electrical equipment for emergency and standby power systems in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F.
2. Anchorage of other electrical equipment in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category E or F.
3. Installation and anchorage of piping systems designed to carry hazardous materials and their associated mechanical units in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F.
4. Installation and anchorage of ductwork designed to carry hazardous materials in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F.
5. Installation and anchorage of vibration isolation systems in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F where the approved construction documents require a nominal clearance of .25 inch (6.4 mm) or less between the equipment support frame and restraint.
6. Installation of mechanical and electrical equipment, including ductwork, piping systems and their structural supports, where automatic fire sprinkler systems are installed in Risk Category IV structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F to verify one of the following:
6.1. Minimum clearances have been provided as required by Section 13.2.3 ASCE/SEI 7.
6.2. A nominal clearance of not less than 3 inches (76 mm) has been provided between ((fire protection))automatic sprinkler system drops and sprigs and: Structural members not used collectively or independently to support the sprinklers; equipment attached to the building structure; and other systems' piping.
Where flexible sprinkler hose fittings are used, special inspection of minimum clearances is not required.
((1705.19 Sealing of mass timber. Periodic special inspections of sealants or adhesives shall be conducted where sealant or adhesive required by Section 703.9 is applied to mass timber building elements as designated in the approved construction documents.))
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-17090Preconstruction load tests.
1709.5 Exterior window and door assemblies. The design pressure rating of exterior windows and doors in buildings shall be determined in accordance with Section 1709.5.1 or 1709.5.2. For ((the purposes of this section, the required design pressure shall be determined using the allowable stress design load combinations of Section 1605.3))exterior windows and doors tested in accordance with Section 1709.5.1 or 1709.5.2, required design wind pressures determined from ASCE 7 shall be permitted to be converted to allowable stress design by multiplying by 0.6.
EXCEPTIONS: | 1. Structural wind load design pressures for window ((units smaller than the size tested in accordance with Section 1709.5.1 or 1709.5.2 shall be permitted to be higher than the design value of the tested unit provided such higher pressures are determined by accepted engineering analysis. All components of the small unit shall be the same as the tested unit. Where such calculated design pressures are used, they shall be validated by an additional test of the window unit having the highest allowable design pressure))or door assemblies other than the size tested in accordance with Section 1709.5.1 or 1709.5.2 shall be permitted to be different than the design value of the tested assembly, provided that such pressures are determined by accepted engineering analysis or validated by an additional test of the window or door assembly to the alternative allowable design pressure in accordance with Section 1709.5.2. Components of the alternate size assembly shall be the same as the tested or labeled assembly. Where engineering analysis is used, it shall be performed in accordance with the analysis procedures of AAMA 2502. |
| 2. Custom exterior windows and doors manufactured by a small business shall be exempt from all testing requirements in Section 1709 of the International Building Code provided they meet the applicable provisions of Chapter 24 of the International Building Code. |
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-1710((Section 1710—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-1715((Section 1715—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-1901((Section 1901—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-1903((Section 1903—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-1904((Section 1904—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-1905((Section 1905—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-1908((Section 1908—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-1909((Section 1909—))Reserved.
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-2103Section 2103—Mortar.
2103.2.4 Mortar for adhered masonry veneer. Mortar for use with adhered masonry veneer shall conform to ASTM C270 for Type N or S, or shall comply with ANSI A118.4 or A118.15 for modified dry-set cement mortar. The cementitious bond coat shall comply with ANSI A118.4 or A118.15.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-2104((Section 2104—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-21-021, filed 10/9/20, effective 11/9/20)
WAC 51-50-21070Section 2107—Allowable stress design.
((2107.1 General. The design of masonry structures using allowable stress design shall comply with Sections 2106 and the requirements of Chapters 1 through 8 of TMS 402/ACI 530/ASCE 5 except as modified by Sections 2107.2 through 2107.3.))
2107.2 TMS 402/ACI 530/ASCE 5, Section 2.1.8.7.1.1, lap splices. In lieu of Section 2.1.8.7.1.1, it shall be permitted to design lap splices in accordance with Section 2107.2.1.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-2111Section 2111—Masonry fireplaces.
2111.8 Fireplaces. Fireplaces shall be provided with each of the following:
1. Tightly fitting flue dampers, operated by a readily accessible manual or approved automatic control.
EXCEPTION: | Fireplaces with gas logs shall be installed in accordance with the International Mechanical Code Section 901, except that the standards for liquefied petroleum gas installations shall be NFPA 58 (Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code) and NFPA 54 (National Fuel Gas Code). |
2. An outside source for combustion air ducted into the firebox. The duct shall be at least 6 square inches, and shall be provided with an operable outside air duct damper.
EXCEPTION: | Washington certified fireplaces shall be installed with the combustion air systems necessary for their safe and efficient combustion and specified by the manufacturer in accordance with IBC Section ((2114 (WAC 51-50-2114)))2115 (WAC 51-50-2115). |
3. Site built fireplaces shall have tight fitting glass or metal doors, or a flue draft induction fan or as approved for minimizing back-drafting. Factory built fireplaces shall use doors listed for the installed appliance.
2111.8.1 Lintel and throat. Masonry over a fireplace opening shall be supported by a lintel of noncombustible material. The minimum required bearing length on each end of the fireplace opening shall be 4 inches (102 mm). The fireplace throat or damper shall be located a minimum of 8 inches (203 mm) above the top of the fireplace opening.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-01-090, filed 12/12/19, effective 7/1/20)
WAC 51-50-2303Section 2303—Minimum standards and quality.
((2303.1.4 Structural glued cross-laminated timber. Cross-laminated timbers shall be manufactured and identified in accordance with ANSI/APA PRG 320. Cross-laminated timbers in Construction Types IV-A, IV-B, and IV-C shall be manufactured and identified in accordance with ANSI/APA PRG 320 - 18.))2303.1.1.3 Used solid-sawn lumber. Used solid-sawn dimensional lumber in good condition and devoid of areas of decay, not meeting the requirements of Section 2303.1.1, 2303.1.1.1, or 2303.1.1.2, that has a nominal thickness of 2 inches with a nominal width of 6 inches or less, shall be assumed to be spruce-pine-fir stud grade and shall have structural properties assigned in accordance with current adopted standards. All other dimensional lumber shall be assumed to be hem-fir No. 2 grade and shall have structural properties assigned in accordance with current adopted standards.
2303.6 Nails and staples. Nails and staples shall conform to requirements of ASTM F1667, including Supplement 1. Nails used for framing and sheathing connections shall have minimum average bending yield strengths as follows: 80 kips per square inch (ksi) (551 MPa) for shank diameters larger than 0.177 inch (4.50 mm) but not larger than 0.254 inch (6.45 mm), 90 ksi (620 MPa) for shank diameters larger than 0.142 inch (3.61 mm) but not larger than 0.177 inch (4.50 mm) and 100 ksi (689 MPa) for shank diameters of not less than 0.099 inch (2.51 mm) but not larger than 0.142 inch (3.61 mm). Staples used for framing and sheathing connections shall have minimum average bending moments as follows: 3.6 in.-lbs (0.41 N-m) for No. 16 gage staples, 4.0 in.-lbs (0.45 N-m) for No. 15 gage staples, and 4.3 in.-lbs (0.49 N-m) for No. 14 gage staples. Staples allowable bending moments shall be listed on the construction documents.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-21-021, filed 10/9/20, effective 11/9/20)
WAC 51-50-2304Section 2304—General construction requirements.
((2304.10 Connectors and fasteners. Connectors and fasteners shall comply with the applicable provisions of Sections 2304.10.1 through 2304.10.8.
2304.10.8 Connection fire-resistance rating. Fire-resistance ratings for connections in Type IV-A, IV-B, or IV-C construction shall be determined by one of the following:
1. Testing in accordance with Section 703.2 where the connection is part of the fire-resistance test.
2. Engineering analysis that demonstrates that the temperature rise at any portion of the connection is limited to an average temperature rise of 250°F (139°C), and a maximum temperature rise of 325°F (181°C), for a time corresponding to the required fire-resistance rating of the structural element being connected. For the purposes of this analysis, the connection includes connectors, fasteners, and portions of wood members included in the structural design of the connection.))
2304.11.2.1 Exterior walls.Exterior walls shall be permitted to be cross-laminated timber not less than 3.5 inches (88 mm) in actual thickness meeting the requirements of Section 2303.1.4.
2304.11.2.2 Interior walls and partitions. Interior walls and partitions shall be of solid wood construction formed by not less than two layers of 1-inch (25 mm) matched boards or laminated construction 3.5 inches (88 mm) in actual thickness, or of 1-hour fire-resistance-rated construction.
2304.11.3.1 Cross-laminated timber floors.Cross-laminated timber shall be not less than 3.5 inches (88 mm) in actual thickness. Cross-laminated timber shall be continuous from support to support and mechanically fastened to one another. Cross-laminated timber shall be permitted to be connected to walls without a shrinkage gap providing swelling or shrinking is considered in the design. Corbelling of masonry walls under the floor shall be permitted to be used. Discussion at committee level.
2304.11.4.1 Cross-laminated timber roofs.Cross-laminated timber roofs shall be not less than 2.5 inches (63 mm) in actual thickness and shall be continuous from support to support and mechanically fastened to one another.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 10-03-097, filed 1/20/10, effective 7/1/10)
WAC 51-50-2400((Chapter 24—Glass and glazing.))Reserved.
((Section 2405—Sloped glazing and skylights.
2405.3 Screening. Where used in monolithic glazing systems, heat-strengthened glass and fully tempered glass shall have screens installed below the glazing material. The screens and their fastenings shall:
(1) Be capable of supporting twice the weight of the glazing;
(2) Be firmly and substantially fastened to the framing members; and
(3) Be installed within 4 inches (102 mm) of the glass. The screens shall be constructed of a noncombustible material not thinner than No. 12 B&S gage (0.0808 inch) with mesh not larger than 1 inch by 1 inch (25 mm by 25 mm). In a corrosive atmosphere, structurally equivalent noncorrosive screen materials shall be used. Heat strengthened glass, fully tempered glass and wired glass, when used in multiple-layer glazing systems as the bottom glass layer over the walking surface, shall be equipped with screening that conforms to the requirements for monolithic glazing systems.
EXCEPTIONS: | In monolithic and multiple-layer sloped glazing systems, the following applies: |
| 1. Fully tempered glass installed without protective screens where glazed between intervening floors at a slope of 30 degrees (0.52 rad) or less from the vertical plane shall have the highest point of the glass 10 feet (3048 mm) or less above the walking surface. |
| 2. Screens are not required below any glazing material, including annealed glass, where the walking surface below the glazing material is permanently protected from the risk of falling glass or the area below the glazing material is not a walking surface. |
| 3. Any glazing material, including annealed glass, is permitted to be installed without screens in the sloped glazing systems of commercial or detached noncombustible greenhouses used exclusively for growing plants and not open to the public, provided that the height of the greenhouse at the ridge does not exceed 30 feet (9144 mm) above grade. |
| 4. Screens shall not be required within individual dwelling units in Groups R-2, R-3 and R-4 where fully tempered glass is used as single glazing or as both panes in an insulating glass unit, and the following conditions are met: |
| 4.1. Each pane of the glass is 16 square feet (1.5 m2) or less in area. |
| 4.2. The highest point of the glass is 12 feet (3658 mm) or less above any walking surface or other accessible area. |
| 4.3. The glass thickness is 3/16 inch (4.8 mm) or less. |
| 5. Screens shall not be required for laminated glass with a 15 mil (0.38 mm) polyvinyl butyral (or equivalent) interlayer within the following limits: |
| 5.1. Each pane of glass is 16 square feet (1.5 m2) or less in area. |
| 5.2. The highest point of the glass is 12 feet (3658 mm) or less above a walking surface or other accessible area.)) |
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-2405Section 2405—Sloped glazing and skylights.
2405.3 Screening. Where used in monolithic glazing systems, annealed, heat strengthened, fully tempered and wired glass shall have broken glass retention screens installed below the glazing material. The screens and their fastenings shall be:
1. Capable of supporting twice the weight of the glazing;
2. Firmly and substantially fastened to the framing members; and
3. Installed within 4 inches (102 mm) of the glass.
The screens shall be constructed of a noncombustible material not thinner than No. 12 B&S gage (0.0808 inch) with mesh not larger than 1 inch by 1 inch (25 mm by 25 mm). In a corrosive atmosphere, structurally equivalent noncorrosive screen materials shall be used. Annealed, heat strengthened, fully tempered and wired glass, when used in multiple-layer glazing systems as the bottom glass layer over the walking surface, shall be equipped with screening that conforms to the requirements for monolithic glazing systems.
EXCEPTION: | In monolithic and multiple-layer sloped glazing systems, the following applies: |
| 1. Fully tempered glass installed without protective screens where glazed between intervening floors at a slope of 30 degrees (0.52 rad) or less from the vertical plane shall have the highest point of the glass 10 feet (3048 mm) or less above the walking surface. |
| 2. Screens are not required below any glazing material, including annealed glass, where the walking surface below the glazing material is permanently protected from the risk of falling glass or the area below the glazing material is not a walking surface. |
| 3. Any glazing material, including annealed glass, is permitted to be installed without screens in the sloped glazing systems of commercial or detached noncombustible greenhouses used exclusively for growing plants and not open to the public, provided that the height of the greenhouse at the ridge does not exceed 30 feet (9144 mm) above grade. |
| 4. Screens shall not be required within individual dwelling units in Groups R-2, R-3, and R-4 where fully tempered glass is used as single glazing or as both panes in an insulating glass unit, and the following conditions are met: |
| 4.1. Each pane of the glass is 16 square feet (1.5 m2) or less in area. |
| 4.2. The highest point of the glass is 12 feet (3658 mm) or less above any walking surface or other accessible area. |
| 4.3. The glass thickness is 3/16 inch (4.8 mm) or less. |
| 5. Screens shall not be required for laminated glass with a 15 mil (0.38 mm) polyvinyl butyral (or equivalent) interlayer within the following limits: |
| 5.1. Each pane of glass is 16 square feet (1.5 m2) or less in area. |
| 5.2. The highest point of the glass is 12 feet (3658 mm) or less above a walking surface or other accessible area. |
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 22-13-094, filed 6/14/22, effective 7/1/23)
WAC 51-50-3500Chapter 35—Referenced standards.
Add the reference standards as follows:
Standard reference number | Title | Referenced in code section number |
ACI 561-21 | Assessment, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Existing Concrete Structures | 405.1.1 |
ASCE/SEI 7-16 | Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures with Supplement No. 1, Supplement No. 2, and Supplement No. 3 | |
ASCE/SEI 7-22 | Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings
and Other Structures
| 1615 |
NFPA 130-20 | Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems | 3101.1, 3116 |
NFPA 13-16 | Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems (except 8.15.5.3(5)) | 403.3.3, 712.1.3.1, 903.3.1.1, 903.2, 903.3.8.2, 903.8.5, 904.13, 905.3.4, 907.6.4, 1019.3 |
INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE
((2018))2021 EDITION
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-480102((Section 102—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 21-12-103, filed 6/2/21, effective 7/3/21)
WAC 51-50-480200Section 201.3—Definitions.
201.3 Terms defined in other codes. Where terms are not defined in this code and are defined in the other International Codes and the Uniform Plumbing Code, such terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them in those codes.
202 General definitions.
ADULT FAMILY HOME. A dwelling, licensed by the state of Washington department of social and health services, in which a person or persons provide personal care, special care, room and board to more than one but not more than six adults who are not related by blood or marriage to the person or persons providing the services. An existing adult family home may provide services to up to eight adults upon approval from the department of social and health services in accordance with RCW
70.128.066.
SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. For the purpose of determining compliance with the flood provisions of this code, damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the value determined using the latest building valuation data published by the International Code Council. If ICC building valuation data is not applicable to this building or structure, the value may be established using an approved market valuation of the structure before the damage occurred.
SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT. For the purpose of determining compliance with the flood provisions of this code, any repair, alteration, addition, or improvement of a building or structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the value determined using the latest building valuation data published by the International Code Council. If ICC building valuation data is not applicable to this building or structure, the value may be established using an approved market valuation of the structure, before the improvement or repair is started. If the structure has sustained substantial damage, any repairs are considered substantial improvement regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either of the following:
1. Any project for improvement of a building required to correct existing health, sanitary or safety code violations identified by the code official and that is the minimum necessary to ensure safe living conditions.
2. Any alteration of a historic structure, provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-21-021, filed 10/9/20, effective 11/9/20)
WAC 51-50-480302Section 302—General provisions.
((302.3))302.2 Additional codes. Alterations, repairs, additions and changes of occupancy to, or relocation of, existing buildings and structures shall comply with the provisions for alterations, repairs, additions and changes of occupancy or relocation, respectively, in this code and the Washington State Energy Code, International Fire Code, International Fuel Gas Code, International Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, and International Residential Code. Where provisions of the other codes conflict with provisions of this code, the provisions of this code shall take precedence.
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-480306Section 306—Structural.
306.6 Additions. Provisions for new construction shall apply to additions. An addition that affects the accessibility to, or contains an area of, a primary function shall comply with the requirements in Section 306.7.1. Limited-use/limited-application elevators installed in accordance with ASME A17.1 shall be permitted as a component of an accessible route connecting the existing construction to the addition.
Option 1
306.7.1 Alterations affecting an area containing a primary function. Where an alteration affects the accessibility to, or contains an area of primary function, the route to the primary function area shall be accessible. The accessible route to the primary function area shall include toilet facilities and drinking fountains serving the area of primary function. Priority shall be given to the improvements affecting the accessible route to the primary function area.
EXCEPTIONS: | 1. The costs of providing the accessible route are not required to exceed 20 percent of the costs of the alterations affecting the area of primary function. |
| 2. This provision does not apply to alterations limited solely to windows, hardware, operating controls, electrical outlets and signs. |
| 3. This provision does not apply to alterations limited solely to mechanical systems, electrical systems, installation or alteration of fire protection systems and abatement of hazardous materials. |
| 4. This provision does not apply to alterations undertaken for the primary purpose of increasing the accessibility of a facility. |
| 5. This provision does not apply to altered areas limited to Type B dwelling and sleeping units. |
Option 2
306.7.1 Alterations affecting an area containing a primary function. Where an alteration affects the accessibility to or contains an area of primary function, the route to the primary function area shall be accessible. Toilet facilities and drinking fountains serving the area of primary function, including the route from the area of primary function to these facilities, shall be accessible.
EXCEPTIONS: | 1. The cumulative costs of providing the accessible route of travel, toilet facilities, and drinking fountains are not required to exceed 20 percent of the costs of the alterations affecting the area of primary function. |
| 2. This provision does not apply to alterations limited solely to windows, hardware, operating controls, electrical outlets, and signs. |
| 3. This provision does not apply to alterations limited solely to mechanical systems, electrical systems, installation or alteration of fire protection systems, and abatement of hazardous materials. |
| 4. This provision does not apply to alterations undertaken for the primary purpose of increasing the accessibility of a facility. |
| 5. This provision does not apply to altered areas limited to Type B dwelling and sleeping units. |
306.7.8 Platform lifts and limited-use/limited-application elevators. Vertical and inclined platform (wheelchair) lifts complying with ICC A117.1 and installed in accordance with ASME A18.1 shall be permitted as a component of an accessible route.
Limited-use/Limited-application elevators installed in accordance with ASME A17.1 shall be permitted as a component of an accessible route.
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-480401Section 401—General.
401.2 Compliance. The work shall not make the building less complying than it was before the repair was undertaken. Work on nondamaged components that is necessary for the required repair of damaged components shall be considered part of the repair and shall not be subject to requirements for alterations.
401.4 Demolition and replacement. Where a building is effectively demolished by damage or where the intended method of repair is demolition and replacement, the replaced building, including its replaced foundation, or remaining foundation as approved by the code official, shall comply with requirements for new construction in the International Building Code.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-480405Section 405—((Reserved))Structural.
405.1 General. Structural repairs shall be in compliance with this section and Section 401.2.
405.1.1 Structural concrete repairs. Repair of structural concrete is permitted to comply with ACI 562 Section 1.7, except where Section 405.2.2, 405.2.3, or 405.2.4.1 requires compliance with Section 304.3.
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-480503Section 503—Alterations.
503.13 Voluntary lateral force-resisting system alterations. Structural alterations that are intended exclusively to improve the lateral force resisting system and are not required by other sections of this code, shall not be required to meet the requirements of Section 1609 or 1613 of the International Building Code, provided that all of the following apply:
1. The capacity of existing structural systems to resist forces is not reduced.
2. New structural elements are detailed and connected to existing or new structural elements as required by the International Building Code for new construction.
EXCEPTION: | New lateral force-resisting systems designed in accordance with the International Building Code are permitted to be of a type designated as "ordinary" or "intermediate" where ASCE 7 Table 12.2-1 states these types of systems are not permitted. |
3. New or relocated nonstructural elements are detailed and connected to existing or new structural elements as required by the International Building Code for new construction.
4. The alterations do not create a structural irregularity as defined in ASCE 7 or make an existing structural irregularity more severe.
503.19 Seismic requirements for alterations with increased occupant load of unreinforced masonry or hollow clay tile buildings. In addition to the requirements in Sections 503.4 through 503.11, alterations meeting all of the following conditions shall comply with the applicable requirements in Sections 503.19.1 through 503.19.4.
1. The occupant load of a building increases by more than 20 percent for occupancy groups A, I, E, R, M, B, H, or S used for storage of hazardous materials.
2. Buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E, or F.
3. The building's structural system includes unreinforced masonry and hollow clay tile bearing walls.
Where there is a change of occupancy with the alteration, the most restrictive seismic requirements in accordance with Section 506 and this section shall apply. The cumulative effect of alterations compared with the original occupant load that have an increase in occupant load over time exceeding 20 percent shall comply with these provisions.
EXCEPTIONS: | 1. A cumulative increase in the occupant load of less than 50 for occupancy categories A or I. |
| 2. A cumulative increase in the occupant load of less than 25 for E occupancies. |
| 3. R-3 occupancies, and all other R occupancies with an increase of 5 dwelling or sleeping units or less. |
| 4. A cumulative increase in occupant load of less than 100 for occupancy categories M or B. |
| 5. A cumulative increase in the occupant load of less than 10 for H occupancies or S occupancies using hazardous materials. |
503.19.1 Large buildings. Buildings four or more stories or buildings more than 12,000 square feet shall be required to perform seismic evaluation in accordance with IEBC 304.3. Any lateral resisting elements shall be required to comply with design requirements for reduced seismic forces in accordance with Section 304.3.2 where found to be deficient.
503.19.2 Parapet bracing. Buildings with parapets constructed of unreinforced masonry where the parapet height to thickness ratio exceeds 1.5:1 shall be required to have parapets anchored, removed, or altered to resist out-of-plane seismic forces unless an evaluation demonstrates compliance of such items. Use of reduced seismic forces in accordance with Section 304.3.2 shall be permitted.
503.19.3 Floor and roof wall anchors. The alteration work shall include the installation of wall anchors at the floor and roof lines unless an evaluation demonstrates compliance of existing wall anchorage. Use of reduced seismic forces in accordance with Section 304.3.2 shall be permitted.
503.19.4 Bracing of partitions and nonstructural walls. Unreinforced masonry partitions and nonstructural walls within the alteration area and adjacent to egress paths from the alteration area shall be anchored, removed, or altered to resist out-of-plane seismic forces unless an evaluation demonstrates compliance of such items. Use of reduced seismic forces in accordance with Section 304.3.2 shall be permitted.
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-480603Section 603—Alteration-Level 2.
603.1 Scope. Level 2 alterations include the addition or elimination of any door or window, the reconfiguration or extension of any system, or the installation of any additional equipment, and shall apply where the work is below the threshold of a Level 3 alteration.
EXCEPTION: | The movement or addition of nonfixed and movable fixtures, cases, racks, counters and partitions not over 5 feet 9 inches (1753 mm) in height shall not be considered a Level 2 alteration. |
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-480604Section 604—Alteration-Level 3.
604.1 Scope. Level 3 alterations apply where one of the criteria is exceeded:
1. The work meets or exceeds the threshold of either substantial improvement or substantial damage; or
2. The alteration area exceeds 50 percent of the building area.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-21-021, filed 10/9/20, effective 11/9/20)
WAC 51-50-480702Section 702—Building elements and materials.
((702.6))702.7 Materials and methods. New work shall comply with the materials and methods requirements in the International Building Code, Washington State Energy Code, International Mechanical Code, and Uniform Plumbing Code, as applicable, that specify material standards, detail of installation and connection, joints, penetrations, and continuity of any element, component, or system in the building.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-480704((Section 704—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-480711((Section 711—))Reserved.
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-480805Section 805—Structural.
805.4 Voluntary lateral force-resisting system alterations. Structural alterations that are intended exclusively to improve the lateral force resisting system and are not required by other sections of this code shall not be required to meet the requirements of Section 1609 or Section 1613 of the International Building Code, provided that the following conditions are met:
1. The capacity of existing structural systems to resist forces is not reduced.
2. New structural elements are detailed and connected to existing or new structural elements as required by the International Building Code for new construction.
EXCEPTION: | New lateral force-resisting systems designed in accordance with the International Building Code are permitted to be of a type designated as "ordinary" or "intermediate" where ASCE 7 Table 12.2-1 states these types of systems are not permitted. |
3. New or relocated nonstructural elements are detailed and connected to existing or new structural elements as required by the International Building Code for new construction.
4. The alterations do not create a structural irregularity as defined in ASCE 7 or make an existing structural irregularity more severe.
805.5 Seismic requirements for Level 2 alterations with increased occupant load of unreinforced masonry or hollow clay tile buildings. In addition to the requirements in IEBC 805.3, Level 2 alterations meeting all of the following conditions shall comply with the applicable requirements in Sections 805.5.1 through 805.5.4.
1. The occupant load of a building increases by more than 20 percent for occupancy groups A, I, E, R, M, B, H, or S used for storage of hazardous materials.
2. Buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F.
3. The building's structural system includes unreinforced masonry and hollow clay tile bearing walls.
Where there is a change of occupancy with the alteration, the most restrictive seismic requirements in accordance with IEBC 1006 and this section shall apply. The cumulative effect of alterations compared with the original occupant load that have an increase in occupant load over time exceeding 20 percent shall comply with these provisions.
EXCEPTIONS: | 1. An increase in the occupant load of less than 50 for occupancy categories A or I. |
| 2. An increase in the occupant load of less than 25 for E occupancies. |
| 3. R-3 occupancies, and all other R occupancies with an increase of 5 dwelling or sleeping units or less. |
| 4. An increase in occupant load of less than 100 for occupancy categories M or B. |
| 5. A cumulative increase in the occupant load of less than 10 for H occupancies or S occupancies using hazardous materials. |
805.5.1 Large buildings. Buildings four or more stories or buildings more than 12,000 square feet shall be required to perform seismic evaluation in accordance with IEBC 304.3. Any lateral resisting elements shall be required to comply with design requirements for reduced seismic forces in accordance with Section 304.3.2 where found to be deficient.
805.5.2 Parapet bracing. Buildings with parapets constructed of unreinforced masonry where the parapet height to thickness ratio exceeds 1.5:1 shall be required to have parapets anchored, removed or altered to resist out-of-plane seismic forces, unless an evaluation demonstrates compliance of such items. Use of reduced seismic forces in accordance with Section 304.3.2 shall be permitted.
805.5.3 Floor and roof wall anchors. The alteration shall include the installation of wall anchors at the floor and roof lines, unless an evaluation demonstrates compliance of existing wall anchorage. Use of reduced seismic forces in accordance with IEBC 304.3.2 shall be permitted.
805.5.4 Bracing of partitions and nonstructural walls. Unreinforced masonry partitions and nonstructural walls within the work area and adjacent to egress paths from the alteration area shall be anchored, removed or altered to resist out-of-plane seismic forces, unless an evaluation demonstrates compliance of such items. Use of reduced seismic forces in accordance with Section 304.3.2 shall be permitted.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-480807((Section 807—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-480808((Section 808—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-21-021, filed 10/9/20, effective 11/9/20)
WAC 51-50-480809Section 809—((Plumbing))Energy conservation.
809.1 Minimum ((fixtures. Where the occupant load of the story is increased by more than 20 percent, plumbing fixtures for the story shall be provided in quantities specified in the International Building Code based on the increased occupant load.))requirements. Level 2 alterations to existing buildings or structures shall comply with the Washington State Energy Code (chapter 51-11C WAC).
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 21-06-035, filed 2/23/21, effective 3/26/21)
WAC 51-50-480810((Energy conservation.))Reserved.
((810.1 Minimum requirements. Level 2 alterations to existing buildings or structures shall comply with the Washington State Energy Code (chapter 51-11C WAC).))
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-480912((Section 912—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-01-090, filed 12/12/19, effective 7/1/20)
WAC 51-50-481002Section 1002—Special use and occupancy.
((1002.1 Compliance with the building code. Where the character or use of an existing building or part of an existing building is changed to one of the following special use or occupancy categories as defined in the International Building Code, the building shall comply with all of the applicable requirements of the International Building Code:
1. Covered and open mall buildings;
2. Atriums;
3. Motor vehicle-related occupancies;
4. Aircraft-related occupancies;
5. Motion picture projection rooms;
6. Stages and platforms;
7. Special amusement buildings;
8. Incidental use areas;
9. Hazardous materials;
10. Ambulatory care facilities;
11. Group I-2 occupancies;
12. Group I-1, Condition 2, for licensure as an assisted living facility under chapter 388-78A WAC or residential treatment facility under chapter 246-337 WAC.))
1002.3 Change of occupancy in health care. Where a change of occupancy occurs to a Group I-2 or I-1 facility, the work area with the change of occupancy shall comply with the International Building Code.
The International Building Code shall apply to Group I-1, Condition 2, for licensure as an assisted living facility under chapter 388-78A WAC or residential treatment facility under chapter 246-337 WAC.
EXCEPTION: | A change in use or occupancy in the following cases shall not be required to meet the International Building Code: |
| 1. Group I-2, Condition 2 to Group I-2, Condition 1. |
| 2. Group I-2 to ambulatory health care. |
| 3. Group I-2 to Group I-1. |
| 4. Group I-1, Condition 2 to Group I-1, Condition 1. |
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-481103((Section 1103—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-481105((Section 1105—))Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-481201Section 1201—Historic buildings—General.
1201.1 Scope.((It is the intent of))This chapter is intended to provide means for the preservation of historic buildings. It is the purpose of this chapter to encourage cost-effective preservation of original or restored architectural elements and features and to provide a historic building that will result in a reasonable degree of safety, based on accepted life and fire safety practices, compared to the existing building. Historical buildings shall comply with the provisions of this chapter relating to their repair, alteration, relocation and change of occupancy.
SECTION 1202—Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-01-090, filed 12/12/19, effective 7/1/20)
WAC 51-50-481205Reserved.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-481301((Relocated or moved buildings—General.))Reserved.
((1301.1Scope. This chapter provides requirements for relocated or moved structures, including relocatable buildings as defined in Chapter 2.
1301.2 Conformance. Buildings or structures moved into or within the jurisdiction shall comply with the provisions of this code, the International Residential Code (chapter 51-51 WAC), the International Mechanical Code (chapter 51-52 WAC), the International Fire Code (chapter 51-54 WAC), the Uniform Plumbing Code and Standards (chapters 51-56 and 51-57 WAC), the Washington State Energy Code (chapter 51-11 WAC) and the Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code (chapter 51-13 WAC) for new buildings or structures.
EXCEPTION: | Group R-3 buildings or structures are not required to comply if: |
| 1. The original occupancy classification is not changed; and |
| 2. The original building is not substantially remodeled or rehabilitated. |
For the purposes of this section, a building shall be considered to be substantially remodeled when the costs of remodeling exceed 60 percent of the value of the building exclusive of the costs relating to preparation, construction, demolition or renovation of foundations.))
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 13-04-067, filed 2/1/13, effective 7/1/13)
WAC 51-50-481302((Requirements.))Reserved.
((This section is not adopted.))
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-481401Relocated or moved buildings—General.
1401.2 Conformance. Buildings or structures moved into or within the jurisdiction shall comply with the provisions of this code, the International Residential Code (chapter 51-51 WAC), the International Mechanical Code (chapter 51-52 WAC), the International Fire Code (chapter 51-54 WAC), the Uniform Plumbing Code and Standards (chapters 51-56 and 51-57 WAC), the Washington State Energy Code (chapter 51-11 WAC) and the Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code (chapter 51-13 WAC) for new buildings or structures.
EXCEPTION: | Group R-3 buildings or structures are not required to comply if: |
| 1. The original occupancy classification is not changed; and |
| 2. The original building is not substantially remodeled or rehabilitated. |
For the purposes of this section, a building shall be considered to be substantially remodeled when the costs of remodeling exceed 60 percent of the value of the building exclusive of the costs relating to preparation, construction, demolition or renovation of foundations.
NEW SECTION
WAC 51-50-481402Requirements.
This section is not adopted.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 20-21-021, filed 10/9/20, effective 11/9/20)
WAC 51-50-481500Section 1501—General.
((1501.1))1501.7 Facilities required. Sanitary facilities shall be provided during construction or demolition activities in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code.
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 16-03-064, filed 1/19/16, effective 7/1/16)
WAC 51-50-490000((Appendix N—Solar readiness.))Reserved.
((The provisions contained in this appendix are not mandatory unless specifically referenced in the local adopting ordinance.
490101.1 General. A solar zone shall be provided on nonresidential buildings of any size that are 5 stories or less in height above grade plane, and shall be located on the roof of the building or on another structure elsewhere on the site. The solar zone shall be in accordance with Sections 490101.3 through 490101.9 and the International Fire Code.
EXCEPTION: | A solar zone is not required where the solar exposure of the building's roof area is less than 75 percent of that of an unshaded area, as measured by one of the following: |
| a. Incident solar radiation expressed in kWh/ft2 per year using typical meteorological year (TMY) data; |
| b. Annual sunlight exposure expressed in cumulative hours per year using TMY data; |
| c. Shadow studies indicating that the roof area is more than 25 percent in shadow, on September 21 at 10:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 1:00 p.m., and 2:00 p.m. solar time. |
490101.2 Definitions. The following words and terms shall, for the purposes of this appendix, have the meanings shown herein. Refer to Chapter 2 of the International Building Code for general definitions.
SOLAR ZONE. A clear area or areas reserved solely for current and future installation of photovoltaic or solarwater heating systems.
490101.3 Minimum area. The minimum area of the solar zone shall be determined by one of the following methods, whichever results in the smaller area:
1. 40 percent of roof area. The roof area shall be calculated as the horizontally-projected gross roof area, less the area covered by skylights, occupied roof decks and planted areas.
2. 20 percent of electrical service size. The electrical service size shall be the rated capacity of the total of all electrical services to the building. The required solar zone size shall be based upon 10 peak watts of PV per square foot.
EXCEPTION: | Subject to the approval of the building official, buildings with extensive rooftop equipment that would make full compliance with this section impractical shall be permitted to reduce the size of the solar zone required by Section N101.3 to the maximum practicable area. |
490101.4 Contiguous area. The solar zone is permitted to be comprised of smaller separated subzones. Each subzone shall be at least 5 feet wide in the narrowest dimension.
490101.5 Obstructions. The solar zone shall be free of pipes, vents, ducts, HVAC equipment, skylights and other obstructions, except those serving photovoltaics or solar water heating systems within the solar zone. Photovoltaics or solar water heating systems are permitted to be installed within the solar zone. The solar zone is permitted to be located above any such obstructions, provided that the racking for support of the future system is installed at the time of construction, the elevated solar zone does not shade other portions of the solar zone, and its height is permitted by the International Building Code and other applicable codes.
490101.6 Shading. The solar zone shall be set back from any existing or new object on the building or site that is located south, east, or west of the solar zone a distance at least two times the object's height above the nearest point on the roof surface. Such objects include, but are not limited to, taller portions of the building itself, parapets, chimneys, antennas, signage, rooftop equipment, trees and roof plantings. No portion of the solar zone shall be located on a roof slope greater than 2:12 that faces within 45 degrees of true north.
490101.7 Access. Areas contiguous to the solar zone shall provide access pathways and provisions for emergency smoke ventilation as required by the International Fire Code.
490101.8 Structural integrity. The as-designed dead load and live load for the solar zone shall be clearly marked on the record drawings, and shall accommodate future photovoltaic or solar water heating arrays at an assumed dead load of 4 pounds per square foot in addition to other required live and dead loads. For photovoltaic systems, a location for future inverters shall be designated either within or adjacent to the solar zone, with a minimum area of 2 square feet for each 1,000 square feet of solar zone area, and shall accommodate an assumed dead load of 175 pounds per square foot. Where photovoltaic or solar water heating systems are installed in the solar zone, structural analysis shall be based upon calculated loads, not upon these assumed loads.
490101.9 Photovoltaic or solar water heating interconnection provisions. Buildings shall provide for the future interconnection of either a photovoltaic system in accordance with Section 490101.9.1 or a solar water heating system in accordance with Section 490101.9.2.
490101.9.1 Photovoltaic interconnection. A capped roof penetration sleeve shall be provided in the vicinity of the future inverter, sized to accommodate the future photovoltaic system conduit. Interconnection of the future photovoltaic system shall be provided for at the main service panel, either ahead of the service disconnecting means or at the end of the bus opposite the service disconnecting means, in one of the following forms:
a. A space for the mounting of a future overcurrent device, sized to accommodate the largest standard rated overcurrent device that is less than 20 percent of the bus rating;
b. Lugs sized to accommodate conductors with an ampacity of at least 20 percent of the bus rating, to enable the mounting of an external overcurrent device for interconnection.
The electrical construction documents shall indicate the following:
a. Solar zone boundaries and access pathways;
b. Location for future inverters and metering equipment; and
c. Route for future wiring between the photovoltaic panels and the inverter, and between the inverter and the main service panel.
N101.9.2 Solar water heating interconnection. Two capped pipe tees shall be provided upstream of the domestic water heating equipment to provide plumbing interconnections between a future solar water heating system and the domestic water heating system. Two roof penetration sleeves shall be provided in the vicinity of the solar zone, capable of accommodating supply and return piping for a future solar water heating system. The plumbing construction documents shall indicate the following:
a. Solar zone boundaries and access pathways;
b. Location for future hot water storage tanks; and
c. Route for future piping between the solar zone and the plumbing interconnection point, following the shortest feasible pathway.))