WSR 23-13-061
RULES OF COURT
STATE SUPREME COURT
[June 8, 2023]
IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CrRLJ 7.4—ARREST OF JUDGMENT | ) ) ) | ORDER NO. 25700-A-1518 |
Judge Steele, having recommended the adoption of the proposed amendments to CrRLJ 7.4—Arrest of Judgment, and the Court having considered the proposed amendments, and having determined that the proposed amendments will aid in the prompt and orderly administration of justice;
Now, therefore, it is hereby
ordered:
(a) That the proposed amendments as shown below are adopted.
(b) That pursuant to the emergency provisions of GR 9 (j)(1), the proposed amendments will be expeditiously published in the Washington Reports and will become effective upon publication.
dated at Olympia, Washington this 8th day of June, 2023.
| | Gonzalez, C.J. |
Johnson, J. | | Gordon McCloud, J. |
Madsen, J. | | Yu, J. |
Owens, J. | | Montoya-Lewis, J. |
Stephens, J. | | |
CrRLJ 7.4
ARREST OF JUDGMENT
(a) [Unchanged.]
(b) Time for Motion; Contents of Motion. A motion for arrest of judgment must be served and filed within 510 days after the verdict or decision. The court on application of the defendant or on its own motion may in its discretion extend the time until such time as judgment is entered. The motion for arrest of judgment shall identify the specific reasons in fact and law for each ground on which the motion is based.
(c)–(d) [Unchanged.]