HOUSE BILL REPORT

                 SHB 1573

                       As Passed House

                       March 12, 1991

Title:  An act relating to the measure of damages to a motor vehicle.

Brief Description:  Establishing the measure of damages for a motor vehicle.

Sponsor(s):  By House Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Winsley, Dellwo, Inslee, R. Meyers, Dorn, R. Johnson and Anderson).

Brief History:

  Reported by House Committee on:

Judiciary, February 20, 1991, DPS;

Passed House, March 12, 1991, 95-0.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

JUDICIARY

Majority Report: That Substitute House Bill No. 1573 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 19 members:  Representatives Appelwick, Chair; Ludwig, Vice Chair; Padden, Ranking Minority Member; Paris, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Belcher; Broback; Forner; Hargrove; Inslee; Locke; R. Meyers; Mielke; H. Myers; Riley; Scott; D. Sommers; Tate; Vance; and Wineberry.

Staff:  Pat Shelledy (786-7149).

Background:  In an action for property damages to a motor vehicle, the determination of damages for repair or replacement is determined by contract, case law, and the Washington Administrative Code's regulations.  No statute exists governing the determination of damages in a civil action for property damage to a motor vehicle.  Disputes have arisen regarding the type of car an insurance company must provide an insured for temporary use while the insured's car gets repaired or replaced.

Summary of Bill:  In an action for property damage to a motor vehicle the measure of damages is:         (1) the reasonable cost of repair; or (2) the difference between the undamaged vehicle's value and the damaged vehicle's value, whichever is less, plus reasonable damages for loss of the use of the vehicle or the amount reasonably spent on a temporary replacement vehicle at not less than $15 per day for the time period in which the repairs can be reasonably completed.

If the cost of repair or replacement exceeds the undamaged vehicle's value, the damages for the loss of use are limited to a reasonable amount for the temporary replacement vehicle until the defendant tenders a reasonable offer.

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For:  (Original Bill) Insurance companies will have to provide a temporary replacement vehicle of a quality similar to the insured's vehicle while the damaged vehicle is being repaired or replaced.  The bill provides a standard that does not exist now.

Testimony Against:  (Original Bill) Determining what kind of vehicle is a similar brand or in similar condition is difficult.

Witnesses:  Representative Winsley, Prime Sponsor (in favor of original bill); Michele Radosevich, Washington State Trial Lawyers Association (in favor of original bill); and Michael Kapphahn, Farmer's Insurance Group (con - concerned about difficulty of determining what kind of vehicle is of similar brand and condition).