HOUSE BILL REPORT

                 SHB 1635

                       As Passed House

                       March 20, 1991

 

Title:  An act relating to local governmental medical care and services.

 

Brief Description:  Providing for taxes to fund emergency medical care services.

 

Sponsor(s):  By House Committee on Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Haugen, Day, D. Sommers, Nealey, Orr and Wynne).

 

Brief History:

  Reported by House Committee on:

Local Government, March 6, 1991, DPS;

Revenue, March 9, 1991, DPS(LG);

Passed House, March 20, 1991, 96-0.

 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute House Bill No. 1635 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 15 members:  Representatives Haugen, Chair; Cooper, Vice Chair; Ferguson, Ranking Minority Member; Mitchell, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Bray; Edmondson; Franklin; Horn; Nealey; Nelson; Rayburn; Roland; Wood; Wynne; and Zellinsky.

 

Staff:  Bill Lynch (786-7092).

 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

REVENUE

 

Majority Report:  The substitute bill by Committee on Local Government be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 14 members:  Representatives Wang, Chair; Fraser, Vice Chair; Holland, Ranking Minority Member; Wynne, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Appelwick; Belcher; Brumsickle; Day; Leonard; Morris; Morton; Phillips; Rust; and Silver.

 

Staff:  Melissa Pailthorp (786-7118).

 

Background:  Any county, city or town, emergency medical service district, public hospital district, or fire protection district is authorized to impose a property tax levy up to 25 cents per $1,000 of assessed value of property for the provision of emergency medical services.  The levy is a regular property tax levy that is imposed, if approved, for a six-year period.

 

At least 60 percent of the people voting on the levy must vote in favor of the levy, when the number of people voting on the proposition does not exceed 40 percent of the number of people who voted in the last preceding general election.  A majority of the people voting on the levy must vote in favor of the levy, when the number of people voting on the proposition exceeds 40 percent of the number of people who voted in the last preceding general election.

 

If a county levies the tax for emergency medical services, then no other taxing district within the county may levy the tax, except that if the county levies less than the full 25 cents, then another taxing district may levy a tax equal to the difference between the 25 cents and the rate levied by the county.

 

It has been suggested that the current 25 cents is not sufficient to meet the need for emergency medical services, and that it shouldn't be necessary to run an excess levy each year to raise the required funds.  Various local governments have recommended that an additional 25 cents should be authorized for emergency medical services if the tax capacity is available for the taxing district.

 

Summary of Bill:  An additional property tax levy of 25 cents per $1,000 of assessed value, or a total of 50 cents per $1,000 of assessed value, may be imposed by a county, city or town, emergency medical service district, public hospital district, or fire protection district for emergency medical services.

 

No taxing district may levy this additional 25 cents if there is pro rata reduction or elimination of levy rates for junior taxing districts within the boundaries of the taxing district.  The additional 25 cent levy does not affect pro rationing.

 

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

 

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

 

Testimony For:  (Local Government): The current 25 cent limit for emergency medical services is insufficient.  There is strong community support for emergency medical services.  It should not be necessary to raise the needed funds through special levies.

 

(Revenue): Additional funds are desperately needed to adequately provide for emergency medical services.  Raising the levy limit will help to resolve this need.

 

 

Testimony Against:  (Local Government): None.

 

(Revenue): None.

 

Witnesses:  (Local Government): Bill Pupo, city of Spokane; Chief Dave Byrnes, Spokane Fire Department; and Stan Finkelstein, Association of Washington Cities.

 

(Revenue): Otto Jensen, Washington State Association of Fire Chiefs; and Kathleen Collins, Association of Washington Cities.