HOUSE BILL REPORT
EHB 1723
As Amended by the Senate
Title: An act relating to the Washington fund for excellence in higher education program.
Brief Description: Creating the Washington fund for excellence in higher education program.
Sponsor(s): Representatives Ogden, Jacobsen, Wood, Spanel, Zellinsky, R. King, Roland, H. Myers and Fraser; by request of Higher Education Coordinating Board;
Brief History:
Reported by House Committee on:
Higher Education, February 20, 1991, DPA;
Appropriations, March 9, 1991, DPA(HE);
Passed House, March 15, 1991, 98-0;
Amended by Senate.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
HIGHER EDUCATION
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 13 members: Representatives Jacobsen, Chair; Ogden, Vice Chair; Wood, Ranking Minority Member; May, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Basich; Dellwo; Fraser; Ludwig; Miller; Prince; Sheldon; Spanel; and Van Luven.
Staff: Susan Hosch (786-7120).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended by Committee on Higher Education. Signed by 28 members: Representatives Locke, Chair; Inslee, Vice Chair; Spanel, Vice Chair; Silver, Ranking Minority Member; Morton, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Appelwick; Belcher; Bowman; Braddock; Brekke; Dorn; Ebersole; Ferguson; Fuhrman; Hine; May; McLean; Mielke; Nealey; Peery; Pruitt; Rust; H. Sommers; Sprenkle; Valle; Vance; Wang; and Wineberry.
Staff: Sherie Story (786-7142).
Background: The Higher Education Coordinating Board has recommended the creation of a program that encourages institutions to work cooperatively to solve longstanding problems plaguing the state's system of higher education. The program would be similar to a federal program that provides funding on a competitive basis to institutions that are experimenting with ways to improve the educational process in colleges and universities.
Summary of Bill: The Washington Fund for Excellence in Higher Education Program is established. The program is designed to encourage colleges and universities to work together to address specific system problems. The program will be administered by the Higher Education Coordinating Board. Through the program, the board may award grants on a competitive basis either to individual state colleges and universities, or to consortia of institutions. In awarding grants, a strong priority will be given to proposals that involve more than one educational sector, and to proposals that show substantial institutional commitment. Each grant will be limited to a maximum of two years.
Participating institutions must provide some financial support to the program. Institutions may provide this support in one of two ways. Participating institutions may either cover part of the program costs during the grant period, or may provide continued support of the funded program at the end of the grant period.
The board's program responsibilities are described. These duties include establishing specific biennial guidelines, and convening review committees to assist the board in evaluating grant proposals.
During the 1991-93 biennium, the board's guidelines will be consistent with three priorities. Initiatives that encourage the participation of minority students, at a rate consistent with their proportion of the state's population will receive a priority. Minority students would include students with disabilities. Teacher preparation programs that encourage collaborative efforts between K-12 and institutions of higher education will also receive a priority. Finally, initiatives that facilitate the transfer of students from K-12 to higher education, and from community colleges to four-year institutions will receive a priority.
Priorities for subsequent biennia will be established by the board. Before adopting these priorities, the board will consult with the governor, the Legislature, institutions of higher education, educational associations, business, community groups, and state agencies concerned with the common schools, community colleges, and vocational education.
The Fund for Excellence is established in the office of the state treasurer. Moneys received for the program will be deposited in the fund. Moneys in the fund are subject to the allotment procedure, but no appropriation is required for disbursements.
EFFECT OF SENATE AMENDMENT(S): If the program is funded during the 1991-93 biennium, one of the program priorities will include K-12 teacher preparation models that encourage higher education faculty involved with teacher preparation to spend time teaching in K-12 schools.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: (Higher Education): The current budgeting process for state colleges and universities does little to encourage institutions to meet specific state priorities, especially when those priorities transcend the needs of any one institution. Using incentives, such as the incentives provided in this bill, system-wide problems can more easily be addressed. The proposed program will foster collaboration among institutions and educational sectors. It is student centered, targets important education issues, and embodies the concept of reforming the higher education process. The program will provide a vehicle to address critical issues, solve problems, and build a network of people committed to improving higher education.
(Appropriations): Enacting this bill, requested by the Higher Education Coordinating Board, could go a long way toward solving some of the system's problems by encouraging institutions to meet state priorities. The board would like to have the program established so that grants and private donations could be pursued, in addition to state funds that may be appropriated.
Testimony Against: (Higher Education): None.
(Appropriations): None.
Witnesses: (Higher Education): Ann Daley, Higher Education Coordinating Board; David Habura, State Board for Community College Education; Terry Teale, Council of Presidents; Eric Christensen, Washington Student Lobby; and Scott LaFramboise, Washington Student Lobby (all in favor).
(Appropriations): Ann Daley, Higher Education Coordinating Board.
VOTE ON FINAL PASSAGE:
Yeas 98