HOUSE BILL REPORT

                 ESHB 1729

                    As Passed Legislature

 

Title:  An act relating to the jury source list.

 

Brief Description:  Preparing a plan for an expanded juror list.

 

Sponsor(s):  By House Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Wineberry, Vance, Inslee, Dellwo, Wang, Forner and Anderson; by request of Administrator for the Courts).

 

Brief History:

  Reported by House Committee on:

Judiciary, March 1, 1991, DPS;

Appropriations, March 9, 1991, DPS(JUD)-A;

Passed House, March 20, 1991, 97-0;

Passed Legislature, 97-0.

 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

JUDICIARY

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute House Bill No. 1729 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 17 members:  Representatives Appelwick, Chair; Ludwig, Vice Chair; Paris, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Belcher; Broback; Forner; Inslee; Locke; R. Meyers; Mielke; H. Myers; Riley; Scott; D. Sommers; Tate; Vance; and Wineberry.

 

Staff:  Bill Perry (786-7123).

 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

APPROPRIATIONS

 

Majority Report:  The substitute by Committee on Judiciary be substituted therefor and the substitute bill as amended by Committee on Appropriations do pass.  Signed by 25 members:  Representatives Locke, Chair; Inslee, Vice Chair; Spanel, Vice Chair; Silver, Ranking Minority Member; Morton, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Appelwick; Belcher; Bowman; Braddock; Brekke; Dorn; Ebersole; Ferguson; Fuhrman; May; Mielke; Peery; Pruitt; Rust; H. Sommers; Sprenkle; Valle; Vance; Wang; and Wineberry.

 

Staff:  Susan Kavanaugh (786-7130).

 

Background:  The master list from which jurors are selected consists exclusively of registered voters.  This use of voter registration lists as the sole source of jurors has received criticism on at least two grounds.  First, it may reduce the likelihood that a jury will represent a fair cross section of the community, one of the goals of the American jury system.  Second, a significant number of citizens may choose not to register to vote simply to avoid jury duty, thereby frustrating one of the goals of a participatory democracy.

 

Various groups, including the Washington Judicial Council and the Commission on Washington Courts, have recommended expansion of the jury source list.  One recommended addition to the list is persons with drivers' licenses.  The merging of the lists of licensed drivers with the lists of registered voters requires care to avoid double counting and other problems.  At least nine other states have merged these two lists to compile their jury source lists.

 

Summary of Bill:  A group of entities is directed to prepare a plan for the merging of the lists of registered voters and licensed drivers (including persons issued identification cards instead of drivers' licenses) in order to compile a jury source list.  The group consists of:

 

othe Office of the Administrator for the Courts;

othe Superior Court Judges Association;

othe District and Municipal Court Judges Association;

othe Association of County Clerks;

othe Office of Financial Management;

othe Secretary of State;

othe Association of County Auditors;

othe Department of Licensing;

othe State Bar Association;

othe Association of Superior Court Administrators; and

othe Association for Court Administration.

 

The plan and proposed legislation are to be submitted to the Legislature by January 1, 1992.  The plan is to be designed for implementation by January 1, 1993.

 

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

 

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

 

Testimony For:  (Judiciary) The expansion of the jury source list will create a better cross-section of citizens to select jurors from, and will remove a disincentive to register to vote.

 

(Appropriations) Same as in the Judiciary Committee.

 

Testimony Against:  (Judiciary) None.

 

(Appropriations) None.

 

Witnesses:  (Judiciary) William Gates, Washington Commission on Trial Courts (in favor); Ralph Munro, Secretary of State (in favor); Clark Holloway, Department of Licensing (in favor); Michele Radosevich, Washington State Trial Lawyers Association (in favor); Rick Wickman, Association of Washington Counties (in favor); David Kerruish, Seattle-King County Bar Association (in favor); Donna Karvia, County Clerks Association (in favor); and Siri Woods, County Clerks Association (in favor).

 

Witnesses:  (Appropriations) Michele Radosevich, Washington State Trial Lawyers.