HOUSE BILL REPORT

                      HB 2369

                     As Reported By House Committee on:

                            Fisheries & Wildlife

                               Appropriations

Title:  An act relating to salmon labeling for human consumption.

Brief Description:  Requiring salmon food fish to be labeled by its source and common name.

Sponsor(s):  Representatives Spanel, R. King, Wilson, Basich, H. Sommers, Hochstatter, Morris, Fuhrman, Kremen, Orr, Haugen, Riley, Padden, R. Meyers, G. Cole, Sheldon, Bowman, Rasmussen and R. Johnson.

Brief History:

   Reported by House Committee on:

Fisheries & Wildlife, January 21, 1992, DP;

Appropriations, February 4, 1992, DPS.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

FISHERIES & WILDLIFE

Majority Report: Do pass.  Signed by 11 members:  Representatives R. King, Chair; Morris, Vice Chair; Wilson, Ranking Minority Member; Fuhrman, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Basich; G. Cole; Haugen; Hochstatter; Orr; Padden; and Spanel.

Staff:  Keitlyn Watson (786-7310).

Background:  Consumers in Washington State are protected under both state and federal law from mislabeled foods sold within the state.  Under state law, false or misleading labels are generally defined as misbranding.  Some food items, such as halibut and poultry, have provisions that specifically describe certain acts that constitute misbranding.

The Department of Agriculture is the state agency primarily responsible for implementation of provisions prohibiting misbranding.  The department may issue an embargo of the food product involved or may seek an injunction through the attorney general, restraining a person from violating misbranding provisions.  Criminal penalties may also be sought against a violator.  After conviction and upon another violation, a violator may also be subject to a maximum of 30 days in jail.

Summary of Bill:  Any person that labels, advertises, or offers fresh or frozen salmon for wholesale or retail sale must identify the species of salmon by its common name as described in the bill, must identify whether the salmon is farm raised or commercially caught, and, if caught or raised in Washington, must indicate such.

Violations of these provisions constitute misbranding.

The Department of Agriculture, in consultation with the Department of Fisheries, must establish reasonable identification standards for salmon and develop a method to administratively enforce provisions of the bill.

Fiscal Note:  Requested 1/15/92.

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For:  There is support for the bill.

Testimony Against:  None.

Witnesses:  Chuck Williams, Salmon for All.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

APPROPRIATIONS

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 28 members:  Representatives Locke, Chair; Inslee, Vice Chair; Spanel, Vice Chair; Silver, Ranking Minority Member; Morton, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Appelwick; Belcher; Bowman; Braddock; Brekke; Carlson; Dorn; Ferguson; Fuhrman; Hine; Lisk; Mielke; Nealey; Peery; Pruitt; Rust; D. Sommers; H. Sommers; Sprenkle; Valle; Vance; Wang; and Wineberry.

Staff:  Susan Nakagawa (786-7145).

Summary of Recommendation of Committee on Appropriations Compared to Recommendation of Committee on Fisheries & Wildlife:  Language is added specifying that wholesalers and retailers who receive inaccurate information and unknowingly identify salmon species or origin inaccurately are not guilty of misbranding.

Fiscal Note:  Available.

Effective Date:  None.

Testimony For:  The department needs funding to adequately enforce this legislation.  The fiscal note indicates the cost of the program necessary for proactive monitoring and enforcement.

Testimony Against:  None.

Witnesses:  Julie Sandberg, Department of Agriculture.