HOUSE BILL REPORT

                      HB 2490

                     As Reported By House Committee on:

                                 Judiciary

                               Appropriations

Title:  An act relating to escape from community placement or community supervision.

Brief Description:  Making escape from community placement or supervision a class C felony.

Sponsor(s):  Representatives Padden, Morris, D. Sommers, Hochstatter, Forner, Brough, Broback, Silver, Fuhrman, Horn, P. Johnson, Bowman, Wynne, Morton, Carlson, Chandler, Mitchell and Tate.

Brief History:

   Reported by House Committee on:

Judiciary, February 6, 1992, DPS;

Appropriations, February 10, 1992, DPS(JUD).

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

JUDICIARY

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 17 members:  Representatives Appelwick, Chair; Ludwig, Vice Chair; Padden, Ranking Minority Member; Paris, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Belcher; Broback; Forner; Hargrove; Inslee; R. Meyers; Mielke; H. Myers; Riley; Scott; D. Sommers; Tate; and Vance.

Staff:  Pat Shelledy (786-7149).

Background:

An offender who is released from prison may be charged with escape if the offender is in "community custody" and "wilfully fails to comply with any one or more of the controls placed on the inmate's movements by the department of corrections."  The offense is a class C felony.  "Community custody" is a term of art under the sentencing reform act.  Most offenders who are sentenced to prison earn "good time" which is credited against their term of confinement.  An inmate is released when the inmate has served his or her time ordered minus any good time earned.  The concept of community custody means the convict is "confined in the community" and an "inmate" of the department of corrections during the time period that reflects the inmate's good time.

According to the department, prosecutors vary in interpretations of the statute's phrase "fails to comply with any one or more of the controls placed on the inmate's movements."  Some prosecutors do not charge under the statute and other prosecutors are charging escape when the department does not consider the inmate to have absconded from community custody. The department may place many restrictions on an inmate's movements (such as ordering them not to visit playgrounds if the offender is a child abuser) which do not have anything to do with escaping from supervision.

The crime of escaping from community custody is an unranked offense which means the sentencing range is up to one year in jail.  When calculating offender points for similar offenses such as willful failure to return from furlough or work release, the offender only gets points if the offender has previous escape offenses.

Summary of Substitute Bill:  The definition of escape is changed to mean that the inmate willfully discontinues making himself or herself available to the department for supervision by making his or her whereabouts unknown or by failing to maintain contact with the department as directed by the community corrections officer. The crime is ranked at seriousness level two which is 0-90 days in jail for a first offender.  Like other comparable escape statutes, only prior escape convictions are counted as the offender's prior criminal history.  A number of technical changes are made as needed in the sentencing reform act.

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:  The definition of escape from community custody is changed.  The original bill's provisions which expanded the crime to offenders who abscond from community supervision and community placement are stricken, and current law is restored.

Fiscal Note:  Available.  New fiscal note requested on February 7, 1992.

Effective Date of Substitute Bill:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For:  The definition of escape from community custody needs clarification.

Testimony Against:  Expanding the provisions to apply to community supervision and placement will have significant fiscal impact.

Witnesses:  Dave Savage, Department of Corrections (supports concept, but opposes particular provisions--prefers HB 2267); and Mike Redman, Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys (supports concept, but opposes particular provisions).

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

APPROPRIATIONS

Majority Report: The substitute bill by Committee on Judiciary be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 28 members:  Representatives Locke, Chair; Inslee, Vice Chair; Spanel, Vice Chair; Silver, Ranking Minority Member; Morton, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Appelwick; Belcher; Bowman; Braddock; Brekke; Carlson; Dorn; Ebersole; Ferguson; Fuhrman; Hine; Lisk; May; Mielke; Nealey; Peery; Pruitt; Rust; D. Sommers; H. Sommers; Sprenkle; Valle; and Wang.

Staff:  John Woolley (786-7154).

Summary of Recommendation of Committee on Appropriations Compared to Recommendation of Committee on Judiciary:  No new changes were made.

Fiscal Note:  Requested February 7, 1992.

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For:  None.

Testimony Against:  None.

Witnesses:  None.