SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5102
AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS, MARCH 7, 1991
Brief Description: Allowing an increased penalty for violations involving big game and endangered species.
SPONSORS:Senators Metcalf, Owen, Sutherland, Snyder, McMullen, L. Kreidler and Roach.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5102 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.
Signed by Senators Metcalf, Chairman; Oke, Vice Chairman; Barr, Conner, Owen, and Sutherland.
Staff: Vic Moon (786‑7469)
Hearing Dates:January 21, 1991; February 5, 1991
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS
Majority Report: That Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5102 be substituted therefor, and the second substitute bill do pass.
Signed by Senators McDonald, Chairman; Craswell, Vice Chairman; Bailey, Bauer, Gaspard, Johnson, L. Kreidler, Metcalf, Murray, Newhouse, Niemi, Rinehart, Saling, Talmadge, West, Williams, and Wojahn.
Staff: Michael Groesch (786-7715)
Hearing Dates:March 6, 1991; March 7, 1991
BACKGROUND:
There are major problems with poaching of fish and wildlife in the state of Washington. For example, as much as 45 percent of the deer killed in the state of Washington are taken illegally.
SUMMARY:
The courts are allowed to impose an additional penalty upon conviction of violations of the wildlife statutes. The penalty can be up to 100 percent of the prescribed penalty and the additional money will be divided between the court, the prosecutor's office and the Department of Wildlife.
EFFECT OF PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE:
The penalty is made uniform with the gross misdemeanor statute, increasing the maximum from $1,000 to up to $5,000 and from 30 days in jail to up to one year. A minimum fee is set. The court will not suspend or defer any penalty until both the criminal and civil penalties are paid. The funds from the civil penalty dealing with wildlife damage will go to support wildlife enforcement.
EFFECT OF PROPOSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE:
The transfer of funds to the special game wildlife fund is deleted.
Appropriation: none
Revenue: yes
Fiscal Note: requested
TESTIMONY FOR (Environment & Natural Resources):
Greater penalties are needed but a slightly different approach would benefit the Department of Wildlife more. (Therefore, the substitute bill is proposed.)
TESTIMONY AGAINST (Environment & Natural Resources): None
TESTIFIED (Environment & Natural Resources): Jim King, Sportsmen's Council (for); Larry Bell, Washington Hound Council (for); Ron Peregrin, Department of Wildlife (for)
TESTIMONY FOR (Ways & Means):
The bill directs the reimbursements to the proper fund and ensures their collection.
TESTIMONY AGAINST (Ways & Means): None
TESTIFIED (Ways & Means): Ron Peregrin, Dept. of Wildlife (pro)