SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5219
AS PASSED SENATE, FEBRUARY 27, 1991
Brief Description: Changing the limits on liability of common carriers for damage or loss of baggage.
SPONSORS:Senators Patterson, Vognild and Rasmussen; by request of Utilities & Transportation Commission.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
Majority Report: Do pass.
Signed by Senators Patterson, Chairman; Nelson, Vice Chairman; von Reichbauer, Vice Chairman; Barr, Conner, Erwin, Hansen, Oke, Sellar, Skratek, Snyder, Thorsness, and Vognild.
Staff: Mary McLaughlin (786‑7309)
Hearing Dates:February 5, 1991
BACKGROUND:
The maximum amount a passenger or shipper may recover for loss or damage to baggage transported by a for-hire bus (auto stage, airporter, excursion, charter) regulated by the Utilities and Transportation Commission is: (1) $200 for each trunk and its contents; (2) $50 for each suitcase, valise or traveling bag and its contents; and (3) $25 for each box, bundle or package. These free baggage allowance limitations were established in 1961.
When a passenger checks his/her baggage with the carrier, the passenger can declare that the baggage has a value in excess of the statutory limitation and pay an additional charge. The rate varies from 50 cents to 75 cents per $100 valuation, depending upon the amount contained in the individual carrier's published tariff.
On the federal level, the ICC's free baggage allowance limitation is $250 per adult fare, unless a higher valuation is declared at the time of delivery to carrier and an additional fee is paid. The carrier may publish a maximum additional value for which they will be liable, but the maximum value may not be less than $1,000.
SUMMARY:
The free baggage allowance limitation is changed from a statutorily fixed amount to an amount set by the Utilities and Transportation Commission. Periodic review and rate adjust is required of the commission.
Appropriation: none
Revenue: none
Fiscal Note: available
TESTIMONY FOR:
Changing the free baggage allowance limitation from a statutorily fixed fee to an amount determined by the commission will better reflect replacement costs.
TESTIMONY AGAINST: None
TESTIFIED: Carol Monohon, UTC (for)