SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5728
AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES,
FEBRUARY 3, 1992
Brief Description: Requiring that threshold determination must be completed within fifteen to thirty days.
SPONSORS:Senators Amondson, Vognild, Owen, Bauer, Stratton, McCaslin, West and Johnson.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5728 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.
Signed by Senators Metcalf, Chairman; Oke, Vice Chairman; Amondson, Barr, Owen, Sellar, and Snyder.
Staff: Atsushi Kiuchi (786‑7708)
Hearing Dates:February 28, 1991; January 21, 1992; February 3, 1992
BACKGROUND:
Under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), a "threshold determination" must be made by the responsible public agency to determine if a proposed action/project will have significant adverse environmental impacts. In making this determination, the agency reviews the environmental checklist and other available documents.
The threshold determination can result in a "determination of significance (DS)." This will require a full environmental impact statement (EIS) to be prepared.
If the threshold determination is a "determination of nonsignificance (DNS)," the action/project has no significant impacts or these impacts can be mitigated. No environmental impact statement is required.
Under the SEPA regulations, the time to complete the threshold determination should not exceed 15 days.
The delay in issuance of the threshold determination has had adverse impacts upon some property owners. Plat approvals have been affected, resulting in project delays beyond statutory time limits.
SUMMARY:
Threshold determinations shall be completed within 15 days, if possible, but under no circumstances go beyond 30 days. If no agency decision is reached after 30 days, the threshold determination shall be automatically approved.
EFFECT OF PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE:
If an agency decision is not reached after 30 days, a declaration of nonsignificance shall be issued that is not subject to administrative, legal or other appeals.
Appropriation: none
Revenue: none
Fiscal Note: none requested
TESTIMONY FOR:
A 30-day time certain requirement for agencies to reach a decision on whether an environmental impact statement is needed or not required under a "declaration of nonsignificance" will help prevent delays in the project reviews.
TESTIMONY AGAINST:
The number of projects delayed by this initial State Environmental Policy Act requirement is few. The legislation could also act in reverse of the intent of the bill with agencies requiring a full environmental impact statement in order to meet the proposed 30-day deadline.
TESTIFIED: John Woodring, John Robinette, Nick Adams, Washington Association of Realtors (pro); Paul Parker, Association of Counties (con); Jeff Parsons, Audubon Society (con); Nacki Stevens, People for Puget Sound (con); Bruce Wishart, Sierra Club (con); Bob Mack, Association of Washington Cities (con)