SENATE BILL REPORT
ESSB 5925
AS PASSED SENATE, MARCH 20, 1991
Brief Description: Requiring the department of revenue and the department of natural resources to act regarding the federal forestry act.
SPONSORS:Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Amondson, McDonald, Snyder, Barr, Madsen, Anderson and Conner).
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5925 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.
Signed by Senators McDonald, Chairman; Craswell, Vice Chairman; Bailey, Bauer, Cantu, Hayner, Johnson, Matson, Metcalf, Newhouse, Saling, L. Smith, and West.
Staff: Michael Groesch (786‑7715)
Hearing Dates:March 6, 1991; March 7, 1991
BACKGROUND:
The federal Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990 prohibits the export of 75 percent of the annual sales volume of unprocessed timber from public lands in Washington. The act also directed the Governor to issue regulations to carry out the purposes of the act. Those regulations are to remain in effect until the Legislature enacts requirements as it deems appropriate to carry out the federal provisions relating to the state export ban.
There is concern that the regulations which have been developed by the Governor are more restrictive than the 75 percent ban which was enacted by Congress. Unnecessary restrictions on unprocessed timber will further erode revenues from the state's public trust lands and will exacerbate the increase in the economic problems which have fallen upon the state's rural ports and timber export dependent communities. There is additional concern that the current rules do not provide equitable access to state timber for all members of the timber community.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Natural Resources shall propose alternative rules to implement the federal Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990. The alternative rules will be designed to minimize the economic impact on the state trusts while providing equitable treatment to timber purchasers and maximizing employment within the state. The Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Revenue shall jointly prepare an enforcement plan and a cost estimate for carrying out the federal act. The proposed rules, enforcement plan and cost estimate shall be presented to the Legislature by December 1, 1991.
Appropriation:none
Revenue:none
Fiscal Note:none requested
TESTIMONY FOR:
The current rules unnecessarily reduce revenues to the forest trusts, they are difficult to implement, and they worsen the economic condition of the timber community.
TESTIMONY AGAINST:
Changing the rules will cause instability in the forest industry and the current rules are necessary to save jobs. Without strict substitution rules, the number of bidders on public timber sales will decline in the long term.
TESTIFIED: Nels Hanson, Norm Hutson, WA Farm Forestry Assn. (pro); Art Stearns, DNR (pro); Terry Raettig, Governor's Timber Team (con); Nick Kirkmire, Washington Citizens for World Trade (pro)