H-3372.2 _______________________________________________
HOUSE BILL 2529
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 52nd Legislature 1992 Regular Session
By Representatives Belcher, Forner, Paris, H. Myers, Riley, Anderson, Leonard, R. King, Ebersole, Bowman, Orr, Scott, J. Kohl, Morris, Fraser, Rasmussen and Brekke
Read first time 01/20/92. Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
AN ACT Relating to restricting residential time and visitation rights of parents who have sexually abused their children; amending RCW 26.10.160; reenacting and amending RCW 26.09.191; and declaring an emergency.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 26.09.191 and 1989 c 375 s 11 and 1989 c 326 s 1 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:
(1) The permanent parenting plan shall not require mutual decision-making or designation of a dispute resolution process other than court action if it is found that a parent has engaged in any of the following conduct: (a) Willful abandonment that continues for an extended period of time or substantial refusal to perform parenting functions; (b) physical, sexual, or a pattern of emotional abuse of a child; or (c) a history of acts of domestic violence as defined in RCW 26.50.010(1) or an assault or sexual assault which causes grievous bodily harm or the fear of such harm.
(2)(a) The parent's residential time with the child shall be limited if it is found that the parent has engaged in any of the following conduct: (i) Willful abandonment that continues for an extended period of time or substantial refusal to perform parenting functions; (ii) physical, sexual, or a pattern of emotional abuse of a child; or (iii) a history of acts of domestic violence as defined in RCW 26.50.010(1) or an assault or sexual assault which causes grievous bodily harm or the fear of such harm.
(b) If the court finds that the parent engaged in sexual abuse of the child, the court shall require that a neutral third party supervise all residential time the parent spends with the child. The supervisor may not be a member of the offending parent's family.
(c) The limitations imposed by the court shall be reasonably calculated to protect the child from physical, sexual, or emotional abuse or harm that could result if the child has contact with the parent requesting residential time. If the court expressly finds limitation on the residential time with the child will not adequately protect the child from the harm or abuse that could result if the child has contact with the parent requesting residential time, the court shall restrain the parent requesting residential time from all contact with the child.
(((c)))
(d) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, if the court expressly
finds that contact between the parent and the child will not cause physical,
sexual, or emotional abuse or harm to the child and that the probability that
the parent's harmful or abusive conduct will recur is so remote that it would
not be in the child's best interests to apply the limitations of (a) and (((b)))
(c) of this subsection, or if the court expressly finds the parent's
conduct did not have an impact on the child, then the court need not apply the
limitations of (a) and (((b))) (c) of this subsection. The
weight given to the existence of a protection order issued under chapter 26.50
RCW as to domestic violence is within the discretion of the court.
(3) A parent's involvement or conduct may have an adverse effect on the child's best interests, and the court may preclude or limit any provisions of the parenting plan, if any of the following factors exist:
(a) A parent's neglect or substantial nonperformance of parenting functions;
(b) A long-term emotional or physical impairment which interferes with the parent's performance of parenting functions as defined in RCW 26.09.004;
(c) A long-term impairment resulting from drug, alcohol, or other substance abuse that interferes with the performance of parenting functions;
(d) The absence or substantial impairment of emotional ties between the parent and the child;
(e) The abusive use of conflict by the parent which creates the danger of serious damage to the child's psychological development;
(f) A parent has withheld from the other parent access to the child for a protracted period without good cause; or
(g) Such other factors or conduct as the court expressly finds adverse to the best interests of the child.
(4) In entering a permanent parenting plan, the court shall not draw any presumptions from the provisions of the temporary parenting plan.
(5) In determining whether any of the conduct described in this section has occurred, the court shall apply the civil rules of evidence, proof, and procedure.
Sec. 2. RCW 26.10.160 and 1989 c 326 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A parent not granted custody of the child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights except as provided in subsection (2) of this section.
(2)(a) Visitation with the child shall be limited if it is found that the parent seeking visitation has engaged in any of the following conduct: (i) Willful abandonment that continues for an extended period of time or substantial refusal to perform parenting functions; (ii) physical, sexual, or a pattern of emotional abuse of a child; or (iii) a history of acts of domestic violence as defined in RCW 26.50.010(1) or an assault or sexual assault which causes grievous bodily harm or the fear of such harm.
(b) If the court finds that the parent engaged in sexual abuse of the child, the court shall require that a neutral third party supervise the visitation. The supervisor may not be a member of the offending parent's family.
(c) The limitations imposed by the court shall be reasonably calculated to protect the child from the physical, sexual, or emotional abuse or harm that could result if the child has contact with the parent requesting visitation. If the court expressly finds limitations on visitation with the child will not adequately protect the child from the harm or abuse that could result if the child has contact with the parent requesting visitation, the court shall restrain the person seeking visitation from all contact with the child.
(((c)))
(d) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, if the court expressly
finds that contact between the parent and the child will not cause physical,
sexual, or emotional abuse or harm to the child and that the probability that
the parent's harmful or abusive conduct will recur is so remote that it would
not be in the child's best interests to apply the limitations of (a) and (((b)))
(c) of this subsection, or if the court expressly finds the parent's
conduct did not have an impact on the child, then the court need not apply the
limitations of (a) and (((b))) (c) of this subsection. The
weight given to the existence of a protection order issued under chapter 26.50
RCW as to domestic violence is within the discretion of the court.
(3) Any person may petition the court for visitation rights at any time including, but not limited to, custody proceedings. The court may order visitation rights for any person when visitation may serve the best interest of the child whether or not there has been any change of circumstances.
(4) The court may modify an order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interests of the child. Modification of a parent's visitation rights shall be subject to the requirements of subsection (2) of this section.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.