H-4463.3          _______________________________________________

 

                            SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2834

                  _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington              52nd Legislature             1992 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Human Services (originally sponsored by Representatives Hargrove, Riley, Leonard, Dellwo, Appelwick and Basich)

 

Read first time 02/07/92.  Providing sentencing alternatives for offenders.


     AN ACT Relating to criminal sentencing; amending RCW 9.94A.150, 9.94A.440, and 9A.20.021; reenacting and amending RCW 9.94A.120; adding new sections to chapter 9.95 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 72.09 RCW; creating new sections; repealing RCW 9.95.001, 9.95.0011, 9.95.003, 9.95.005, 9.95.007, 9.95.009, 9.95.010, 9.95.011, 9.95.013, 9.95.015, 9.95.017, 9.95.020, 9.95.028, 9.95.030, 9.95.031, 9.95.032, 9.95.040, 9.95.052, 9.95.055, 9.95.090, 9.95.100, 9.95.110, 9.95.115, 9.95.116, 9.95.120, 9.95.121, 9.95.122, 9.95.123, 9.95.124, 9.95.125, 9.95.126, 9.95.130, 9.95.140, 9.95.145, 9.95.150, 9.95.160, 9.95.170, 9.95.190, 9.95.200, 9.95.210, 9.95.220, 9.95.230, 9.95.240, 9.95.250, 9.95.260, 9.95.265, 9.95.270, 9.95.280, 9.95.290, 9.95.300, 9.95.310, 9.95.320, 9.95.330, 9.95.340, 9.95.350, 9.95.360, 9.95.370, 9.95.900, 9.96.050, 72.04A.050, 72.04A.070, 72.04A.080, 72.04A.090, 72.04A.120, and 72.04A.900; prescribing penalties; providing effective dates; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.      The legislature finds that crowded prisons are clearly one of the most pressing problems facing the criminal justice system today.  Even the most conservative estimates indicate that despite our aggressive prison construction plan we will not be able to build enough prison beds to keep pace with expected growth in the prison population over the next ten years.  The huge increase in our prison population is not only the result of more individuals committing serious crimes but also because most offenders released from prison will return again.  Our corrections system has become a high-cost institution that perpetually recycles inmates without deterring crime.  As a result of these conditions, serious concerns have been raised about our current corrections philosophy.  Attention must be directed towards implementing a long-range corrections strategy that focuses on inmate responsibility through work training, the development of mature and marketable job skills, and requiring inmates to pay for the cost of their incarceration.

     The combined cost of housing, maintaining, and supervising inmates in our state corrections facilities is increasing beyond our capability to pay.  The legislature recognizes that the responsibility for criminal activity must fall squarely on the criminal.  Society should not have to pay the price for crimes twice, once for the criminal act and then again by feeding, clothing, and housing the offender.  The corrections system must be the first place where criminal offenders are given the opportunity to be responsible for paying for their criminal activity, not just through the loss of their freedom, but also by working while in prison and contributing an appropriate portion of their wages to the cost of their incarceration.  Allowing offenders to become responsible through working in meaningful jobs for real wages can be a beneficial opportunity for corrections.  Everyone profits from a successful corrections industry program -- the prison system, taxpayers, the community, families, and the inmate.  Most important, an inmate who is drug-free and has mature job skills is significantly more likely not to return to prison.

     It is the purpose and intent of this act to outline a comprehensive strategy for reducing upwardly spiraling prison costs through an inmate work responsibility program, preserving scarce prison cell space for our most dangerous offenders, and providing judges with alternatives to incarceration, including drug rehabilitation, that must be used without jeopardizing public safety.

 

     Sec. 2.  RCW 9.94A.120 and 1991 c 221 s 2, 1991 c 181 s 3, and 1991 c 104 s 3 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

     When a person is convicted of a felony, the court shall impose punishment as provided in this section.

     (1) Except as authorized in subsections (2), (4), (5), ((and)) (7), and (20) of this section, the court shall impose a sentence within the sentence range for the offense.

     (2) The court may impose a sentence outside the standard sentence range for that offense if it finds, considering the purpose of this chapter, that there are substantial and compelling reasons justifying an exceptional sentence.

     (3) Whenever a sentence outside the standard range is imposed, the court shall set forth the reasons for its decision in written findings of fact and conclusions of law.  A sentence outside the standard range shall be a determinate sentence.

     (4)(a) An offender convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree shall be sentenced to a term of total confinement not less than twenty years.

     (b) An offender convicted of the crime of assault in the first degree where the offender used force or means likely to result in death or intended to kill the victim shall be sentenced to a term of total confinement not less than five years.

     (c) An offender convicted of the crime of rape in the first degree shall be sentenced to a term of total confinement not less than five years, and shall not be eligible for furlough, work release or other authorized leave of absence from the correctional facility during such minimum five-year term except for the purpose of commitment to an inpatient treatment facility.

     (d) An offender shall be sentenced to a minimum term of confinement of not less than fifteen years if the offender (i) while committed to a state correctional facility for murder in the first or second degree, homicide by abuse, assault in the first or second degree, rape in the first or second degree, kidnapping in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, arson in the first degree, or burglary in the first degree; (ii) commits the crime of murder in the second degree, assault in the first or second degree, rape in the first or second degree, arson in the first or second degree, or robbery in the first or second degree.  The sentence shall be served consecutive to any term of confinement remaining on the offense or offenses for which the offender was committed to the state institution as provided in RCW 9.94A.400 (2) and (5).  An offender who commits murder in the first degree while committed to a state institution for the conviction of one of the offenses listed in (d)(ii) of this subsection shall serve his or her sentence consecutive to any term of confinement remaining on the offense or offenses for which the offender was committed to the state institution.  RCW 9A.20.021(1)(b), which provides that the statutory maximum for class B felonies is ten years, does not apply to the crimes identified in (d)(ii) of this subsection when committed in a state correctional facility by an offender who is committed to the state institution for a crime listed in (d)(i) of this subsection.  The statutory maximum is a term of life imprisonment.

     The foregoing minimum terms of total confinement, specified in (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this subsection, are mandatory and shall not be varied or modified as provided in subsection (2) of this section.

     (5) In sentencing a first-time offender the court may waive the imposition of a sentence within the sentence range and impose a sentence which may include up to ninety days of confinement in a facility operated or utilized under contract by the county and a requirement that the offender refrain from committing new offenses.  The sentence may also include up to two years of community supervision, which, in addition to crime-related prohibitions, may include requirements that the offender perform any one or more of the following:

     (a) Devote time to a specific employment or occupation;

     (b) Undergo available outpatient treatment for up to two years, or inpatient treatment not to exceed the standard range of confinement for that offense;

     (c) Pursue a prescribed, secular course of study or vocational training;

     (d) Remain within prescribed geographical boundaries and notify the court or the community corrections officer prior to any change in the offender's address or employment;

     (e) Report as directed to the court and a community corrections officer; or

     (f) Pay all court-ordered legal financial obligations as provided in RCW 9.94A.030 and/or perform community service work.

     (6) If a sentence range has not been established for the defendant's crime, the court shall impose a determinate sentence which may include not more than one year of confinement, community service work, a term of community supervision not to exceed one year, and/or other legal financial obligations.  The court may impose a sentence which provides more than one year of confinement if the court finds, considering the purpose of this chapter, that there are substantial and compelling reasons justifying an exceptional sentence.

     (7)(a)(i) When an offender is convicted of a sex offense other than a violation of RCW 9A.44.050 or a sex offense that is also a serious violent offense and has no prior convictions for a sex offense or any other felony sex offenses in this or any other state, the sentencing court, on its own motion or the motion of the state or the defendant, may order an examination to determine whether the defendant is amenable to treatment.

     The report of the examination shall include at a minimum the following:  The defendant's version of the facts and the official version of the facts, the defendant's offense history, an assessment of problems in addition to alleged deviant behaviors, the offender's social and employment situation, and other evaluation measures used.  The report shall set forth the sources of the evaluator's information.

     The examiner shall assess and report regarding the defendant's amenability to treatment and relative risk to the community.  A proposed treatment plan shall be provided and shall include, at a minimum:

     (A) Frequency and type of contact between offender and therapist;

     (B) Specific issues to be addressed in the treatment and description of planned treatment modalities;

     (C) Monitoring plans, including any requirements regarding living conditions, lifestyle requirements, and monitoring by family members and others;

     (D) Anticipated length of treatment; and

     (E) Recommended crime-related prohibitions.

     The court on its own motion may order, or on a motion by the state shall order, a second examination regarding the offender's amenability to treatment.  The evaluator shall be selected by the party making the motion.  The defendant shall pay the cost of any second examination ordered unless the court finds the defendant to be indigent in which case the state shall pay the cost.

     (ii) After receipt of the reports, the court shall consider whether the offender and the community will benefit from use of this special sexual offender sentencing alternative and consider the victim's opinion whether the offender should receive a treatment disposition under this subsection.  If the court determines that this special sex offender sentencing alternative is appropriate, the court shall then impose a sentence within the sentence range.  If this sentence is less than eight years of confinement, the court may suspend the execution of the sentence and impose the following conditions of suspension:

     (A) The court shall place the defendant on community supervision for the length of the suspended sentence or three years, whichever is greater; and

     (B) The court shall order treatment for any period up to three years in duration.  The court in its discretion shall order outpatient sex offender treatment or inpatient sex offender treatment, if available.  A community mental health center may not be used for such treatment unless it has an appropriate program designed for sex offender treatment.  The offender shall not change sex offender treatment providers or treatment conditions without first notifying the prosecutor, the community corrections officer, and the court, and shall not change providers without court approval after a hearing if the prosecutor or community corrections officer object to the change.  In addition, as conditions of the suspended sentence, the court may impose other sentence conditions including up to six months of confinement, not to exceed the sentence range of confinement for that offense, crime-related prohibitions, and requirements that the offender perform any one or more of the following:

     (I) Devote time to a specific employment or occupation;

     (II) Remain within prescribed geographical boundaries and notify the court or the community corrections officer prior to any change in the offender's address or employment;

     (III) Report as directed to the court and a community corrections officer;

     (IV) Pay all court-ordered legal financial obligations as provided in RCW 9.94A.030, perform community service work, or any combination thereof; or

     (V) Make recoupment to the victim for the cost of any counseling required as a result of the offender's crime.

     (iii) The sex offender therapist shall submit quarterly reports on the defendant's progress in treatment to the court and the parties.  The report shall reference the treatment plan and include at a minimum the following:  Dates of attendance, defendant's compliance with requirements, treatment activities, the defendant's relative progress in treatment, and any other material as specified by the court at sentencing.

     (iv) At the time of sentencing, the court shall set a treatment termination hearing for three months prior to the anticipated date for completion of treatment.  Prior to the treatment termination hearing, the treatment professional and community corrections officer shall submit written reports to the court and parties regarding the defendant's compliance with treatment and monitoring requirements, and recommendations regarding termination from treatment, including proposed community supervision conditions.  Either party may request and the court may order another evaluation regarding the advisability of termination from treatment.  The defendant shall pay the cost of any additional evaluation ordered unless the court finds the defendant to be indigent in which case the state shall pay the cost.  At the treatment termination hearing the court may:  (A) Modify conditions of community supervision, and either (B) terminate treatment, or (C) extend treatment for up to the remaining period of community supervision.

     (v) The court may revoke the suspended sentence at any time during the period of community supervision and order execution of the sentence if:  (A) The defendant violates the conditions of the suspended sentence, or (B) the court finds that the defendant is failing to make satisfactory progress in treatment.  All confinement time served during the period of community supervision shall be credited to the offender if the suspended sentence is revoked.

     (vi) After July 1, 1991, examinations and treatment ordered pursuant to this subsection shall only be conducted by sex offender treatment providers certified by the department of health pursuant to chapter 18.155 RCW.

     For purposes of this subsection, "victim" means any person who has sustained emotional, psychological, physical, or financial injury to person or property as a result of the crime charged.  "Victim" also means a parent or guardian of a victim who is a minor child unless the parent or guardian is the perpetrator of the offense.

     (b) When an offender is convicted of any felony sex offense committed before July 1, 1987, and is sentenced to a term of confinement of more than one year but less than six years, the sentencing court may, on its own motion or on the motion of the offender or the state, order the offender committed for up to thirty days to the custody of the secretary of social and health services for evaluation and report to the court on the offender's amenability to treatment at these facilities.  If the secretary of social and health services cannot begin the evaluation within thirty days of the court's order of commitment, the offender shall be transferred to the state for confinement pending an opportunity to be evaluated at the appropriate facility.  The court shall review the reports and may order that the term of confinement imposed be served in the sexual offender treatment program at the location determined by the secretary of social and health services or the secretary's designee, only if the report indicates that the offender is amenable to the treatment program provided at these facilities.  The offender shall be transferred to the state pending placement in the treatment program.  Any offender who has escaped from the treatment program shall be referred back to the sentencing court.

     If the offender does not comply with the conditions of the treatment program, the secretary of social and health services may refer the matter to the sentencing court.  The sentencing court shall commit the offender to the department of corrections to serve the balance of the term of confinement.

     If the offender successfully completes the treatment program before the expiration of the term of confinement, the court may convert the balance of confinement to community supervision and may place conditions on the offender including crime-related prohibitions and requirements that the offender perform any one or more of the following:

     (i) Devote time to a specific employment or occupation;

     (ii) Remain within prescribed geographical boundaries and notify the court or the community corrections officer prior to any change in the offender's address or employment;

     (iii) Report as directed to the court and a community corrections officer;

     (iv) Undergo available outpatient treatment.

     If the offender violates any of the terms of community supervision, the court may order the offender to serve out the balance of the community supervision term in confinement in the custody of the department of corrections.

     After June 30, 1993, this subsection (b) shall cease to have effect.

     (c) When an offender commits any felony sex offense on or after July 1, 1987, and is sentenced to a term of confinement of more than one year but less than six years, the sentencing court may, on its own motion or on the motion of the offender or the state, request the department of corrections to evaluate whether the offender is amenable to treatment and the department may place the offender in a treatment program within a correctional facility operated by the department.

     Except for an offender who has been convicted of a violation of RCW 9A.44.040 or 9A.44.050, if the offender completes the treatment program before the expiration of his or her term of confinement, the department of corrections may request the court to convert the balance of confinement to community supervision and to place conditions on the offender including crime-related prohibitions and requirements that the offender perform any one or more of the following:

     (i) Devote time to a specific employment or occupation;

     (ii) Remain within prescribed geographical boundaries and notify the court or the community corrections officer prior to any change in the offender's address or employment;

     (iii) Report as directed to the court and a community corrections officer;

     (iv) Undergo available outpatient treatment.

     If the offender violates any of the terms of his or her community supervision, the court may order the offender to serve out the balance of his community supervision term in confinement in the custody of the department of corrections.

     Nothing in (c) of this subsection shall confer eligibility for such programs for offenders convicted and sentenced for a sex offense committed prior to July 1, 1987.  This subsection (c) does not apply to any crime committed after July 1, 1990.

     (d) Offenders convicted and sentenced for a sex offense committed prior to July 1, 1987, may, subject to available funds, request an evaluation by the department of corrections to determine whether they are amenable to treatment.  If the offender is determined to be amenable to treatment, the offender may request placement in a treatment program within a correctional facility operated by the department.  Placement in such treatment program is subject to available funds.

     (8)(a) When a court sentences a person to a term of total confinement to the custody of the department of corrections for an offense categorized as a sex offense or a serious violent offense committed after July 1, 1988, but before July 1, 1990, assault in the second degree, any crime against a person where it is determined in accordance with RCW 9.94A.125 that the defendant or an accomplice was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of commission, or any felony offense under chapter 69.50 or 69.52 RCW, committed on or after July 1, 1988, the court shall in addition to the other terms of the sentence, sentence the offender to a one-year term of community placement beginning either upon completion of the term of confinement or at such time as the offender is transferred to community custody in lieu of earned early release in accordance with RCW 9.94A.150 (1) and (2).  When the court sentences an offender under this subsection to the statutory maximum period of confinement then the community placement portion of the sentence shall consist entirely of such community custody to which the offender may become eligible, in accordance with RCW 9.94A.150 (1) and (2).  Any period of community custody actually served shall be credited against the community placement portion of the sentence.

     (b) When a court sentences a person to a term of total confinement to the custody of the department of corrections for an offense categorized as a sex offense or serious violent offense committed on or after July 1, 1990, the court shall in addition to other terms of the sentence, sentence the offender to community placement for two years or up to the period of earned early release awarded pursuant to RCW 9.94A.150 (1) and (2), whichever is longer.  The community placement shall begin either upon completion of the term of confinement or at such time as the offender is transferred to community custody in lieu of earned early release in accordance with RCW 9.94A.150 (1) and (2).  When the court sentences an offender under this subsection to the statutory maximum period of confinement then the community placement portion of the sentence shall consist entirely of the community custody to which the offender may become eligible, in accordance with RCW 9.94A.150 (1) and (2).  Any period of community custody actually served shall be credited against the community placement portion of the sentence.  Unless a condition is waived by the court, the terms of community placement for offenders sentenced pursuant to this section shall include the following conditions:

     (i) The offender shall report to and be available for contact with the assigned community corrections officer as directed;

     (ii) The offender shall work at department of corrections-approved education, employment, and/or community service;

     (iii) The offender shall not consume controlled substances except pursuant to lawfully issued prescriptions;

     (iv) An offender in community custody shall not unlawfully possess controlled substances; and

     (v) The offender shall pay supervision fees as determined by the department of corrections.

     (c) The court may also order any of the following special conditions:

     (i) The offender shall remain within, or outside of, a specified geographical boundary;

     (ii) The offender shall not have direct or indirect contact with the victim of the crime or a specified class of individuals;

     (iii) The offender shall participate in crime-related treatment or counseling services;

     (iv) The offender shall not consume alcohol;

     (v) The residence location and living arrangements of a sex offender shall be subject to the prior approval of the department of corrections; or

     (vi) The offender shall comply with any crime-related prohibitions.

     (d) Prior to transfer to, or during, community placement, any conditions of community placement may be removed or modified so as not to be more restrictive by the sentencing court, upon recommendation of the department of corrections.

     (9) If the court imposes a sentence requiring confinement of thirty days or less, the court may, in its discretion, specify that the sentence be served on consecutive or intermittent days.  A sentence requiring more than thirty days of confinement shall be served on consecutive days.  Local jail administrators may schedule court-ordered intermittent sentences as space permits.

     (10) If a sentence imposed includes payment of a legal financial obligation, the sentence shall specify the total amount of the legal financial obligation owed, and shall require the offender to pay a specified monthly sum toward that legal financial obligation.  Restitution to victims shall be paid prior to any other payments of monetary obligations.  Any legal financial obligation that is imposed by the court may be collected by the department, which shall deliver the amount paid to the county clerk for credit.  The offender's compliance with payment of legal financial obligations shall be supervised by the department.  All monetary payments ordered shall be paid no later than ten years after the last date of release from confinement pursuant to a felony conviction or the date the sentence was entered.  Independent of the department, the party or entity to whom the legal financial obligation is owed shall have the authority to utilize any other remedies available to the party or entity to collect the legal financial obligation.  Nothing in this section makes the department, the state, or any of its employees, agents, or other persons acting on their behalf liable under any circumstances for the payment of these legal financial obligations.  If an order includes restitution as one of the monetary assessments, the county clerk shall make disbursements to victims named in the order.

     (11) Except as provided under RCW 9.94A.140(1) and 9.94A.142(1), a court may not impose a sentence providing for a term of confinement or community supervision or community placement which exceeds the statutory maximum for the crime as provided in chapter 9A.20 RCW.

     (12) All offenders sentenced to terms involving community supervision, community service, community placement, or legal financial obligation shall be under the supervision of the secretary of the department of corrections or such person as the secretary may designate and shall follow explicitly the instructions of the secretary including reporting as directed to a community corrections officer, remaining within prescribed geographical boundaries, notifying the community corrections officer of any change in the offender's address or employment, and paying the supervision fee assessment.

     (13) All offenders sentenced to terms involving community supervision, community service, or community placement under the supervision of the department of corrections shall not own, use, or possess firearms or ammunition.  Offenders who own, use, or are found to be in actual or constructive possession of firearms or ammunition shall be subject to the appropriate violation process and sanctions.  "Constructive possession" as used in this subsection means the power and intent to control the firearm or ammunition.  "Firearm" as used in this subsection means a weapon or device from which a projectile may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.

     (14) The sentencing court shall give the offender credit for all confinement time served before the sentencing if that confinement was solely in regard to the offense for which the offender is being sentenced.

     (15) A departure from the standards in RCW 9.94A.400 (1) and (2) governing whether sentences are to be served consecutively or concurrently is an exceptional sentence subject to the limitations in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, and may be appealed by the defendant or the state as set forth in RCW 9.94A.210 (2) through (6).

     (16) The court shall order restitution whenever the offender is convicted of a felony that results in injury to any person or damage to or loss of property, whether the offender is sentenced to confinement or placed under community supervision, unless extraordinary circumstances exist that make restitution inappropriate in the court's judgment.  The court shall set forth the extraordinary circumstances in the record if it does not order restitution.

     (17) As a part of any sentence, the court may impose and enforce an order that relates directly to the circumstances of the crime for which the offender has been convicted, prohibiting the offender from having any contact with other specified individuals or a specific class of individuals for a period not to exceed the maximum allowable sentence for the crime, regardless of the expiration of the offender's term of community supervision or community placement.

     (18) In any sentence of partial confinement, the court may require the defendant to serve the partial confinement in work release, in a program of home detention, on work crew, or in a combined program of work crew and home detention.

     (19) All court-ordered legal financial obligations collected by the department and remitted to the county clerk shall be credited and paid where restitution is ordered.  Restitution shall be paid prior to any other payments of monetary obligations.

     (20) An offender shall be sentenced to a minimum term of confinement of not less than fifteen years or a determinate term within the standard range, whichever is greater, if the offender (a) while committed to a state correctional facility for murder in the first or second degree, homicide by abuse, assault in the first or second degree, rape in the first or second degree, kidnapping in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, arson in the first degree, or burglary in the first degree; (b) commits the crime of murder in the second degree, assault in the first or second degree, rape in the first or second degree, arson in the first or second degree, or robbery in the first or second degree.  The court may impose an exceptional sentence above the mandatory minimum term or the standard range for the offense based on the existence of aggravating factors as provided in RCW 9.94A.390, but may not impose an exceptional sentence below the mandatory minimum or standard range.  The term imposed shall be served consecutive to any term of confinement remaining on the offense or offenses for which the offender was committed to the state institution as provided in RCW 9.94A.400 (2) and (5).  An offender who commits murder in the first degree while committed to a state institution for the conviction of one of the offenses listed in (b) of this subsection shall serve his or her sentence consecutive to any term of confinement remaining on the offense or offenses for which the offender was committed to the state institution.  RCW 9A.20.021(1)(b), which provides that the statutory maximum for class B felonies is ten years, does not apply to the crimes identified in (b) of this subsection when committed in a state correctional facility by an offender who is committed to the state institution for a crime listed in (a) of this subsection.  The statutory maximum is a term of life imprisonment.

 

     Sec. 3.  RCW 9.94A.150 and 1990 c 3 s 202 are each amended to read as follows:

     No person serving a sentence imposed pursuant to this chapter and committed to the custody of the department shall leave the confines of the correctional facility or be released prior to the expiration of the sentence except as follows:

     (1) Except as otherwise provided for in subsection (2) of this section, the term of the sentence of an offender committed to a correctional facility operated by the department, may be reduced by earned early release time in accordance with procedures that shall be developed and promulgated by the correctional agency having jurisdiction in which the offender is confined.  The earned early release time shall be for good behavior and good performance, as determined by the correctional agency having jurisdiction. The correctional agency shall not credit the offender with earned early release credits in advance of the offender actually earning the credits.  Any program established pursuant to this section shall allow an offender to earn early release credits for presentence incarceration.  If an offender is transferred from a county jail to the department of corrections, the county jail facility shall certify to the department the amount of time spent in custody at the facility and the amount of earned early release time.  In the case of an offender convicted of a serious violent offense or a sex offense that is a class A felony committed on or after July 1, 1990, the aggregate earned early release time may not exceed fifteen percent of the sentence.  In no other case shall the aggregate earned early release time exceed one‑third of the total sentence;

     (2) A person convicted of a sex offense or an offense categorized as a serious violent offense, assault in the second degree, any crime against a person where it is determined in accordance with RCW 9.94A.125 that the defendant or an accomplice was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of commission, or any felony offense under chapter 69.50 or 69.52 RCW may become eligible, in accordance with a program developed by the department, for transfer to community custody status in lieu of earned early release time pursuant to subsection (1) of this section;

     (3) An offender may leave a correctional facility pursuant to an authorized furlough or leave of absence.  In addition, offenders may leave a correctional facility when in the custody of a corrections officer or officers;

     (4) The governor, upon recommendation from the clemency and pardons board, may grant an extraordinary release for reasons of serious health problems, senility, advanced age, extraordinary meritorious acts, or other extraordinary circumstances;

     (5) No more than the final six months of the sentence may be served in partial confinement designed to aid the offender in finding work and reestablishing him or herself in the community;

     (6) The governor may pardon any offender;

     (7) The department of corrections may release an offender from confinement any time within ten days before a release date calculated under this section; and

     (8) An offender may leave a correctional facility prior to completion of his or her sentence if the sentence has been reduced as provided in RCW 9.94A.160.

 

     Sec. 4.  RCW 9.94A.440 and 1989 c 332 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) Decision not to prosecute.

     STANDARD:  A prosecuting attorney may decline to prosecute, even though technically sufficient evidence to prosecute exists, in situations where prosecution would serve no public purpose, would defeat the underlying purpose of the law in question or would result in decreased respect for the law.

     GUIDELINE/COMMENTARY:

     Examples

     The following are examples of reasons not to prosecute which could satisfy the standard.

     (a) Contrary to Legislative Intent - It may be proper to decline to charge where the application of criminal sanctions would be clearly contrary to the intent of the legislature in enacting the particular statute.

     (b) Antiquated Statute - It may be proper to decline to charge where the statute in question is antiquated in that:

     (i) It has not been enforced for many years; and

     (ii) Most members of society act as if it were no longer in existence; and

     (iii) It serves no deterrent or protective purpose in today's society; and

     (iv) The statute has not been recently reconsidered by the legislature.

     This reason is not to be construed as the basis for declining cases because the law in question is unpopular or because it is difficult to enforce.

     (c) De Minimus Violation - It may be proper to decline to charge where the violation of law is only technical or insubstantial and where no public interest or deterrent purpose would be served by prosecution.

     (d) Confinement on Other Charges - Except for crimes committed by prisoners in state correctional facilities as provided in RCW 9.94A.120(20), it may be proper to decline to charge because the accused has been sentenced on another charge to a lengthy period of confinement; and

     (i) Conviction of the new offense would not merit any additional direct or collateral punishment;

     (ii) The new offense is either a misdemeanor or a felony which is not particularly aggravated; and

     (iii) Conviction of the new offense would not serve any significant deterrent purpose.

     (e) Pending Conviction on Another Charge - It may be proper to decline to charge because the accused is facing a pending prosecution in the same or another county; and

     (i) Conviction of the new offense would not merit any additional direct or collateral punishment;

     (ii) Conviction in the pending prosecution is imminent;

     (iii) The new offense is either a misdemeanor or a felony which is not particularly aggravated; and

     (iv) Conviction of the new offense would not serve any significant deterrent purpose.

     (f) High Disproportionate Cost of Prosecution - It may be proper to decline to charge where the cost of locating or transporting, or the burden on, prosecution witnesses is highly disproportionate to the importance of prosecuting the offense in question.  This reason should be limited to minor cases and should not be relied upon in serious cases.

     (g) Improper Motives of Complainant - It may be proper to decline charges because the motives of the complainant are improper and prosecution would serve no public purpose, would defeat the underlying purpose of the law in question or would result in decreased respect for the law.

     (h) Immunity - It may be proper to decline to charge where immunity is to be given to an accused in order to prosecute another where the accused's information or testimony will reasonably lead to the conviction of others who are responsible for more serious criminal conduct or who represent a greater danger to the public interest.

     (i) Victim Request - It may be proper to decline to charge because the victim requests that no criminal charges be filed and the case involves the following crimes or situations:

     (i) Assault cases where the victim has suffered little or no injury;

     (ii) Crimes against property, not involving violence, where no major loss was suffered;

     (iii) Where doing so would not jeopardize the safety of society.

     Care should be taken to insure that the victim's request is freely made and is not the product of threats or pressure by the accused.

     The presence of these factors may also justify the decision to dismiss a prosecution which has been commenced.

     Notification

     The prosecutor is encouraged to notify the victim, when practical, and the law enforcement personnel, of the decision not to prosecute.

     (2) Decision to prosecute.

     STANDARD:

     Crimes against persons will be filed if sufficient admissible evidence exists, which, when considered with the most plausible, reasonably foreseeable defense that could be raised under the evidence, would justify conviction by a reasonable and objective fact-finder.  With regard to offenses prohibited by RCW 9A.44.040, 9A.44.050, 9A.44.073, 9A.44.076, 9A.44.079, 9A.44.083, 9A.44.086, 9A.44.089, and 9A.64.020 the prosecutor should avoid prefiling agreements or diversions intended to place the accused in a program of treatment or counseling, so that treatment, if determined to be beneficial, can be provided pursuant to RCW 9.94A.120(7).

     Crimes against property/other crimes will be filed if the admissible evidence is of such convincing force as to make it probable that a reasonable and objective fact-finder would convict after hearing all the admissible evidence and the most plausible defense that could be raised.

     See table below for the crimes within these categories.

 

                CATEGORIZATION OF CRIMES FOR PROSECUTING STANDARDS

 

     CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS

 

     Aggravated Murder

     1st Degree Murder

     2nd Degree Murder

     1st Degree Kidnaping

     1st Degree Assault

     1st Degree Rape

     1st Degree Robbery

     1st Degree Rape of a Child

     1st Degree Arson

     2nd Degree Kidnaping

     2nd Degree Assault

     2nd Degree Rape

     2nd Degree Robbery

     1st Degree Burglary

     1st Degree Manslaughter

     2nd Degree Manslaughter

     1st Degree Extortion

     Indecent Liberties

     Incest

     2nd Degree Rape of a Child

     Vehicular Homicide

     Vehicular Assault

     3rd Degree Rape

     3rd Degree Rape of a Child

     1st Degree Child Molestation

     2nd Degree Child Molestation

     3rd Degree Child Molestation

     2nd Degree Extortion

     1st Degree Promoting Prostitution

     Intimidating a Juror

     Communication with a Minor

     Intimidating a Witness

     Intimidating a Public Servant

     Bomb Threat (if against person)

     3rd Degree Assault

     Unlawful Imprisonment

     Promoting a Suicide Attempt

     Riot (if against person)

 

     CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY/OTHER CRIMES

 

     2nd Degree Arson

     1st Degree Escape

     2nd Degree Burglary

     1st Degree Theft

     1st Degree Perjury

     1st Degree Introducing Contraband

     1st Degree Possession of Stolen Property

     Bribery

     Bribing a Witness

     Bribe received by a Witness

     Bomb Threat (if against property)

     1st Degree Malicious Mischief

     2nd Degree Theft

     2nd Degree Escape

     2nd Degree Introducing Contraband

     2nd Degree Possession of Stolen Property

     2nd Degree Malicious Mischief

     1st Degree Reckless Burning

     Taking a Motor Vehicle without Authorization

     Forgery

     2nd Degree Perjury

     2nd Degree Promoting Prostitution

     Tampering with a Witness

     Trading in Public Office

     Trading in Special Influence

     Receiving/Granting Unlawful Compensation

     Bigamy

     Eluding a Pursuing Police Vehicle

     Willful Failure to Return from Furlough

     Riot (if against property)

     Thefts of Livestock

 

     ALL OTHER UNCLASSIFIED FELONIES

 

     Selection of Charges/Degree of Charge

     (1) The prosecutor should file charges which adequately describe the nature of defendant's conduct.  Other offenses may be charged only if they are necessary to ensure that the charges:

     (a) Will significantly enhance the strength of the state's case at trial; or

     (b) Will result in restitution to all victims.

     (2) The prosecutor should not overcharge to obtain a guilty plea.  Overcharging includes:

     (a) Charging a higher degree;

     (b) Charging additional counts.

     This standard is intended to direct prosecutors to charge those crimes which demonstrate the nature and seriousness of a defendant's criminal conduct, but to decline to charge crimes which are not necessary to such an indication.  Crimes which do not merge as a matter of law, but which arise from the same course of conduct, do not all have to be charged.

     GUIDELINES/COMMENTARY:

     Police Investigation

     A prosecuting attorney is dependent upon law enforcement agencies to conduct the necessary factual investigation which must precede the decision to prosecute.  The prosecuting attorney shall ensure that a thorough factual investigation has been conducted before a decision to prosecute is made.  In ordinary circumstances the investigation should include the following:

     (1) The interviewing of all material witnesses, together with the obtaining of written statements whenever possible;

     (2) The completion of necessary laboratory tests; and

     (3) The obtaining, in accordance with constitutional requirements, of the suspect's version of the events.

     If the initial investigation is incomplete, a prosecuting attorney should insist upon further investigation before a decision to prosecute is made, and specify what the investigation needs to include.

     Exceptions

     In certain situations, a prosecuting attorney may authorize filing of a criminal complaint before the investigation is complete if:

     (1) Probable cause exists to believe the suspect is guilty; and

     (2) The suspect presents a danger to the community or is likely to flee if not apprehended; or

     (3) The arrest of the suspect is necessary to complete the investigation of the crime.

     In the event that the exception to the standard is applied, the prosecuting attorney shall obtain a commitment from the law enforcement agency involved to complete the investigation in a timely manner.  If the subsequent investigation does not produce sufficient evidence to meet the normal charging standard, the complaint should be dismissed.

     Investigation Techniques

     The prosecutor should be fully advised of the investigatory techniques that were used in the case investigation including:

     (1) Polygraph testing;

     (2) Hypnosis;

     (3) Electronic surveillance;

     (4) Use of informants.

     Pre-Filing Discussions with Defendant

     Discussions with the defendant or ((his/her)) his or her representative regarding the selection or disposition of charges may occur prior to the filing of charges, and potential agreements can be reached.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.      The indeterminate sentence review board shall cease to exist on January 1, 1993.  All  persons who are convicted of crimes committed before July 1, 1984, and who are under the supervision of the board on the effective date of this section, shall have their sentences reviewed and adjusted as provided in sections 6 through 8 of this act.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.      (1) Before its expiration on January 1, 1993, the indeterminate sentence review board shall establish, using the tables prescribed under RCW 9.94A.310 and 9.94A.320, a standard range for each offender under its supervision who is not on parole.  If an offender's crime does not have a sentence range or if the law defining the crime has been amended since the commission of the offense,  the board shall select that range that, in the board's opinion, includes crimes that are most similar to the offender's crime.  For each offender for whom the board has selected a standard range, the board shall provide to the sentencing court a report containing the standard range and any other information the board considers relevant to the offender.

     (2) Each sentencing court shall establish, using the tables prescribed under RCW 9.94A.310 and 9.94A.320, a standard range for each offender serving a sentence under RCW 9.95.011 (section 7, chapter 224, Laws of 1986) and for each offender who, after the effective date of this section, is convicted of a crime committed before July 1, 1984.  If an offender's crime does not have a sentence range or if the law defining the crime has been amended since the commission of the offense, the court shall select that range that, in the court's opinion, includes crimes that are most similar to the offender's crime.

     (3) On each offender for whom a sentencing range has been established under subsection (1) or (2) of this section, the court shall either impose a determinate term of confinement within that range or impose an exceptional term of confinement outside the range.  The court shall also impose a determinate term of postrelease supervision on the offender for a period not to exceed two years if the court believes the offender should be subject to postrelease supervision, given the nature of the offender's criminal conduct and the circumstances when such supervision is required under chapter 9.94A RCW.

     In imposing a determinate term of confinement, including an exceptional sentence, the court may consider any information that it considers relevant to the offender, including, but not limited to, any information the indeterminate sentence review board would have been authorized to consider in setting a minimum term or making parole decisions for the offender.  The court may impose a term of confinement outside the range only if it finds that there are substantial and compelling reasons justifying the exceptional term.  Whenever the court imposes a term outside the range, it shall set forth the reasons for its decision in written findings of fact and conclusions of law.  A sentence outside the range is a determinate sentence and is subject to RCW 9.94A.210.

     The court may revise a determinate term of confinement or postrelease supervision set under this section, but in doing so shall conform to the rules and standards that were applicable to the setting of the determinate term.    

     (4) Each offender on parole on January 1, 1993, is released from parole and placed on postrelease supervision for a period which shall be the shorter of two years or the amount of time left on the offender's statutory maximum term of imprisonment.  The period shall be reduced for time served on parole.  Each offender for whom the indeterminate sentence review board has scheduled a parole release date that falls on or after January 1, 1993, shall be released from confinement on the date scheduled for release, but only if (a) the board has not subsequently denied the scheduled release, and (b) the secretary of corrections, on or after January 1, 1993, has not denied the release.  The secretary may deny the release only for good cause, such as the offender's bad conduct while in confinement or a clear mistake or oversight in the setting of the release date.  The court shall specify a determinate term of postrelease supervision, not to exceed two years, for each offender who is released under this subsection after January 1, 1993, and who the court believes should be subject to postrelease supervision, given the nature of the offender's criminal conduct and the circumstances when such supervision is required under chapter 9.94A RCW.  Subsections (2) and (3) of this section do not apply to an offender whom the indeterminate sentence review board has scheduled for release on parole, unless the release date is denied under this subsection.

     (5) To the extent not inconsistent with this section, the terms, conditions, and rules relating to postrelease supervision required under this section, and the administration of such supervision, shall be as provided for offenders on postrelease supervision under chapter 9.94A RCW.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7.      An offender who believes that he or she has completed his or her sentence may petition the superior court for restoration of civil rights.  If the court finds that the sentence has been fully completed, it shall provide the offender with a certificate specifying that the offender has completed his or her sentence and that all civil rights lost by operation of convictions are restored to the offender.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8.      The supreme court is requested to adopt rules to govern the implementation of this chapter by the superior courts.  Among other things, the rules should specify the appropriate superior court to exercise jurisdiction under this chapter in circumstances where the offender is under sentence for more than one crime committed before July 1, 1984, and has been sentenced by more than one superior court for those crimes.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9.      The department of corrections shall assist the judiciary in fulfilling its responsibilities under this chapter, including the preparation of written recommendations.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 10.     Nothing in this chapter may be construed to create any eligibility for persons sentenced to mandatory life without parole or sentenced to the death penalty for a crime committed before July 1, 1984, to be released from confinement under this chapter.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 11.     All references to the indeterminate sentence review board in the Revised Code of Washington shall be construed to mean the superior courts of the state of Washington or the department of corrections, as appropriate.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12.     All reports, documents, surveys, books, records, files, papers, or written material in the possession of the indeterminate sentence review board shall be delivered to the custody of the department of corrections.  All cabinets, furniture, office equipment, motor vehicles, and other tangible property employed by the indeterminate sentence review board shall be made available to the department of corrections.  All funds, credits, or other assets held by the indeterminate sentence review board shall be assigned to the department of corrections.

     Whenever any question arises as to the transfer of any personnel, funds, books, documents, records, papers, files, equipment, or other tangible property used or held in the exercise of the powers and the performance of the duties and functions transferred, the director of financial management shall make a determination as to the proper allocation and certify the same to the state agencies concerned.

     The transfer of the powers, duties, functions, and personnel of the indeterminate sentence review board does not affect the validity of any act performed before the effective date of this section.

 

     Sec. 13.  RCW 9A.20.021 and 1982 c 192 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:

     (1) Felony.  No person convicted of a classified felony shall be punished by confinement or fine exceeding the following:

     (a) For a class A felony, by confinement in a state correctional institution for a term of life imprisonment, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of fifty thousand dollars, or by both such confinement and fine;

     (b) Except as provided in RCW 9.94A.120(4)(d) and (20) for a class B felony, by confinement in a state correctional institution for a term of ten years, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of twenty thousand dollars, or by both such confinement and fine;

     (c) For a class C felony, by confinement in a state correctional institution for five years, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of ten thousand dollars, or by both such confinement and fine.

     (2) Gross Misdemeanor.  Every person convicted of a gross misdemeanor defined in Title 9A RCW shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a maximum term fixed by the court of not more than one year, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not more than five thousand dollars, or by both such imprisonment and fine.

     (3) Misdemeanor.  Every person convicted of a misdemeanor defined in Title 9A RCW shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a maximum term fixed by the court of not more than ninety days, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not more than one thousand dollars, or by both such imprisonment and fine.

     (4) This section applies to only those crimes committed on or after July 1, 1984.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 14.  A new section is added to chapter 72.09 RCW to read as follows:

     The secretary shall increase inmate participation in class I and class II correctional industries work programs incrementally until a combined total of fifty percent of all able and eligible inmates are employed in class I and class II programs by December 30, 1996.  All inmates working in correctional industries programs shall deposit at least fifty percent of their gross wages in a department of corrections personal inmate savings account until the account reaches a minimum total of two hundred fifty dollars.  Thereafter, all inmates working in class I, class II, class III, and class IV correctional industries programs shall pay fifty percent of their gross wages earned, up to six dollars per hour, toward the cost of incarceration so long as the inmate has retained at least two hundred fifty dollars in a department of corrections personal inmate savings account.  The department shall explore other methods of recovering a portion of the share of inmate wages dedicated to the payment of the cost of incarceration, on incentive programs that offer inmates benefits and amenities paid for only from wages earned while working in a correctional industries program.  The department shall develop the necessary administrative structure to recover inmates' wages and keep records of the amount inmates pay for the costs of incarceration and amenities.  All funds gained from this section shall be deposited in a dedicated fund with the department of corrections and shall be used only for the purpose of enhancing and maintaining the correctional industries program until December 31, 2000, and thereafter all funds shall be deposited in the general fund.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 15.     Effective January 1, 1993, the following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:

     (1) RCW 9.95.001 and 1986 c 224 s 2;

     (2) RCW 9.95.0011 and 1989 c 259 s 4 & 1986 c 224 s 12;

     (3) RCW 9.95.003 and 1986 c 224 s 3, 1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 34 s 8, 1969 c 98 s 9, 1959 c 32 s 1, & 1955 c 340 s 9;

     (4) RCW 9.95.005 and 1986 c 224 s 4, 1959 c 32 s 2, & 1955 c 340 s 10;

     (5) RCW 9.95.007 and 1986 c 224 s 5, 1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 63 s 1, & 1959 c 32 s 3;

     (6) RCW 9.95.009 and 1990 c 3 s 707, 1989 c 259 s 1, 1986 c 224 s 6, 1985 c 279 s 1, 1982 c 192 s 8, & 1981 c 137 s 24;

     (7) RCW 9.95.010 and 1955 c 133 s 2;

     (8) RCW 9.95.011 and 1986 c 224 s 7;

     (9) RCW 9.95.013 and 1989 c 259 s 5;

     (10) RCW 9.95.015 and 1986 c 224 s 8 & 1961 c 138 s 1;

     (11) RCW 9.95.017 and 1986 c 224 s 11;

     (12) RCW 9.95.020 and 1955 c 133 s 3;

     (13) RCW 9.95.028 and 1984 c 114 s 1;

     (14) RCW 9.95.030 and 1984 c 114 s 2 & 1955 c 133 s 4;

     (15) RCW 9.95.031 and 1929 c 158 s 1;

     (16) RCW 9.95.032 and 1984 c 114 s 3 & 1929 c 158 s 2;

     (17) RCW 9.95.040 and 1986 c 224 s 9, 1975-'76 ex.s. c 63 s 2, 1961 c 138 s 2, & 1955 c 133 s 5;

     (18) RCW 9.95.052 and 1986 c 224 s 10, 1983 c 196 s 1, & 1972 ex.s. c 67 s 1;

     (19) RCW 9.95.055 and 1951 c 239 s 1;

     (20) RCW 9.95.090 and 1955 c 133 s 10;

     (21) RCW 9.95.100 and 1955 c 133 s 11;

     (22) RCW 9.95.110 and 1955 c 133 s 12;

     (23) RCW 9.95.115 and 1989 c 259 s 3 & 1951 c 238 s 1;

     (24) RCW 9.95.116 and 1989 c 259 s 2;

     (25) RCW 9.95.120 and 1981 c 136 s 37, 1979 c 141 s 2, 1969 c 98 s 2, 1961 c 106 s 2, & 1955 c 133 s 13;

     (26) RCW 9.95.121 and 1981 c 136 s 38, 1979 c 141 s 3, & 1969 c 98 s 6;

     (27) RCW 9.95.122 and 1969 c 98 s 4;

     (28) RCW 9.95.123 and 1969 c 98 s 5;

     (29) RCW 9.95.124 and 1983 c 196 s 2, 1981 c 136 s 39, 1979 c 141 s 4, & 1969 c 98 s 6;

     (30) RCW 9.95.125 and 1969 c 98 s 7;

     (31) RCW 9.95.126 and 1969 c 98 s 8;

     (32) RCW 9.95.130 and 1955 c 133 s 14;

     (33) RCW 9.95.140 and 1990 c 3 s 126 & 1955 c 133 s 15;

     (34) RCW 9.95.145 and 1990 c 3 s 127;

     (35) RCW 9.95.150 and 1955 c 133 s 16;

     (36) RCW 9.95.160 and 1955 c 133 s 17;

     (37) RCW 9.95.170 and 1981 c 136 s 40, 1979 c 141 s 5, 1967 c 134 s 13, & 1935 c 114 s 3;

     (38) RCW 9.95.190 and 1983 c 3 s 10 & 1955 c 133 s 18;

     (39) RCW 9.95.200 and 1981 c 136 s 41, 1979 c 141 s 6, 1967 c 134 s 15, & 1957 c 227 s 3;

     (40) RCW 9.95.210 and 1987 c 202 s 146, 1984 c 46 s 1, 1983 c 156 s 4, 1982 1st ex.s. c 47 s 10, 1982 1st ex.s. c 8 s 5, 1981 c 136 s 42, & 1980 c 19 s 1;

     (41) RCW 9.95.220 and 1957 c 227 s 5;

     (42) RCW 9.95.230 and 1982 1st ex.s. c 47 s 11 & 1957 c 227 s 6;

     (43) RCW 9.95.240 and 1957 c 227 s 7;

     (44) RCW 9.95.250 and 1981 c 136 s 43, 1979 c 141 s 8, 1967 c 134 s 17, & 1957 c 227 s 8;

     (45) RCW 9.95.260 and 1981 c 136 s 44, 1979 c 141 s 9, 1967 c 134 s 14, & 1935 c 114 s 7;

     (46) RCW 9.95.265 and 1977 c 75 s 5 & 1955 c 340 s 11;

     (47) RCW 9.95.270 and 1937 c 92 s 1;

     (48) RCW 9.95.280 and 1955 c 183 s 1;

     (49) RCW 9.95.290 and 1955 c 183 s 2;

     (50) RCW 9.95.300 and 1955 c 183 s 3;

     (51) RCW 9.95.310 and 1986 c 125 s 1, 1971 ex.s. c 31 s 1, & 1961 c 217 s 2;

     (52) RCW 9.95.320 and 1986 c 125 s 2, 1981 c 136 s 45, 1971 ex.s. c 31 s 2, & 1961 c 217 s 3;

     (53) RCW 9.95.330 and 1981 c 136 s 46, 1971 ex.s. c 31 s 3, & 1961 c 217 s 4;

     (54) RCW 9.95.340 and 1986 c 125 s 3, 1981 c 136 s 47, 1971 ex.s. c 31 s 4, & 1961 c 217 s 5;

     (55) RCW 9.95.350 and 1986 c 125 s 4, 1981 c 136 s 48, 1971 ex.s. c 31 s 5, & 1961 c 217 s 6;

     (56) RCW 9.95.360 and 1986 c 125 s 5, 1981 c 136 s 49, 1971 ex.s. c 31 s 6, and 1961 c 217 s 7;

     (57) RCW 9.95.370 and 1981 c 136 s 50, 1971 ex.s. c 31 s 7, & 1961 c 217 s 8;

     (58) RCW 9.95.900 and 1981 c 137 s 32;

     (59) RCW 9.96.050 and 1980 c 75 s 1 & 1961 c 187 s 1;

     (60) RCW 72.04A.050 and 1981 c 136 s 81, 1979 c 141 s 173, & 1967 c 134 s 7;

     (61) RCW 72.04A.070 and 1981 c 136 s 82, 1979 c 141 s 174, & 1967 c 134 s 9;

     (62) RCW 72.04A.080 and 1981 c 136 s 83, 1979 c 141 s 175, & 1967 c 134 s 10;

     (63) RCW 72.04A.090 and 1981 c 136 s 84, 1979 c 141 s 176, 1969 c 98 s 1, & 1967 c 134 s 11;

     (64) RCW 72.04A.120 and 1991 c 104 s 2, 1989 c 252 s 20, & 1982 c 207 s 1; and

     (65) RCW 72.04A.900 and 1981 c 137 s 34.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 16.     The legislature intends that counties be reimbursed for costs incurred during this fiscal biennium as a result of the transfer of jurisdiction of offenders under the indeterminate sentence review board to the sentencing courts and that such reimbursement be at a rate not exceeding two thousand dollars per offender.  Any funds appropriated to the indeterminate sentence review board and remaining unexpended on January 1, 1993, are transferred to the office of financial management. The office shall develop a formula for reimbursement and shall disburse the funds to the counties in accordance with that formula.  The office of financial management shall seek the advice of the administrator for the courts in adopting the formula and in determining which counties qualify for the reimbursement and the amounts required.  If the counties do not use any or all of the funds available for reimbursement by the last day of the biennium, any remaining funds shall lapse and revert to the general fund of the state of Washington.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 17.     Sections 5 through 11 of this act are added to chapter 9.95 RCW.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 18.     (1) Sections 5 through 10 of this act are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.

     (2) Sections 1 through 4 and 11 through 14 of this act shall take effect June 30, 1992.

     (3) Sections 15 and 16 of this act shall take effect January 1, 1993.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 19.     If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.