CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                   SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2676

 

 

                               

 

 

                        52nd Legislature

                      1992 Regular Session

Passed by the House March 11, 1992

  Yeas 67   Nays 30

 

 

 

Speaker of the

       House of Representatives

 

Passed by the Senate March 6, 1992

  Yeas 40   Nays 9

               CERTIFICATE

 

I, Alan Thompson, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2676 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

President of the Senate

                               Chief Clerk

 

 

Approved Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                     FILED

          

 

 

Governor of the State of Washington

                        Secretary of State

                       State of Washington


                  _______________________________________________

 

                            SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2676

                  _______________________________________________

 

                             AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE

 

                     Passed Legislature - 1992 Regular Session

 

State of Washington              52nd Legislature             1992 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Trade & Economic Development (originally sponsored by Representatives Sheldon, Forner, Cantwell, Rasmussen, Ferguson, Wynne, Jacobsen and Carlson)

 

Read first time 02/03/92.  Concerning economic development related projects.


     AN ACT Relating to economic development related projects of regional or state-wide significance; adding new sections to chapter 36.70A RCW; adding a new section to chapter 35.63 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 35A.63 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 36.70 RCW; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to read as follows:

     Counties and cities, as part of their planning processes, may identify economic development related projects of regional or state significance.  When a county or city identifies a project, the county or city may request that county-wide planning policies address the project and may seek to coordinate planning for this project on a regional basis when appropriate.  The county or city may seek state technical assistance to plan for the project, including development of a common data base, and may seek state financial assistance to help offset the impacts of the project.  The effects of the economic development related project of regional or state significance that should be addressed include infrastructure, transportation, and public facilities necessitated by the project.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 35.63 RCW to read as follows:

     Counties and cities, as part of their planning process, may identify economic development-related projects of regional or state significance.  When a county or city identifies a project, the county or city may seek to coordinate planning for this project on a regional basis when appropriate.  The county or city may seek state technical assistance to plan for the project, including development of a common data base, and may seek state financial assistance to help offset the impacts of the project.  The effects of the economic development-related project of regional or state significance that should be addressed include infrastructure, transportation, and public facilities necessitated by the project.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 35A.63 RCW to read as follows:

     Cities, as part of their planning process, may identify economic development-related projects of regional or state significance.  When a city identifies a project, the city may seek to coordinate planning for this project on a regional basis when appropriate.  The city may seek state technical assistance to plan for the project, including development of a common data base, and may seek state financial assistance to help offset the impacts of the project.  The effects of the economic development-related project of regional or state significance that should be addressed include infrastructure, transportation, and public facilities necessitated by the project.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  A new section is added to chapter 36.70 RCW to read as follows:

     Counties, as part of their planning process, may identify economic development-related projects of regional and state significance.  When a county identifies a project, the county may seek to coordinate planning for this project on a regional basis when appropriate.  The county may seek state technical assistance to plan for the project, including development of a common data base, and may seek state financial assistance to help offset the impacts of the project.  The effects of the economic development-related project of regional or state significance that should be addressed include infrastructure, transportation, and public facilities necessitated by the project.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.  A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to read as follows:

     A county required or choosing to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 may establish, in consultation with cities, a process for reviewing proposals to authorize siting of major industrial developments outside urban growth areas.

     (1) "Major industrial development" means a master planned location for a specific manufacturing, industrial, or commercial business that:  (a) Requires a parcel of land devoid of critical areas and so large that no suitable parcels are available within an urban growth area; or (b) is a natural resource-based industry requiring a location near agricultural land, forest land, or mineral resource land upon which it is dependent.  The major industrial development shall not be for the purpose of retail shopping developments.

     (2) A major industrial development may be approved outside an urban growth area in a county planning under this chapter if criteria including, but not limited to the following, are met:

     (a) New infrastructure is provided for and impact fees are established consistent with the requirements of RCW 82.02.060;

     (b) Transit-oriented site planning and traffic demand management programs are implemented;

     (c) Buffers are provided between the major industrial development and adjacent nonurban areas;

     (d) Environmental protection including air and water quality has been addressed and provided for;

     (e) Development regulations are established to ensure that urban growth will not occur in adjacent nonurban areas;

     (f) Provision is made to mitigate adverse impacts on designated agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands;

     (g) The plan for the major industrial development is consistent with the county's development regulations established for protection of critical areas; and

     (h) The county has determined and entered findings that land suitable to site the major industrial development is unavailable within the urban growth area.  Priority shall be given to applications for sites that are adjacent to or in close proximity to the urban growth area.

     (3) Final approval of an application for a major industrial development may be considered an adopted amendment to the comprehensive plan adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070 designating the major industrial development site on the land use map as an urban growth area.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.      This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.