_______________________________________________
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5411
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 52nd Legislature 1991 Regular Session
By Senate Committee on Agriculture & Water Resources (originally sponsored by Senators Bailey, Anderson, Hansen, Barr, McMullen, Conner and Skratek).
Read first time March 4, 1991.
AN ACT Relating to the alleviation of flood damage; amending RCW 86.16.120, 79.72.050, 79.90.130, 79.90.150, 79.90.300, 90.58.020, 90.58.030, 90.58.100, 75.20.100, 75.20.103, 75.10.130, 43.21C.020, 47.28.140, 79.01.135, 86.26.007, 36.32.290, 86.26.005, 86.26.040, 86.26.050, 86.26.060, 86.26.070, 86.26.100, and 86.26.105; adding a new section to chapter 79.90 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 90.58 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 86.16 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 86.26 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 43.21C RCW; creating new sections; recodifying RCW 79.01.135; repealing RCW 79.90.140; and declaring an emergency.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that floods pose threats to public health and to the safety of public and private property including loss or endangerment to human life; damage to homes; reduction of water quality; damage to public roads, highways, bridges, and utilities; interruption of travel, communication, and commerce; damage to fisheries, fish propagation facilities, and fish habitat; harm to livestock; destruction or degradation of environmentally sensitive areas; erosion of soil, stream banks and beds; and harmful accumulation of soil and debris in the beds of streams or other bodies of water and on public and private lands.
The legislature finds that the alleviation of flood damage to public and private property and to the public health and safety is a matter of public concern. The legislature further finds that most actions that will be effective to prevent and minimize damage by floods need to be planned and approved in advance of the time that a flood occurs.
It is the policy of the state for state agencies to cooperate and assist the public in actions which will prevent and minimize flood damage.
The purpose of this act is to develop a coordinated state policy that will provide a broader perspective to be applied in the implementation of various state laws to require the inclusion of the policy of alleviation of flood damage as a high priority.
Sec. 2. RCW 86.16.120 and 1935 c 159 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
Damages
within the meaning of this chapter shall include loss of human life and
damages to homes and possessions; harmful inundation((,));
water erosion of soil, stream banks and beds((,)); stream channel
shifting and changes((,)); harmful deposition by water of eroded
and shifting soils, rocks, gravel, and debris upon property or in the
beds of streams or other bodies of water((,)); damages by high
water to public roads, highways, bridges, utilities and to works built for
protection against floods or inundation((,)); the interruption by
floods of travel, communication and commerce((,)); harm to livestock
by flood waters; reduction in the flow capacity of streams due to the
accumulation of deposited silt, soils, gravel, and other materials in the beds
of streams; the accumulations of deposited soils, rocks, gravel, sand, and
other materials on stream bars that may result in a change in the flow
direction of streams or erosion of stream banks; damage to fisheries, fish
propagation facilities, and fish habitat; degradation of scenic, historic, and
recreational values of rivers; and all other high water influences and
results which injuriously affect the public health and the safety of property.
Sec. 3. RCW 79.72.050 and 1977 ex.s. c 161 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
All state government agencies and local governments are hereby directed to
pursue policies with regard to their respective activities, functions, powers,
and duties which are designed to conserve and enhance the conditions of rivers
which have been included in the system, in accordance with the management
policies and the rules ((and regulations)) adopted by the department for
such rivers. Local agencies are directed to pursue such policies with respect
to all lands in the river area owned or leased by such local agencies. Nothing
in this chapter shall authorize the modification of a shoreline management plan
adopted by a local government and approved by the state pursuant to chapter
90.58 RCW without the approval of the department of ecology and local
government. The policies adopted pursuant to this chapter shall be integrated,
as fully as possible, with those of the shoreline management act of 1971.
(2) Nothing in this chapter shall grant to the committee of participating agencies or the department the power to restrict the use of private land without either the specific written consent of the owner thereof or the acquisition of rights in real property authorized by RCW 79.72.040.
(3) Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the department of natural resources from exercising its full responsibilities and obligations for the management of state trust lands.
(4) Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the state, any state government agency, or local government from carrying out its duty to protect the public health and welfare by preventing or minimizing flood damages as defined in RCW 86.16.120. Further, no permit sought by any person, for a project or activity on private land, pursuant to any other chapter shall be conditioned or denied by any state government agency or local government for the purpose of effecting the policies or goals of this chapter.
Sec. 4. RCW 79.90.130 and 1982 1st ex.s. c 21 s 19 are each amended to read as follows:
((Valuable
materials situated within or upon tidelands, shorelands, or the beds of
navigable waters belonging to the state may be sold separately from the land,
when in the judgment of the department of natural resources, it is in the best interests
of the state to sell the same. When application is made for the purchase of
any valuable material, situated within or upon aquatic lands, the department
shall inspect and appraise the value of the material applied for: PROVIDED,
That no valuable material shall be sold for less than the appraised value
thereof: PROVIDED FURTHER, That)) The department is authorized and
empowered to confer with and enter into any agreements with the public
authorities of the state of Oregon, which in the judgment of the department
will assist the state of Washington and the state of Oregon in securing the
maximum revenues for sand, gravel or other valuable materials taken from the
bed of the Columbia river where said river forms the boundary line between said
states.
Sec. 5. RCW 79.90.150 and 1982 1st ex.s. c 21 s 21 are each amended to read as follows:
When gravel, rock, sand, silt or other material from any aquatic lands is removed by any public agency or under public contract for channel or harbor improvement, or flood control, or the prevention and minimization of flood damages as defined in RCW 86.16.120, use of such material may be authorized by the department of natural resources for a public purpose on land owned or leased by the federal government, state, or any municipality, county, city, town, or public corporation: PROVIDED, That when no public land site is available for deposit of such material, its deposit on private land with the landowner's permission is authorized and may be designated by the department of natural resources to be for a public purpose. Prior to removal and use, the federal agency, state agency, municipality, county, city, town, or public corporation contemplating or arranging such use shall first obtain written permission from the department of natural resources. No payment of royalty shall be required for such gravel, rock, sand, silt, or other material used for such public purpose, but a charge will be made if such material is subsequently sold or used for some other purpose: PROVIDED, That the department may authorize such public agency or private landowner to dispose of such material without charge when necessary to implement disposal of material. No charge shall be required for any use of the material obtained under the provisions of this chapter when used solely on an authorized site. Nothing in this section shall repeal or modify the provisions of RCW 75.20.100 or eliminate the necessity of obtaining a permit for such removal from other state or federal agencies as otherwise required by law. For the purpose of this section, "public purpose" includes, but is not limited to, the construction, maintenance, improvement, or repair of any public street, road, highway, dike, levee, or project undertaken pursuant to chapter 86.26 RCW.
Sec. 6. RCW 79.90.300 and 1982 1st ex.s. c 21 s 36 are each amended to read as follows:
The department of natural resources, upon application by any person or when determined by the department to be in the best interest of the state, may enter into a contract or lease providing for the removal and sale of rock, gravel, sand, and silt, or other valuable materials located within or upon beds of navigable waters, or upon any tidelands or shorelands belonging to the state and providing for payment to be made therefor by such royalty as the department may fix, by negotiation, by sealed bid, or at public auction. If application is made for the purchase of any valuable material situated within or upon aquatic lands the department shall inspect and appraise the value of the material in the application.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. RCW 79.01.135 as amended by this act is recodified as a section in chapter 79.90 RCW.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. RCW 79.90.140 and 1982 1st ex.s. c 21 s 20 are each repealed.
Sec. 9. RCW 90.58.020 and 1982 1st ex.s. c 13 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
The legislature finds that the shorelines of the state are among the most valuable and fragile of its natural resources and that there is great concern throughout the state relating to their utilization, protection, restoration, and preservation. In addition it finds that ever increasing pressures of additional uses are being placed on the shorelines necessitating increased coordination in the management and development of the shorelines of the state. The legislature further finds that much of the shorelines of the state and the uplands adjacent thereto are in private ownership; that unrestricted construction on the privately owned or publicly owned shorelines of the state is not in the best public interest; and therefore, coordinated planning is necessary in order to protect the public interest associated with the shorelines of the state while, at the same time, recognizing and protecting private property rights consistent with the public interest. There is, therefor, a clear and urgent demand for a planned, rational, and concerted effort, jointly performed by federal, state, and local governments, to prevent the inherent harm in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines.
It is the policy of the state to provide for the management of the shorelines of the state by planning for and fostering all reasonable and appropriate uses. This policy is designed to insure the development of these shorelines in a manner which, while allowing for limited reduction of rights of the public in the navigable waters, will promote and enhance the public interest. This policy contemplates protecting against adverse effects to the public health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife, and the waters of the state and their aquatic life, while protecting generally public rights of navigation and corollary rights incidental thereto.
The legislature declares that the interest of all of the people shall be paramount in the management of shorelines of state-wide significance. The department, in adopting guidelines for shorelines of state-wide significance, and local government, in developing master programs for shorelines of state-wide significance, shall give preference to uses in the following order of preference which:
(1) Recognize and protect the state-wide interest over local interest;
(2) Preserve the natural character of the shoreline;
(3) Result in long term over short term benefit;
(4) Protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline;
(5) Increase public access to publicly owned areas of the shorelines;
(6) Increase recreational opportunities for the public in the shoreline;
(7) Provide for any other element as defined in RCW 90.58.100 deemed appropriate or necessary.
In the implementation of this policy the public's opportunity to enjoy the physical and aesthetic qualities of natural shorelines of the state shall be preserved to the greatest extent feasible consistent with the overall best interest of the state and the people generally and the need to prevent and minimize flood damage. To this end uses shall be preferred which are consistent with control of pollution and prevention of damage to the natural environment, or are unique to or dependent upon use of the state's shoreline. Alterations of the natural condition of the shorelines of the state, in those limited instances when authorized, shall be given priority for projects or activities that have the primary purpose of preventing or minimizing flood damages as defined in RCW 86.16.120, single family residences, ports, shoreline recreational uses including but not limited to parks, marinas, piers, and other improvements facilitating public access to shorelines of the state, industrial and commercial developments which are particularly dependent on their location on or use of the shorelines of the state and other development that will provide an opportunity for substantial numbers of the people to enjoy the shorelines of the state. Alterations of the natural condition of the shorelines and wetlands of the state shall be recognized by the department. Shorelines and wetlands of the state shall be appropriately classified and these classifications shall be revised when circumstances warrant regardless of whether the change in circumstances occurs through man-made causes or natural causes. Any areas resulting from alterations of the natural condition of the shorelines and wetlands of the state no longer meeting the definition of "shorelines of the state" shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter 90.58 RCW.
Permitted uses in the shorelines of the state shall be designed and conducted in a manner to minimize, insofar as practical, any resultant damage to the ecology and environment of the shoreline area and any interference with the public's use of the water.
Sec. 10. RCW 90.58.030 and 1987 c 474 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions and concepts apply:
(1) Administration:
(a) "Department" means the department of ecology;
(b) "Director" means the director of the department of ecology;
(c) "Local government" means any county, incorporated city, or town which contains within its boundaries any lands or waters subject to this chapter;
(d) "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal corporation, or agency of the state or local governmental unit however designated;
(e) "Hearing board" means the shoreline hearings board established by this chapter.
(2) Geographical:
(a) "Extreme low tide" means the lowest line on the land reached by a receding tide;
(b) "Ordinary high water mark" on all lakes, streams, and tidal water is that mark that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the department: PROVIDED, That in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water;
(c) "Shorelines of the state" are the total of all "shorelines" and "shorelines of state-wide significance" within the state;
(d) "Shorelines" means all of the water areas of the state, including reservoirs, and their associated wetlands, together with the lands underlying them; except (i) shorelines of state-wide significance; (ii) shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean annual flow is twenty cubic feet per second or less and the wetlands associated with such upstream segments; and (iii) shorelines on lakes less than twenty acres in size and wetlands associated with such small lakes;
(e) "Shorelines of state-wide significance" means the following shorelines of the state:
(i) The area between the ordinary high water mark and the western boundary of the state from Cape Disappointment on the south to Cape Flattery on the north, including harbors, bays, estuaries, and inlets;
(ii) Those areas of Puget Sound and adjacent salt waters and the Strait of Juan de Fuca between the ordinary high water mark and the line of extreme low tide as follows:
(A) Nisqually Delta--from DeWolf Bight to Tatsolo Point,
(B) Birch Bay--from Point Whitehorn to Birch Point,
(C) Hood Canal--from Tala Point to Foulweather Bluff,
(D) Skagit Bay and adjacent area--from Brown Point to Yokeko Point, and
(E) Padilla Bay--from March Point to William Point;
(iii) Those areas of Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca and adjacent salt waters north to the Canadian line and lying seaward from the line of extreme low tide;
(iv) Those lakes, whether natural, artificial, or a combination thereof, with a surface acreage of one thousand acres or more measured at the ordinary high water mark;
(v) Those natural rivers or segments thereof as follows:
(A) Any west of the crest of the Cascade range downstream of a point where the mean annual flow is measured at one thousand cubic feet per second or more,
(B) Any east of the crest of the Cascade range downstream of a point where the annual flow is measured at two hundred cubic feet per second or more, or those portions of rivers east of the crest of the Cascade range downstream from the first three hundred square miles of drainage area, whichever is longer;
(vi) Those wetlands associated with (i), (ii), (iv), and (v) of this subsection (2)(e);
(f) "Wetlands" or "wetland areas" means those lands extending landward for two hundred feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark; floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward two hundred feet from such floodways; and all marshes, bogs, swamps, and river deltas associated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of this chapter; the same to be designated as to location by the department of ecology: PROVIDED, That any county or city may determine that portion of a one-hundred-year-flood plain to be included in its master program as long as such portion includes, as a minimum, the floodway and the adjacent land extending landward two hundred feet therefrom;
(g) "Floodway" means those portions of the area of a river valley lying streamward from the outer limits of a watercourse upon which flood waters are carried during periods of flooding that occur with reasonable regularity, although not necessarily annually, said floodway being identified, under normal condition, by changes in surface soil conditions or changes in types or quality of vegetative ground cover condition. The floodway shall not include those lands that can reasonably be expected to be protected from flood waters by flood control devices maintained by or maintained under license from the federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state;
(h) "Flood damage" shall have the same meaning as provided in RCW 86.16.120.
(3) Procedural terms:
(a) "Guidelines" means those standards adopted to implement the policy of this chapter for regulation of use of the shorelines of the state prior to adoption of master programs. Such standards shall also provide criteria to local governments and the department in developing master programs;
(b) "Master program" shall mean the comprehensive use plan for a described area, and the use regulations together with maps, diagrams, charts, or other descriptive material and text, a statement of desired goals, and standards developed in accordance with the policies enunciated in RCW 90.58.020;
(c) "State master program" is the cumulative total of all master programs approved or adopted by the department of ecology;
(d) "Development" means a use consisting of the construction or exterior alteration of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, or minerals; bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary nature which interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to this chapter at any state of water level;
(e) "Substantial development" shall mean any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds two thousand five hundred dollars plus an amount to adjust for inflation, or any development which materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state; except that the following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this chapter. The department shall adjust the amount subject to this subsection once every five years commencing on January 1, 1991. The amount of the inflation adjustment shall be based upon the inflation rate as measured by the implicit price deflator index that has occurred since the last increase:
(i) Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire, or elements;
(ii) Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single family residences;
(iii) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements;
(iv) Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on wetlands, and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures including but not limited to head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels: PROVIDED, That a feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, alteration of the contour of the wetlands by leveling or filling other than that which results from normal cultivation, shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities. A feedlot shall be an enclosure or facility used or capable of being used for feeding livestock hay, grain, silage, or other livestock feed, but shall not include land for growing crops or vegetation for livestock feeding and/or grazing, nor shall it include normal livestock wintering operations;
(v) Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor buoys;
(vi) Construction on wetlands by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use or for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the state agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof, other than requirements imposed pursuant to this chapter;
(vii) Construction of a dock, including a community dock, designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of single and multiple family residences, the cost of which does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars;
(viii) Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored ground water for the irrigation of lands;
(ix) The marking of property lines or corners on state owned lands, when such marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water;
(x)
Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other
facilities ((existing on September 8, 1975,)) which were created,
developed, or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or
diking system;
(xi) Any action commenced prior to December 31, 1982, pertaining to (A) the restoration of interim transportation services as may be necessary as a consequence of the destruction of the Hood Canal bridge, including, but not limited to, improvements to highways, development of park and ride facilities, and development of ferry terminal facilities until a new or reconstructed Hood Canal bridge is open to traffic; and (B) the reconstruction of a permanent bridge at the site of the original Hood Canal bridge.
Sec. 11. RCW 90.58.100 and 1971 ex.s. c 286 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) The master programs provided for in this chapter, when adopted and approved by the department, as appropriate, shall constitute use regulations for the various shorelines of the state. In preparing the master programs, and any amendments thereto, the department and local governments shall to the extent feasible:
(a) Utilize a systematic interdisciplinary approach which will insure the integrated use of the natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts;
(b) Consult with and obtain the comments of any federal, state, regional, or local agency having any special expertise with respect to any environmental impact;
(c) Consider all plans, studies, surveys, inventories, and systems of classification made or being made by federal, state, regional, or local agencies, by private individuals, or by organizations dealing with pertinent shorelines of the state;
(d) Conduct or support such further research, studies, surveys, and interviews as are deemed necessary;
(e) Utilize all available information regarding hydrology, geography, topography, ecology, economics, and other pertinent data;
(f) Employ, when feasible, all appropriate, modern scientific data processing and computer techniques to store, index, analyze, and manage the information gathered.
(2) The master programs shall include, when appropriate, the following:
(a) An economic development element for the location and design of industries, transportation facilities, port facilities, tourist facilities, commerce and other developments that are particularly dependent on their location on or use of the shorelines of the state;
(b) A public access element making provision for public access to publicly owned areas;
(c) A recreational element for the preservation and enlargement of recreational opportunities, including but not limited to parks, tidelands, beaches, and recreational areas;
(d) A circulation element consisting of the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the shoreline use element;
(e) A use element which considers the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the use on shorelines and adjacent land areas for housing, business, industry, transportation, agriculture, natural resources, recreation, education, public buildings and grounds, and other categories of public and private uses of the land;
(f) A conservation element for the preservation of natural resources, including but not limited to scenic vistas, aesthetics, and vital estuarine areas for fisheries and wildlife protection;
(g) An
historic, cultural, scientific, and educational element for the protection and
restoration of buildings, sites, and areas having historic, cultural,
scientific, or educational values; ((and))
(h) An element that gives the same consideration to the state-wide interest in the prevention and minimization of flood damages as defined in RCW 86.16.120 as that given any other master program element; and
(i) Any other element deemed appropriate or necessary to effectuate the policy of this chapter.
(3) The master programs shall include such map or maps, descriptive text, diagrams and charts, or other descriptive material as are necessary to provide for ease of understanding.
(4) Master programs will reflect that state-owned shorelines of the state are particularly adapted to providing wilderness beaches, ecological study areas, and other recreational activities for the public and will give appropriate special consideration to same.
(5) Each master program shall contain provisions to allow for the varying of the application of use regulations of the program, including provisions for permits for conditional uses and variances, to insure that strict implementation of a program will not create unnecessary hardships or thwart the policy enumerated in RCW 90.58.020. Any such varying shall be allowed only if extraordinary circumstances are shown and the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. The concept of this subsection shall be incorporated in the rules adopted by the department relating to the establishment of a permit system as provided in RCW 90.58.140(3).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. A new section is added to chapter 90.58 RCW to read as follows:
Within six months of the effective date of this act, the department shall submit to local governments guidelines to incorporate the policies of this chapter. Within nine months from receipt of such guidelines, local governments shall submit to the department in writing proposed changes to their master programs to incorporate the requirements of this chapter.
Sec. 13. RCW 75.20.100 and 1988 c 272 s 1 and 1988 c 36 s 33 are each amended to read as follows:
In the event that any person or government agency desires to construct any form of hydraulic project or perform other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state, such person or government agency shall, before commencing construction or work thereon and to ensure the proper protection of fish life, secure the written approval of the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife as to the adequacy of the means proposed for the protection of fish life. This approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The department of fisheries or the department of wildlife shall grant or deny approval within forty-five calendar days of the receipt of a complete application and notice of compliance with any applicable requirements of the state environmental policy act, made in the manner prescribed in this section. The applicant may document receipt of application by filing in person or by registered mail. A complete application for approval shall contain general plans for the overall project, complete plans and specifications of the proposed construction or work within the mean higher high water line in salt water or within the ordinary high water line in fresh water, and complete plans and specifications for the proper protection of fish life. The forty-five day requirement shall be suspended if (1) after ten working days of receipt of the application, the applicant remains unavailable or unable to arrange for a timely field evaluation of the proposed project; (2) the site is physically inaccessible for inspection; or (3) the applicant requests delay. Immediately upon determination that the forty-five day period is suspended, the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife shall notify the applicant in writing of the reasons for the delay. Approval is valid for a period of up to five years from date of issuance. The permittee must demonstrate substantial progress on construction of that portion of the project relating to the approval within two years of the date of issuance. If either the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife denies approval, that department shall provide the applicant, in writing, a statement of the specific reasons why and how the proposed project would adversely affect fish life. In deliberating permit approval, the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife shall give equal consideration to the state policy to prevent or minimize flood damage as defined in RCW 86.16.120. Protection of fish life shall be the only ground upon which approval may be denied or conditioned. Chapter 34.05 RCW applies to any denial of project approval, conditional approval, or requirements for project modification upon which approval may be contingent. If any person or government agency commences construction on any hydraulic works or projects subject to this section without first having obtained written approval of the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife as to the adequacy of the means proposed for the protection of fish life, or if any person or government agency fails to follow or carry out any of the requirements or conditions as are made a part of such approval, the person or director of the agency is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. If any such person or government agency is convicted of violating any of the provisions of this section and continues construction on any such works or projects without fully complying with the provisions hereof, such works or projects are hereby declared a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as such.
For
the purposes of this section and RCW 75.20.103, "bed" shall mean the
land below the ordinary high water lines of state waters. This definition
shall not include irrigation ditches, canals, storm water run-off devices, or
other artificial watercourses except where they exist in a natural watercourse
that has been altered by ((man)) people. For the purposes of
this section and RCW 75.20.103, "emergency" means an imminent threat
to life, public or private property, or an imminent threat of serious
environmental degradation.
The phrase "to construct any form of hydraulic project or perform other work" shall not include the act of driving across an established ford. Driving across streams or on wetted stream beds at areas other than established fords requires approval. Work within the ordinary high water line of state waters to construct or repair a ford or crossing requires approval.
For each application, the department of fisheries and the department of wildlife shall mutually agree on whether the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife shall administer the provisions of this section, in order to avoid duplication of effort. The department designated to act shall cooperate with the other department in order to protect all species of fish life found at the project site. If the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife receives an application concerning a site not in its jurisdiction, it shall transmit the application to the other department within three days and notify the applicant.
In case of an emergency arising from weather or stream flow conditions or other natural conditions, the department of fisheries or department of wildlife, through their authorized representatives, shall issue immediately upon request oral approval for removing any obstructions, repairing existing structures, restoring stream banks, or to protect property threatened by the stream or a change in the stream flow without the necessity of obtaining a written approval prior to commencing work. Conditions of an oral approval shall be reduced to writing within thirty days and complied with as provided for in this section. Oral approval shall be granted immediately upon request, for a stream crossing during an emergency situation.
This
section shall not apply to the construction of any form of hydraulic project or
other work which diverts water for agricultural irrigation or stock watering
purposes authorized under or recognized as being valid by the state's water codes,
or when such hydraulic project or other work is associated with streambank
stabilization ((to protect farm and agricultural land as defined in RCW
84.34.020)) as defined in RCW 75.20.103. These irrigation or stock
watering diversion and streambank stabilization projects shall be governed by
RCW 75.20.103.
Sec. 14. RCW 75.20.103 and 1988 c 272 s 2 and 1988 c 36 s 34 are each amended to read as follows:
In the
event that any person or government agency desires to construct any form of
hydraulic project or other work that diverts water for agricultural irrigation
or stock watering purposes, or when such hydraulic project or other work is
associated with streambank stabilization ((to protect farm and agricultural
land as defined in RCW 84.34.020)), and when such diversion or streambank
stabilization will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of
any river or stream or will utilize any waters of the state or materials from
the stream beds, the person or government agency shall, before commencing
construction or work thereon and to ensure the proper protection of fish life,
secure a written approval from the department of fisheries or the department of
wildlife as to the adequacy of the means proposed for the protection of fish
life. This approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The department of
fisheries or the department of wildlife shall grant or deny the approval within
forty-five calendar days of the receipt of a complete application and notice of
compliance with any applicable requirements of the state environmental policy
act, made in the manner prescribed in this section. The applicant may document
receipt of application by filing in person or by registered mail. A complete
application for an approval shall contain general plans for the overall
project, complete plans and specifications of the proposed construction or work
within ordinary high water line, and complete plans and specifications for the
proper protection of fish life. The forty-five day requirement shall be
suspended if (1) after ten working days of receipt of the application, the
applicant remains unavailable or unable to arrange for a timely field
evaluation of the proposed project; (2) the site is physically inaccessible for
inspection; or (3) the applicant requests delay.
Immediately upon determination that the forty-five day period is suspended, the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife shall notify the applicant in writing of the reasons for the delay.
An approval shall remain in effect without need for periodic renewal for projects that divert water for agricultural irrigation or stock watering purposes and that involve seasonal construction or other work. Approval for streambank stabilization projects shall remain in effect without need for periodic renewal if the problem causing the need for the streambank stabilization occurs on an annual or more frequent basis. The permittee must notify the appropriate agency before commencing the construction or other work within the area covered by the approval.
The permittee must demonstrate substantial progress on construction of that portion of the project relating to the approval within two years of the date of issuance. If either the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife denies approval, that department shall provide the applicant, in writing, a statement of the specific reasons why and how the proposed project would adversely affect fish life. In deliberating permit approval, the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife shall give equal consideration to the state policy to prevent or minimize flood damage as defined in RCW 86.16.120. Protection of fish life shall be the only ground upon which approval may be denied or conditioned. Issuance, denial, conditioning, or modification shall be appealable to the hydraulic appeals board established in RCW 43.21B.005 within thirty days of the notice of decision. The burden shall be upon the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife to show that the denial or conditioning of an approval is solely aimed at the protection of fish life.
The department granting approval may, after consultation with the permittee, modify an approval due to changed conditions. The modifications shall become effective unless appealed to the hydraulic appeals board within thirty days from the notice of the proposed modification. The burden is on the department issuing the approval to show that changed conditions warrant the modification in order to protect fish life.
A permittee may request modification of an approval due to changed conditions. The request shall be processed within forty-five calendar days of receipt of the written request. A decision by the department that issued the approval may be appealed to the hydraulic appeals board within thirty days of the notice of the decision. The burden is on the permittee to show that changed conditions warrant the requested modification and that such modification will not impair fish life.
If any person or government agency commences construction on any hydraulic works or projects subject to this section without first having obtained written approval of the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife as to the adequacy of the means proposed for the protection of fish life, or if any person or government agency fails to follow or carry out any of the requirements or conditions as are made a part of such approval, the person or director of the agency is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. If any such person or government agency is convicted of violating any of the provisions of this section and continues construction on any such works or projects without fully complying with the provisions hereof, such works or projects are hereby declared a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as such.
For each application, the department of fisheries and the department of wildlife shall mutually agree on whether the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife shall administer the provisions of this section, in order to avoid duplication of effort. The department designated to act shall cooperate with the other department in order to protect all species of fish life found at the project site. If the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife receives an application concerning a site not in its jurisdiction, it shall transmit the application to the other department within three days and notify the applicant.
In case of an emergency arising from weather or stream flow conditions or other natural conditions, the department of fisheries or department of wildlife, through their authorized representatives, shall issue immediately upon request oral approval for removing any obstructions, repairing existing structures, restoring stream banks, or to protect property threatened by the stream or a change in the stream flow without the necessity of obtaining a written approval prior to commencing work. Conditions of an oral approval shall be reduced to writing within thirty days and complied with as provided for in this section.
For purposes of this chapter, "streambank stabilization" shall include but not be limited to log and debris removal, bank protection (including riprap, jetties, and groins), gravel removal and erosion control.
Sec. 15. RCW 75.10.130 and 1989 c 175 s 160 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) There is hereby created within the environmental hearings office under RCW 43.21B.005 the hydraulic appeals board of the state of Washington.
(2)
The hydraulic appeals board shall consist of three members: The director of
the department of ecology or the director's designee, the director of the
department of agriculture or the director's designee, ((and the director or
the director's designee of the department whose action is appealed under
subsection (6) of this section)) and a member of the county legislative
authority appointed by the chair of that authority from the county where the project
in question is situated. A decision must be agreed to by at least two
members of the board to be final.
(3) The board may adopt rules necessary for the conduct of its powers and duties or for transacting other official business.
(4) The board shall make findings of fact and prepare a written decision in each case decided by it, and that finding and decision shall be effective upon being signed by two or more board members and upon being filed at the hydraulic appeals board's principal office, and shall be open to public inspection at all reasonable times.
(5) The board has exclusive jurisdiction to hear appeals arising from the approval, denial, conditioning, or modification of a hydraulic approval issued by either the department of fisheries or the department of wildlife under the authority granted in RCW 75.20.103 for the diversion of water for agricultural irrigation or stock watering purposes or when associated with streambank stabilization to protect farm and agricultural land as defined in RCW 84.34.020.
(6) (a) Any person aggrieved by the approval, denial, conditioning, or modification of a hydraulic approval pursuant to RCW 75.20.103 may seek review from the board by filing a request for the same within thirty days of notice of the approval, denial, conditioning, or modification of such approval.
(b) The review proceedings authorized in (a) of this subsection are subject to the provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW pertaining to procedures in adjudicative proceedings.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. A new section is added to chapter 86.16 RCW to read as follows:
Local governments that have adopted flood plain management regulations pursuant to this chapter shall include provisions that allow for the establishment of livestock flood sanctuary areas at a convenient location within a farming unit that contains domestic livestock. Local governments may limit the size and configuration of the livestock flood sanctuary areas, but such limitation shall provide adequate space for the expected number of livestock on the farming unit and shall be at an adequate elevation to protect livestock. Modification to flood plain management regulations required pursuant to this section shall be within the minimum federal requirements necessary to maintain coverage under the national flood insurance program.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. A new section is added to chapter 86.26 RCW to read as follows:
Flood protection project is the work necessary to preserve, restore, or improve either natural or human-made flood control facilities to repair or prevent flood damage as defined in RCW 86.16.120 including but not limited to action by erosion, stream flow, sheet runoff, or other damages by the sea or other bodies of water.
Sec. 18. RCW 43.21C.020 and 1971 ex.s. c 109 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
The legislature, recognizing that ((man)) people depend((s))
on ((his)) biological and physical surroundings for food, shelter, and
other needs, and for cultural enrichment as well; and recognizing further the
profound impact of man's activity on the interrelations of all components of
the natural environment, particularly the profound influences of population
growth, high-density urbanization, industrial expansion, resource utilization
and exploitation, and new and expanding technological advances and recognizing
further the critical importance of restoring and maintaining environmental
quality to the overall welfare and development of man, declares that it is the
continuing policy of the state of Washington, in cooperation with federal and
local governments, and other concerned public and private organizations, to use
all practicable means and measures, including financial and technical
assistance, in a manner calculated to: (a) Foster and promote the general
welfare; (b) to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can
exist in productive harmony; and (c) fulfill the social, economic, and other
requirements of present and future generations of Washington citizens.
(2) In order to carry out the policy set forth in this chapter, it is the continuing responsibility of the state of Washington and all agencies of the state to use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs, and resources to the end that the state and its citizens may:
(a) Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;
(b) Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, and esthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings;
(c) Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences;
(d) Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage;
(e) Maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;
(f)
Achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high
standards of living and a wide sharing of life's amenities; ((and))
(g) Enhance the quality of renewable resources and approach the maximum attainable recycling of depletable resources; and
(h) Provide for the prevention and minimization of flood damage as defined in RCW 86.16.120.
(3) The legislature recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. A new section is added to chapter 43.21C RCW to read as follows:
Decisions pertaining to applications for projects that are not a substantial development as defined in RCW 90.58.030(3)(e) and will aid in the prevention or minimization of flood damages as defined in RCW 86.16.120, shall be approved or disapproved within thirty calendar days from the date the application is received, unless it is determined that a detailed statement must be made, in which case the application must be approved or disapproved within sixty days from the date the application is received, unless, through the promulgation of a formal order, it is determined that the process cannot be completed within such period.
Sec. 20. RCW 47.28.140 and 1984 c 7 s 174 are each amended to read as follows:
When in the opinion of the governing authorities representing the department and any agency, instrumentality, municipal corporation, or political subdivision of the state of Washington, any highway, road, or street will be benefited or improved by constructing, reconstructing, locating, relocating, laying out, repairing, surveying, altering, improving, or maintaining, or by the establishment adjacent to, under, upon, within, or above any portion of any such highway, road, or street of an urban public transportation system, by either the department or any agency, instrumentality, municipal corporation, or political subdivision of the state, and it is in the public interest to do so, the authorities may enter into cooperative agreements wherein either agrees to perform the work and furnish the materials necessary and pay the cost thereof, including necessary engineering assistance, which costs and expenses shall be reimbursed by the party whose responsibility it was to do or perform the work or improvement in the first instance. The work may be done by either day labor or contract, and the cooperative agreement between the parties shall provide for the method of reimbursement. In the case of some special benefit or improvement to a state highway derived from any project that assists in the prevention or minimization of flood damages as defined in RCW 86.16.120 or from the construction of any public works project, including any urban public transportation system, the department may contribute to the cost thereof by making direct payment to the particular state department, agency, instrumentality, municipal corporation, or political subdivision on the basis of benefits received, but such payment shall be made only after a cooperative agreement has been entered into for a specified amount or on an actual cost basis prior to the commencement of the particular public works project.
Sec. 21. RCW 79.01.135 and 1984 c 212 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:
Whenever, pursuant to RCW 79.01.134, the commissioner of public lands enters into a contract for the sale and removal of rock, gravel, sand, or silt out of a riverbed, the commissioner shall, when establishing a royalty, take into consideration flood protection value to the public such as the prevention and minimization of flood damage as defined in RCW 86.16.120 that will arise as a result of such removal.
Sec. 22. RCW 86.26.007 and 1986 c 46 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
The flood control assistance account is hereby established in the state treasury. At the beginning of each biennium after June 30, 1985, the state treasurer shall transfer from the general fund to the flood control assistance account an amount of money which, when combined with money remaining in the account from the previous biennium, will equal a minimum of four million dollars plus any additional amounts appropriated to the flood control assistance account by the legislature. Moneys in the flood control assistance account may be spent only after appropriation for purposes specified under this chapter. All earnings of investments of balances in the flood control assistance account shall be credited to the general fund.
Sec. 23. RCW 36.32.290 and 1963 c 4 s 36.32.290 are each amended to read as follows:
When the board of county commissioners of any county deems it essential to the public interest for flood prevention purposes it may remove drifts, jams, logs, debris, gravel, earth, stone or bars forming obstructions to the stream, or other material from the beds, channels, and banks of watercourses in any manner deemed expedient, including the deposit thereof on bars not forming obstructions to the stream, or on subsidiary or high water channels of such watercourses.
Prior to any person or agency placing wooded debris within a stream channel or flood way, a permit must be obtained from the county government in the county that placement is proposed. The county may approve, deny, or place conditions on the permit to assure that any flood hazard caused by such debris is minimized.
Sec. 24. RCW 86.26.005 and 1951 c 240 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
It is
the purpose of the state in the exercise of its sovereign and police powers and
in the interest of public welfare, to establish a state and local participating
flood ((control maintenance)) protection policy.
Sec. 25. RCW 86.26.040 and 1988 c 36 s 63 are each amended to read as follows:
Whenever
state grants under this chapter are used in a flood ((control maintenance))
protection project, the engineer of the county within which the project
is located shall approve all plans for the specific project and shall supervise
the work. The approval of such plans, construction and expenditures by the
department of ecology, in consultation with the department of fisheries and the
department of wildlife, shall be a condition precedent to state participation
in the cost of any project beyond planning and designing the specific project.
Additionally,
state grants may be made to counties for preparation of a comprehensive flood
((control management)) protection plan required to be prepared
under RCW 86.26.050.
Sec. 26. RCW 86.26.050 and 1988 c 36 s 64 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
State participation shall be in such preparation of comprehensive flood ((control
management)) protection plans and flood ((control maintenance))
protection projects as are affected with a general public and state
interest, as differentiated from a private interest, and as are likely to bring
about public benefits commensurate with the amount of state funds allocated
thereto.
(2) No
participation for flood ((control maintenance)) protection
projects may occur with a county or other municipal corporation unless the
director of ecology has approved the flood plain management activities of the
county, city, or town having planning jurisdiction over the area where the
flood ((control maintenance)) protection project will be, on the
one hundred year flood plain surrounding such area.
The department of ecology shall adopt rules concerning the flood plain management activities of a county, city, or town that are adequate to protect or preclude flood damage to structures, works, and improvements, including the restriction of land uses within a river's meander belt or floodway to only flood-compatible uses. Whenever the department has approved county, city, and town flood plain management activities, as a condition of receiving an allocation of funds under this chapter, each revision to the flood plain management activities must be approved by the department of ecology, in consultation with the department of fisheries and the department of wildlife.
No
participation with a county or other municipal corporation for flood ((control
maintenance)) protection projects may occur unless the county
engineer of the county within which the flood ((control maintenance)) protection
project is located certifies that a comprehensive flood ((control management))
protection plan has been completed and adopted by the appropriate local
authority, or is being prepared for all portions of the river basin or other
area, within which the project is located in that county, that are subject to
flooding with a frequency of one hundred years or less.
(3)
Participation for flood ((control maintenance)) protection
projects and preparation of comprehensive flood ((control management)) protection
plans shall be made from grants made by the department of ecology from the
flood control assistance account. Comprehensive flood ((control management))
protection plans, and any revisions to the plans, must be approved by
the department of ecology, in consultation with the department of fisheries and
the department of wildlife.
Sec. 27. RCW 86.26.060 and 1984 c 212 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
Grants
for flood ((control maintenance)) protection shall be so employed
that as far as possible, funds will be on hand to meet unusual, unforeseeable
and emergent flood conditions. Allocations by the department of ecology, for
emergency purposes, shall in each instance be in amounts which together with
funds provided by local authority, if any, under reasonable exercise of its
emergency powers, shall be adequate for the preservation of life and property,
and with due regard to similar needs elsewhere in the state.
Sec. 28. RCW 86.26.070 and 1951 c 240 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:
Any
municipal corporation subject to flood conditions, may establish in its
treasury a flood ((control maintenance)) protection fund. Such
fund may be maintained by transfer thereto of moneys derived from regular or
special lawful levies for flood ((control)) protection purposes,
moneys which may be lawfully transferred to it from any other municipal fund;
and gifts and contributions received for flood ((control)) protection
purposes. All costs and expenses for flood ((control maintenance)) protection
purposes shall be paid out of said flood ((control maintenance)) protection
fund, which fund shall not be used for any other purpose.
Sec. 29. RCW 86.26.100 and 1986 c 46 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
State
participation in the cost of any flood ((control maintenance)) protection
project shall be provided for by a written memorandum agreement between the
director of ecology and the legislative authority of the county submitting the
request, which agreement, among other things, shall state the estimated cost
and the percentage thereof to be borne by the state. In no instance, except on
emergency projects, shall the state's share exceed one-half the cost of the
project, to include project planning and design. However, grants to prepare a
comprehensive flood ((control)) protection management plan
required under RCW 86.26.050 shall not exceed seventy-five percent of the full
planning costs, but not to exceed amounts for either purpose specified in rule
and regulation by the department of ecology.
Sec. 30. RCW 86.26.105 and 1986 c 45 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
A
comprehensive flood ((control management)) protection plan shall
determine the need for flood ((control)) protection work,
consider alternatives to in-stream flood ((control)) protection
work, identify and consider potential impacts of in-stream flood ((control))
protection work on the state's in-stream resources, and identify the
river's meander belt or floodway. A comprehensive flood ((control)) protection
management plan shall be completed and adopted within at least three years of
the certification that it is being prepared, as provided in RCW 86.26.050.
If
after this three-year period has elapsed such a comprehensive flood ((control))
protection plan has not been completed and adopted, grants for flood ((control
maintenance)) protection projects shall not be made to the county or
municipal corporations in the county until a comprehensive flood ((control))
protection plan is completed and adopted by the appropriate local
authority. These limitations on grants shall not preclude allocations for
emergency purposes made pursuant to RCW 86.26.060.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 31. (1) The department of community development shall form a watercourse management task force to provide for the implementation of the policy of this act to protect the public health and safety by protecting and minimizing flood damage and to provide for the incorporation of these policies in various administrative rules. The department to the extent possible, should solicit the appointment of members to the task force who have experienced damage by flooding. The task force is assigned the following duties:
(a) Work cooperatively with the corps of engineers to develop a memorandum of agreement that will resolve the conflicts between federal "minimum acceptable performance level" vegetation management guidelines that are designed to prevent washout and damage to dikes in order that dike owners are eligible for coverage under P.L. 84-99, and state requirements established pursuant to RCW 75.20.100 and 75.20.103 established to protect fish life. If a memorandum of agreement is not completed by February 1, 1992, the federal "minimum acceptable performance level" requirements shall take precedence.
(b) Review and modify the Washington Administrative Code rules adopted to implement RCW 75.20.100 and 75.20.103 to provide for the improved ability to protect streambanks from erosion, to maintain the capacity of the watercourses to handle floodwaters including gravel bar removal and dredging where appropriate, and other provisions that affect the ability to undertake activities to prevent and minimize flood damage while protecting fish life.
(c) Establish a streamlined permit processing procedure that will assure applicants timely action on permit issuance including modification of the emergency provisions to assure that applications are processed in time to allow the applicant to take the necessary action in sufficient time prior to the time the damage occurs.
(d) Develop an informational brochure that provides information as to when permits are required for flood damage prevention and minimization projects, and to recommend ways to best proceed through the various regulatory program permitting processes.
(e) Provide recommendations to the department of ecology on guidelines to local governments developed pursuant to section 12 of this act.
(2) The task force shall be composed of the following:
(a) Three persons who own land damaged by flooding within the area declared as a national disaster in 1990 to be nominated by state-wide agricultural organizations;
(b) One person from the department of fisheries;
(c) One person from the department of wildlife;
(d) One person from the department of ecology knowledgeable about flood control;
(e) Two persons representing county government selected from counties which were declared as national disaster areas in 1990 with knowledge and experience in flood control issues;
(f) One person from the department of natural resources;
(g) Two persons representing tribal governments as determined by the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission;
(h) Two representatives for diking and drainage districts damaged by flooding and located within the area declared as a national disaster area in 1990;
(i) One person from the department of community development; and
(j) One person from a company with knowledge and experience in the removal of accumulated material from watercourses.
(3) The federal corps of engineers shall be invited to attend and participate in the meeting of the task force and to assist in the development of policies that help reduce the damage from future flooding while protecting the natural resources of the state.
(4) The department of community development shall provide for the election of a chair from the members of the task force at either the first or second meeting of the task force. The department of community development shall provide staff assistance to the task force. The task force members shall be eligible to receive reimbursement for travel expenses in accordance with RCW 43.03.050.
(5) In addition, the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate shall appoint one member from each caucus to serve as ex officio members of the task force who shall be eligible to receive compensation in accordance with chapter 44.04 RCW.
(6) The task force shall be assembled by the department of community development and have its first meeting by June 1, 1991. The task force shall develop a report by December 15, 1991, containing its findings and recommendations to the secretary of the senate and to the chief clerk of the house of representatives.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 32. Section 12 of this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 33. If specific funding for the purposes of sections 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 23, and 31 of this act, referencing this act by bill number, is not provided by June 30, 1991, in the omnibus appropriations act, sections 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 23, and 31 of this act shall be null and void.