CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6085
52nd Legislature
1992 Regular Session
Passed by the Senate March 9, 1992 Yeas 43 Nays 2
President of the Senate
Passed by the House March 3, 1992 Yeas 96 Nays 0 |
CERTIFICATE
I, Gordon Golob, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6085 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth. |
Speaker of the House of Representatives |
Secretary
|
Approved Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below. |
FILED |
|
|
Governor of the State of Washington |
Secretary of State State of Washington |
_______________________________________________
SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6085
_______________________________________________
AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE
Passed Legislature - 1992 Regular Session
State of Washington 52nd Legislature 1992 Regular Session
By Senate Committee on Governmental Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Bauer, McCaslin, Sutherland, Sellar, Madsen and Vognild)
Read first time 01/23/92.
AN ACT Relating to boundary review boards; amending RCW 36.93.100; and adding a new section to chapter 36.93 RCW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 36.93.100 and 1991 c 363 s 96 are each amended to read as follows:
The board shall review and approve, disapprove, or modify any of the actions set forth in RCW 36.93.090 when any of the following shall occur within forty-five days of the filing of a notice of intention:
(1) Three members of a five-member boundary review board or five members of a boundary review board in a county with a population of one million or more files a request for review: PROVIDED, That the members of the boundary review board shall not be authorized to file a request for review of the following actions:
(a) The incorporation or change in the boundary of any city, town, or special purpose district;
(b)
The extension of permanent water service outside of its existing corporate
boundaries by a city, town, or special purpose district ((where such)) if
(i) the extension is through the installation of water mains of six inches
or less in diameter or (ii) the county legislative authority for the county
in which the proposed extension is to be built is required or chooses to plan
under RCW 36.70A.040 and has by a majority vote waived the authority of the
board to initiate review of all other extensions; or
(c)
The extension of permanent sewer service outside of its existing corporate
boundaries by a city, town, or special purpose district ((where such)) if
(i) the extension is through the installation of sewer mains of eight
inches or less in diameter or (ii) the county legislative authority for the
county in which the proposed extension is to be built is required or chooses to
plan under RCW 36.70A.040 and has by a majority vote waived the authority of
the board to initiate review of all other extensions;
(2) Any governmental unit affected, including the governmental unit for which the boundary change or extension of permanent water or sewer service is proposed, or the county within which the area of the proposed action is located, files a request for review of the specific action;
(3) A petition requesting review is filed and is signed by:
(a) Five percent of the registered voters residing within the area which is being considered for the proposed action (as determined by the boundary review board in its discretion subject to immediate review by writ of certiorari to the superior court); or
(b) An owner or owners of property consisting of five percent of the assessed valuation within such area;
(4) The majority of the members of boundary review boards concur with a request for review when a petition requesting the review is filed by five percent of the registered voters who deem themselves affected by the action and reside within one-quarter mile of the proposed action but not within the jurisdiction proposing the action.
If a period of forty-five days shall elapse without the board's jurisdiction having been invoked as set forth in this section, the proposed action shall be deemed approved.
If a review of a proposal is requested, the board shall make a finding as prescribed in RCW 36.93.150 within one hundred twenty days after the filing of such a request for review. If this period of one hundred twenty days shall elapse without the board making a finding as prescribed in RCW 36.93.150, the proposal shall be deemed approved unless the board and the person who submitted the proposal agree to an extension of the one hundred twenty day period.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 36.93 RCW to read as follows:
The decisions of a boundary review board located in a county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 must be consistent with RCW 36.70A.020, 36.70A.110, and 36.70A.210.