CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                   SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1954

 

 

                   Chapter 317, Laws of 1991

                         (partial veto)

 

 

                        52nd Legislature

                      1991 Regular Session

 

 

                     AGRICULTURAL NUISANCES

 

 

                    EFFECTIVE DATE:  7/28/91

 

 


Passed by the House March 20, 1991

  Yeas 97   Nays 0

 

 

              JOE KING             

Speaker of the

       House of Representatives

 

Passed by the Senate April 9, 1991

  Yeas 38   Nays 9

 

 

           JOEL PRITCHARD          

President of the Senate

 

 

Approved May 21, 1991, with

the exception of section 1,

which is vetoed.

 

 

 

 

 

           BOOTH GARDNER           

Governor of the State of Washington


       CERTIFICATE

 

I, Alan Thompson, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1954 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

            ALAN THOMPSON             Chief Clerk

 

 

                                     FILED         

 

 

 

                 May 21, 1991 - 10:25 a.m.

 

 

 

                        Secretary of State   

                       State of Washington  



 


                  _______________________________________________

 

                            SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1954

                  _______________________________________________

 

                    AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE

 

                     Passed Legislature - 1991 Regular Session

 

 

State of Washington              52nd Legislature             1991 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Agriculture & Rural Development (originally sponsored by Representatives Rayburn, Nealey, McLean, R. Johnson, Chandler, Kremen, D. Sommers, Ballard, Roland, Bowman, Grant, Inslee, Rasmussen and Sheldon).

 

Read first time March 1, 1991.Changing conditions and limitations on agricultural nuisances.


     AN ACT Relating to agricultural nuisances; and amending RCW 7.48.305 and 7.48.310.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:The text of the following section has been vetoed by the Governor.  It is noted in bold italic.

 

   *

 

     Sec. 1.  RCW 7.48.305 and 1979 c 122 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

     Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, agricultural activities conducted on farmland, if consistent with good agricultural practices and established prior to surrounding nonagricultural activities, are presumed to be reasonable and ((do)) shall not be found to constitute a nuisance unless the activity has a substantial adverse effect on the public health and safety.

     If that agricultural activity is undertaken in conformity with federal, state, and local laws and regulations, it is presumed to be good agricultural practice and not adversely affecting the public health and safety, and as such shall not be restricted as to the time during which it may be conducted.

     Nothing in this section shall affect or impair any right to sue for damages.

*Sec. 1 was vetoed, see message at end of chapter.

 

     Sec. 2.  RCW 7.48.310 and 1979 c 122 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

     As used in RCW 7.48.305:

     (1) "Agricultural activity" means a condition or activity which occurs on a farm in connection with the commercial production of farm products and includes, but is not limited to, ((the growing or raising of horticultural and viticultural crops, berries, poultry, livestock, grain, mint, hay, and dairy products)) marketed produce at roadside stands or farm markets; noise; odors; dust; fumes; operation of machinery and irrigation pumps; movement, including, but not limited to, use of current county road ditches, streams, rivers, canals, and drains, and use of water for agricultural activities; ground and aerial application of seed, fertilizers, conditioners, and plant protection products; employment and use of labor; roadway movement of equipment and livestock; protection from damage by wildlife; prevention of trespass; construction and maintenance of buildings, fences, roads, bridges, ponds, drains, waterways, and similar features and maintenance of streambanks and watercourses; and conversion from one agricultural activity to another.

     (2) "Farm" means the land, buildings, freshwater ponds, freshwater culturing and growing facilities, and machinery used in the commercial production of farm products.

     (3) "Farmland" means land or freshwater ponds devoted primarily to the production, for commercial purposes, of livestock, freshwater aquacultural, or other agricultural commodities.

     (4) "Farm product" means those plants and animals useful to humans and includes, but is not limited to, forages and sod crops, dairy and dairy products, poultry and poultry products, livestock, including breeding, grazing, and recreational equine use, fruits, vegetables, flowers, seeds, grasses, trees, freshwater fish and fish products, apiaries, equine and other similar products, or any other product which incorporates the use of food, feed, fiber, or fur.


     Passed the House March 20, 1991.

     Passed the Senate April 9, 1991.

Approved by the Governor May 21, 1991, with the exception of certain items which were vetoed.

     Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 21, 1991.


 

     Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

 

     "I am returning herewith, without my approval as to section 1, Substitute House Bill No. 1954 entitled:

 

"AN ACT Relating to agricultural nuisances."

 

     This bill expands the list of agricultural activities which are included within the exemption to statutory nuisance provisions.  Because of its importance as a message, I am going to sign section 2 of this legislation.  I would hope that the agricultural community becomes more involved in advocating for strong growth management regulation.  The problems addressed by this legislation could better be addressed by controlling growth and preserving agricultural lands for agricultural purposes.  Limiting nuisance litigation does not prevent the intrusion of urban uses into prime agricultural areas.  The conflicts will only continue to escalate.

 

     However, I have vetoed section 1 primarily because of the ambiguity that it creates regarding other important regulatory programs.  As originally drafted, the bill indicated that reasonable agricultural activities could not be restricted as to "time of day."  As the bill passed, it does not allow restrictions as to "time."  This could mean time of day or it could mean a season.  Although this section was intended to address local noise ordinances, there are other regulatory programs that occasionally restrict agricultural activities based on seasonal criteria.  For example, some activities may be limited during specific months to protect juvenile salmon.  To address concerns raised by this ambiguity, I have vetoed section 1.

 

     With the exception of section 1, Substitute House Bill No. 1954 is approved."