CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                        HOUSE BILL 2082

 

 

                   Chapter 361, Laws of 1991

                         (partial veto)

 

 

                        52nd Legislature

                      1991 Regular Session

 

 

             DISTRICT COURT JUDGES‑-QUALIFICATIONS

 

 

                    EFFECTIVE DATE:  7/28/91

 

 


Passed by the House March 18, 1991

  Yeas 97   Nays 0

 

 

              JOE KING             

Speaker of the

       House of Representatives

 

Passed by the Senate April 12, 1991

  Yeas 39   Nays 0

 

 

           JOEL PRITCHARD          

President of the Senate

 

 

Approved May 21, 1991, with

the exception of section 2,

which is vetoed.

 

 

 

 

 

           BOOTH GARDNER           

Governor of the State of Washington


       CERTIFICATE

 

I, Alan Thompson, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is HOUSE BILL 2082 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

            ALAN THOMPSON             Chief Clerk

 

 

                                     FILED         

 

 

 

                 May 21, 1991 - 11:36 a.m.

 

 

 

                        Secretary of State   

                       State of Washington  



 


                  _______________________________________________

 

                                  HOUSE BILL 2082

                  _______________________________________________

 

                     Passed Legislature - 1991 Regular Session

 

 

State of Washington              52nd Legislature             1991 Regular Session

 

By Representative Appelwick.

 

Read first time February 21, 1991.  Referred to Committee on Judiciary.Changing provisions relating to district court judges.


     AN ACT Relating to district courts; and amending RCW 3.34.060 and 3.34.100.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

     Sec. 1.  RCW 3.34.060 and 1989 c 227 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

     To be eligible to file a declaration of candidacy for and to serve as a district court judge, a person must:

     (1) Be a registered voter of the district court district and electoral district, if any; and

     (2) Be either:

     (a) A lawyer admitted to practice law in the state of Washington; or

     (b) A person who has been elected and has served as a justice of the peace, district judge, municipal judge, or police judge in Washington; or

     (c) In those districts having a population of less than ((ten)) five thousand persons, a person who has taken and passed the qualifying examination for the office of district judge as shall be provided by rule of the supreme court.The text of the following section has been vetoed by the Governor.  It is noted in bold italic.

 

   *

 

     Sec. 2.  RCW 3.34.100 and 1984 c 258 s 16 are each amended to read as follows:

     If a district judge dies, resigns, is convicted of a felony, ceases to reside in the district, fails to serve for any reason except temporary disability, or if his or her term of office is terminated in any other manner, the office shall be deemed vacant.  The county legislative authority shall fill all vacancies by appointment and the judge thus appointed shall hold office until the next general election and until a successor is elected and qualified.  District judges shall be granted ((sick)) leave from their positions due to illness or injury in the same manner as sick leave is provided to other county employees.

*Sec. 2 was vetoed, see message at end of chapter.


     Passed the House March 18, 1991.

     Passed the Senate April 12, 1991.

Approved by the Governor May 21, 1991, with the exception of certain items which were vetoed.

     Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 21, 1991.


 

     Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

 

     "I am returning herewith, without my approval as to section 2, House Bill No. 2082 entitled:

 

"AN ACT Relating to district courts."

 

     Section 2 of this bill addresses the question of sick leave benefits for district court judges.  There is confusion as to the scope of the benefit being allowed under current law.

 

     Section 2 attempts to clarify sick leave policy for district court judges.  I am not convinced, however, that the language used in section 2 achieves that purpose.  In fact, I believe that it would add further ambiguity.  Because of the financial implications associated with this issue, it is important that any change in the law be set forth with precision.

 

     I suggest that county elected officials work with district court judges to clarify and resolve sick leave issues before additional legislation is proposed.

 

     For the reasons stated, I have vetoed section 2.

 

     With the exception of section 2, House Bill No. 2082 is approved."