CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
HOUSE BILL 2374
Chapter 65, Laws of 1992
(partial veto)
52nd Legislature
1992 Regular Session
SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAMS FUNDING
EFFECTIVE DATE: 6/11/92
Passed by the House February 14, 1992 Yeas 95 Nays 0
JOE KING Speaker of the House of Representatives
Passed by the Senate March 5, 1992 Yeas 49 Nays 0 |
CERTIFICATE
I, Alan Thompson, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is HOUSE BILL 2374 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. |
JOEL PRITCHARD President of the Senate |
ALAN THOMPSON Chief Clerk
|
Approved March 26, 1992, with the exception of sections 3 and 4, which are vetoed. Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below. |
FILED
March 26, 1992 - 12:19 p.m. |
|
|
BOOTH GARDNER Governor of the State of Washington |
Secretary of State State of Washington |
_______________________________________________
HOUSE BILL 2374
_______________________________________________
Passed Legislature - 1992 Regular Session
State of Washington 52nd Legislature 1992 Regular Session
By Representatives Kremen, Chandler, McLean, Winsley, Basich, Wood, Rayburn, Vance, Mitchell, Betrozoff, Dellwo, Grant, Pruitt, Ebersole, Spanel, Zellinsky, Ballard, Tate, R. King, Peery, Jacobsen, Leonard, Cantwell, Jones, G. Fisher, R. Johnson, Riley, Wang, Moyer, Franklin, Morton, Edmondson, Paris, Roland, J. Kohl, Fuhrman, Ludwig, Bray, Brekke, May, H. Myers, Rasmussen, O'Brien and Sheldon
Read first time 01/15/92. Referred to Committee on Human Services.
AN ACT Relating to senior volunteers; adding a new section to chapter 43.63A RCW; creating new sections; providing an effective date; and declaring an emergency.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that there is a growing number of citizens in the state over the age of sixty who have much to offer their fellow citizens and communities through volunteer service. The legislature further finds that public programs for education, at-risk youth, adult literacy, and combating drug abuse have benefited from and are still in need of the assistance of skilled retired senior volunteer programs volunteers. In addition the legislature further finds that public programs for developmentally disabled, environmental protection, corrections, crime prevention, mental health, long-term and respite care, and housing and homeless, among others, are also in need of volunteer assistance from the retired senior volunteer program.
Therefore, the legislature intends to encourage the increased involvement of senior volunteers by providing funding throughout Washington to promote the development and enhancement of such programs.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 43.63A RCW to read as follows:
(1) Each biennium the department of community development shall distribute such funds as are appropriated for retired senior volunteer programs (RSVP) as follows:
(a) At least sixty-five percent of the moneys may be distributed according to formulae and criteria to be determined by the department of community development in consultation with the RSVP directors association.
(b) Up to twenty percent of the moneys may be distributed by competitive grant process to develop RSVP projects in counties not presently being served, or to expand existing RSVP services into counties not presently served.
(c) Ten percent of the moneys may be used by the department of community development for administration, monitoring of the grants, and providing technical assistance to the RSVP projects.
(d) Up to five percent of the moneys may be used to support projects that will benefit RSVPs state-wide.
(2) Grants under subsection (1) of this section shall give priority to programs in the areas of education, tutoring, English as a second language, combating of and education on drug abuse, housing and homeless, and respite care, and shall be distributed in accordance with the following:
(a) None of the grant moneys may be used to displace any paid employee in the area being served.
(b) Grants shall be made for programs that focus on:
(i) Developing new roles for senior volunteers in nonprofit and public organizations with special emphasis on areas targeted in section 1 of this act. The roles shall reflect the diversity of the local senior population and shall respect their life experiences;
(ii) Increasing the expertise of volunteer managers and RSVP managers in the areas of communication, recruitment, motivation, and retention of today's over-sixty population;
(iii) Increasing the number of senior citizens recruited, referred, and placed with nonprofit and public organizations; and
(iv) Providing volunteer support such as: Mileage to and from the volunteer assignment, recognition, and volunteer insurance.The text of the following section has been vetoed by the Governor. It is noted in bold italic.
*
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. The department of community development may immediately take such steps as are necessary to ensure that this act is implemented promptly.
*Sec. 3 was vetoed, see message at end of chapter.
*
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. (1) Sections 1 and 2 of this act shall take effect July 1, 1992.
(2) Section 3 of this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.
*Sec. 4 was vetoed, see message at end of chapter.
Passed the House February 14, 1992.
Passed the Senate March 5, 1992.
Approved by the Governor March 26, 1992, with the exception of certain items which were vetoed.
Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 26, 1992.
Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:
"I am returning herewith, without my approval as to sections 3 and 4, House Bill No. 2374 entitled:
"AN ACT Relating to senior volunteers."
House Bill No. 2374 establishes a statutory formula for distributing funds to local retired senior volunteer programs. The legislation will provide a solid framework for funding these activities. Senior volunteer programs provide important assistance to respond to a wide range of social concerns and local needs.
I am concerned, however, with the possible confusion which may occur with the enactment of sections 3 and 4. These sections direct the Department of Community Development to act immediately to implement the bill, delay implementation of sections 1 and 2 until July 1 of this year, and enact section 3 of the bill at an intermediate date. While I believe it is important to implement this legislation rapidly, the language in these sections is contradictory and unnecessary.
For this reason, I have vetoed sections 3 and 4 of House Bill No. 2374.
With the exception of sections 3 and 4, House Bill No. 2374 is approved."