SENATE BILL REPORT

                           SSB 5075

                AS PASSED SENATE, MARCH 5, 1993

Brief Description:  Prohibiting hazing at institutions of higher education.

SPONSORS: Senate Committee on Higher Education (originally sponsored by Senators Winsley, Fraser and Erwin)

SENATE COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5075 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass. 

     Signed by Senators Bauer, Chairman; Drew, Vice Chairman; Cantu, Jesernig, Prince, Quigley, Sheldon, and West.

Staff:  Scott Huntley (786‑7421)

Hearing Dates: February 10, 1993; February 15, 1993

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION

BACKGROUND:

Hazing has been viewed as a serious social problem affecting institutions of higher education.  This view is particularly strong at those institutions with fraternity and sorority living groups, which sometimes have prescribed initiation rituals required for acceptance into the organization.

Hazing is illegal at institutions of higher education in 28 states.  Although some of this state's four-year institutions have adopted internal anti-hazing policies, the state of Washington has no statute specifically addressing the issue of hazing and prescribing penalties. 

SUMMARY:

"Hazing" is defined as a method of initiation into a student organization or living group that causes, or is likely to cause, bodily danger or physical harm, or serious mental or emotional harm, to any student or other person attending a public or private institution of higher education.  Customary athletic events or other similar contests or competitions are specifically excluded from this definition.

No student or other person in attendance at any public or private institution of higher education may engage, or conspire to engage, in hazing.

Hazing is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 90 days, or both.

Any student who participates in hazing will forfeit any entitlement to public funds, scholarships or awards.  Any organization or living group that knowingly permits hazing to be conducted by those subject to its control will be deprived of any sanction, official recognition, or approval granted by a public institution of higher education.

Appropriation:  none

Revenue:  none

Fiscal Note:  available

TESTIMONY FOR:

Initiation rites into fraternities and sororities on college campuses have resulted in individuals being placed in very dangerous situations.  In some cases, serious injury and even death has occurred as a result of hazing of this kind.  Twenty-eight other states have moved to control such initiations by creating the crime of hazing and prescribing penalties for the practice.  This state should also do this in order to protect students, and institutions that might be liable to lawsuits if such practices occur on their campuses.

TESTIMONY AGAINST:  None

TESTIFIED:  Larry Ganders, Washington State University (pro); Mary Marcy, Central Washington University (pro); George Durrie, Eastern Washington University (pro)

HOUSE AMENDMENT(S):

A civil penalty is added for an organization that knowingly allows hazing.  The amendment clarifies that a student who participates in the hazing of another will lose all state-funded grants, scholarships and awards.  The amendatory language instructs institutions to draft rules for offenses not covered by the act.