SENATE BILL REPORT

 

                           SSB 6073

 

              AS PASSED SENATE, FEBRUARY 15, 1994

 

 

Brief Description:  Correcting unemployment compensation statutes for base year compensation and defining employment.

 

SPONSORS: Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators Prentice, Newhouse and Vognild; by request of Employment Security Department)

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR & COMMERCE

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6073 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass. 

     Signed by Senators Moore, Chairman; Prentice, Vice Chairman; Amondson, Deccio, Fraser, McAuliffe, Newhouse, Pelz, Prince, Sellar, Sutherland, Vognild and Wojahn.

 

Staff:  Patrick Woods (786‑7430)

 

Hearing Dates: January 18, 1994; February 3, 1994

 

 

BACKGROUND:

 

Unemployment Insurance Claimant Base Year:  Unemployment insurance programs in all states determine claimant eligibility through the use of a "base year."  In Washington, "conventional base year" is the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters.  A claimant must have worked 680 hours in his or her base year in order to qualify for benefits.

 

In 1987 the Legislature authorized an "alternate base year."  This process allows claimants that do not have the necessary 680 hours of employment in the conventional base year to move their base year forward to the most recent four completed quarters.  Under the alternate base year process, the Employment Security Department was provided administrative relief by not requiring that it contact employers or take other special administrative action to speed the data collection process.  However, since employers may not have reported more recent work to the department in the last quarter, there was often a delay in establishing a claimant's alternate base year claims.

 

The U.S. Department of Labor contends that this provision granting administrative relief to the department violates the federally mandated payment when due requirements and raises a conformity issue.  The states are required to be in conformity with the federal standards in order to receive administrative funding and maintain valuable employer tax credits.

 

Massage Therapists/Public and Private Nonprofit Institutions:  The fact that a unemployment insurance (UI) claimant was employed by a "covered employer" is a basic test for determining UI eligibility.  Like other forms of insurance, benefits are available only for individuals covered by the policy and although states have some discretion about who is covered, the minimum standards are stipulated in federal law.

 

In 1993 the Legislature under HB 1292 provided a limited exemption from coverage for licensed massage practitioners who merely rented office space and are not considered employees.  In reviewing this provision, the U.S. Department of Labor informed the state Employment Security Department that under federal law, licensed massage practitioners who provided services for a public or private nonprofit institution must be covered under the unemployment insurance program.

 

SUMMARY:

 

The Department of Employment Security is directed to promptly contact employers requesting wage information on the claimant's last completed calendar quarter.

 

The existing statutory exemption from UI coverage for licensed massage practitioners is modified.  Licensed massage practitioners who provide services for public and private nonprofit employers are required to be covered under the state's unemployment insurance program.

 

The conformity issue raised by the U.S. Department of Labor is addressed. 

 

Appropriation:  none

 

Revenue:  none

 

Fiscal Note:  available

 

TESTIMONY FOR:

 

The bill is needed to address the federal conformity issues raised by the U.S. Department of Labor.

 

TESTIMONY AGAINST (original bill):

 

The bill will adversely impact businesses if they have to respond to additional demands for wage information from the Department of Employment Security.

 

TESTIFIED:  Vernon Stoner, ESD (pro); Karma Reavis, Bellingham Frozen Foods; Sheryl Hershey, Bellingham Cold Storage

 

HOUSE AMENDMENT(S):

 

The amendment provides for additional unemployment insurance benefits to be paid to unemployment insurance claimants who had a balance of federal-state extended benefits available after February 26, 1994.