SENATE BILL REPORT

 

                           ESSB 6228

 

              AS PASSED SENATE, FEBRUARY 11, 1994

 

 

Brief Description:  Revising provisions relating to definitions of agricultural and forest land of long‑term commercial significance.

 

SPONSORS: Senate Committee on Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Senators Haugen, Anderson, Owen, Hargrove, Sellar, Oke, McAuliffe and M. Rasmussen)

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6228 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass. 

     Signed by Senators Owen, Chairman; Hargrove, Vice Chairman; Amondson, Franklin, Oke, Sellar, L. Smith and Snyder.

 

Staff:  Vic Moon (786‑7469)

 

Hearing Dates: January 26, 1994; February 4, 1994

 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES & PARKS

 

 

BACKGROUND:

 

The Growth Management Act defined lands of long-term commercial significance.  Definitions of those lands have caused problems in the continued operation of forest management on commercial forest lands covered by the act. 

 

SUMMARY:

 

The legislative intent provides long term protection be given to lands which grow timber.  Clarification of definitions will not require all counties covered by the Growth Management Act to readopt plans.

 

Forest land is defined as lands devoted to growing commercial timber.  "Long-term commercial significance" means land with growing  capacity, productivity, soil composition and economic viability for long-term production based on the land's nearness to population areas, surrounding uses and parcel sizes.

 

Appropriation:  none

 

Revenue:  none

 

Fiscal Note:  requested January 17, 1994

 

TESTIMONY FOR:

 

Several counties have not interpreted the forest land requirements of the Growth Management Act correctly.  The law needs to be clarified.

 

TESTIMONY AGAINST (original bill):

 

The counties would have to redo all their plans under this proposal.

 

TESTIFIED:  Paul Parker, WA State Association of Counties (con); Jeff Parsons, National Audubon Society (con); Jennifer Belcher, Commissioner of Public Lands; Lucy Steers, 1000 Friends of Washington (con); Ralph Mackey, WEC (con); Pat Harper (pro); Tim Boyd, WFPA (pro); Noel Higa, Higa Engineering (pro); Keith Dearborn, Bogle & Gates (pro); Peter Overton, WFFA (pro)

 

HOUSE AMENDMENT(S):

 

The language of the Senate bill is reworded for clarity.  Upland finfish hatcheries are added to the definition of agricultural land.