CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

                        SENATE BILL 5572

 

 

 

 

                        53rd Legislature

                      1993 Regular Session

Passed by the Senate March 13, 1993

  YEAS 45   NAYS 0

 

 

 

President of the Senate

 

Passed by the House April 8, 1993

  YEAS 98   NAYS 0

               CERTIFICATE

 

I, Marty Brown, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SENATE BILL 5572 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

Speaker of the

       House of Representatives

                                 Secretary

 

 

Approved Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                     FILED

          

 

 

Governor of the State of Washington

                        Secretary of State

                       State of Washington


                              _______________________________________________

 

                                                     SENATE BILL 5572

                              _______________________________________________

 

                                                       Passed Legislature - 1993 Regular Session

 

 

State of Washington                              53rd Legislature                             1993 Regular Session

 

By Senators Prentice, Vognild, Prince, Hargrove, Barr, McAuliffe, Haugen, Snyder, Pelz, Loveland, Sheldon, Moore, Erwin, Fraser, M. Rasmussen and Wojahn

 

Read first time 02/03/93.  Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

Assessing environmental costs of transportation projects.


          AN ACT Relating to the identification of environmental costs for transportation projects; and creating a new section.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  Recognizing the importance of maintaining the quality of life in Washington state, the citizens of this state demand protection and preservation of our scarce natural resources.  Citizens also demand an efficient and effective transportation system.  The departments of transportation, ecology, fisheries, and wildlife and the Puget Sound water quality authority have worked jointly to develop cooperative approaches for mitigating environmental  impacts resulting from transportation projects.  Nevertheless, many transportation projects are costing more than was budgeted due to unanticipated and extensive environmental considerations.  It is the intent of the legislature to find a process for accessing, budgeting, and accounting for environmental costs related to significant transportation projects in order to determine whether the environmental costs exceed the transportation benefits of a project.

          Therefore, the department of transportation shall undertake a pilot program in at least one transportation district that will serve as a case study for the entire department.  The department shall identify and cost out the discrete environmental elements of a representative sampling of transportation projects.  The environmental elements should include, but not necessarily be limited to, wetlands, storm water, hazardous waste, noise, fish, and wildlife.  The department shall also consider an assessment of the cost impacts resulting from delays associated with permitting requirements.

          It is the intent of the legislature that the environmental cost estimates be developed during a detailed scoping process that will include preliminary engineering and design.  After the detailed scoping process and design report is complete, the department shall submit project-specific recommendations and cost estimates to the transportation commission before approval is granted for the construction phase of the projects.

          Based upon the findings of the pilot program the transportation commission shall recommend policies to the legislative transportation committee regarding:  (1) The current practice of appropriating design and construction dollars simultaneously; (2) identification of reasonable thresholds for environmental costs; (3) budget and accounting modifications that may be warranted in order to accurately capture environmental costs associated with transportation projects; and (4) modification to the priority array statutes, chapter 47.05 RCW.

 


                                                           --- END ---