CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

               SECOND ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5983

 

 

 

 

                        53rd Legislature

                   1993 First Special Session

Passed by the Senate May 5, 1993

  YEAS 27   NAYS 19

 

 

 

President of the Senate

 

Passed by the House May 5, 1993

  YEAS 57   NAYS 40

               CERTIFICATE

 

I, Marty Brown, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SECOND ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5983 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

Speaker of the

       House of Representatives

                                 Secretary

 

 

Approved Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                     FILED

          

 

 

Governor of the State of Washington

                        Secretary of State

                       State of Washington


                              _______________________________________________

 

                                      SECOND ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5983

                              _______________________________________________

 

                                                    Passed Legislature - 1993 First Special Session

 

 

State of Washington                              53rd Legislature                             1993 Regular Session

 

By Senators M. Rasmussen and Loveland; by request of Department of Agriculture

 

Read first time 04/09/93.  Referred to Committee on Ways & Means.

 

Altering fees related to agriculture.


          AN ACT Relating to fees; and amending RCW 15.36.105, 15.53.9014, 15.58.415, 17.21.070, 17.21.110, 17.21.122, 17.21.126, 17.21.129, 17.21.220, 17.21.360, 69.07.040, and 69.25.250.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

        Sec. 1.  RCW 15.36.105 and 1992 c 160 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

          There is levied on all milk processed in this state an assessment not to exceed ((one-half)) fifty-four one-hundredths of one cent per hundredweight.  The director shall determine, by rule, an assessment, that with contribution from the general fund, will support an inspection program to maintain compliance with the provisions of the pasteurized milk ordinance of the national conference on interstate milk shipment.  All assessments shall be levied on the operator of the first milk plant receiving the milk for processing.  This shall include milk plants that produce their own milk for processing and milk plants that receive milk from other sources.  All moneys collected under this section shall be paid to the director by the twentieth day of the succeeding month for the previous month's assessments.  The director shall deposit the funds into the dairy inspection account hereby created within the agricultural local fund established in RCW 43.23.230.  The funds shall be used only to provide inspection services to the dairy industry.  If the operator of a milk plant fails to remit any assessments, that sum shall be a lien on any property owned by him or her, and shall be reported by the director and collected in the manner and with the same priority over other creditors as prescribed for the collection of delinquent taxes under chapters 84.60 and 84.64 RCW.

          This section shall take effect July 1, 1992, and shall expire June 30, 1994.

 

        Sec. 2.  RCW 15.53.9014 and 1982 c 177 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) Each commercial feed shall be registered with the department and such registration shall be renewed annually before such commercial feed may be distributed in this state:  PROVIDED, That sales of food processing byproducts from fruit, vegetable, or potato processing plants, freezing or dehydrating facilities, or juice or jelly preserving plants; unmixed seed, whole or processed, made directly from the entire seed; unground hay, straw, stover, silage, cobs, husks, and hulls, when not mixed with other material; bona fide experimental feeds on which accurate records and experimental programs are maintained; and customer-formula feeds are exempt from such registration.  The exemption for byproducts provided by this subsection does not apply to byproducts or products of sugar refineries or to materials used in the preparation of pet foods.

          (a) Beginning July 1, ((1982)) 1993, each registration for a commercial feed product distributed in packages of ten pounds or more shall be accompanied by a fee of ((ten)) eleven dollars.  If such commercial feed is also distributed in packages of less than ten pounds it shall be registered under subsection (b) of this section.

          (b) Beginning July 1, ((1982)) 1993, each registration for a commercial feed product distributed in packages of less than ten pounds shall be accompanied by an annual registration fee of forty-five dollars on each such commercial feed so distributed, but no inspection fee may be collected on packages of less than ten pounds of the commercial feed so registered.

          (2) The application for registration shall be on forms provided by the department.

          (3) The department may require that such application be accompanied by a label and/or other printed matter describing the product.  All registrations expire on December 31st of each year, and are renewable unless such registration is canceled by the department or it has called for a new registration, or unless canceled by the registrant.

          (4) The application shall include the information required by RCW 15.53.9016(1)(b) through (1)(e).

          (5) A distributor shall not be required to register any commercial feed brand or product which is already registered under the provisions of this chapter.

          (6) Changes in the guarantee of either chemical or ingredient composition of a commercial feed registered under the provisions of this chapter may be permitted if there is satisfactory evidence that such changes would not result in a lowering of the feed value of the product for the purpose for which designed.

          (7) The department is empowered to refuse registration of any application not in compliance with the provisions of this chapter and to cancel any registration subsequently found to be not in compliance with any provisions of this chapter, but a registration shall not be refused or canceled until the registrant has been given opportunity to be heard before the department and to amend his application in order to comply with the requirements of this chapter.

          (8) If an application for renewal of the registration provided for in this section is not filed prior to January 1st of any one year, a penalty of ten dollars shall be assessed and added to the original fee and shall be paid by the applicant before the renewal registration may be issued, unless the applicant furnishes an affidavit that he has not distributed this feed subsequent to the expiration of his or her prior registration.

 

        Sec. 3.  RCW 15.58.415 and 1989 c 380 s 32 are each amended to read as follows:

          Each registration and licensing fee under this chapter is increased by a surcharge of ((five)) six dollars to be deposited in the ((agriculture‑-)) agricultural local fund, provided that an additional one-time surcharge of five dollars shall be collected on January 1, 1990.  The revenue raised by the imposition of this surcharge shall be used to assist in funding the pesticide incident reporting and tracking review panel, department of social and health services' pesticide investigations, and the department of agriculture's pesticide investigations.

 

        Sec. 4.  RCW 17.21.070 and 1991 c 109 s 30 are each amended to read as follows:

          It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of applying pesticides to the land of another without a commercial pesticide applicator license.  Application for the license shall be accompanied by a fee of one hundred ((twenty-five)) thirty-six dollars and in addition a fee of ((ten)) eleven dollars for each apparatus, exclusive of one, used by the applicant in the application of pesticides:  PROVIDED, That the provisions of this section shall not apply to any person employed only to operate any apparatus used for the application of any pesticide, and in which such person has no financial interest or other control over such apparatus other than its day to day mechanical operation for the purpose of applying any pesticide.  Commercial pesticide applicator licenses shall expire annually on a date set by rule by the director.  License fees shall be prorated where necessary to accommodate staggering of expiration dates of a license or licenses.

 

        Sec. 5.  RCW 17.21.110 and 1992 c 170 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

          It shall be unlawful for any person to act as an employee of a commercial pesticide applicator and apply pesticides manually or as the operator directly in charge of any apparatus which is licensed or should be licensed under the provisions of this chapter for the application of any pesticide, without having obtained a commercial pesticide operator license from the director.  The commercial pesticide operator license shall be in addition to any other license or permit required by law for the operation or use of any such apparatus.  Application for a commercial operator license shall be accompanied by a license fee of thirty-three dollars.  The provisions of this section shall not apply to any individual who is a licensed commercial pesticide applicator.  Commercial pesticide operator licenses shall expire  annually on a date set by rule by the director.  License fees shall be prorated where necessary to accommodate staggering of expiration dates of a license or licenses.

 

        Sec. 6.  RCW 17.21.122 and 1992 c 170 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

          It shall be unlawful for any person to act as a private-commercial applicator without having obtained a private-commercial applicator license from the director.  Application for a private-commercial applicator license shall be accompanied by a license fee of ((fifteen)) seventeen dollars before a license may be issued.  Private-commercial applicator licenses issued by the director shall be annual licenses expiring on a date set by rule by the director.  License fees shall be prorated where necessary to accommodate staggering of expiration dates of a license or licenses.

 

        Sec. 7.  RCW 17.21.126 and 1992 c 170 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

          It shall be unlawful for any person to act as a private applicator without first complying with the certification requirements determined by the director as necessary to prevent unreasonable adverse effects on the environment, including injury to the applicator or other persons, for that specific pesticide use.  Certification standards to determine the individual's competency with respect to the use and handling of the pesticide or class of pesticides the private applicator is to be certified to use shall be relative to hazards according to RCW 17.21.030 as now or hereafter amended.  In determining these standards the director shall take into consideration standards of the EPA and is authorized to adopt by rule these standards.  Application for private applicator certification shall be accompanied by a license fee of ((fifteen)) seventeen dollars before a certification may be issued.  Individuals with a valid certified applicator license, pest control consultant license, or dealer manager license who qualify in the appropriate license categories are exempt from this fee requirement provided that licensed public operators exempted from that license fee requirement are not exempted from the private applicator fee requirement.  Private applicator certification issued by the director shall expire annually on a date set by rule by the director.  License fees shall be prorated where necessary to accommodate staggering of expiration dates of a license or licenses.

 

        Sec. 8.  RCW 17.21.129 and 1992 c 170 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:

          Except as provided in RCW 17.21.203(1), it is unlawful for a person to use or supervise the use of any pesticide which is restricted to use by certified applicators, on small experimental plots for research purposes when no charge is made for the pesticide and its application, without a demonstration and research applicator's license.

          A license fee of ((fifteen)) seventeen dollars shall be paid before a demonstration and research license may be issued.  The demonstration and research applicator license shall be an annual license expiring on a date set by rule by the director.  License fees shall be prorated where necessary to accommodate staggering of expiration dates of a license or licenses.

 

        Sec. 9.  RCW 17.21.220 and 1991 c 109 s 37 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) All state agencies, municipal corporations, and public utilities or any other governmental agency shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted thereunder concerning the application of pesticides.

          (2) It shall be unlawful for any employee of a state agency, municipal corporation, public utility, or any other government agency to use or to supervise the use of any pesticide restricted to use by certified applicators, or any pesticide by means of an apparatus, without having obtained a public operator license from the director.  A license fee of ((fifteen)) seventeen dollars shall be paid before a public operator license may be issued.  The license fee shall not apply to public operators licensed and working in the health vector field.  Public operator licenses shall expire annually on a date set by rule by the director.  License fees shall be prorated where necessary to accommodate staggering of expiration dates of a license or licenses.  The public operator license shall be valid only when the operator is acting as an employee of a government agency.

          (3) The jurisdictional health officer or his or her duly authorized representative is exempt from this licensing provision when applying pesticides not restricted to use by certified applicators to control pests other than weeds.

          (4) Such agencies, municipal corporations and public utilities shall be subject to legal recourse by any person damaged by such application of any pesticide, and such action may be brought in the county where the damage or some part thereof occurred.

 

        Sec. 10.  RCW 17.21.360 and 1989 c 380 s 66 are each amended to read as follows:

          Each registration and licensing fee under this chapter is increased by a surcharge of ((five)) six dollars to be deposited in the ((agriculture‑-)) agricultural local fund, provided that an additional one-time surcharge of five dollars shall be collected on January 1, 1990.  The revenue raised by the imposition of this surcharge shall be used to assist in funding the pesticide incident reporting and tracking review panel, department of social and health services' pesticide investigations, and the department of agriculture's pesticide investigations.

 

        Sec. 11.  RCW 69.07.040 and 1992 c 160 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

          It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a food processing plant or process foods in the state without first having obtained an annual license from the department, which shall expire on a date set by rule by the director.  License fees shall be prorated where necessary to accommodate staggering of expiration dates.  Application for a license shall be on a form prescribed by the director and accompanied by the license fee.  The license fee is determined by computing the gross annual sales for the accounting year immediately preceding the license year.  If the license is for a new operator, the license fee shall be based on an estimated gross annual sales for the initial license period.

 

          If gross annual sales are:                    The license fee is:

          $0 to $50,000                                               $((50.00)) 55.00

          $50,001 to $500,000                           $((100.00)) 110.00

          $500,001 to $1,000,000                       $((200.00)) 220.00

          $1,000,001 to $5,000,000                     $((350.00)) 385.00

          $5,000,001 to $10,000,000       $((500.00)) 550.00

          Greater than $10,000,000                    $((750.00)) 825.00

 

Such application shall include the full name of the applicant for the license and the location of the food processing plant he or she intends to operate.  If such applicant is an individual, receiver, trustee, firm, partnership, association or corporation, the full name of each member of the firm or partnership, or names of the officers of the association or corporation shall be given on the application.  Such application shall further state the principal business address of the applicant in the state and elsewhere and the name of a person domiciled in this state authorized to receive and accept service of summons of legal notices of all kinds for the applicant.  The application shall also specify the type of food to be processed and the method or nature of processing operation or preservation of that food and any other necessary information.  Upon the approval of the application by the director and compliance with the provisions of this chapter, including the applicable regulations adopted hereunder by the department, the applicant shall be issued a license or renewal thereof.

          Licenses shall be issued to cover only those products, processes, and operations specified in the license application and approved for licensing.  Wherever a license holder wishes to engage in processing a type of food product that is different than the type specified on the application supporting the licensee's existing license and processing that type of food product would require a major addition to or modification of the licensee's processing facilities or has a high potential for harm, the licensee shall submit an amendment to the current license application.  In such a case, the licensee may engage in processing the new type of food product only after the amendment has been approved by the department.

          If upon investigation by the director, it is determined that a person is processing food for retail sale and is not under permit, license, or inspection by a local health authority, then that person may be considered a food processor and subject to the provisions of this chapter.

 

        Sec. 12.  RCW 69.25.250 and 1975 1st ex.s. c 201 s 26 are each amended to read as follows:

          There is hereby levied an assessment not to exceed ((two and one-half)) three mills per dozen eggs entering intrastate commerce, as prescribed by rules and regulations issued by the director.  Such assessment shall be applicable to all eggs entering intrastate commerce except as provided in RCW 69.25.170 and 69.25.290.  Such assessment shall be paid to the director on a monthly basis on or before the tenth day following the month such eggs enter intrastate commerce.  The director may require reports by egg handlers or dealers along with the payment of the assessment fee.  Such reports may include any and all pertinent information necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.  The director may, by regulations, require egg container manufacturers to report on a monthly basis all egg containers sold to any egg handler or dealer and bearing such egg handler or dealer's license number.

 


                                                           --- END ---