CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

          ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5468

 

                   Chapter 302, Laws of 1994

                     CHAPTER NO. CORRECTED

                         (partial veto)

 

                        53rd Legislature

                      1994 Regular Session

 

 

BUSINESSES‑-TAX INCENTIVES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION

 

 

                    EFFECTIVE DATE:  4/2/94

Passed by the Senate March 10, 1994

  YEAS 30   NAYS 18

 

 

 

JOEL PRITCHARD

President of the Senate

 

Passed by the House March 10, 1994

  YEAS 61   NAYS 36

             CERTIFICATE

 

I, Marty Brown, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5468 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

  BRIAN EBERSOLE

Speaker of the

      House of Representatives

MARTY BROWN

                            Secretary

 

 

Approved April 2, 1994, with the exception of section 2, which is vetoed. Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                FILED          

 

 

            April 2, 1994 - 2:12 p.m.

 

 

 

    MIKE LOWRY

Governor of the State of Washington

                   Secretary of State

                  State of Washington


          _______________________________________________

 

           ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5468

          _______________________________________________

 

            AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE

 

             Passed Legislature - 1994 Regular Session

 

State of Washington      53rd Legislature     1994 Regular Session

 

By Senate Committee on Trade, Technology & Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Fraser, Skratek, Pelz and Prentice)

 

Read first time 02/04/94.

 

Imposing requirements for businesses that receive public assistance.



    AN ACT Relating to private business entities receiving public assistance; adding a new chapter to Title 43 RCW; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that when public funds are used to support private enterprise, the public may gain through the creation of new jobs, the diversification of the economy, or higher quality jobs for existing workers.  The legislature further finds that such returns on public investments are not automatic and that tax-based incentives, in particular, may result in a greater tax burden on businesses and individuals that are not eligible for the public support.  It is the purpose of this chapter to collect information sufficient to allow the legislature and the executive branch to make informed decisions about the merits of existing tax-based incentives and loan programs intended to encourage economic development in the state.The text of the following section has been vetoed by the Governor.  It is noted in bold italic.

 

    *NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  (1) The department of revenue and the department of community, trade, and economic development shall gather such base-line data as is necessary to measure the effect on businesses of any of the following benefits:  (a) A loan of one hundred thousand dollars or more from the development loan fund; (b) fifty thousand dollars or more in tax credits under chapter 82.62 RCW; or (c) a deferral of one hundred thousand dollars or more in taxes under chapter 82.60 or 82.61 RCW.  The departments shall measure the effect of the programs on job creation, company growth, the introduction of new products, the diversification of the state's economy, growth in investments, the movement of firms or the consolidation of firms' operation into the state, and such other factors as the departments select.

    (2) The departments shall also measure whether the businesses receiving the benefits:  (a) Have complied with federal and state requirements for affirmative action in hiring and promotion of their employees; (b) have provided an average wage that is above the average wage paid by firms located in the same county that share the same two-digit standard industrial code; (c) have provided basic health coverage at a level at least equivalent to basic health coverage under chapter 70.47 RCW; (d) have complied with all applicable federal and state environmental and employment laws and regulations; and (e) have complied with the requirements of all federal and state plant closure laws if reducing operations at a facility or relocating a facility.

    (3) Businesses applying for one of the benefits specified in subsection (1) of this section shall submit employment impact estimates to the departments specifying the number and types of jobs, with wage rates and benefits for those jobs, that the business submitting the application expects to be eliminated, created, or retained on the project site and on other employment sites of the business in Washington as a result of the project that is the subject of the application.

    (4) The departments shall specify that upon a certain date or dates, the businesses that receive one of the benefits specified in subsection (1) of this section shall submit to the department an employment impact statement stating the net number and types of jobs eliminated, created, or retained, with the wage rates and benefits for those jobs, by the business in Washington as a result of the benefit received. 

    (5) The information collected on individual businesses under this section is not subject to public disclosure.

    (6) The departments shall report their findings to the executive-legislative committee on economic development policy, or the appropriate legislative committees, if the executive-legislative committee on economic development policy is not created by statute, by September 1, 1995.  The report shall provide aggregate information on businesses that share the same two-digit standard industrial code.

    (6) The executive-legislative committee on economic development policy shall evaluate the departments' report and make recommendations to the governor and the legislature on the continuation of the benefit programs and any conditions under which they should operate if they are to continue.

*Sec. 2 was vetoed, see message at end of chapter.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  Sections 1 and 2 of this act shall constitute a new chapter in Title 43 RCW.

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.


    Passed the Senate March 10, 1994.

    Passed the House March 10, 1994.

Approved by the Governor April 2, 1994, with the exception of certain items which were vetoed.

    Filed in Office of Secretary of State April 2, 1994.


 

    Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:

 

    "I am returning herewith, without my approval as to section 2, Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5468 entitled:

 

"AN ACT Relating to private business entities receiving public assistance;"

 

    This legislation would direct the Department of Revenue and the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development to prepare a study of firms that have participated in state sales tax deferral, business and occupation tax credit, and development loan fund programs. The departments would be required to collect information to measure the effect of these tax provisions and loans on businesses. The departments would also be directed to measure whether the firms participating in the programs have followed a wide range of federal and state requirements under other statutes and have met other standards of conduct not required under current law. Firms applying for participation in these programs would be required to prepare employment impact estimates for the departments.

 

    I understand and agree with the premise that the state has an interest in determining whether its economic development programs are achieving their intended effect. I also agree that the goal of state economic development activities is to encourage a sustainable high wage, high skill economy in the state for all of the state's citizens.

 

    I continue to believe that the state should maintain high environmental, health and safety, and employment standards implemented in a way that minimize bureaucracy, duplication, and confusion for the state's businesses. High standards should be enacted in the laws that govern these subjects. However, if compliance with existing standards in these areas is to be examined by the study, the Department of Revenue and the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development are not the proper agencies to conduct the study.

 

    I am also concerned that the private business information to be collected from businesses under this legislation would be subject to public disclosure. Because we believe that public business should take place in the open, our state has one of the strongest public disclosure statutes in the nation. The only way for publicly collected information to remain confidential is to amend our public disclosure statutes to specifically exempt such information from disclosure requirements. Despite the effort in the legislation to ensure that information collected from individual firms will remain confidential, I believe that information collected would be subject to disclosure.

 

    As a result of these two concerns, I am vetoing section 2 of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5468. However, I also believe that it is in the state's long-term interest to promote a sustainable high wage, high skill economy and to maintain high environmental, health and safety, and employment standards. As a result, I am asking the directors of state agencies with responsibility for environmental protection, employment, economic development, and workplace health and safety to identify threshold criteria that the state should consider applying in the future as eligibility criteria for state assistance programs. If businesses are willful repeat violators of existing statutes in these areas, these businesses should be removed from the benefits of the state's economic development programs. I am also directing these agencies to involve interested parties in the process of identifying such criteria. I will examine the results of these actions and consider requesting changes in state law and regulations to implement them.

 

    With the exception of section 2, Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5468 is approved."