6637-S AMH .... H5376.2
SSB 6637 - H AMD 430 ADOPTED 3-1-96
By Representatives Van Luven and Reams
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:
"Sec. 1. RCW 36.70A.010 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
The legislature finds that uncoordinated and unplanned growth, together with a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in the conservation and the wise use of our lands, pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety, and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state. It is in the public interest that citizens, communities, local governments, and the private sector cooperate and coordinate with one another in comprehensive land use planning. The legislature further finds that many of the decisions by the growth management hearings boards have not accorded adequate deference to planning choices made by counties and cities. The legislature restates its intention that implementation of the growth management act focus on locally developed and locally implemented strategies to manage population growth, rather than planning decisions made at the state or regional level. Further, the legislature finds that it is in the public interest that economic development programs be shared with communities experiencing insufficient economic growth.
Sec. 2. RCW 36.70A.020 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
The following goals are adopted to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations of those counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040. This chapter does not establish or require that the following goals be given any particular priority. The growth management hearings boards, in any of their decisions, shall have no discretion to prioritize, balance, or rank these goals. The following goals are not listed in order of priority and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations:
(1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
(2) Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development.
(3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.
(4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock.
(5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities.
(6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions.
(7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
(8) Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries, including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forest lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses.
(9) Open space and recreation. Encourage the retention of open space and development of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks.
(10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water.
(11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts.
(12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards.
(13) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance.
Sec. 3. RCW 36.70A.280 and 1995 c 347 s 108 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A growth management
hearings board ((shall)) may exercise its discretion to hear and
determine only those petitions alleging either:
(a) That an action
of a state agency, county, or city planning under this chapter ((is not
in compliance with the requirements of this chapter,)) or chapter
90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption of shoreline master programs or
amendments thereto, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to plans, development
regulations, or amendments, adopted under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW is
not supported by substantial evidence in the record developed before the state
agency, county, or city; or
(b) That the twenty-year growth management planning population projections adopted by the office of financial management pursuant to RCW 43.62.035 should be adjusted.
(2) A ((petition may
be filed only by the state, a county or city that plans under this chapter, a
person who has either appeared before the county or city regarding the matter
on which a review is being requested or is certified by the governor within
sixty days of filing the request with the board, or a person qualified pursuant
to RCW 34.05.530)) board has discretion to consider only petitions filed
by a state agency, a county or a city that plans under this chapter, or a
person. The petitioner must demonstrate that it: Has participated in the public
adoption process of the county or city regarding the matter on which a review
is being requested; can demonstrate that each issue presented in the petition
for review was presented by the petitioner on the record during the public
adoption process; and can demonstrate the petitioner's interests will suffer
specific and perceptible harm if the action of the county or city is not
reviewed.
(3) For purposes of this section "person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, governmental subdivision or unit thereof, or public or private organization or entity of any character.
(4) When considering a possible adjustment to a growth management planning population projection prepared by the office of financial management, a board shall consider the implications of any such adjustment to the population forecast for the entire state.
The rationale for any adjustment that is adopted by a board must be documented and filed with the office of financial management within ten working days after adoption.
If adjusted by a board, a county growth management planning population projection shall only be used for the planning purposes set forth in this chapter and shall be known as a "board adjusted population projection". None of these changes shall affect the official state and county population forecasts prepared by the office of financial management, which shall continue to be used for state budget and planning purposes.
Sec. 4. RCW 36.70A.290 and 1995 c 347 s 109 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) All requests for review to a growth management hearings board shall be initiated by filing a petition that includes a detailed statement of issues presented for resolution by the board.
(2) All petitions relating to whether or not an adopted comprehensive plan, development regulation, or permanent amendment thereto, is in compliance with the goals and requirements of this chapter or chapter 90.58 or 43.21C RCW must be filed within sixty days after publication by the legislative bodies of the county or city.
(a) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, the date of publication for a city shall be the date the city publishes the ordinance, or summary of the ordinance, adopting the comprehensive plan or development regulations, or amendment thereto, as is required to be published.
(b) Promptly after adoption, a county shall publish a notice that it has adopted the comprehensive plan or development regulations, or amendment thereto.
Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, for purposes of this section the date of publication for a county shall be the date the county publishes the notice that it has adopted the comprehensive plan or development regulations, or amendment thereto.
(c) For local governments planning under RCW 36.70A.040, promptly after approval or disapproval of a local government’s shoreline master program or amendment thereto by the department of ecology as provided in RCW 90.58.090, the local government shall publish a notice that the shoreline master program or amendment thereto has been approved or disapproved by the department of ecology. For purposes of this section, the date of publication for the adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program is the date the local government publishes notice that the shoreline master program or amendment thereto has been approved or disapproved by the department of ecology.
(3) Unless the board dismisses the petition as frivolous or finds that the person filing the petition lacks standing, the board shall, within ten days of receipt of the petition, set a time for hearing the matter.
(4) The ((board
shall base its)) board's discretion is limited to issuing a decision
based solely on the record developed by the city, county, or the state
((and supplemented with additional evidence if the board determines that
such additional evidence would be necessary or of substantial assistance to the
board in reaching its decision)).
(5) The board((,))
shall consolidate, when appropriate, all petitions involving the review of the
same comprehensive plan or the same development regulation or regulations.
Sec. 5. RCW 36.70A.300 and 1995 c 347 s 110 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) The board shall
issue a final order within one hundred eighty days of receipt of the petition
for review, or, when multiple petitions are filed, within one hundred eighty
days of receipt of the last petition that is consolidated. Such a final order
shall be based exclusively on ((whether or not a state agency, county, or
city is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW
as it relates to adoption or amendment of shoreline master programs, or chapter
43.21C RCW as it relates to plans, development regulations, and amendments
thereto, adopted under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW. In the final
order, the board shall either: (a) Find that the state agency, county, or city
is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter or chapter 90.58 RCW as
it relates to the adoption or amendment of shoreline master programs; or (b)
find that the state agency, county, or city is not in compliance with the
requirements of this chapter or chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption
or amendment of shoreline master programs, in which case the board shall remand
the matter to the affected state agency, county, or city and)) the
matters within the board's discretion set forth in RCW 36.70A.280. The final
order shall specify a reasonable time not in excess of one hundred eighty
days within which the state agency, county, or city shall comply with the
requirements of this chapter.
(2) A finding of
noncompliance and an order of remand shall not affect the validity of
comprehensive plans and development regulations during the period of remand((,
unless the board's final order also:
(a) Includes a
determination, supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law, that the
continued validity of the plan or regulation would substantially interfere with
the fulfillment of the goals of this chapter; and
(b) Specifies the
particular part or parts of the plan or regulation that are determined to be
invalid, and the reasons for their invalidity.
(3) A determination
of invalidity shall:
(a) Be prospective
in effect and shall not extinguish rights that vested under state or local law
before the date of the board's order; and
(b) Subject any
development application that would otherwise vest after the date of the board's
order to the local ordinance or resolution that both is enacted in response to
the order of remand and determined by the board pursuant to RCW 36.70A.330 to
comply with the requirements of this chapter.
(4) If the ordinance
that adopts a plan or development regulation under this chapter includes a
savings clause intended to revive prior policies or regulations in the event
the new plan or regulations are determined to be invalid, the board shall
determine under subsection (2) of this section whether the prior policies or
regulations are valid during the period of remand.
(5))). The boards do not have discretion to
invalidate or make ineffective plans or development regulations during the
period of remand.
(3) Any party aggrieved by a final decision of the hearings board may appeal the decision to superior court as provided in RCW 34.05.514 or 36.01.050 within thirty days of the final order of the board.
Sec. 6. RCW 36.70A.320 and 1995 c 347 s 111 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Except as provided in
subsection (2) of this section, comprehensive plans and development
regulations, ((and)) amendments thereto, and any other required
actions adopted under this chapter are presumed valid upon adoption. In
any petition ((under this chapter, the board, after full consideration of
the petition, shall determine whether there is compliance with the requirements
of this chapter. In making its determination)), the board shall consider
the criteria adopted by the department under RCW 36.70A.190(4). The board
shall not have the discretion to substitute its own interpretation of this
chapter for the interpretation made by the county or city acting under this
chapter. The board shall defer to the county or city as to how the county or
city balanced the goals set forth in RCW 36.70A.020 in the development of its
comprehensive plan, development regulations, amendments thereto, and any other
required actions adopted under this chapter. The board shall find
compliance ((unless)) if it finds ((by a preponderance of the
evidence)) that the interpretation or application of this chapter by the
state agency, county, or city ((erroneously interpreted or applied this
chapter)) is supported by substantial evidence in the record developed
before the state agency, county, or city.
(2) The shoreline element of a comprehensive plan and the applicable development regulations adopted by a county or city shall take effect as provided in chapter 90.58 RCW.
Sec. 7. RCW 36.70A.330 and 1995 c 347 s 112 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) After the time set
for complying with the requirements of this chapter under RCW 36.70A.300(1)(((b)))
has expired, or at an earlier time upon the motion of a county or city ((subject
to a determination of invalidity under RCW 36.70A.300)), the board shall
set a hearing for the purpose of determining whether the state agency, county,
or city is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
(2) The board shall conduct a hearing and issue a finding of compliance or noncompliance with the requirements of this chapter. A person with standing to challenge the legislation enacted in response to the board's final order may participate in the hearing along with the petitioner and the state agency, city, or county. A hearing under this subsection shall be given the highest priority of business to be conducted by the board, and a finding shall be issued within forty-five days of the filing of the motion under subsection (1) of this section with the board.
(3) If the board finds that the state agency, county, or city is not in compliance, the board shall transmit its finding to the governor. The board may recommend to the governor that the sanctions authorized by this chapter be imposed.
(((4) The board
shall also reconsider its final order and decide:
(a) If a
determination of invalidity has been made, whether such a determination should
be rescinded or modified under the standards in RCW 36.70A.300(2); or
(b) If no
determination of invalidity has been made, whether one now should be made under
the standards in RCW 36.70A.300(2).
The board shall
schedule additional hearings as appropriate pursuant to subsections (1) and (2)
of this section.))
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. It is the intent of the legislature that the discretion given to growth management hearings boards in chapter 347, Laws of 1995, to determine that a plan or regulation is invalid is null and void. Any board's exercise of discretion to determine a plan or regulations invalid made at any time is null, void, and of no effect. The legislature intends that this act have retroactive application and apply to determinations of invalidity made before, on, and after the effective date of this act."
SSB 6637 - H AMD
By Representative
On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "discretion;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 36.70A.010, 36.70A.020, 36.70A.280, 36.70A.290, 36.70A.300, 36.70A.320, and 36.70A.330; and creating a new section."
--- END ---