HOUSE BILL REPORT

                  HB 1989

 

             As Reported By House Committee On:

                      Commerce & Labor

 

Title:  An act relating to employment in the construction industry.

 

Brief Description:  Changing provisions related to employment in the construction industry.

 

Sponsors:  Representatives Lisk, Ebersole and Patterson.

 

Brief History:

  Committee Activity:

Commerce & Labor:  1/30/96 [DP2S].

 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR

 

Majority Report:  The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 7 members:  Representatives McMorris, Chairman; Hargrove, Vice Chairman; Thompson, Vice Chairman; Cairnes; Fuhrman; Goldsmith and Horn.

 

Minority Report:  Do not pass.  Signed by 4 members:  Representatives Romero, Ranking Minority Member; Conway, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Cody and Cole.

 

Staff:  Chris Cordes (786-7117).

 

Background: 

 

Third-party liability under industrial insurance

 

Injured workers covered by industrial insurance, or their beneficiaries, are compensated for their injuries under the industrial insurance provisions and are not permitted to sue their employers for damages.  However, a worker may file a damage suit against a "third party," if the third party is not the injured worker's co-worker.  Workers who are working on the same job site, but who are employed by different employers are not considered to be co-workers.

 

Third-party immunity is granted to design professionals who perform professional services for a construction project, unless the professional assumes responsibility for safety by contract or actually exercised control over that part of the premises where the worker was injured.  Design professionals include licensed or authorized architects, engineers, land surveyors, or landscape architects.

 

Safety requirements under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act

 

Under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act, general contractors are responsible for provision of a safe workplace for their own employees, and for compliance with all safety regulations with respect to all employees on a construction job site.  Washington courts have determined that a subcontractor's employee has a cause of action against the general contractor if the injury was caused by a violation of a specific safety regulation at the construction job site.

 

In 1993, the Department of Labor and Industries issued a regional directive, developed in consultation with labor and management representatives in the construction industry and related industries.  The regional directive establishes guidelines for assessing the compliance of general contractors with the requirements for safety applying to the subcontractor's employees.

 

Summary of Second Substitute Bill: 

 

Third-party liability under industrial insurance for injuries at construction sites

 

The immunity from liability for workplace injuries for third parties performing services at a construction site is modified.

 

An injured worker or the worker's beneficiary is not permitted to seek damages for industrial injuries or occupational diseases occurring in the course of employment at a construction project from the owner or developer of the project, or any person performing work, furnishing materials, or providing services for the project, including design professionals, construction managers, general or prime contractors, suppliers, subcontractors of any tier, or their employees.  This prohibition applies whether the work is performed at the site under a single contract or multiple contracts. 

 

This immunity does not apply to

 

!a person or entity that injures a worker by deliberate intention.  It is against public policy to indemnify against this liability. 

 

!manufacturers and product sellers for product liability actions.

 

!negligent preparation of design plans by a design professional.

 

Safety requirements under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act

 

All construction employers.  All construction employers have a duty to provide a safe workplace for their employees and employees of their subcontractors, in the context of general industry practice.  The duty includes implementation of a safety program that is effective in practice.  Construction employers must take reasonable steps to ensure that their safety programs are designed to comply with law.

 

Each construction employer on the site must designate a person who is responsible for safety. The name and telephone number of the designated person must be communicated to the contractor's own employees.  The name and telephone number of the designated safety person for the prime or general contractor must be posted at the site.

 

Safety suggestions and hazard identification are to be encouraged.  Disciplinary actions may be taken for violation of appropriately communicated requirements, including verbal or written reprimand, suspension from work, and termination for cause, subject to the employer's written policy or written agreement between the employer and the employees, if any.

 

A violation or citation under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) does not affect the immunity granted under the industrial insurance law.

 

Prime or general contractors.  The prime or general contractor has primary responsibility for safety compliance at each job site.   If a construction employer's safety program is effective in practice, no WISHA citation may be issued for violations by their subcontractors.

 

"Effective in practice" means all of the following are complied with:

 

(1)Subcontractors must comply, by contract, with WISHA.

(2)A written program is implemented and enforced for each site by the prime or general contractor.

(3)Each subcontractor provides, and makes available, an accident prevention plan for the work site.

(4)The safety person's name and telephone number is posted.

(5)All necessary safety equipment is provided to employees.

 

Authority to adopt rules

 

The Department of Labor and Industries must adopt rules, in consultation with affected parties, to implement the act.

 

Second Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:   A provision is deleted that would have made employers in the construction industry responsible for two-thirds of the medical aid fund premium instead of one-half and all of the supplemental fund premium instead of one-half.  The requirements for safety at a construction work site are revised, with specific duties stated for all construction contractors and for the prime or general contractor.  The elements of a safety program that are necessary for the program to be "effective in practice" are added.

 

Appropriation:  None.

 

Fiscal Note:  Available.

 

Effective Date of Substitute Bill:  The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect immediately.

 

Testimony For:  None.

 

Testimony Against:  None.

 

Testified:  None.