HOUSE BILL REPORT

                 SHB 2316

                      As Passed House:

                      February 6, 1996

Title:  An act relating to siting juvenile correctional facilities.

Brief Description:  Providing a procedure for siting juvenile correctional facilities.

Sponsors:  House Committee on Corrections (originally sponsored by Representatives Ballasiotes, Dyer, Radcliff, Lambert, D. Schmidt, Blanton, Robertson, L. Thomas, Elliot, McMahan and Thompson).

Brief History:

  Committee Activity:

Corrections:  1/17/96, 2/1/96 [DPS].

  Floor Activity:

Passed House:  2/6/96, 94-0.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CORRECTIONS

Majority Report:  The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 11 members:  Representatives Ballasiotes, Chairman; Blanton, Vice Chairman; Sherstad, Vice Chairman; Quall, Ranking Minority Member; Tokuda, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Cole; Dickerson; Koster; Radcliff; Schoesler and D. Sommers.

Staff:  Diana Canzoneri (786-7156).

Background:  Current law requires the Department of Corrections to utilize a process for involving and informing local communities when the department establishes or relocates work release facilities and other community-based correctional facilities for adults.  Requirements for this process are stipulated in the law.

Under current law, there is no similar public participation process required for the siting of juvenile correctional facilities.

Summary of Bill:  A process for siting juvenile correctional facilities is established that is similar to the siting process required for adult correctional facilities. 

The Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), under which the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration operates, is required to establish a public participation process for establishing and relocating juvenile correctional facilities.  The siting procedure requirements apply to both publicly and privately operated community-based facilities as well as to institutions.

In order to establish any such facility, DSHS must first follow a public participation procedure that includes wide dissemination of siting proposals, public meetings, and opportunities for commentary.  Prior to initiating the public participation process, DSHS must contact local governmental planning agencies.  DSHS must coordinate with these agencies to reduce duplication of effort and to ensure that opportunities are provided for effective citizen input.

Once the department has selected three or fewer sites for final consideration, or has begun negotiations with a provider of a contracted juvenile facility, notification and public hearings must be conducted in the communities containing the potential sites.  An additional public hearing must also be held in the community selected as the final proposed site.

As part of the siting process, the department must notify the following entities:

$newspapers and other major media,

$schools, libraries, and local government offices,

$the local chamber of commerce and economic development agency,

$residents and property-owners within a half mile of the proposed site, and

$any other local organization that requests notification.

Public meetings and notice required under local ordinances may be substituted for meetings and notification if consistent with other requirements in the act.  However, a representative from DSHS must be present at all public hearings to site the department's juvenile correctional facilities. 

Appropriation:  None.

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For:  A public process for siting juvenile correctional facilities is needed.  However, there should be a requirement that the department contact local governments as a first priority.  Decisions regarding the siting of juvenile correctional facilities present issues that may be of special concern to individual cities.  Cities want to be more involved in these choices.

The public participation process outlined in the bill is very similar to the process the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration uses in siting institutional facilities.

Testimony Against:  The bill as currently crafted does not easily fit with, or apply to, the process typically used to site community-based juvenile correctional facilities,nor does it reflect the fact that many of these facilities are operated by service providers on a contract-basis.  (Note:  The substitute bill contains provisions to address these concerns.)

Testified:  Kathy Gerke, Association of Cities (pro); and Sid Sidorowicz, Department of Social and Health Services, Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration (neutral).