SENATE BILL REPORT

                   SB 6422

              As Reported By Senate Committee On:

            Government Operations, February 1, 1996

Title:  An act relating to protecting general aviation facilities from encroachment of incompatible land uses.

Brief Description:  Requiring additional planning for general aviation facilities.

Sponsors:  Senators Haugen, Morton, Hale, Swecker, Prentice and Sutherland.

Brief History:

Committee Activity:  Government Operations:  1/25/96, 2/1/96 [DPS].

SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6422 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

  Signed by Senators Haugen, Chair; Sheldon, Vice Chair; Goings, Hale, Heavey and Winsley.

Staff:  Diane Smith (786-7410)

Background:  Counties and cities planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA) must develop comprehensive plans that include a transportation element and a land use element.  GMA requires that the transportation and land use elements be consistent with each other, but it does not require planners to protect general aviation airports from incompatible land uses.

Summary of Substitute Bill:  Consideration of general aviation airport facilities is required in both the land use and transportation elements of the comprehensive plans of counties and cities planning under the GMA.

Every city and town, code city, charter city and county having a general aviation airport in its jurisdiction is required to discourage the siting of land uses that are incompatible with the airport.  This policy must be implemented in the comprehensive plan and development regulations as they are amended in the normal course of land use proceedings.  Formal consultation with the aviation community is required and all plans and regulations must be filed with the aviation division of the Department of Transportation.

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:  The substitute bill structures the technical amendatory sections in a less redundant manner.  Charter cities are included.

Appropriation:  None.

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For:  General aviation airports are vanishing due to pressure from encroaching incompatible land uses.  The land use planning statutes should express the state policy that these airports should not be subjected to incompatible neighbors.  This way, the airports can be preserved to the enhancement of our transportation system and the safety of all air travel.

Testimony Against:  It is not clear what this bill asks local governments to do.  There are real problems with vested property rights and the legislative directive to cause potential compensable takings.

Testified:  Mark Tripplet, WA Pilots-General Aviation (pro); Bill Brubaker, WSDOT Aviation Division (pro); Ted Wirch, Jim Johnson, WPA (pro); David Williams, AWC.