H-2239.1          _______________________________________________

 

                            SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1098

                  _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington              54th Legislature             1995 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Agriculture & Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives Chappell, Chandler, Mastin, Brumsickle, Boldt, Lisk, Schoesler, Robertson, Sehlin, Clements, Foreman, Pennington, Stevens, Delvin and Mielke)

 

Read first time 03/01/95.

 

Providing increased penalties for false writings or statements concerning farms or agricultural commodities.



     AN ACT Relating to false writings or statements concerning the food production industry; amending RCW 4.16.080; adding a new chapter to Title 7 RCW; prescribing penalties; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature declares that the production of agricultural commodities constitutes a large and significant proportion of the Washington economy.  Because of the perishable nature of agricultural commodities, even short delays in the marketing of agricultural commodities can cause devastating impacts on agricultural producers and consumers in this state.  The legislature therefore recognizes that the impact of a disparaging statement can be as damaging to a business as a defamatory statement.

     The legislature also finds that once consumers believe that a product is unsafe, the product does not return to the same level of consumption by consumers even when the information that the consumers based their belief upon later proves to be false.   The legislature therefore finds that it has a compelling interest to protect the vitality of the agricultural economy and the general welfare of the citizens of this state by allowing producers of agricultural commodities to recover damages for the dissemination of disparaging information regarding any agricultural commodity.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

     (1) "Disparagement" means dissemination to the public in any manner of any false information regarding the application of any agricultural chemical or process to agricultural commodities or products, or false information alleging any disease to agricultural commodities or products, that is not based on reliable scientific data, that the disseminator knows or should have known to be false, and that causes the consuming public to doubt the safety of any agricultural commodity.  Information is false if it is a false factual assertion or an opinion premised upon facts that are false.

     (2) "Agricultural commodity" means products as defined in RCW 15.65.020.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  (1) Any producer of agricultural commodities who suffers damages as a result of another person's disparagement of any such agricultural commodity may bring an action for damages in a court of competent jurisdiction.

     (2) If a disparaging statement is disseminated with reference to an entire group or class of agricultural commodities, a cause of action arises in favor of each producer of the group or class who is damaged even though the statement is not directed at a particular producer.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  (1) A producer of an agricultural product shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence  that he or she has been damaged by the dissemination of a disparaging statement.  It is unnecessary for the producer to prove the exact amount of damages in order to recover under this section.

     (2) In a case where damages are awarded under this section, the court shall award to the plaintiff all costs of the litigation, including reasonable attorneys' fees, investigation costs, and court costs.

     (3) A person who intentionally disseminates disparaging information with the intent to harm agricultural producers shall be liable to the producers for substantial damages without the producer having to prove actual damages.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.  Nothing in this chapter may be construed as applying to customary debate among members of the research community or to an opinion or concern of a member of the general public expressed in any news medium in a manner that is open to any member of the general public.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  Nothing in this chapter is intended to abrogate the common law action for product disparagement or defamation of a producer of an agricultural commodity or any other cause of action available.

 

     Sec. 7.  RCW 4.16.080 and 1989 c 38 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

     The following actions shall be commenced within three years:

     (1) An action for waste or trespass upon real property;

     (2) An action for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including an action for the specific recovery thereof, or for any other injury to the person or rights of another not hereinafter enumerated;

     (3) Except as provided in RCW 4.16.040(2), an action upon a contract or liability, express or implied, which is not in writing, and does not arise out of any written instrument;

     (4) An action for relief upon the ground of fraud, the cause of action in such case not to be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud;

     (5) An action against a sheriff, coroner, or constable upon a liability incurred by the doing of an act in his or her official capacity and by virtue of his or her office, or by the omission of an official duty, including the nonpayment of money collected upon an execution; but this subdivision shall not apply to action for an escape;

     (6) An action against an officer charged with misappropriation or a failure to properly account for public funds intrusted to his or her custody; an action upon a statute for penalty or forfeiture, where an action is given to the party aggrieved, or to such party and the state, except when the statute imposing it prescribed a different limitation:  PROVIDED, HOWEVER, The cause of action for such misappropriation, penalty or forfeiture, whether for acts heretofore or hereafter done, and regardless of lapse of time or existing statutes of limitations, or the bar thereof, even though complete, shall not be deemed to accrue or to have accrued until discovery by the aggrieved party of the act or acts from which such liability has arisen or shall arise, and such liability, whether for acts heretofore or hereafter done, and regardless of lapse of time or existing statute of limitation, or the bar thereof, even though complete, shall exist and be enforceable for three years after discovery by aggrieved party of the act or acts from which such liability has arisen or shall arise;

     (7) All actions for damages for disparagement of agricultural commodities brought under section 3 of this act.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8.   Sections 1 through 6 of this act shall constitute a new chapter in Title 7 RCW.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9.  If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 10.   This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.

 


                                    --- END ---