BP BHEAD INT H

AN ACT Relating to indigent persons; amending RCW 13.40.145; and adding new sections to chapter 10.73 RCW.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 10.73 RCW to read as follows:

The legislature is aware that the constitutional requirements of equal protection and due process require that counsel be provided for indigent persons and persons who are indigent and able to contribute for the first appeal as a matter of right from a judgment and sentence in a criminal case, and no further. There is no constitutional right to the appointment of counsel at public expense to collaterally attack a judgment and sentence in a criminal matter or to seek discretionary review of a lower appellate court decision.

The legislature finds that it is appropriate to extend the right to counsel at state expense to persons who are indigent and persons who are indigent and able to contribute as those terms are defined in RCW 10.101.010 in the following instances:

(1) For indigent persons filing a direct appeal as a matter of right from a judgment and sentence in a criminal case;

(2) For indigent persons responding to a direct appeal filed as a matter of right or who are responding to a motion for discretionary review or petition for review filed by the state in a criminal case;

(3) For indigent persons under a sentence of death, counsel shall be provided, upon request, for the purpose of filing and prosecution of a motion or petition for collateral attack, except that counsel may not be provided at public expense for the filing or prosecution of a second or subsequent collateral attack on the same judgment and sentence;

(4) For indigent persons not under a sentence of death to prosecute a collateral attack after the chief judge has determined that the issues raised by the petition are not frivolous in accordance with the procedure contained in rules of appellate procedure 16.11, except that counsel shall not be provided at public expense for the filing or prosecution of a second or subsequent collateral attack on the same judgment and sentence;

(5) For indigent persons who are responding to a collateral attack filed by the state or who are responding to or prosecuting an appeal from a collateral attack that was filed by the state;

(6) For indigent persons to prosecute an appeal after the supreme court or court of appeals has accepted discretionary review of a decision of a court of limited jurisdiction;

(7) For indigent persons to prosecute an appeal after the supreme court has accepted discretionary review of a court of appeals decision.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 10.73 RCW to read as follows:

(1) The court of appeals, supreme court, and superior courts may require an adult or a juvenile convicted of a crime or the parents or another person legally obligated to support a juvenile offender to pay appellate costs.

(2) Appellate costs are limited to expenses specifically incurred by the state in prosecuting or defending an appeal or collateral attack from a criminal conviction or sentence. Appellate costs shall not include expenditures in connection with the maintenance and operation of government agencies that must be made irrespective of specific violations of the law. Expenses incurred for producing a verbatim report of proceedings and clerk's papers may be included in costs the court may require a convicted defendant or juvenile offender to pay.

(3) Costs, including recoupment of fees for court appointed counsel, shall be requested in accordance with the procedures contained in Title 14 of the rules of appellate procedure and in Title 9 of the rules for appeal of decisions of courts of limited jurisdiction, as now or hereafter amended. An award of costs shall become part of the trial court judgment and sentence. An award of costs in juvenile cases shall also become part of any order previously entered in the trial court pursuant to RCW 13.40.145.

(4) A defendant or juvenile offender who has been sentenced to pay costs and who is not in contumacious default in the payment thereof may at any time petition the court that sentenced the defendant or juvenile offender for remission of the payment of costs or of any unpaid portion thereof. If it appears to the satisfaction of the sentencing court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the defendant, the defendant's immediate family, or the juvenile offender, the sentencing court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, or modify the method of payment under RCW 10.01.170.

(5) The parents or another person legally obligated to support a juvenile offender who has been ordered to pay appellate costs pursuant to RCW 13.40.145 and who is not in contumacious default in the payment thereof may at any time petition the court that sentenced the juvenile offender for remission of the payment of costs or of any unpaid portion thereof. If it appears to the satisfaction of the sentencing court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the parents or another person legally obligated to support a juvenile offender or on their immediate families, the sentencing court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, or may modify the method of payment.

Sec. 3. RCW 13.40.145 and 1984 c 86 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

Upon disposition or at the time of a modification or at the time an appellate court remands the case to the trial court following a ruling in favor of the state the court may order the juvenile or a parent or another person legally obligated to support the juvenile to appear, and the court may inquire into the ability of those persons to pay a reasonable sum representing in whole or in part the fees for legal services provided by publicly funded counsel and the costs incurred by the public in producing a verbatim report of proceedings and clerk's papers for use in the appellate courts.

If, after hearing, the court finds the juvenile, parent, or other legally obligated person able to pay part or all of the attorney's fees and costs incurred on appeal, the court may enter such order or decree as is equitable and may enforce the order or decree by execution, or in any way in which a court of equity may enforce its decrees.

In no event may the court order an amount to be paid for attorneys' fees that exceeds the average per case fee allocation for juvenile proceedings in the county where the services have been provided or the average per case fee allocation for juvenile appeals established by the Washington supreme court.

In any case in which there is no compliance with an order or decree of the court requiring a juvenile, parent, or other person legally obligated to support the juvenile to pay for legal services provided by publicly funded counsel, the court may, upon such person or persons being properly summoned or voluntarily appearing, proceed to inquire into the amount due upon the order or decree and enter judgment for that amount against the defaulting party or parties. Judgment shall be docketed in the same manner as are other judgments for the payment of money.

The county in which such judgments are entered shall be denominated the judgment creditor, and the judgments may be enforced by the prosecuting attorney of that county. Any moneys recovered thereon shall be paid into the registry of the court and shall be disbursed to such person, persons, agency, or governmental entity as the court finds entitled thereto.

Such judgments shall remain valid and enforceable for a period of ten years subsequent to entry.