CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

 

              ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1556

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                        54th Legislature

                      1996 Regular Session

Passed by the House January 10, 1996

  Yeas 93   Nays 0

 

 

 

 

Speaker of the

       House of Representatives

 

Passed by the Senate March 5, 1996

  Yeas 41   Nays 1

               CERTIFICATE

 

I, Timothy A. Martin, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1556 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.

 

 

 

 

President of the Senate

 

                               Chief Clerk

 

 

Approved Place Style On Codes above, and Style Off Codes below.

                                     FILED

          

 

 

Governor of the State of Washington

                        Secretary of State

                       State of Washington


                  _______________________________________________

 

                       ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1556

                  _______________________________________________

 

                     Passed Legislature - 1996 Regular Session

 

State of Washington              54th Legislature             1995 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Representatives Wolfe, Boldt, Scott, Romero, B. Thomas, Johnson, Talcott, Delvin, Carrell, Campbell, Van Luven, Cooke, Dickerson, Kessler, Basich, Conway, Smith and Costa)

 

Read first time 03/01/95.

 

Revising procedures for determining visitation rights for persons other than a parent.



     AN ACT Relating to visitation; and amending RCW 26.09.240.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

     Sec. 1.  RCW 26.09.240 and 1989 c 375 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:

     ((The court may order visitation rights for a person other than a parent when visitation may serve the best interest of the child whether or not there has been any change of circumstances.

     A person other than a parent may petition the court for visitation rights at any time.

     The court may modify an order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interests of the child.)) (1) A person other than a parent may petition the court for visitation with a child at any time or may intervene in a pending dissolution, legal separation, or modification of parenting plan proceeding.  A person other than a parent may not petition for visitation under this section unless the child's parent or parents have commenced an action under this chapter.

     (2) A petition for visitation with a child by a person other than a parent must be filed in the county in which the child resides.

     (3) A petition for visitation or a motion to intervene pursuant to this section shall be dismissed unless the petitioner or intervenor can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that a significant relationship exists with the child with whom visitation is sought.  If the petition or motion is dismissed for failure to establish the existence of a significant relationship, the petitioner or intervenor shall be ordered to pay reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the parent, parents, other custodian, or representative of the child who responds to this petition or motion.

     (4) The court may order visitation between the petitioner or intervenor and the child between whom a significant relationship exists upon a finding supported by the evidence that the visitation is in the child's best interests.

     (5)(a) Visitation with a grandparent shall be presumed to be in the child's best interests when a significant relationship has been shown to exist.  This presumption may be rebutted by a preponderance of evidence showing that visitation would endanger the child's physical, mental, or emotional health.

     (b) If the court finds that reasonable visitation by a grandparent would be in the child's best interest except for hostilities that exist between the grandparent and one or both of the parents or person with whom the child lives, the court may set the matter for mediation under RCW 26.09.015.

     (6) The court may consider the following factors when making a determination of the child's best interests:

     (a) The strength of the relationship between the child and the petitioner;

     (b) The relationship between each of the child's parents or the person with whom the child is residing and the petitioner;

     (c) The nature and reason for either parent's objection to granting the petitioner visitation;

     (d) The effect that granting visitation will have on the relationship between the child and the child's parents or the person with whom the child is residing;

     (e) The residential time sharing arrangements between the parents;

     (f) The good faith of the petitioner;

     (g) Any criminal history or history of physical, emotional, or sexual abuse or neglect by the petitioner; and

     (h) Any other factor relevant to the child's best interest.

     (7) The restrictions of RCW 26.09.191 that apply to parents shall be applied to a petitioner or intervenor who is not a parent.  The nature and extent of visitation, subject to these restrictions, is in the discretion of the court.

     (8) The court may order an investigation and report concerning the proposed visitation or may appoint a guardian ad litem as provided in RCW 26.09.220.

     (9) Visitation granted pursuant to this section shall be incorporated into the parenting plan for the child.

     (10) The court may modify or terminate visitation rights granted pursuant to this section in any subsequent modification action upon a showing that the visitation is no longer in the best interest of the child.

 


                                    --- END ---