H-4854.1          _______________________________________________

 

                            SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2411

                  _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington              54th Legislature             1996 Regular Session

 

By House Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Representatives Hickel and Mitchell)

 

Read first time 02/02/96. 

 

Providing concurrent jurisdiction for certain courts dealing with compulsory school attendance.



     AN ACT Relating to court jurisdiction; amending RCW 35.20.030; reenacting and amending RCW 13.04.030; adding a new section to chapter 28A.225 RCW; and declaring an emergency.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

     Sec. 1.  RCW 13.04.030 and 1995 c 312 s 39 and 1995 c 311 s 15 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

     (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, the juvenile courts in the several counties of this state, shall have exclusive original jurisdiction over all proceedings:

     (a) Under the interstate compact on placement of children as provided in chapter 26.34 RCW;

     (b) Relating to children alleged or found to be dependent as provided in chapter 26.44 RCW and in RCW 13.34.030 through 13.34.170;

     (c) Relating to the termination of a parent and child relationship as provided in RCW 13.34.180 through 13.34.210;

     (d) To approve or disapprove out-of-home placement as provided in RCW 13.32A.170;

     (e) Relating to juveniles alleged or found to have committed offenses, traffic infractions, or violations as provided in RCW 13.40.020 through 13.40.230, unless:

     (i) The juvenile court transfers jurisdiction of a particular juvenile to adult criminal court pursuant to RCW 13.40.110; or

     (ii) The statute of limitations applicable to adult prosecution for the offense, traffic infraction, or violation has expired; or

     (iii) The alleged offense or infraction is a traffic, fish, boating, or game offense or traffic infraction committed by a juvenile sixteen years of age or older and would, if committed by an adult, be tried or heard in a court of limited jurisdiction, in which instance the appropriate court of limited jurisdiction shall have jurisdiction over the alleged offense or infraction:  PROVIDED, That if such an alleged offense or infraction and an alleged offense or infraction subject to juvenile court jurisdiction arise out of the same event or incident, the juvenile court may have jurisdiction of both matters:  PROVIDED FURTHER, That the jurisdiction under this subsection does not constitute "transfer" or a "decline" for purposes of RCW 13.40.110(1) or (e)(i) of this subsection:  PROVIDED FURTHER, That courts of limited jurisdiction which confine juveniles for an alleged offense or infraction may place juveniles in juvenile detention facilities under an agreement with the officials responsible for the administration of the juvenile detention facility in RCW 13.04.035 and 13.20.060; or

     (iv) The juvenile is sixteen or seventeen years old and the alleged offense is:  (A) A serious violent offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030 committed on or after June 13, 1994; or (B) a violent offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030 committed on or after June 13, 1994, and the juvenile has a criminal history consisting of:  (I) One or more prior serious violent offenses; (II) two or more prior violent offenses; or (III) three or more of any combination of the following offenses:  Any class A felony, any class B felony, vehicular assault, or manslaughter in the second degree, all of which must have been committed after the juvenile's thirteenth birthday and prosecuted separately.  In such a case the adult criminal court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction.

     If the juvenile challenges the state's determination of the juvenile's criminal history, the state may establish the offender's criminal history by a preponderance of the evidence.  If the criminal history consists of adjudications entered upon a plea of guilty, the state shall not bear a burden of establishing the knowing and voluntariness of the plea;

     (f) Under the interstate compact on juveniles as provided in chapter 13.24 RCW;

     (g) Relating to termination of a diversion agreement under RCW 13.40.080, including a proceeding in which the divertee has attained eighteen years of age;

     (h) Relating to court validation of a voluntary consent to an out-of-home placement under chapter 13.34 RCW, by the parent or Indian custodian of an Indian child, except if the parent or Indian custodian and child are residents of or domiciled within the boundaries of a federally recognized Indian reservation over which the tribe exercises exclusive jurisdiction; and

     (i) Relating to petitions to compel disclosure of information filed by the department of social and health services pursuant to RCW 74.13.042.

     (2)(a) The family court shall have concurrent original jurisdiction with the juvenile court over all proceedings under this section if the superior court judges of a county authorize concurrent jurisdiction as provided in RCW 26.12.010.

     (b) Courts of limited jurisdiction have concurrent original jurisdiction with the juvenile court over all proceedings involving compulsory school attendance provisions under chapter 28A.225 RCW, if the courts of limited jurisdiction have agreed to exercise jurisdiction as provided in section 3 of this act.

     (3) A juvenile subject to adult superior court jurisdiction under subsection (1)(e) (i) through (iv) of this section, who is detained pending trial, may be detained in a county detention facility as defined in RCW 13.40.020 pending sentencing or a dismissal.

 

     Sec. 2.  RCW 35.20.030 and 1993 c 83 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

     The municipal court shall have jurisdiction to try violations of all city ordinances and all other actions brought to enforce or recover license penalties or forfeitures declared or given by any such ordinances.  It is empowered to forfeit cash bail or bail bonds and issue execution thereon, to hear and determine all causes, civil or criminal, arising under such ordinances, and to pronounce judgment in accordance therewith:  PROVIDED, That for a violation of the criminal provisions of an ordinance no greater punishment shall be imposed than a fine of five thousand dollars or imprisonment in the city jail not to exceed one year, or both such fine and imprisonment, but the punishment for any criminal ordinance shall be the same as the punishment provided in state law for the same crime.  The municipal court shall also have original concurrent jurisdiction with the juvenile court over all proceedings involving compulsory school attendance provisions under chapter 28A.225 RCW if the municipal court has agreed to exercise jurisdiction as provided in section 3 of this act.  All civil and criminal proceedings in municipal court, and judgments rendered therein, shall be subject to review in the superior court by writ of review or on appeal:  PROVIDED, That an appeal from the court's determination or order in a traffic infraction proceeding may be taken only in accordance with RCW 46.63.090(5).  Costs in civil and criminal cases may be taxed as provided in district courts.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 28A.225 RCW to read as follows:

     References to juvenile court in this chapter mean, in addition to the juvenile court of the superior court, courts of limited jurisdiction that have agreed to exercise jurisdiction over proceedings under this chapter.  If a court of limited jurisdiction has jurisdiction over juveniles who violate this chapter, that court also has jurisdiction over parents charged with violations of this chapter.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.

 


                                    --- END ---