2747-S

AN ACT Relating to regulatory reform; amending RCW 76.09.010, 76.09.040, 48.02.060, 48.44.050, 48.46.200, 34.05.328, 34.05.570, 34.05.375, 4.84.350, and 48.30.010; adding a new section to chapter 43.22 RCW; and adding new sections to chapter 34.05 RCW.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

Sec. 1. RCW 76.09.010 and 1993 c 3 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) The legislature hereby finds and declares that the forest land resources are among the most valuable of all resources in the state; that a viable forest products industry is of prime importance to the state's economy; that it is in the public interest for public and private commercial forest lands to be managed consistent with sound policies of natural resource protection; that coincident with maintenance of a viable forest products industry, it is important to afford protection to forest soils, fisheries, wildlife, water quantity and quality, air quality, recreation, and scenic beauty.

(2) The legislature further finds and declares it to be in the public interest of this state to create and maintain through the adoption of this chapter a comprehensive state-wide system of laws and forest practices regulations which will achieve the following purposes and policies:

(a) Afford protection to, promote, foster and encourage timber growth, and require such minimum reforestation of commercial tree species on forest lands as will reasonably utilize the timber growing capacity of the soil following current timber harvest;

(b) Afford protection to forest soils and public resources by utilizing all reasonable methods of technology in conducting forest practices;

(d) Promote efficiency by permitting maximum operating freedom consistent with the other purposes and policies stated herein;

(e) Provide for regulation of forest practices so as to avoid unnecessary duplication in such regulation;

(f) Provide for interagency input and intergovernmental and tribal coordination and cooperation;

(g) Achieve compliance with all applicable requirements of federal and state law with respect to nonpoint sources of water pollution from forest practices;

(h) To consider reasonable land use planning goals and concepts contained in local comprehensive plans and zoning regulations; and

(i) Foster cooperation among managers of public resources, forest landowners, Indian tribes and the citizens of the state.

The authority of the board to adopt forest practices rules is prescribed by this subsection (2) and RCW 76.09.040. The board may not adopt forest practices rules based solely on any other section of law stating a statute's intent or purpose, on the enabling provisions of the statute establishing the agency, or on any combination of such provisions.

(3) The legislature further finds and declares that it is also in the public interest of the state to encourage forest landowners to undertake corrective and remedial action to reduce the impact of mass earth movements and fluvial processes.

(4) The legislature further finds and declares that it is in the public interest that the applicants for state forest practice permits should assist in paying for the cost of review and permitting necessary for the environmental protection of these resources.

Sec. 2. RCW 76.09.040 and 1994 c 264 s 48 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) Where necessary to accomplish the purposes and policies specifically stated in RCW 76.09.010(2), and to implement the provisions of this chapter, the board shall ((~~promulgate~~)) adopt forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules pursuant to chapter 34.05 RCW and in accordance with the procedures enumerated in this section that:

(a) Establish minimum standards for forest practices;

(b) Provide procedures for the voluntary development of resource management plans which may be adopted as an alternative to the minimum standards in (a) of this subsection if the plan is consistent with the purposes and policies specifically stated in RCW 76.09.010(2) and the plan meets or exceeds the objectives of the minimum standards;

(d) Establish procedures for the collection and administration of forest practice fees as set forth by this chapter.

Forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules pertaining to water quality protection shall be ((~~promulgated~~)) adopted individually by the board and by the department of ecology after they have reached agreement with respect thereto. All other forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules shall be ((~~promulgated~~)) adopted by the board.

Forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules shall be administered and enforced by the department except as otherwise provided in this chapter. Such ((~~regulations~~)) rules shall be ((~~promulgated~~)) adopted and administered so as to give consideration to all purposes and policies specifically set forth in RCW 76.09.010(2).

((~~(2)~~)) (3) The board shall prepare proposed forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules. In addition to any forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules relating to water quality protection proposed by the board, the department of ecology shall prepare proposed forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules relating to water quality protection.

Prior to initiating the rule making process, the proposed ((~~regulations~~)) rules shall be submitted for review and comments to the department of fish and wildlife and to the counties of the state. After receipt of the proposed forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules, the department of fish and wildlife and the counties of the state shall have thirty days in which to review and submit comments to the board, and to the department of ecology with respect to its proposed ((~~regulations~~)) rules relating to water quality protection. After the expiration of such thirty day period the board and the department of ecology shall jointly hold one or more hearings on the proposed ((~~regulations~~)) rules pursuant to chapter 34.05 RCW. At such hearing(s) any county may propose specific forest practices ((~~regulations~~)) rules relating to problems existing within such county. The board and the department of ecology may adopt such proposals if they find the proposals are consistent with the purposes and policies of this chapter.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 43.22 RCW to read as follows:

For rules adopted after the effective date of this section, the director of the department of labor and industries may not rely solely on a statute's statement of intent or purpose, on the enabling provisions of the statute establishing the agency, or on any combination of such provisions, for statutory authority to adopt any rule: PROVIDED, That this section shall not apply to rules adopted pursuant to chapter 39.12 RCW.

Sec. 4. RCW 48.02.060 and 1947 c 79 s .02.06 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) The commissioner shall have the authority expressly conferred upon him or her by or reasonably implied from the provisions of this code.

(2) The commissioner shall execute his or her duties and shall enforce the provisions of this code.

(3) The commissioner may:

(a) Make reasonable rules and regulations for effectuating any provision of this code, except those relating to his or her election, qualifications, or compensation: PROVIDED, That the commissioner may not adopt rules after the effective date of this section that are based solely on this statute, or on a statute's statement of intent or purpose, or on the enabling provisions of the statute establishing the agency, or any combination of such provisions, for statutory authority to adopt any rule, except rules defining or clarifying terms in, or procedures necessary to the implementation of a statute. No such rules and regulations shall be effective prior to their being filed for public inspection in the commissioner's office.

(b) Conduct investigations to determine whether any person has violated any provision of this code.

(c) Conduct examinations, investigations, hearings, in addition to those specifically provided for, useful and proper for the efficient administration of any provision of this code.

Sec. 5. RCW 48.44.050 and 1947 c 268 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

The insurance commissioner shall make reasonable regulations in aid of the administration of this chapter which may include, but shall not be limited to regulations concerning the maintenance of adequate insurance, bonds, or cash deposits, information required of registrants, and methods of expediting speedy and fair payments to claimants: PROVIDED, That the commissioner may not adopt rules after the effective date of this section that are based solely on this section, a statute's statement of intent or purpose, or on the enabling provisions of the statute establishing the agency, or any combination of such provisions, for statutory authority to adopt any rule, except rules defining or clarifying terms in, or procedures necessary to the implementation of a statute.

Sec. 6. RCW 48.46.200 and 1975 1st ex.s. c 290 s 21 are each amended to read as follows:

The commissioner may adopt, in accordance with the provisions of the administrative procedure act, chapter 34.05 RCW, ((~~promulgate~~)) rules and regulations as necessary or proper to carry out the provisions of this chapter: PROVIDED, That the commissioner may not adopt rules after the effective date of this section that are based solely on this section, a statute's statement of intent or purpose, or on the enabling provisions of the statute establishing the agency, or any combination of such provisions, for statutory authority to adopt any rule, except rules defining or clarifying terms in, or procedures necessary to the implementation of a statute. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit the commissioner from requiring changes in procedures previously approved by ((~~him~~)) the commissioner.

Sec. 7. RCW 34.05.328 and 1995 c 403 s 201 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) Before adopting a rule described in subsection (5) of this section, an agency shall:

(a) Clearly state in detail the general goals and specific objectives of the statute that the rule implements;

(b) Determine that the rule is needed to achieve the general goals and specific objectives stated under (a) of this subsection, and analyze alternatives to rule making and the consequences of not adopting the rule;

(c) Determine that the probable benefits of the rule are greater than its probable costs, taking into account both the qualitative and quantitative benefits and costs and the specific directives of the statute being implemented;

(d) Determine, after considering alternative versions of the rule and the analysis required under (b) and (c) of this subsection, that the rule being adopted is the least burdensome alternative for those required to comply with it that will achieve the general goals and specific objectives stated under (a) of this subsection;

(e) Determine that the rule does not require those to whom it applies to take an action that violates requirements of another federal or state law;

(f) Determine that the rule does not impose more stringent performance requirements on private entities than on public entities unless required to do so by federal or state law;

(g) Determine if the rule differs from any federal regulation or statute applicable to the same activity or subject matter and, if so, determine that the difference is justified by the following:

(i) A state statute that explicitly allows the agency to differ from federal standards; or

(ii) Substantial evidence that the difference is necessary to achieve the general goals and specific objectives stated under (a) of this subsection; and

(h) Coordinate the substance of the rule, to the maximum extent practicable, with other federal, state, and local laws applicable to the same activity or subject matter.

(2) In making its determinations pursuant to subsection (1) (b) through (g) of this section, the agency shall place in the rule-making file documentation of sufficient quantity and quality so as to persuade a reasonable person that the determinations are justified.

(3) Before adopting rules described in subsection (5) of this section, an agency shall place in the rule-making file a rule implementation plan for rules filed under each adopting order. The plan shall describe how the agency intends to:

(a) Implement and enforce the rule, including a description of the resources the agency intends to use;

(b) Inform and educate affected persons about the rule;

(d) Evaluate whether the rule achieves the purpose for which it was adopted, including, to the maximum extent practicable, the use of interim milestones to assess progress and the use of objectively measurable outcomes.

(4) After adopting a rule described in subsection (5) of this section regulating the same activity or subject matter as another provision of federal or state law, an agency shall do all of the following:

(a) Provide to the business assistance center a list citing by reference the other federal and state laws that regulate the same activity or subject matter;

(b) Coordinate implementation and enforcement of the rule with the other federal and state entities regulating the same activity or subject matter by making every effort to do one or more of the following:

(i) Deferring to the other entity;

(ii) Designating a lead agency; or

(iii) Entering into an agreement with the other entities specifying how the agency and entities will coordinate implementation and enforcement.

If the agency is unable to comply with this subsection (4)(b), the agency shall report to the legislature pursuant to (c) of this subsection;

(i) The existence of any overlap or duplication of other federal or state laws, any differences from federal law, and any known overlap, duplication, or conflict with local laws; and

(ii) Make recommendations for any legislation that may be necessary to eliminate or mitigate any adverse effects of such overlap, duplication, or difference.

(5)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, this section applies to:

(i) Significant legislative rules of the departments of ecology, labor and industries, health, revenue, and natural resources, the employment security department, the forest practices board, the office of the insurance commissioner, and to the legislative rules of the department of fish and wildlife implementing chapter 75.20 RCW; and

(ii) Any rule of any agency, if this section is voluntarily made applicable to the rule by the agency, or is made applicable to the rule by a majority vote of the joint administrative rules review committee within forty-five days of receiving the notice of proposed rule making under RCW 34.05.320.

(b) This section does not apply to:

(i) Emergency rules adopted under RCW 34.05.350;

(ii) Rules relating only to internal governmental operations that are not subject to violation by a nongovernment party;

(iii) Rules adopting or incorporating by reference without material change federal statutes or regulations, Washington state statutes, rules of other Washington state agencies, shoreline master programs other than those programs governing shorelines of state-wide significance, or, as referenced by Washington state law, national consensus codes that generally establish industry standards, if the material adopted or incorporated regulates the same subject matter and conduct as the adopting or incorporating rule, however, the exemption in this subsection (5)(b)(iii) does not apply if the rule adopted is the rule of another Washington state agency, which rule was not adopted in accordance with this section. Any doubts as to whether this requirement has been met shall be resolved in favor of causing the rules to be subjected to the requirements of this section;

(iv) Rules that only correct typographical errors, make address or name changes, or clarify language of a rule without changing its effect;

(v) Rules the content of which is explicitly and specifically dictated by statute; or

(vi) Rules that set or adjust fees or rates pursuant to legislative standards.

(i) A "procedural rule" is a rule that adopts, amends, or repeals (A) any procedure, practice, or requirement relating to any agency hearings; (B) any filing or related process requirement for making application to an agency for a license or permit; or (C) any policy statement pertaining to the consistent internal operations of an agency.

(ii) An "interpretive rule" is a rule, the violation of which does not subject a person to a penalty or sanction, that sets forth the agency’s interpretation of statutory provisions it administers.

(iii) A "significant legislative rule" is a rule other than a procedural or interpretive rule that (A) adopts substantive provisions of law pursuant to delegated legislative authority, the violation of which subjects a violator of such rule to a penalty or sanction; (B) establishes, alters, or revokes any qualification or standard for the issuance, suspension, or revocation of a license or permit; or (C) adopts a new, or makes significant amendments to, a policy or regulatory program.

(d) In the notice of proposed rule making under RCW 34.05.320, an agency shall state whether this section applies to the proposed rule pursuant to (a)(i) of this subsection, or if the agency will apply this section voluntarily.

(6) By January 31, 1996, and by January 31st of each even-numbered year thereafter, the office of financial management, after consulting with state agencies, counties, and cities, and business, labor, and environmental organizations, shall report to the governor and the legislature regarding the effects of this section on the regulatory system in this state. The report shall document:

(a) The rules proposed to which this section applied and to the extent possible, how compliance with this section affected the substance of the rule, if any, that the agency ultimately adopted;

(b) The costs incurred by state agencies in complying with this section;

(c) Any legal action maintained based upon the alleged failure of any agency to comply with this section, the costs to the state of such action, and the result;

(d) The extent to which this section has adversely affected the capacity of agencies to fulfill their legislatively prescribed mission;

(e) The extent to which this section has improved the acceptability of state rules to those regulated; and

(f) Any other information considered by the office of financial management to be useful in evaluating the effect of this section.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. A new section is added to chapter 34.05 RCW under the subchapter heading "Part III" to read as follows:

If an amendment is made to a subsection of an existing significant legislative rule, then the entire section must be processed in accordance with RCW 34.05.328.

Sec. 9. RCW 34.05.570 and 1995 c 403 s 802 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) Generally. Except to the extent that this chapter or another statute provides otherwise:

(a) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, the burden of demonstrating the invalidity of agency action is on the party asserting invalidity;

(b) The validity of agency action shall be determined in accordance with the standards of review provided in this section, as applied to the agency action at the time it was taken;

(c) The court shall make a separate and distinct ruling on each material issue on which the court's decision is based; and

(d) The court shall grant relief only if it determines that a person seeking judicial relief has been substantially prejudiced by the action complained of.

(2) Review of rules. (a) A rule may be reviewed by petition for declaratory judgment filed pursuant to this subsection or in the context of any other review proceeding under this section. In an action challenging the validity of a rule, the agency shall be made a party to the proceeding.

(b) The validity of any rule may be determined upon petition for a declaratory judgment addressed to the superior court of Thurston county, when it appears that the rule, or its threatened application, interferes with or impairs or immediately threatens to interfere with or impair the legal rights or privileges of the petitioner. The burden of demonstrating the validity of any rule is on the agency. The declaratory judgment order may be entered whether or not the petitioner has first requested the agency to pass upon the validity of the rule in question.

(c) In a proceeding involving review of a rule, the court shall declare the rule invalid only if it finds that: The rule violates constitutional provisions; the rule exceeds the statutory authority of the agency; the rule was adopted without compliance with statutory rule-making procedures; or the rule is arbitrary and capricious.

(3) Review of agency orders in adjudicative proceedings. The burden of proof is on the agency to demonstrate that any challenged provision of (a) through (i) of this subsection was not violated. The court shall grant relief from an agency order in an adjudicative proceeding only if it determines that:

(a) The order, or the statute or rule on which the order is based, is in violation of constitutional provisions on its face or as applied;

(b) The order is outside the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency conferred by any provision of law;

(c) The agency has engaged in unlawful procedure or decision-making process, or has failed to follow a prescribed procedure;

(d) The agency has erroneously interpreted or applied the law;

(e) The order is not supported by evidence that is substantial when viewed in light of the whole record before the court, which includes the agency record for judicial review, supplemented by any additional evidence received by the court under this chapter;

(f) The agency has not decided all issues requiring resolution by the agency;

(g) A motion for disqualification under RCW 34.05.425 or 34.12.050 was made and was improperly denied or, if no motion was made, facts are shown to support the grant of such a motion that were not known and were not reasonably discoverable by the challenging party at the appropriate time for making such a motion;

(h) The order is inconsistent with a rule of the agency unless the agency explains the inconsistency by stating facts and reasons to demonstrate a rational basis for inconsistency; or

(i) The order is arbitrary or capricious.

(4) Review of other agency action.

(a) All agency action not reviewable under subsection (2) or (3) of this section shall be reviewed under this subsection.

(b) A person whose rights are violated by an agency's failure to perform a duty that is required by law to be performed may file a petition for review pursuant to RCW 34.05.514, seeking an order pursuant to this subsection requiring performance. Within twenty days after service of the petition for review, the agency shall file and serve an answer to the petition, made in the same manner as an answer to a complaint in a civil action. The court may hear evidence, pursuant to RCW 34.05.562, on material issues of fact raised by the petition and answer.

(c) Relief for persons aggrieved by the performance of an agency action, including the exercise of discretion, or an action under (b) of this subsection can be granted only if the court determines that the action is:

(i) Unconstitutional;

(ii) Outside the statutory authority of the agency or the authority conferred by a provision of law;

(iii) Arbitrary or capricious; or

(iv) Taken by persons who were not properly constituted as agency officials lawfully entitled to take such action.

Sec. 10. RCW 34.05.375 and 1988 c 288 s 314 are each amended to read as follows:

No rule proposed after July 1, 1989, is valid unless it is adopted in substantial compliance with RCW 34.05.310 through 34.05.395. Inadvertent failure to mail notice of a proposed rule adoption to any person as required by RCW 34.05.320(3) does not invalidate a rule. No action based upon this section may be maintained to contest the validity of any rule unless it is commenced within ((~~two~~)) seven years after the effective date of the rule.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. A new section is added to chapter 34.05 RCW to read as follows:

(1) A person may petition an agency requesting that an existing rule be subject to readoption. The office of financial management shall prescribe by rule the format for such petitions and the procedure for their submission, consideration, and disposition and provide a standard form that may be used to petition any agency. Within sixty days after submission of a petition, the agency shall either (a) deny the petition in writing, stating (i) its reasons for the denial, specifically addressing each item listed in subsection (3) of this section and, where appropriate, (ii) the alterative means by which it will address the concerns raised by the petitioner, or (b) initiate the readoption procedure in accordance with this section.

(2) If an agency denies a petition submitted under subsection (1) of this section, the petitioner, within thirty days of the denial, may appeal the denial to the joint administrative rules review committee. Within sixty days after receiving the appeal, the committee shall, by a majority vote of its members, either (a) deny the appeal in writing, stating its reasons for the denial, or (b) direct the agency to initiate the readoption procedure in accordance with this section. The agency shall initiate the readoption procedure by the date specified by the committee.

(3) An agency's written denial under subsection (1) of this section must address each of the following:

(a) Whether the rule is authorized;

(b) Whether the rule is needed;

(d) Whether alternatives to the rule exist that will serve the same purpose at less cost;

(e) Whether the rule applies differently to public and private entities;

(f) Whether the rule serves the purposes for which it was adopted;

(g) Whether the benefits of the rule are greater than its costs;

(h) Whether the rule is clearly and simply stated; and

(i) Whether there is adequate justification if the rule is different than a federal law applicable to the same activity or subject matter.

Persons are encouraged to address each of these issues in their petition to the agency.

(4) For purposes of this section, "readoption" means that the text of the existing rule is submitted under RCW 34.05.320 as a proposed rule and is then subject to the rule-making process set forth in this chapter. However, an agency need not submit a statement of inquiry under RCW 34.05.310 for an existing rule subject to readoption. Unless readopted, an existing rule subject to readoption is automatically repealed one hundred eighty days after publication of the text as a proposed rule in the Washington State Register.

(5) A decision by an agency under subsection (1) of this section to deny a petition for readoption is not subject to judicial review.

(6) The office of financial management shall initiate the rule making required by subsection (1) of this section by July 1, 1996.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. A new section is added to chapter 34.05 RCW under the subchapter heading "Part V" to read as follows:

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, after December 31, 2000, the following agencies may not rely solely on a statute's statement of intent or purpose or the enabling provisions of the statute establishing the agency, or any combination of such provisions, for the agency's statutory authority to have adopted a rule challenged after December 31, 2000: The commissioner of public lands, the department of social and health services, the department of ecology, the department of agriculture, the department of health, the department of revenue, the department of licensing, the department of labor and industries, the employment security department, the forest practices board, the fish and wildlife commission, and the office of the insurance commissioner.

(2) This section does not apply to rules adopted under chapter 39.12 RCW or RCW 48.30.010.

Sec. 13. RCW 4.84.350 and 1995 c 403 s 903 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award a qualified party that prevails in a judicial review of an agency action fees and other expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, unless the court finds that the agency action was substantially justified or that circumstances make an award unjust. A qualified party shall be considered to have prevailed if the qualified party obtained relief on a significant issue that achieves some benefit that the qualified party sought.

(2) The amount awarded a qualified party under subsection (1) of this section shall not exceed:

(a) For cases involving rule validity:

(i) Twenty-five thousand dollars for superior court cases; and

(ii) Fifteen thousand dollars for appeals to the court of appeals and the supreme court; and

(b) For cases involving other agency action:

(i) Fifty thousand dollars for superior court cases; and

(ii) Fifteen thousand dollars for appeals to the court of appeals and the supreme court.

(3) Subsection (1) of this section shall not apply unless all parties challenging the agency action are qualified parties. If two or more qualified parties join in an action, the award in total shall not exceed twenty-five thousand dollars. The court, in its discretion, may reduce the amount to be awarded pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, or deny any award, to the extent that a qualified party during the course of the proceedings engaged in conduct that unduly or unreasonably protracted the final resolution of the matter in controversy.

(4) Qualified parties shall receive awards under this section for cases pending July 23, 1995.

Sec. 14. RCW 48.30.010 and 1985 c 264 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) No person engaged in the business of insurance shall engage in unfair methods of competition or in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of such business as such methods, acts, or practices ((~~are defined pursuant to subsection (2) of this section.~~

~~(2) In addition to such unfair methods and unfair or deceptive acts or practices as~~)) are expressly defined and prohibited by this code((, the commissioner may from time to time by regulation promulgated pursuant to chapter 34.05 RCW, define other methods of competition and other acts and practices in the conduct of such business reasonably found by the commissioner to be unfair or deceptive.

~~(3) No such regulation shall be made effective prior to the expiration of thirty days after the date of the order by which it is promulgated~~)).

((~~(4)~~)) (2) If the commissioner has cause to believe that any person is violating any such ((~~regulation~~)) rule or prohibition of this code, the commissioner may order such person to cease and desist therefrom. The commissioner shall deliver such order to such person direct or mail it to the person by registered mail with return receipt requested. If the person violates the order after expiration of ten days after the cease and desist order has been received by him or her, he or she may be fined by the commissioner a sum not to exceed two hundred and fifty dollars for each violation committed thereafter.

((~~(5)~~)) (3) If any such ((~~regulation~~)) rule or prohibition of this code is violated, the commissioner may take such other or additional action as is permitted under the insurance code for violation of a ((~~regulation~~)) rule or that prohibition.

(4) Any permanent rule that was adopted by the commissioner under the authority of this section as it existed before the effective date of this section, and that was in effect as of the effective date of this section, shall, if otherwise valid, remain in effect until and unless it is repealed by the commissioner, who shall retain the authority to repeal any such rule, or is effectively repealed by an act of the legislature.